Enhancing Qualitative Social Science with GIS

A resource for supporting "Qualitative GIS"

ArcGIS has much to offer social scientists using qualitative and mixed-method perspectives in their work.

Why GIS for Social Science?

In a broad effort led by Esri’s Chief Scientist,  Dawn Wright , Ph.D., a number of  researchers at Esri  are looking at the many ways qualitative social science can benefit from GIS. While ArcGIS can help with an array of quantitative approaches, it also brings many capabilities to enhance qualitative methodologies.

This exploration began with a  Technical Workshop at UC 2021  to showcase the power and utility of  ArcGIS for qualitative social science  research, which includes data capture, coding, and analysis workflows. Briefly summarized, the workshop discusses how GIS and Social Science intersect at the use, visualization, and dissemination of diverse data types, e.g., perception data, concepts, behaviors, and values—to address longstanding issues of social and environmental concern.

What's New: Mapping Qualitative Data (January 2024)

Starting with Data

To begin understanding what GIS can do for qualitative social science, we first define what we mean by qualitative, quantitative and spatial data. Table 1 below provides a brief summary. However, what's important to note is that although spatial data is distinct, it can be combined to transform other types of data to become spatialized. That is, both quantitative and qualitative data can be combined with spatial data to associate shape, size, location, and other spatial information. For example, when a researcher collects attitudinal data in several neighborhood planning units, she can associate location information with each survey response. This spatialization of resident feedback would enable her to find additional patterns for analysis and comparison between neighborhoods.

Table 1. Comparison of different data types

Qualitative Data & GIS

Qualitative data can mean a lot of different things for GIS professionals and qualitative researchers, and the different perspectives they bring frame how they encounter and work with such data. For many GIS practitioners, qualitative data often come in the form of things like open-text survey responses, ad hoc or unstructured feedback, or user-defined attributes. Additionally, AI tools have been developed that can automatically pull-out certain kinds of information from documents, images, or video, or that can score sentiment, which can all then be spatialized, if not already. In such contexts, qualitative data are utilized as yet another kind of data source, which must be collected, classified, and extracted so that they can be easily integrated into GIS tools/workflows. Generally, the goal behind this is to create a single "authoritative" view from the data that is used to inform various kinds of action or decisions. As such, the primary concern typically driving how GIS practitioners interact with qualitative data is: “How can I organize, quantify, or make sense of non-numerical data?”

Figure 1. Multiple meanings of qualitative data

However, to people like human geographers, sociologists, anthropologists, or many other researchers, qualitative data means something quite different. From their point of view, such data consists of things like notes and reflections generated through field-based observation, interview recordings and their corresponding transcripts, photos or videos taken by the researcher or participants, or any number of digital or material things relevant to the project at hand.

In other words, unlike the single, authoritative view from the data that a lot of GIS work aims to create, qualitative researchers are often focused on understanding things from multiple perspectives. This means that many qualitative researchers often use participatory data collection methods that empower participants to become research collaborators who can generate data about their lives and better steer research priorities towards local concerns. The underlying question driving how many social researchers encounter qualitative data is generally: “How can I comprehend and convey the lived realities of our participants on their own terms?"

However, seeing the power of both GIS and qualitative data, in recent years researchers and practitioners across GIS, geography, and social science fields continue to seek new ways to understand the importance of space and place and to use new technologies to uncover insights. Additionally, they are also looking for novel ways to visualize and analyze their data, and other ways to tell stories about the relationships between people and places, oftentimes with the aim of communicating to fresh audiences.

Case Examples of Qualitative GIS

Unsurprisingly, there are different mixed-method and multi-disciplinary projects that have emerged from and helped define this growing field of “Qualitative GIS”. These  real-world examples  show a variety of studies that have successfully combined qualitative and GIS approaches.

Tools

There are a number of different ArcGIS tools available to social science researchers to utilize location information to transform their qualitative data, which includes sourcing, collecting, creating, and analyzing.

Living Atlas Layers

Data Access

Contextual data such as satellite imagery or population statistics

Data Collection & Creation

Locational, contextual, photo/video, and participant-generated data, surveys

Analysis & Visualization

Identify spatial patterns; triangulate or validate qualitative and geospatial data

Collaboration & Dissemination

Create engaging stories or interactive digital media; speak to public audiences; build a hub to work on share projects

Resources

Below we list some resources to help with further exploration. Send suggestions for additional links to socialscience@esri.com.

Climate Change & Qualitative GIS


Social Justice & Map-based Data Visualization


Learn Imagery & Remote Sensing


Ethics & Qualitative GIS


Learning ArcGIS Tools




    A. Field Maps Discovery and Migration:

B. Field Maps Data Collection:

C. Field Maps Location Tracking:

D. Field Maps Automation:


Your Story!

Meet the Team

 

Table 1. Comparison of different data types

Figure 1. Multiple meanings of qualitative data