Talbot Mills Dam Removal

Welcome to Talbot Mills Dam

Use this StoryMap to learn about Talbot Mills dam, historical information about the dam and region, maps and visuals regarding migratory fish passage, and potential impacts resulting from the removal of the dam.

The guide below shows information about each section, or keep scrolling to view them all!

 Existing Conditions at Talbot Mills Dam and the SuAsCo Watershed : Start here to learn about the site and get oriented to the dam and the surrounding area.

 History of Migratory Fish and Humans:  Visit this section to learn about the rich history of migratory fish and humans at the site prior to the dam construction.

 History of Talbot Mills Dam:  Talbot Mills Dam has a rich but fraught history involving some of 19th century New England's most prominent engineers, industrialists and environmentalists. Use this interactive timeline to learn more about the highlights of that conflict.

 Fish Passage in the Merrimack River Watershed:  Visit this section to compare historical migratory fish habitat with today, and see where improvements can be made.

 Comparing Barriers Across the Watershed:  In this section, compare the habitat restoration potential from removing various dams in the Merrimack watershed.

 Dam Removal and Flooding:  Learn how removing the dam will not negatively affect flood control, and may reduce flood risk immediately upstream. 

 Dam Removal and Drinking Water:  Multiple studies have found that the dam removal will have minimal impact on Billerica’s drinking water intake, and does not pose a threat to the town’s water supply. 

 Learn More:  Once you've viewed this StoryMap, check out other sources of information about the project.

 Stay in Touch:  Sign up to join our email list to get project updates!

Existing Conditions at Talbot Mills Dam and the SuAsCo Watershed

Talbot Mills is a historic mill complex located on the Concord River in Billerica, Massachusetts.

It is upstream of two dams on the Concord River:

  1. The Middlesex Dam, which is breached so fish can pass here under normal flow conditions.
  2. Centennial Island Dam which has a fish ladder for fish passage.  Fish counts are conducted here each year .

The Concord River is part of the Sudbury, Assbet and Concord River (SuAsCo) watershed. These rivers flow northward from the headwaters in Westborough to empty into the Merrimack River in Lowell.

The mill complex has many components.

The dam, made of granite-block, holds back the water…

Talbot Mills Dam on Sept 4, 2022 during a historic drought.

and diverts some of the water behind the dam through two sluiceways.

The sluiceways direct water to two large mills, where it was used to generate power: Talbot Mills Complex on the south side of the river, and Faulkner Mills Complex on the north side of the river. These mills used water from behind the Talbot Mills Dam to power their operations until the mid to late 1800s, at which point they moved to steam power.

Talbot Mills Complex

The sluice gate on the north side of the dam, which once controlled the flow of water into the Faulkner Mill, is still in place.

However, due to its poor condition, water currently flows through this gate uncontrolled.

View looking upstream at the sluice gate.

Another gate controlled the flow of water into the Faulkner Mill. This gate is currently open and receiving uncontrolled flow from the gate upstream.

View looking downstream at the gate to the Faulkner Mill building.

A waste gate, on the south side of the dam, which once controlled the flow downstream in the river, is now plugged.

View looking upstream at the plugged waste gate.

A fishway on the north side of the dam plugged with a concrete block in the 1960's, and remains that way today.

View looking upstream at the plugged historic fishway.

Talbot Mills Dam was also used to divert river water into the Middlesex Canal, which connected Lowell to Boston.  The canal was used to move goods produced on the Merrimack River down to Boston between 1802 and the 1860s. Mules pulled barges across the Concord River on a floating towpath. 

Sign on the section of the Middlesex Canal near the Talbot Mills Dam

Today, the Talbot Mills Dam no longer serves any industrial purpose, but still has an impact on the local ecology, hydrology, and recreational use. The dam holds back water, creating an impoundment known as the Mill Pond. The dam raises the water level significantly for approximately 0.5 miles upstream to the Pollard St. bridge. It has minor impacts on water levels upstream. The dam slows the flow of water, resulting in near-stagnant conditions upstream during dry summers. It also prevents the natural movement of sediment and nutrients downstream to the Merrimack River and estuary. It is a barrier to fish passage, restricting or preventing the movement of migratory fish both up and downstream.

The Mill Pond

The approximate limit of the Mill Pond is at the Fordway Bar at the Pollard St. bridge, a naturally-occurring stretch of bedrock, boulders, and heavy gravel which creates a high-point in the river. This bar was a natural place for people and wildlife to cross the Concord River before the Pollard St. bridge was built.

View from the Pollard St. bridge, looking downstream at the Fordway bar section of the Concord River.

The Concord River is also used for many other purposes. Three miles upstream is the public drinking water intake for the town of Billerica.

Billerica water intake structure.

The river is popular for recreational fishing, boating, and  birding. The Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge is upstream on the Concord River, as is Minute Man National Historical Park. The federally-designated Wild and Scenic Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord River begins about five miles upstream of the dam. Twenty-nine miles of these rivers have special protection due to their exceptional scenic and recreational value. They are protected by the Wild and Scenic River Stewardship Council made up of local municipal, state, federal and non-profit representatives under the guidance of the National Park Service. This Partnership Wild and Scenic River is one of only 16 such rivers in the US–a unique and precious resource.

Concord River at Minute Man National Historical Park.

Next, learn more about the dam’s history, its impact on the region today, and why removing the dam is key to restoring native fish populations and the health of the river.

Water falling over Talbot Mills Dam.

History of Migratory Fish and Humans

The Talbot Mills Dam removal will increase habitat connectivity for many species of fish within the watershed, with the project’s priority focus on five species of diadromous fish: sea lamprey, American eel, blueback herring, alewife and American shad. Diadromous fish require both fresh and saltwater habitats to complete their life cycle, and are under threat globally due to human-caused changes. The loss of habitat connectivity is a primary driver of their decline. These species are critical to nutrient exchange between oceanic and terrestrial ecosystems, and their restoration will benefit many species of fish, mammals and birds throughout the SuAsCo watershed, and the Gulf of Maine, including economically important fisheries.  

Diadromous fish have a long evolutionary history, greatly predating the evolution of our own species. They began populating the Concord River after the last glacial retreat, likely around the same time as the first human presence in the area, and they have played an important role in human life here for thousands of years.

Sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) are one of the oldest extant species of fish on earth. Lampreys first appear in the fossil record about 360 million years ago. They are considered living fossils and are one of the earliest organisms to have a spinal cord.

Sea lampreys are anadromous, meaning they spawn in freshwater and live their adult lives in saltwater. They are an edible fish, and are part of traditional cuisines around the world.

Distribution and status of sea lamprey in their native North American range.  A recent study  indicated populations in the Merrimack River watershed are vulnerable.

American eel (Anguila rostrata) are another ancient species, with Anguila species entering the fossil record 83 million years ago. American eel are unique as the only catadromous species in North America, meaning they spawn in the ocean, but live their adult lives in freshwater habitat. The lifecycle of eels has long been shrouded in mystery. They spawn in the Saragasso Sea, but this event has never been seen by human eyes.

Eels have long been a source of human food, many people today are familiar eating eel as unagi sushi, and there continues to be a commercial fishery in Maine. Unfortunately habitat fragmentation, pollution, and overharvesting have led to their decline. American Eels are listed as endangered by the  IUCN 3.1 .

To learn more about the American Eel, check out this PBS documentary The Mystery of Eels

Blueback Herring (Alosa aestivalis), Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) , and American Shad (Alosa sapidissima) all belong to the Alosa genus of river herring. Like sea lampreys, these three species are anadromous, spawning in freshwater and spending their adult lives in the ocean.

The Alosa genus first evolved 55 million years ago, and these species play a critical role in oceanic food webs. They are a prey species for many fish targeted by commercial and recreational fisheries, as well as being prey for mammals and birds, including four species of birds and three species of whales listed as endangered by the state of Massachusetts.

Shad, alewife, and blueback herring have also long been used by humans as food, bait and fertilizer. Their numbers have declined considerably from their historic levels, primarily due to habitat fragmentation caused by dams, with the  IUCN  considering blueback herring to be a vulnerable species.

To put into context how long these fish have been on the earth, human ancestors only split off from the ancestors of chimpanzees 6 million years ago and our species, Homo sapiens, has only existed for ~400,000 years.

Not only do these ancient species have unique evolutionary histories, due to their multi-habitat lifestyles, they play a critical role in nutrient cycling between oceanic and terrestrial ecosystems. They are at the base of the food chain, supporting many species in rivers and oceans. When their populations suffer, so do the many species that rely on them.

All of these species have an ancient history of human use as food, and have played an important role in human life in North America.

Human presence in the Concord River valley goes back to the end of the last Ice Age. As the glaciers retreated,  our current landscape emerged and the northeast gradually became habitable for humans and migratory fish alike.

Approximately 22,000 years ago New England and much of North America was buried under miles of ice.

Talbot Mills Historical Map

Approximately 14,000-12,500 years ago the glaciers melted, leaving behind rivers and large glacial lakes including Glacial Lake Sudbury and Glacial Lake Concord.

Map showing glacial retreat and glacial lakes within the SuAsCo watershed.

The famed wetlands and sluggish pace of the Great Meadows are a result of the gradual upslope of these ancient lake bottoms.

Approximately 12,500-10,000 years ago humans first entered the region following the retreating ice. The SuAsCo and Shawsheen River watersheds contain a large inventory of known pre-contact Native American sites. Artifacts from these locations provide a glimpse into life long ago. Migratory fish began populating the area soon after glacial retreat as well.

The ecosystem at the time was cold tundra and grasslands. Human lifeways were migratory, following herds of large mammals, particularly caribou.

Approximately 10,000-5,000 years ago the tundra converted to boreal forest, then the mixed deciduous forest we see today, as the climate warmed and dried. Due to a decline in many of the larger species, humans relied on smaller game, freshwater fish and wetland plants for food sources. Regular seasonal settlements emerged and settlement sites existed throughout the watershed. Based on locations of found artifacts, it is understood that people settled near falls where fishing was easier, such as those currently beneath Talbot Mills Dam.

5,000-3,000 years ago the population of hunter-gatherers increased. Fishing weirs found dating to this period suggests increased fishing and improved fishing methods.

3,600-1,000 years ago people had established long distance trading routes, as indicated by non-local materials found in tools from this period. People began farming, as indicated by the earliest evidence of agriculture in the region. Anadromous fish continued to be an important food source, along with deer and turkey. Stone artifacts from this period have been found within the SuAsCo watershed.

1,000-450 years ago Tribal territories, as they existed in the European Colonial Contact period, including the Nipmuc and Pawtucket territories within the watershed were established. Click below to explore an interactive map of native territories, languages and treaties within the SuasCo watershed and around the globe, developed by  Native Land Digital .

In 1710 a timber crib dam was built on the site. At the time the dam was the first barrier diadromous fish would encounter on their journey from the ocean, and it caused fish populations to suffer. Within 135 years anadromous fish had been extirpated from the Concord River watershed, and catadromous eels had also declined. This was primarily due to the continued construction of dams, many without fish passage. Thousands of years of human-fish interaction was brought to an end over the span of a few generations.

These ancient species, who play a critical role in global ecosystems and the human economy, are imperiled. Removing the dam at Talbot Mills is an opportunity to renew the story of diadromous fish and humans in the SuAsCo watershed, and to honor the long interrelationship between these species and our own.

History of Talbot Mills Dam

Talbot Mills Dam has long played a role in the industrial history of the region. Dams at the site supported development of sawmills and grist mills, the creation of the historic Middlesex Canal, and a robust textile industry that persisted into the late 20th century. However, for as long as there have been dams at the site there has been conflict. The initial conflict pitted subsistence upriver farmers and fishers against their downriver neighbors. Later agriculturalists and transcendentalists clashed against industrialists and their workers.

Over the past 312 years, a lot has happened at this location:

  • Five dams in total existed
  • One dam was destroyed by court order
  •  Another destroyed by a group of vigilante farmers
  • A third was ordered lowered, but saved by injunction
  • Four different commissions studied the dam and its effect on upriver flooding
  •  At least six petitions requested the dam be removed or altered to reduce flooding, improve drainage, or restore fish passage
  • At least eight lawsuits were filed covering the same issue, with many countersuits and appeals

Click below to dig deeper into the exciting events in this dammed history: the controversy over the dam, the mills it powered, the canal it regulated, the flooding it caused, and the fish it disrupted.

Fish Passage in the Merrimack River Watershed

Talbot Mills and the Concord River are part of a larger river system: the Merrimack River watershed, and part of a larger ecosystem: The Gulf of Maine and Atlantic Ocean.

This means the dam has impacts to the river and ecosystem, well beyond its immediate surroundings.

This is the Merrimack River Watershed

These are the rivers in the Merrimack River Watershed.

Historically, prior to colonization and the industrial revolution, fish could move freely up and down these streams.

Sediments and nutrients were transported freely from upstream tributaries, downstream to the marsh, allowing the river to support a variety of habitats and ecosystems.

Migratory fish used to travel from the oceans, to the mouth of the Merrimack River...

they swam up the mainstem of the river…

and some returned to spawning grounds in the lower tributaries, while others continued upstream.

Some returned to spawning grounds in the Shawsheen River...

while others migrated up the Concord River.

Many continued up the main stem. An observation in an early biological survey of the Merrimack River in from the end of the 18th century recounted shad at Amoskeag Falls:

“so thick as to crowd each other in the passage up the falls… you could not put in your hand without touching some of them.”

American shad.

Marston, P.M. and Gordon, M. 1938. Notes on fish and early fishing in the Merrimack River system. Biological survey of the Merrimack watershed. New Hampshire Fish and Game Commission, Concord: 186-198.

Migratory fish have been observed as far upstream as...

the upper sections of the Pemigewasset River, in the White Mountains.

Relative to this, the swim to Talbot Mills Dam is quite close to the ocean.

The green area shows the historical extent of habitat available to migratory fish for spawning, or for eels, for spending the majority of their lives.

Today, almost all of that habitat is blocked by estimated 3,148 dams.

Approximately 2,648 in the New Hampshire portion of the watershed and 500 in the Massachusetts portion.

Now fish can still make it into the mouth of the river,

and up the lower part of the Merrimack River...

but most of the tributaries are no longer accessible due to dams.

Some dams like the Essex Dam in Lawrence and the Pawtucket Dam in Lowell have ways for fish to pass up and down stream. Because of this, they are shown as green circles.

Fish ladder in Lowell at the Pawtucket Dam

Just downstream of Pawtucket Dam, the Concord River flows into the Merrimack River. Talbot Mills Dam is located just a few miles upstream from the confluence, and upstream of Centennial Island dam, which currently has a fish ladder for passage.

Fish ladder at Centennial Island.

While fish ladders and fish lifts with downstream bypass do make it possible for some fish to pass up and downstream, it is not guaranteed that all fish can pass and requires an extensive amount of maintenance.

Where dam removal is impractical, this can be an alternative. From the perspective of fish passage, dam removal is the best way to ensure fish are able to move up and down the river.

Amoskeag Dam in Manchester, NH, also has fish passage, but fish are met with additional barriers a few miles upstream. Hooksett Dam in Hooksett, NH, and Garvins Falls Dam in Bow, NH, currently lack upstream fish passage infrastructure.

Amoskeag Falls, 1906.

The green area shows the habitat available to migratory fish today, relative to the historically available area, in red. The green area assumes fish can pass through various fish passage facilities, which is not always the case.

Most fish need slower moving waters of the tributaries to spawn and survive. While restoration efforts have improved access to tributaries from just 40 years ago, there are still very few tributaries accessible for migratory fish.

The yellow areas are river segments that are upstream of just one dam lacking fish passage. The yellow shows the potential for migratory fish habitat restoration.

Many state and federal agencies, together with local partners, nonprofits, municipalities and community members are working to free these rivers, and reconnect them to the ocean.

Because dam removals can sometimes take decades to complete, restoration efforts must be prioritized by where the biggest impact can occur - or where the largest yellow area can be turned green with just one dam removal.

Comparing Barriers Across the Watershed

Talbot Mills is a high priority for removal because it is blocking significant potential habitat in the Merrimack River watershed, and is upstream of only one dam on the Merrimack River, and one intact dam on the Concord River, both of which already have fish passage structures.

Use the slides below to review the potential habitat that can be restored within each of the subwatersheds of the Merrimack River watershed. To learn even more about the restoration potential in these watersheds, check out the Merrimack River Comprehensive Plan for Diadromous Fishes.

The Powwow River is the first tributary to the Merrimack River fish may encounter when swimming up the Merrimack. There are many dams in close succession on this river, which makes for a limited area of habitat that can be restored by removing just one dam. There are four dams in the first two miles of the most downstream portion of the river.

The next river upstream is the Little River. The first dam on the Little River is currently in the permitting process for removal. Click here to learn more about the project.

Removing this dam will restore approximately 3.5 river miles of habitat. The river section downstream of the dam is buried underground, and not suitable for upstream fish passage for most species. Removal of the dam will have other benefits, including reduced flood risk, greater public access to the river area, cooler water temperature, and diversified in-stream habitat.

The Spicket River is highly channelized through the city of Lawrence and faces water quality challenges common to urban streams. There are two additional dams within the first two miles of the most downstream dam, thus reducing the impact of removing just one dam.

Stevens Pond Dam on the Spicket

The restoration of the Shawsheen River has already made significant progress, with the two most downstream dams removed in 2017. River herring can now migrate upstream all the way to the Ballardvalle Dam, as has been documented by an  annual herring count . Removal of Ballardvale Dam would reconnect 17 miles of mainstem river and numerous tributaries with the ocean, an impressive potential for habitat restoration. Because there are no dams on the mainstem of the Merrimack River between the Shawsheen and the ocean, this potential habitat is particularly important for fish population restoration.

The Sudbury, Assabet and Concord River watershed has the largest area for potential restoration by a significant margin. With the removal of only Talbot Mills Dam, 35 miles of mainstem river and over 100 miles of tributaries would be available to migratory fish and effectively reconnected with the ocean.

Beaver Brook has some restoration potential in terms of river miles upstream of only one dam but it is not as significant as the Shawsheen River and far from the potential on the Concord River. Currently, the removal of the three most downstream dams on Beaver Brook is being studied. Removal of these three dams would provide 15 miles of mainstem habitat and 22 miles of tributary streams effectively reconnected with the ocean.

Due to multiple dams in succession, the migratory fish passage restoration potential for Stony Brook is limited.

A dam at the mouth of Salmon Brook, followed by multiple dams in close succession makes for limited restoration potential from the removal of one dam.

Restoration progress has been made in the Nashua River watershed and there is still potential for more progress with improved fish passage. While the yellow area upstream of the Pepperell Paper Co. Dam looks like there is large potential for habitat restoration, this is upstream of four other dams with fish passage. This is a hydropower dam and fish passage is required once 5,000 river herring have passed the downstream dam at Mine Falls, two years in a row. Improved passage at these downstream barriers is an important focus of restoration efforts.

The Souhegan River already has a significant amount of habitat available in the downstream portion of the river thanks to the removal of the Merrimack Village Dam in 2008. There are two dams in close succession in Milford, NH, blocking approximately six river miles of mainstem habitat until the Pine Valley Mills Dam, an active hydropower dam.

There is good potential habitat upstream of Pine Island Dam on Cohas Brook, which is known to be alewife spawning and rearing habitat.

Kelly Falls Dam is the first dam on the Piscataquog River, with two more dams in succession upstream. Improving passage at these locations would provide significant habitat. This is a priority, but due to multiple dams requiring passage improvements to make that habitat available, there may be greater challenges here relative to Talbot Mills Dam.

The remaining rivers in the upstream portion of the watershed show limited potential for restoring fish passage for migratory fish from the ocean. These rivers are upstream of three dams on the mainstem of the river with fish passage: Essex Dam in Lawrence, Pawtucket Falls Dam in Lowell, and Amoskeag Falls Dam in Manchester. They are also upstream of Hooksett Dam in Hooksett which currently does not have fish passage, but construction of upstream passage is planned. Some are upstream of Garvins Falls Dam in Concord which currently does not have passage or plans for improving it. These mainstem dams make restoring fish passage in the upper watershed a challenge.

Dam Removal and Flooding

Talbot Mills dam is a run of river dam. It does not have any way of controlling water coming in, or going out.

This is similar to a full bathtub with no way to remove the drain plug. The same amount of water that flows in, flows out.

If there is less water flowing in, there will be less water flowing out. If there is more water flowing in, there is more water flowing out.

Because of this, removing the dam doesn’t change the water surface elevation downstream of the dam, it only changes the elevation of the water surface directly behind the dam. This animation shows modeled water depth during and following a rainstorm event in March 2010. This same storm without the dam would have led to much lower water levels right behind the dam, but no difference downstream and only a very small difference farther upstream.

Removing Talbot Mills Dam will actually alleviate flooding in two ways:

  1. Water will no longer pond behind the dam, so the water surface just upstream of the dam will be significantly lower, and will be slightly lower farther upstream during high flow conditions.
  2. Talbot Mills Dam is aging and in poor condition. Due to climate change, storms are becoming larger and more powerful. These two factors combined creates a major risk for infrastructure and people downstream. Removing the dam eliminates the risk of a catastrophic failure, which could send a significant amount of uncontrolled water downstream and underneath the Faulkner Mills Complex.

Dam Removal and Drinking Water

 A study was completed in 2021  to assess the potential impact removing Talbot Mills Dam may have on the drinking water intake for the Town of Billerica. The study found that the difference in water depth at the drinking water intake after dam removal would be 0.17 feet lower during the median annual flow, 0.35 feet lower during drought conditions and 0.43 feet lower during the 100-year flood. A 7Q10 drought condition is the lowest seven day average flow that has a 10 percent chance of happening any given year.

The water intake facility has three chambers, each equipped with an exterior trash rack, a through-flow traveling screen and a pump wetwell. The potential risk to the facility during drought conditions is that not enough water would enter the wetwell to be able to operate the pump. Fortunately the study found that the change of 0.35' (~4") does not affect the pump's ability to function, with 5.8' of water continuing to make it to the wet well, submerging the pump intake with 4.5' of water.

Use the slider below to see the difference in water depth during drought conditions, relative to the height of the drinking water intake facility. The left side shows existing conditions and the right side shows post dam removal.

Can you spot the difference between the two images?

While this impact is considered minimal, it is taken seriously by the project team working to remove the dam. Any changes resulting specifically from the removal of the dam will be thoroughly studied under many different conditions and mitigated through the permitting and design process. Apart from dam removal, however, many changes including climate change, new development, and others will have a larger impact on river flows than dam removal will have at this location.

Conclusion

Talbot Mills Dam has held a significant place in recent history, but no longer serves the purposes it once did. Aging infrastructure is expensive and burdensome to maintain, and Talbot Mills is no exception. The dam owner has found that this effort is not worthwhile when the dam no longer provides the benefits it was built to provide. Today, Talbot Mills Dam disrupts natural riverine processes, preventing the Concord River from carrying out essential functions like sediment and nutrient transport, and providing habitat to migratory fish species. The dam leads to degraded water quality behind it, which is stagnant, limited in dissolved oxygen and too warm in the summer months. Removing Talbot Mills Dam provides an opportunity to restore the health of the Concord River, and restore the history of the river, the fish that lived in it and the Indigenous Peoples who relied on it, long before the dam was here.

Learn More

This StoryMap will be updated as the project progresses and more information is developed. We are actively conducting studies on the dam and river, and new information will be provided when it becomes available. In the meantime, you can find more helpful and interactive ways to learn about the project and dam removals!

  • Take a virtual tour of Talbot Mills, the Middlesex Canal Museum, and the Middlesex Canal
  • Check out a video about dam removals in the Merrimack River watershed
  • Visit our website, to learn more, read our FAQ document, and check out all of the studies completed to date!

Stay in Touch

 Sign up  to receive updates about the Talbot Mills Dam removal project.

 Check out  if there are any upcoming public meetings or events regarding this project.

The development of this StoryMap was funded in part by the  Massachusetts Environmental Trust . For more information, please visit www.mass.gov/eea/met

Talbot Mills Dam on Sept 4, 2022 during a historic drought.

Talbot Mills Complex

View looking upstream at the sluice gate.

View looking downstream at the gate to the Faulkner Mill building.

View looking upstream at the plugged waste gate.

View looking upstream at the plugged historic fishway.

Sign on the section of the Middlesex Canal near the Talbot Mills Dam

The Mill Pond

View from the Pollard St. bridge, looking downstream at the Fordway bar section of the Concord River.

Billerica water intake structure.

Concord River at Minute Man National Historical Park.

Water falling over Talbot Mills Dam.

Distribution and status of sea lamprey in their native North American range.  A recent study  indicated populations in the Merrimack River watershed are vulnerable.

American shad.

Fish ladder in Lowell at the Pawtucket Dam

Fish ladder at Centennial Island.

Amoskeag Falls, 1906.

Stevens Pond Dam on the Spicket