CreelCat: Angler Survey Database

An innovative database designed to inform managers, recreational fishers, and the public about fish species in their area

Angler catches a fish during a Panfish Fishing Tournament on June 6, 2015 on Brownlee Reservoir in Oregon. Fish serve as an important recreational, commercial, and cultural resource in the United States and Canada. Credit: Baker County Tourism.

Group fly fishing from drift boat on White River, Arkansas.
Group fly fishing from drift boat on White River, Arkansas.

What is an angler?

The term "angler" refers to a person who uses fishing rods with lines and hooks to catch fish as a hobby. Anglers are a type of fisherman, a broader term describing any person catching fish regardless of method or purpose.

Tildon Jones (Fish Biologist, USFWS) and Jim Prairie (hydro modeler, BOR) lecture to a public audience at Dinosaur the intricacies of the modern Adaptive Management Program for hydropower operation that considers the ecological needs of 3 endangered, endemic fish species in the Basin.
Tildon Jones (Fish Biologist, USFWS) and Jim Prairie (hydro modeler, BOR) lecture to a public audience at Dinosaur the intricacies of the modern Adaptive Management Program for hydropower operation that considers the ecological needs of 3 endangered, endemic fish species in the Basin.

What are angler/creel surveys?

Angler or creel surveys collect data on how people participating in recreational fishing interact with bodies of water; their fishing preferences for location, fish species, and fishing techniques; and harvest metrics and species composition. These surveys include physical surveys, interviews, and information from participating locals.

Why are these surveys used?

Local wildlife agencies and park managers can use the surveys to get a sense of the fish species and the fishing techniques anglers in that area prefer, which can help monitor fish biodiversity in the local waterways.



CreelCat data and application


Current research applications

Lynch et al., 2021 - The U.S. Inland Creel and Angler Survey Catalog (CreelCat): Development, applications, and opportunities

USGS scientist Collin Smith, aboard USGS research vessel Dogfish, sets out a sampling net—called a lampara net—to capture nearshore fishes in a subtidal eelgrass bed in Eagle Harbor, Bainbridge Island, Washington. Lampara fishing in these deeper eelgrass beds, which are difficult to sample with other approaches, can show whether forage fishes like sand lance and surf smelt use eelgrass bed slightly offshore from the beach.

Inland recreational fishing, defined as primarily leisure-driven fishing in freshwaters, is a popular pastime in the USA. State natural resource agencies endeavor to provide high-quality and sustainable fishing opportunities for anglers. Managers often use creel and other angler survey data to inform state- and waterbody-level management efforts. Despite the broad implementation of angler surveys and their importance to fisheries management at state scales, regional and national coordination among these activities is minimal. Management of fish living in rivers, lakes, and other waterbodies crossing state boundaries may benefit from collaborative, large-scale management practices and research. Here, we introduce the U.S. Inland Creel and Angler Survey Catalog (CreelCat), a first-of-its-kind, publicly available national database of angler survey data that establishes a baseline of national inland recreational fishing metrics. We highlight research and management applications to help support sustainable inland recreational fishing practices and present science to inform management implementation for implementation.


Nicholas Sievert et al., 2023 - CreelCat, a Catalog of United States Inland Creel and Angler Survey Data

The United States Inland Creel and Angler Survey Catalog (CreelCat) contains a national compilation of angler and creel survey data collected by natural resource management agencies across the United States (including Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico). These surveys are used to help inform the management of recreational fisheries, by collecting information about anglers including what they are catching and harvesting, the amount of effort they expend, their angling preferences, and demographic information.

An image of a graph showing the number of angler surveys that have been collected by year from 1945 to 2015. (x-axis = year by 10s, y-axis = number of surveys collected)

Number of surveys by year contained in the CreelCat Database

As of May 1, 2023, CreelCat houses over 14,729 surveys from 33 states, Puerto Rico, and Washington, D.C., comprising 235 data fields across 8 tables. These tables contain 235,015 records of fish catch and harvest metrics, 27,250 angler preference metrics, 14,729 records of survey characteristics, 13,576 records of effort metrics, and 409 records of angler demographics. Though individual creel surveys are often deployed to meet local science and management objectives, creel data aggregated across jurisdictions has the potential to address larger scale research and management needs.


Robertson et al., 2023 - Estimating lentic recreational fisheries catch and effort across the United States

Our study developed a statistical approach to combine survey data with different methods and assess the relationship between daily catch and effort of recreational fishers. We applied this approach to CreelCat data on ponds and lakes and found that the relationship between recreational fisheries catch and effort was not straightforward. We found that as fishing effort increased, the number of fish caught per hour of fishing effort decreased.

Staff at the Klamath Falls Field Station evaluate Lost River and shortnose sucker habitat relative to the presence, abundance, and health of the fish. Sucker distribution among habitats is evaluated using occupancy models that account for imperfect detection.

Furthermore, we identified that fishing effort varied across regions and was affected by the size of the waterbody where fishing occurred, the average age of people in surrounding counties, and the distance from the waterbody to main roads. This new statistical approach has several practical applications. It could be used to inform recreational fisheries management in regions that have limited data. Additionally by taking into account socio-economic and ecological factors that influence fishing effort, this approach could improve our understanding about how local and regional recreational fisheries will change in response to climate change. 


Kaz et al., 2024 - U.S. Inland Creel Programs: A Regional Comparison and Best Practices

(DOI: In development)

Close up underwater image of a group of Common snook (Centropomus undecimalis) in Florida

In United States (U.S.) inland waters, recreational fishers (anglers), rather than commercial fishers, account for a primary source of fishing pressure. As such, the recreational sector can be a substantial driver of fishing mortality, requiring well-informed management for the sustained viability of inland recreational fisheries. In this project, we review creel data from over 35 states and territories in the U.S. Creel and Angler Survey Catalog (‘CreelCat’) to 1) provide a regional comparison of U.S. inland creel programs, 2) discuss important limitations and biases of the dataset, and 3) identify best practices for future creel data collection to increase broad-scale comparability, validity, and utility of data. This review marks an initial step towards characterizing available inland fishery data, thus making it possible to identify national or regional data needs. Ultimately, more cohesive, accessible data enables the capacity to monitor trends within U.S. inland recreational fisheries on larger scales and extrapolate to broader ecological and social shifts.  


Robertson et al., 2024 - Inland recreational fisheries in the United States catch an order of magnitude more than reported to the UN 

(DOI: In development)

Scientist holding a herring dip net of forage fish in Cook Inlet, AK

Recreational fisheries are important global contributors to food security, socio-cultural practices, and local and regional economies. However, inland recreational fisheries are often overlooked by policymakers due to a limited understanding of the magnitude of their effort, catch, and harvest. Here, we used the US Inland Creel and Fisher Survey Catalog (CreelCat) and catch and effort model (CreelCatch) to estimate the magnitude of total inland recreational fisheries effort and catch in the conterminous US. The CreelCatch model projected fishing effort and catch across all lakes, ponds, and reservoirs based on drivers of fishing effort, waterbody area, and regional random effects. We estimated that lentic recreational fisheries in the conterminous US likely catch 400,000 – 1.13 million tonnes of fish per year, 30 – 80 times greater than inland commercial fisheries. Inland recreational fisheries warrant greater consideration for their contribution to national scale socio-economics and impacts on fish stocks and ecosystems. 


Wszola et al., 2024 - Lake  temperature and morphometry shape the thermal composition of recreational fishing catch

(DOI: In development)

USGS Fishery Biologist, Pat Braaten, and biologists from USGS Columbia Environmental Research Center and the Fort Peck Field Office release a telemetry-tagged, female pallid sturgeon after recapturing her to check her reproductive status. She was still full of ripe, black eggs, and had not yet spawned when she was netted.

Managing freshwater fisheries in warming lakes is challenging because climate change impacts anglers, fish, and their interactions. Inland lakes are rapidly warming, creating novel coolwater management challenges and emerging warmwater opportunities. Warmwater fishing opportunities are likely to increase as the climate warms, but larger, deeper lakes will likely provide thermal refuges for coolwater fish and the anglers who pursue them. We integrated recent models of current and future lake temperatures with recreational fisheries catch data from 587 lakes in three north -central U.S. states (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) to evaluate how the thermal composition of recreational fisheries catch varied as a function of temperature, ice coverage, and lake morphometry. We found that warmwater catch share (WCS), the proportion of fish in recreational angling catch that belonged to the warmwater thermal guild (final temperature preferendum [FTP] > 25℃), increased with average annual lake surface temperature and decreased with survey ice coverage. However, we also found that WCS decreased with increased lake area and depth. Using mid-century (2040 – 2060) water temperature and ice projections while holding all other variables constant, we predicted that WCS will likely increase as the climate warms, but that significant thermal heterogeneity will persist. Large (> 100 ha), deep (> 10 m) lakes and those with cooler (<3700 annual growing degree days) predicted future temperatures will likely hold thermal refugia for coolwater (FTP 19 – 25℃) and coldwater (FTP < 19 ℃) fish even as average lake temperatures rise, creating the potential for management actions to resist the shift from coolwater to warmwater fisheries.  Managers of smaller and more rapidly warming lakes may want to consider strategies that accept or direct emerging warmwater fishing opportunities. We suggest that the most viable path to climate adaptation in landscapes of diverse lakes may be to resist warmwater shifts where possible and accept or direct the rise of warmwater fishing opportunities where necessary.

About the CASCs

The Climate Adaptation Science Centers (CASCs) partner with natural and cultural resource managers to provide the scientific information needed to help fish, wildlife, ecosystems, and the communities they support adapt to the impacts of a changing climate. Our network is comprised of nine Regional CASCs, managed by the National CASC located at U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) headquarters in Reston, VA. 

Learn more about USGS CASC  here. 

Contact us: casc@usgs.gov

Disclaimer: Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Geonarrative Designers - Jason Motley and Nick Sievert

Number of surveys by year contained in the CreelCat Database