2024 Albuquerque Bikeway and Trail Facilities Plan

Proposed Network: Biking in Albuquerque Tomorrow

Welcome to the 2024 Bikeway and Trail Facilities Plan Proposed Network Story Map. This tool provides an overview of the proposed bikeways and trails network and the results of project prioritization.

See the  Existing Conditions Story Map  for additional background on the purpose of the 2024 Plan and analyses related to bicycling in Albuquerque today.

Note this Story Map is not intended to be used for bicycle trip planning purposes. See the City of Albuquerque  Interactive Bike and Multi-Use Trail Map  for additional information.

Biking in Albuquerque Today

The 2024 Bikeway and Trail Facilities Plan focuses on on-street bikeways and paved multi-use trails and identifies projects that appeal to bicyclists of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds.

The maps, data, and analyses presented in this Story Map lay the groundwork for the 2024 Plan’s recommendations by assessing the strengths and limitations of existing bikeways and trails.

Today, the City of Albuquerque has a healthy network of bicycling infrastructure, consisting of seven types of facilities:

  • Standard Bike Lanes
  • Buffered Bike Lanes
  • Separated Bike Lanes
  • Bike Boulevards
  • Bike Routes
  • Paved Multi-Use Trails outside of street right-of-way
  • Sidepaths adjacent to roadways

Go to the Proposed Bikeways and Trails Network Tab to learn more about proposed bikeway facilities.

Note: The 2024 Plan does not update the 2015 Plan's recommendations for unpaved trails.


Proposed Bikeways & Trails Network

The 2024 Plan proposes a robust network of on-street bikeways and paved multi-use trails across the City of Albuquerque. The following map depicts existing and proposed bikeways by facility type.

Comparison Map

The slide map below depicts the existing on-street bikeways and trails network and the proposed network from the 2024 Plan.

It is important to note that not all existing facilities meet the needs of bicyclists of all ages and abilities. See the Existing Conditions Story Map for more information on bicyclist level of traffic stress and the existing low-stress network. An objective of the proposed network is to create low-stress, high comfort conditions across the city to the greatest extent possible.

Scroll through the next sequence of map pages to learn more about different facility types and where improvements are proposed. See the  Projects & Prioritization  tab for additional details and clock on the proposed projects to learn about project limits, priority level, and timeframe for implementation (plausible near-term or long-term).

Proposed Bikeways by Facility Type

Standard Bike Lanes

Through striping, bike lanes delineate a separate, dedicated space for people biking. Standard bike lanes are typically located at the road edge and do not provide additional vertical or horizontal separation from vehicular travel lanes.

Carlisle Boulevard south of Constitution Road

Appropriate Contexts Collector and arterial streets with moderate speeds and volumes. Per the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Bikeway Selection Guide, bike lanes are best suited for streets with traffic volumes under 6,500 vehicles per day. On local streets with wide pavement sections (i.e., at least 40 feet wide), bike lanes may be an appropriate alternative to bike boulevards.

Posted Speed: 30 mph or lower

Design Considerations Per the City of Albuquerque Development Process Manual (DPM), bike lanes should be a minimum of 5 feet wide, with additional width (up to 6.5 feet) desired as space permits. The gutter pan is not included in the bike lane width. Bike lanes may be implemented on existing roadways by narrowing vehicle travel lanes, medians, and/or parking lanes; reducing the number of vehicle travel lanes; and/or reconsidering the need for parking.

Buffered Bike Lanes

Buffered bike lanes are bikeways with striped, horizontal space between the bike lane and the adjacent vehicle travel lane, which provides additional separation between bicyclists and moving vehicle traffic.

San Pedro Drive north of Lomas Boulevard

Appropriate Contexts Buffers are appropriate for all bike lanes as space permits. Buffers are particularly critical for increasing user comfort levels as driver speeds and traffic volumes increase. Per the FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide, buffered bike lanes are best suited for streets with traffic volumes under 6,500 vehicles per day (the same threshold recommended for standard bike lanes).

Posted Speeds: 35 mph or lower (DPM), 30 mph or lower (FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide)

Design Considerations Per the DPM, buffers may range from 1–3 feet, depending on the available roadway space, with wider buffers preferred. Buffers that are 1.5 feet or less may be comprised of parallel striped lines. Wider buffers should feature cross hatching. Buffered bike lanes specifically refer to separation from moving vehicle traffic, though additional buffers may be applied on the inside of a bike lane to create separation from parked vehicles or to improve sight lines where walls or barriers are present on the roadway edge.

Separated Bike Lanes

Separated bike lanes, also known as protected bike lanes, are a form of buffered bike lane that features some form of vertical separation from people driving and are located at street level.

Example: Austin, TX

Appropriate Contexts Vertical separation may be considered for all buffered bike lanes, depending on the roadway conditions, and is desirable for ensuring user comfort on roads with traffic volumes over 6,500 vehicles per day, per the FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide.

Posted Speeds: 30 mph or higher. Vertical separation is critical for ensuring user comfort level on roads with operating speeds of 35 mph or greater, per the FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide.

Design Considerations Vertical elements may include tubular markers (flex posts), raised curbs, or vehicle parking. Per the DPM, separated bike lanes should be a minimum width of 6.5 feet with a 3-foot buffer for the vertical element.

Bike Boulevards

Bike boulevards are low-stress corridors with slow speeds and low vehicle volumes. They feature traffic calming elements and enhanced crossing treatments to reduce through-vehicle traffic and manage driver speeds.

Though people biking share space with drivers, the low-stress conditions ensure these bikeways appeal to people biking of all ages and abilities.

Silver Avenue Bike Boulevard through Nob Hill

Appropriate Contexts Primarily residential streets that run parallel to major roads and have posted speeds of 25 mph or lower before implementation. Per the DPM, the target daily vehicle volume is 1,000 or below after implementation; 1,000– 2,000 vehicles per day is acceptable. Narrower streets (under 40 feet wide) are preferable for bike boulevards because wider streets require additional treatments to encourage slower driver speeds.

Posted Speeds: 20 mph or lower after implementation

Design Considerations Per the DPM and the Bike Boulevard Toolkit, typical features include branded signage and pavement markings, design elements to narrow the roadway (e.g. diverters or striped on-street parking) and reduce traffic (e.g. closed medians at major intersections), and enhanced street crossings to remove barriers to longer-distance travel.

See the City of Albuquerque Bike Boulevard Toolkit for detailed design considerations and the City of Albuquerque Bicycle and Trail Crossing Guide for appropriate crossing facilities at major intersections.

Enhanced Bike Routes

Enhanced bike routes are shared streets that utilize signage and pavement markings (i.e. sharrows) to indicate that bicyclists may be present and to help bicyclists connect to other facilities and local destinations.  

Existing bike route along Marquette Ave; proposed as a bike boulevard

Today, bike routes are a common form of bikeway throughout Albuquerque and are typically designated through basic signage along local streets with low volumes of vehicle traffic, though conditions vary in terms of treatments and traffic volumes and speeds. Many existing bike routes are proposed as bike boulevards or enhanced bike routes in the 2024 Plan.

Appropriate Contexts Low-volume (generally under 2,000 vehicles per day) and low-speed streets, including residential streets.

Enhanced bike route proposed in the 2024 plan are intended to provide short connections to local destinations or link other facilities to one another. Unlike proposed bike boulevards, they do not involve crossing treatments at intersections with major streets.

Posted Speeds: 25 mph or lower

Design Considerations Enhanced bike routes share many of the characteristics of bike boulevards, including frequent pavement markings and traffic calming features to reduce vehicle speeds and increase bicyclist user comfort. Per the DPM, bike route designations may be used selectively on higher-volume roads where a bikeway connection is desired but right-of-way is constrained and bike lanes that meet the minimum design standards are not feasible.

Paved Multi-Use Trails

Paved multi-use trails are off-street facilities in their own right-of-way that are shared with people walking.

Bosque Trail near Rio Grande Nature Center

Appropriate Contexts Multi-use trails are typically located in natural settings or along drainage channels or arroyos.

Posted Speeds: Off-Street, No Posted Speeds

Design Considerations DPM guidance calls for a minimum width of 10 feet, with 12 feet recommended and 14 feet desired for high-use areas and long-distance routes. Additional space is needed for shoulders and frontages against private property. Consult the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities for detailed design guidance.

Sidepaths

Sidepaths are paved, two-way facilities shared among people biking and walking. Sidepaths are located within the public street right-of-way on the outside of the curb. Because sidepaths are located at curb level, they provide vertical separation between people biking and motor vehicle traffic. Sidepaths may take the place of sidewalks and can complement on-street bike lanes to provide options for different bicyclist user types.

Arroyo Vista Boulevard near Nusenda Community Stadium

Appropriate Contexts Sidepaths are appropriate on streets with sufficient space between the curb and the property line. Sidepaths are most appropriate on streets with limited intersections and driveways because drivers often do not account for bicyclists traveling in both directions at these conflict points.

Posted Speeds: 30 mph or higher. Vertical separation (achieved for sidepaths at curb level) is critical for ensuring user comfort level on roads with operating speeds of 35 mph or greater, per the FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide.

Design Considerations Per the DPM, sidepaths are designed using the same width and engineering standards as paved multi-use trails and should be demarcated with a dashed yellow centerline on asphalt pavement. Wider sidepaths are desired to the greatest extent possible to allow for both people walking and biking to comfortably pass and to increase overall capacity of the facility.

Sidepaths should be offset from the curb and the property line. These buffers create spatial separation and ensure that people biking feel comfortable using the full extent of the sidepath. Landscaping and street trees are desired for shade as long as they do not impede visibility approaching intersections and site access points. Conflicts at driveways and intersections must be accounted for during facility design.


Network Spines

The 2024 Plan designates a series of corridors as network spines that support longer distance travel by bicycle, link together key destinations, and connect multiple neighborhoods. Network spines anchor the network and are distributed geographically across the city to ensure all Burqueños can access the bikeway network.

Spines include a range of facility types and are intended to provide long-distance, low-stress connections. Some spines are parallel to each other to accommodate the preferences of different users and support different potential implementation timeframes.

Example: Comanche Road

Comanche Road is part of a network spine that features proposed separated bike lanes to the east of San Mateo Boulevard. This network spine links the Bosque Trail to Tramway Boulevard and utilizes the existing Paseo del Nordeste Trail and North Diversion Channel Trail as well as proposed bikeway improvements on Candelaria Road.

Bikeway improvements along this corridor are mostly plausible in the near term.


Enhanced Crossings

Major street crossings and signalized intersections can create significant barriers to people bicycling across the City of Albuquerque. The 2024 Plan identifies numerous crossing improvements along existing and proposed paved multi-use trails and bike boulevards that are critical for bicyclist comfort and providing connections to major destinations and other important bikeways and trails.

The map to the right depict recommended crossing locations. The recommended crossing type depends on the roadway context and is based on the City of Albuquerque Bicycle and Trail Crossings Guide.

Proposed Enhanced Crossings by Crossing Type

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB)

Also referred to as HAWK signals, PHBs are a traffic control device that brings traffic to a complete stop at a midblock crossing or an uncontrolled intersection when activated by a pedestrian or bicyclist.

PHB near International District Library along Central Avenue

Applications & Constraints

  • Driver yield rates are shown to be 90-100%.
  • Should feature raised medians to allow for two-stage crossing, if needed.
  • Higher cost than RRFBs.
  • Require electrical connections and additional right-of-way for implementation.

Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)

RRFBs are traffic control devices that increase driver awareness of pedestrians and bicyclists crossing roadways at marked midblock crossings or uncontrolled intersections.

The beacons consist of rectangular-shaped amber lights that flash when activated and reinforce the need for drivers to stop at the crosswalk.

Example: Bloomington, IN

Applications & Constraints

  • Appropriate on streets with moderate speeds and traffic volumes.
  • Safety benefits decrease as road width, traffic volumes, and driver speeds increase.
  • Should feature raised medians to allow for two-stage crossing, if needed.
  • Driver yield rates are lower than PHBs.

Geometric Improvements

Geometric improvements encompass a range of potential crossing treatments -- including marked crosswalks, median refuge islands, bulbouts, raised crossings, and stop control -- intended to support safe, comfortable bicycle crossings of lower-volume and lower-speed streets.

Raised median and refuge island at Silver Avenue and Girard Boulevard

Applications & Constraints

  • Lower speed and/or volume roadways.
  • Rely on signage and crosswalk markings for driver compliance.

Projects & Prioritization

Prioritization Results

This map shows the results of the Bikeway Evaluation Process that was applied to all projects proposed in the 2024 Plan. Scroll through the following screens to view the evaluation criteria.

It is important to note that projects are not implemented based solely on priority level. Other considerations in project selection include and are not limited to the timeframe for implementation, estimated cost, technical challenges, and available staff resources.

Evaluation Criteria

The table below contains the criteria used in the City of Albuquerque Bikeway Evaluation Process; the pie chart to the right indicates the share of points by category. The process was applied to all projects proposed in the 2024 Plan.

Category

Criteria

Safety

Bicyclist-Involved Crashes High Fatal and Injury Network

Equity

Vulnerability Index

Access

Destinations Comprehensive Plan Centers

Network Improvements

Facility Needs User Comfort Network Spine

Level of Use

Potential For Bicycle Trips

Community Input

Community Input

Safety: Crashes

The safety category prioritizes:

  • Projects along, parallel to, or that intersect with High Fatal and Injury Network (HFIN)
  • Projects along corridors with bicyclist-involved crashes

Data Sources: New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) Traffic Safety Division crash data (2018-2022). MRCOG created crash data inventory; City of Albuquerque simplified HFIN

Equity: Vulnerability Index

The equity category prioritizes:

  • Projects in areas with high a share of vulnerable communities (based on economic, demographic, housing, and transportation considerations)

Data Sources: Vulnerability Index, MRCOG

Access: Destinations

The access category prioritizes projects that connect to:

  • Comprehensive Plan Centers
  • Key destinations, including schools, parks, community centers, libraries, transit facilities and high-frequency transit stops

Data Sources: City of Albuquerque Comprehensive Plan; destinations inventory (dataset provided by the City of Albuquerque)

Network Improvements

The network improvements category prioritizes projects that:

  • Support longer-distance travel by bicycle (i.e., network spines)
  • Improve user comfort and reduce LTS
  • Meet FHWA facility type guidance

Data Sources: Bicycle LTS analysis, FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide

Level of Use: Trip Potential

The level of use category prioritizes:

  • Projects that create opportunities for more trips to be taken by bicycle, based on an analysis of the share of trips that are less than 2 miles in the project area.

Data Sources: Replica - commercially available data that synthesizes Census data and observed travel behavior to model a range of trip types and distances.

Community Input

The community input category prioritizes:

  • Projects that received positive feedback through the project priorities online survey map conducted in Fall 2023

Data Sources: Project Priorities Survey Map

Explore the Data!

This map includes layers related to the proposed bikeways and trails network for the 2024 Plan. Turn features on and off by clicking on the symbols in the legend. When highlighted in blue, the feature is turned on.

Carlisle Boulevard south of Constitution Road

San Pedro Drive north of Lomas Boulevard

Example: Austin, TX

Silver Avenue Bike Boulevard through Nob Hill

Existing bike route along Marquette Ave; proposed as a bike boulevard

Bosque Trail near Rio Grande Nature Center

Arroyo Vista Boulevard near Nusenda Community Stadium

PHB near International District Library along Central Avenue

Example: Bloomington, IN

Raised median and refuge island at Silver Avenue and Girard Boulevard