What is the biosphere? Can we see it from space?

Part 1 of the SatSchool Biosphere Module

What is the biosphere?

The Biosphere is made up of the parts of the Earth where life exists. It includes the land, ocean, and atmosphere. Life exists from  9.5 km deep  in the oceans up to  50 km high  in the atmosphere. Within the biosphere living things span a range of sizes, from the microscopic (like phytoplankton) to the gigantic (like whales and redwood trees).

Organisms within the biosphere interact with all other systems. For example, roots from plants and burrowing insect/animal species can alter the composition and structure of soils, while plants remove CO 2  and release oxygen back into the atmosphere.

The biosphere is often broken down into smaller groups of related things to make it easier to understand its structure. For example, we may break it down like this:

Biosphere - The biosphere contains all living things on Earth.

Biome - A biome is a large collection of organisms occupying a major habitat. Examples of biomes include desert, forest, tundra, and grasslands. Biomes include vast regions of habitat and so might be broken down even further. In this example, we're looking at the tropical rainforest biome. 

Ecosystem - An ecosystem is the interaction of all plants and animals with their physical environment. The Amazon rainforest is an ecosystem, for example.

Community - A community is a group of two or more populations of species existing in the same place at the same time.

Population - A population is a group of all the members of one species in a given location. 

Individual - An individual is a single organism. Organisms can be as small as a single, microscopic phytoplankton, or as large as a single tree.

What is a satellite?

A satellite can be defined as anything in orbit around the Earth (or another planet!). Thousands of man-made satellites orbit the Earth. Over 650 of these are dedicated Earth Observation missions. Satellites provide a bird's eye view of Earth, allowing us to see larger areas at one time and collect data more quickly than with instruments on the ground.

What are satellites used for?

  • Telecommunications - TV and radio, satellite phones
  • Space observations (space telescopes) - observing stars, planets and other space phenomena
  • Space stations - home for astronauts, space laboratories
  • GPS or SatNav - navigation
  • Earth Observation - weather monitoring, scientific research, cartography (map making)

The Satellite we will focus on is Sentinel-2

Sentinel-2 is a satellite launched in 2015 by the European Space Agency. There are two Sentinel-2 satellites currently in orbit called Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-2B. These two satellites work together to image the Earth, so we call them the Sentinel-2 constellation.

Sentinel-2 captures images of the Earth using a sensor called the Multispectral-Instrument (or MSI). The MSI works like a camera, capturing data in parts of the visible light spectrum. However, unlike cameras you are used to, the MSI can also capture light from parts of the spectrum we cannot see, such as the Infrared.

If you're not yet familiar with the electromagnetic spectrum, we are going to cover it slightly further down this page, or you can find a special SatSchool explanation of the spectrum here!

Can we see the biosphere from space?

The Earth contains incredible patterns and colours at a range of scales. Many of these are related to organisms in the biosphere.

Colours and patterns on the Earth's surface can be seen in pictures taken by satellites and might reveal clues or information about the biosphere.

Look at the picture on the right and think about the following questions:

Can you think of any individual organisms, populations, communities, or ecosystems that might be visible from space?

What features would make these visible from space?

Hint: What would help you identify something from really far away?

The following images show amazing colours and patterns that might be related to the biosphere. Most of them were captured by Sentinel-2!

  1. What organisms or biosphere features can you identify in each image? Why are these features able to be imaged by satellites? Identify the level in the biosphere that these organisms belong to- is it a biome, ecosystem, community, or individual?

We'll help you with this first image, if you've not already guessed!

This is the Amazon Rainforest, an enormous ecosystem in Brazil. Other tropical rainforests can be found around the world, and together these form the tropical rainforest biome.

In the picture we can see:

The brown Amazon River, carrying lots of mud (sediment).

Lots of dark green areas, which are made from millions of trees and other plants reflecting green light back toward the satellite. Do you think we can pick out individuals, or is it more likely we are looking at communities?

Light brown areas, many of which are the result of deforestation - where the trees have been cut down and the soil has been exposed.

So, we can see parts of the tropical rainforest biome in this picture. We can also get some useful information quickly, such as areas where we think deforestation is happening.

Try the next pictures on your own! Information will come after each image, but try to work it out for yourself first.

  1. What organisms or biosphere features can you identify in this image?
  2. Why are these features able to be imaged by satellites?
  3. Identify the level in the biosphere that these organisms belong to- is it a biome, ecosystem, community, or individual?

This is a section of Egmont National Park, in New Zealand

  1. What organisms or biosphere features can you identify in this image? Similar to the last image of the Amazon Rainforest, there's dark green areas here that look like trees. We can tell from the colour and texture that this seems to be a forest. We might even be able to see the tops of individual trees. There's a very clear edge to the forest, where it's lighter green and there's a patchwork of different colours. This seems like it's farmland.
  2. Why are these features able to be imaged by satellites? We might be able to see individual trees because they are very large, making them easier to spot from very far away. In the farmland, we are looking more at communities or a population - the organisms are too small for us to see individuals with a satellite. However, we can still recognise the colour and pattern of farmland.
  3. Identify the level in the biosphere that these organisms belong to- is it a biome, ecosystem, community, or individual? We can see the forest, which is an ecosystem. Within the forest, we might be able to see single trees - these are individuals. In the farmland, we are looking at communities. Sometimes in farmland, within a single field, we may be looking more at a population, because all the plants are the same species.

Egmont National Park has a well defined, circular boundary. Within this boundary, the forest ecosystem is protected. Outside the boundary, there is more farmland and human activity. This is very easy to pick out in the satellite image!

The brown and white in the centre of the National Park is Mount Taranaki, an active volcano.

A little more tricky this time...

  1. What organisms or biosphere features can you identify in this image?
  2. Why are these features able to be imaged by satellites?
  3. Identify the level in the biosphere that these organisms belong to- is it a biome, ecosystem, community, or individual?

This is the Yukon Delta, in Alaska. It's where the Yukon River meets the Bering Sea.

  1. What organisms or biosphere features can you identify in this image? We can see a lot of green again - it seems like colour is a great indicator of living things in satellite imagery! It is difficut to work out what this green is, it doesn't have the same texture or patterns as the forest in the previous images. Some context here helps! The Yukon Delta is in the Arctic, where there are very few trees. Instead, the green colour is representing smaller plants - like grasses and shrubs (bushes). The darker brown colours are likely to be areas of mixed vegetation and water - marshlands. These are a very important habitat for many species of bird.
  2. Why are these features able to be imaged by satellites? We can see the vegetation because it's green, but it's really difficult to know much more than this without knowing some things about the area we are looking at first. This is often a problem with satellite data - we need to validate our interpretation of what we are looking at with other sources of information.
  3. Identify the level in the biosphere that these organisms belong to- is it a biome, ecosystem, community, or individual? We can see a wetland ecosystem, with lots of water, beautiful meandering rivers, green and brown vegetation. Within the ecosystem we can see communities of green and brown vegetation, but we don't have enough detail to be able to see the individuals within these communities. We can't see the birds and other animals that live here, because they're too small and they move around.

The biosphere also includes living things that aren't terrestrial (that aren't on land). What do you think we are looking at here?

  1. What organisms or biosphere features can you identify in this image?
  2. Why are these features able to be imaged by satellites?
  3. Identify the level in the biosphere that these organisms belong to- is it a biome, ecosystem, community, or individual?

This is part of the Great Barrier Reef, off the East Coast of Australia.

  1. What organisms or biosphere features can you identify in this image? This is a hard question again! The reef is under the water, so the colours are a little bit obscured by the water surface. We can see bright areas, which look a little bit like under water islands. These areas are coral reefs.
  2. Why are these features able to be imaged by satellites? It's difficult for satellites to see through water, but because there is so much coral close to the surface of the water we can still see a change in colour. If we know we are looking at a part of the world where there are coral reefs, we can presume that these pale island features are coral reefs.
  3. Identify the level in the biosphere that these organisms belong to- is it a biome, ecosystem, community, or individual? Here we are looking at the ecosystem level. We don't have enough detail to see individual corals or fish under the water.

One more amazing thing about this image is that you can see the currents of water swirling through the reefs. Imagine how these currents would interact with all the species living on each reef.

You've answered enough questions! You can scroll through and look at the beautiful images on the right. We'll pick up with some more science in a minute.

This is the mountains and boreal forest around Fairbanks, Alaska.

Again, green is showing us where a lot of the vegetation is. You can see the snow capped mountains in the bottom of the image. Notice there only seems to be green vegetation away from the mountains, at lower elevations.

These are the Galapagos Islands, off the West Coast of Ecuador in South America.

The Galapagos Islands are made from a series of volcanoes.

They were made famous by Charles Darwin, on his expedition aboard HMS Beagle in 1835.

Many of the organisms found in the Galapagos can't be found anywhere else on Earth, meaning they are endemic.

This inspired Darwin and helped to form his Theory of Natural Selection and Evolution.

From a satellite image, we can pick out the different ecosystems on the islands, but we can't tell what the species are.

We'd wouldn't know they're unique, endemic species without someone on the ground to have a look at them for us.

We'll finish this section a little closer to home!

These are the Shetland Isles, off the North Coast of Scotland.

On the land you can see a mix of grassland and moorland ecosystems, in brown and green colours.

But the most interesting bit is the sea!

Off the East Coast of Shetland in this image is a huge phytoplankton bloom. This is made from millions of tiny marine plants. You can see the way the water is moving from the patterns in the bloom.

This is probably a population, made from millions of individuals belonging to the same species.

So we can see the biosphere from space!

Looking at satellite images can give us a quick sense of what the biosphere may be like in a given location. In the examples above, you could probably pick out where there were forests, fields, or reefs.

But it can sometimes be difficult to identify what we're looking at. We can most easily see the biosphere from space when large numbers of organisms appear together as population, community or ecosystem. For example, the images of forests or reefs show communities where large numbers of tree and coral individuals create a change in the colour of the surface that's visible to our satellites.

It's much more difficult to view individual organisms. When individual organisms are very large, or out satellite data is very high resolution, we might be able to pick out individuals. But usually this is a problem, either because the organisms are too small or because they move!

It gets even more difficult to understand what we're looking at in the biosphere when satellite data has poor spatial resolution.

This can make satellite imagery appear blocky or pixelated, meaning that we can't recognise the shape of areas or objects.

In the example to the right of Egmont National Park, New Zealand, there is Sentinel-2 data on the left and MODIS data on the right.

Sentinel-2 data is at spatial resolution of 10m, meaning that each pixel is showing us a 10m area.

In comparison, MODIS data is at a spatial resolution of roughly 500m!

You can see that in the Sentinel-2 data, you can easily pick out the shape of the National Park boundary and might even be able to recognise individual trees.

In the MODIS data many trees, fields, rocks and other objects are located within each pixel and this makes it much harder to understand what we see.

What might we be interested in measuring in the biosphere?

2. What might we be interested in measuring in the biosphere?

(This section needs edited) Things we are interested in measuring from space include:

  • The health of vegetation
  • The timing of events in the life of vegetation (when does vegetation begin to get green in the Spring, when is it greenest?)
  • The productivity of vegetation, which we might measure as its weight (biomass)
  • The height of vegetation
  • The type of vegetation

We can also sometimes measure animals from space, although for the reasons explained above this is normally very difficult! See the Oceans storymap for counting whales from space, or the Cryosphere storymap about locating penguin colonies in Antarctica.


How can we use satellites to understand the biosphere?

As you've hopefully learned, simply looking at images taken by satellites can only take us so far. Sometimes it's hard to work out exactly what a satellite image is showing, especially when individual organisms are rarely visible.

We can manipulate satellite image data to make it easier to work out where organisms, especially plants and vegetation, are located.

Satellite images are made up of many tiny squares called pixels, just like your TV or computer screen. In a coloured satellite image like the ones above, the colour in each pixel is made up of red, green, and blue light. The amount of red, green, and blue light in each pixel is measured by the satellite and given a value between 0 and 255. Each value from every pixel across the image for one colour goes into a different channel: all the blue values between 0 and 255 are in the blue channel, for example. When the image is made, the three colours are mixed in the right proportions using these channel values to produce the final colour image.

Satellites also record light that we cannot see. The electromagnetic spectrum is the term used to describe the entire range of light that exists, including these invisible wavelengths. Most light that exists on Earth is emitted by the Sun. The spectrum is shown below.

3. What percentage of the electromagnetic spectrum are we able to see with our own eyes?

Electromagnetic Spectrum. Credit: kcvs.ca.

Some satellites like Sentinel 2A and 2B are able to detect infrared wavelengths.

Living plants absorb red light and use it for photosynthesis, but reflect green light. Plants also reflect infrared light more strongly than the bare ground. Healthier plants reflect infrared light more strongly than diseased, dead or stressed plants.

Plants reflect different light bands depending on their health. Credit: Physics Open Labs.

4. Based on these facts about plants and infrared light, what might infrared satellite imagery be able to tell us about plants and vegetation?

A reflectance spectrum contains information about the colour and the brightness of light in the electromagnetic spectrum reflected by an object. The reflectance spectra of vegetation and soil are shown below.

5. Optional question: How do these spectra relate to the diagram of light bands reflected by leaves above?

Reflectance spectra for vegetation and soil. Credit: Physics Open Labs.

False Colour Composites

A false colour composite image can be used to highlight land surfaces, by making use of parts of an image (like the infrared) where a surface reflects a lot of electromagnetic radiation. In these images, the red, blue and green channels are assigned different wavelengths. When we're interested in vegetation, it's quite common for the red channel to be assigned to near-infrared, green to be red, and blue to be green. This is because of the high reflectance of near-infrared radiation by vegetation.

6. What colour would vegetation be in this false colour composite image?

Use the slider below to see how False Colour Composites can highlight vegetation. What differences do you notice between the two images? Do some things become clearer?

True Colour Composite (left) and False Colour Composite (right; Red = NIR, Green = Red, Blue = Green) from Sentinel-2 over Egmont National Park, New Zealand.

Click the button below to explore the worksheet 'Illuminating the biosphere'.

Follow the link to Sentinelhub Playground to create your own False Colour Composites.

Band Maths

While false colour composites are quick to create and allow an improved visual understanding of what we're looking at, they're not very useful for making measurements.

To get objective information from our satellite data, we can perform mathematical calculations on the reflectance values in each pixel to get a new summary number. We call this summary number a Band Index.

Band indices take advantage of the reflectance spectra of land surfaces, particularly where there are strong high and low values in the spectra. The normalised Difference Vegetation Index (or NDVI) is the band indice most commonly used for studying vegetation. It's been used in science since the 1970s!

NDVI uses infrared and red bands recorded by satellites to calculate a number between -1 and 1:

NDVI uses near-infrared (NIR) and red bands to calculate a value or index.

7. How do you think NDVI can be used to image the biosphere, given what we know about plants and infra-red light? Who might be interested in using NDVI images?

NDVI calculation and values for two plants. Credit: NASA.

8. Which of the plants in the above image is healthy, which is 'stressed'? Do healthy plants have a higher or lower NDVI value?

9. Use the image above to sketch a graph that relates plant health on the x-axis to NDVI on the y-axis.

NDVI can be used to locate and quantify the amount of green vegetation. The index can also be used to work out if vegetation is stressed or diseased. This can help farmers better look after their crops. With an NDVI image, farmers could easily see where there is some sort of crop damage perhaps caused by drought, flooding or disease. Importantly, NDVI imagery could also be used to detect, isolate, and control the spread of plant disease.

Other Complex Methods (needs images added)

In additon to satellites which act like cameras, taking pictures using reflected solar energy, some satellites create their own energy and use this to measure the biosphere. Two methods commonly used are Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR).

LiDAR systems use a laser to scan the Earth, creating 3D points mapped to the surface. We can then use these points to get information about vegetation structure, such as the canopy height of a forest and the density of vegetation.

SAR are based on the same technologies boats, planes, and bats use to detect objects. SAR satellites ping the Earth with energy and measure the energy which is reflected and returned to the satellite. We can use SAR to find out information about biomass. SAR is particularly tricky to interpret, as it doesn't look like the kind of images we are used to seeing!


Forest Fires: Monitoring the impact of 21st Century Fires on Global Forests

Forest fires are a natural part of some ecosystems. Some species, such as the Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta), have even evolved to take advantage of fire!

Why certain naturally occurring wildfires are necessary - Jim Schulz

However, large and damaging forest fires have been in the news a lot in recent years. Fires are becoming bigger and hotter than they have been historically. Climate change and anthropogenic (human) influences on the structure of forests have changed the way in which forest fires work. For a long time, we have extinguished forest fires as quickly as possible. This has prevented natural forest fires from happening and has led to the build up of large amounts of fuel on the forest floor (dead wood) which can then make fires burn larger and hotter. Climate change is also increasing the frequency of drought, extreme high temperatures and storm conditions which promote large fires.

Explore the satellite images of Evia, Greece in the below BBC article.

You can explore a live map of thermal anomalies detected from space, alongside fire warnings and confirmed fires below.

Are there any large fires you can spot? Do you think they're likely at this time of year?

Live US Wildfire Activity Web Map

We can see forest fires from space. The Sentinel-2 image below shows many fires burning around the Lena river in Russia. You can see some faint orange lines where the fires are burning and can obviously see the smoke plumes being blown away from the fires on the wind. During fires like this, we can use satellites to monitor smoke and aerosols as they travel from the fire over vast distances through our atmosphere.

10. But how would we measure the impact on vegetation? Think about NDVI and false colour composites.

Fires burn in the boreal forest ecosystem around the Lena river in Russia's Irkutsk Oblast. Credit: ESA

Wallabi Point Fires in November 2019

The Wallabi point fires in November 2019 were part of a very large Australian fire season, which made international news. We're going to take a look at some satellite imagery over the fires.

First of all, let's look at an image we're more familiar with. This is a True Colour composite from before and after the fires. Can you see where the fire has burned vegetation?

Before and after imagery over a fire.

It seems like some vegetation in the large block of forest surrounding the river burned, as it appears more brown and black in the True Colour image. Let's now use a False Colour composite to try and see more clearly where there are changes in vegetation.

That's made the effects of the fire much more obvious. Because healthy vegetation reflects more near-infrared light, the areas with healthy vegetation are bright red. You can see that a lot of these areas turn darker or lose their red colour after the fire, suggesting that the vegetation has been lost or damaged. We will now try to make the areas where vegetation has been lost or damaged clearer by calculating the NDVI.

In the map above, red is representative of very low NDVI values and dark green is representative of high NDVI. You can clearly see a decrease in the NDVI over the forest area, although some areas within the forest appear to have survived the fire and remain dark green. We can make the change in NDVI easier to interpret by classifying the NDVI values into 4 categories: Dark green for high values, light green for medium values, yellow for low values, and red for extremely low values.

When we classify the NDVI values like this, we can work out the change in the area of each classification. In case, the area covered by each NDVI class before and after the fire is:

--- Table of values to be inserted here.

So, we could estimate that within the area covered by the image there has been loss of _____ area of vegetation with high NDVI values.

Why is this important? How do we use it?

We can use Earth Observation of fires to:

  • Detect fires as they begin using thermal anomalies
  • Monitor the size and intensity of fires
  • Monitor the movement of smoke and atmospheric pollutants away from the fire
  • Measure the impact of fire on vegetation, including the area which has burned and how it recovers.

This is important for our understanding of how fires are changing (for the science) and for planning responses and recovery plans after a fire has happened.


Summary

  • The Biosphere contains all life on Earth and can be broken down into a number of smaller systems.
  • We can see the biosphere from space! This is easiest when large numbers of individuals create a change in the land surface and when our data is at a high spatial resolution.
  • We may be interested in measuring the type of vegetation present, the amount of vegetation, characteristics like its health, height, leaf area...
  • To help us measure vegetation, we can use the spectra of leaves to create False Colour Composites and Band Indices like the NDVI.
  • We can do this over Forest Fires to better understand how they are changing in the 21st century and to plan responses to them.

Other useful resources

For more information on the biosphere:

For more information on Earth Observation of the biosphere:

For more information on forest fires:

Interested in other SatSchool modules? You should check out:

Answers

The number of organisms grouped together, the size of individuals, and the colour of organisms compared to their environment all affect how visible organisms and biological systems are from space.

  1. 3 x 3 photo grid left to right, top to bottom: 1. Forests in the transition from mountains to lower elevations in Alaska, community; 2. Coral in the Great Barrier Reef, ecosystem; 3. Phytoplankton bloom off Shetland Isles, community; 4. Vegetation growing on the volcanic landscape of the Galapagos islands, community; 5. The Amazon Rainforest, ecosystem; 6.Coral reefs and the atolls of the Maldives, ecosystem; 7. Vegetation cover following the boundary of Egmont National Park, NZ, community; 8. Vegetation on land and bright green algae blooming in Lake George, Uganda, ecosystem; 9. Vegetation on the Yukon River delta, Alaska, community.

2. In the biosphere, we might be interested in measuring plant health in crops, plant diversity, species diversity, biomass, biodiversity, whether species are endangered or extinct, animal health in stressed environments, crop yield, spread or retreat of species overtime.

3. Humans can see around 0.0035% of the entire electromagnetic spectrum!

4. Infrared light measured by satellites can be used to tell us where the ground is bare i.e. there are no or few living plants. Infrared light may also be able to inform us about plant health: whether plants are diseased, dead or stressed.

5. Optional question: Healthy plants have higher reflectance values at longer wavelengths (reflect more light with longer wavelengths) as they reflect near infrared wavelengths (which are long) more strongly than other wavelengths. As plants become more stressed, they reflect near infrared wavelengths less strongly, so unhealthy vegetation reflectance spectra have lower reflectance values at near infrared wavelengths. Check your understanding of this with the interactive electromagnetic spectrum chart.

6. Vegetation would be red.

7. Higher NDVI values in an image might indicate vegetation is healthier. This is because healthy plants strongly reflect near infrared light compared to red light, so the top of the NDVI calculation will be a large value, making the NDVI value also high.

8. The green plant is healthy, the brown plant is stressed. The healthier the plant the higher the NDVI value as the difference between the amount of near infrared and red reflected light is greatest.

9. Your sketch of NDVI against plant health should look something like this:

10. NDVI could be used to map where vegetation is on a map. An NDVI map could be made of an area before a fire and another could be made for after the fire. Comparing the NDVI values in the same place for the two times will show you how fires have affected the area. False colour composite maps can be used in the same way. See the finals section for examples!

Content in this StoryMap was sourced from:

Image of Shetland from Sentinel-2

European Space Agency

Reflectance spectra for vegetation and soil. Credit: Physics Open Labs.

True Colour Composite (left) and False Colour Composite (right; Red = NIR, Green = Red, Blue = Green) from Sentinel-2 over Egmont National Park, New Zealand.

NDVI uses near-infrared (NIR) and red bands to calculate a value or index.

NDVI calculation and values for two plants. Credit: NASA.

Fires burn in the boreal forest ecosystem around the Lena river in Russia's Irkutsk Oblast. Credit: ESA

Before and after imagery over a fire.