Post-Fire Flooding: The Museum Fire

Flagstaff Watershed, Arizona 2019-2021

Flagstaff Watershed Protection Project

After the 2010 Schultz Fire, which resulted in extreme post-fire flooding and one fatality, projections indicated that a similar wildfire event on steep slopes above Flagstaff could cause similar effects to large areas within the City of Flagstaff.

To fund treatments within the Flagstaff watershed, the Greater Flagstaff Forest Partnership worked with City government to create a $10 million bond measure that passed in 2012 with 73% support. It became known as the Flagstaff Watershed Protection Project (FWPP) and is a partnership among the State, City, and Coconino National Forest. Project implementation was approximately 65% complete as of September 2019.

The Museum Fire ignited on July 21, 2019

What actions were taken to manage the Museum Fire and post-fire flooding effects? What results followed?

Museum Fire Background

Click the arrow to the right to continue.

Ignition Source

The Museum Fire started in the Dry Lake Hills area just north of Flagstaff on July 21, 2019. Fire investigators determined the cause to be a result of restoration activities related to the Flagstaff Watershed Protection Project, likely an excavator striking a rock. As required, the equipment operator stayed on-scene for one hour following shutdown that evening. However, the resulting ignition, smoldering slowly, remained undetected until the next morning when conditions allowed the fire to spread. The contractor followed all regulations and the ignition is considered unfortunate, but rare.

At the time of the fire, the area was experiencing prolonged dry conditions colloquially known as the "non-soon," referring to the absence of summer monsoon rains and multiple years of winter drought. Dry conditions lead to dry fuels that, combined with an ignition source, allow fire to burn and spread more readily.

Response

The initial attack to the Museum fire was immediate and robust with aircraft and other resources ordered immediately. These included Air Attack, three Heavy Helicopters, two additional helicopters, multiple air tankers, ten engines, multiple crews, bulldozers, and overhead. These resources appeared on scene very quickly but access to the immediate fire area was difficult for all but aviation. The decision was quickly made to order an Incident Management Team (IMT).

Once contained, the Museum Fire spanned 1,961 acres of variable mountainous topography. Burned vegetation included ponderosa pine, mixed conifer, activity fuels, and log decks. The Burned Area Emergency Response treatments cost a total of $3.7 million USD.

Museum Fire Map of Soil Burn Severity

Low severity burned areas are shown in cool tones and higher severity areas are shown in warm tones. Twelve percent of the area burned at high severity (red), 28% burned at moderate severity (yellow), and 60% burned at low or very low severity (blue-green and dark green)

Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER)

The U.S. Forest Service ordered the BAER team only two days after beginning initial attack. BAER team ranked approximately 1288 acres as having “severe soil erosion hazard” with an estimated 5+ years needed for vegetative recovery. BAER team storm event models indicated that existing drainage infrastructure would be inadequate to handle potential storm water and debris flows, resulting in risk to human life and safety in urban communities due to post-fire flooding. Roads, recreational trails, and natural resources (including Mexican spotted owl habitat) within the fire perimeter were also deemed at risk from post-fire flooding under monsoon rain conditions.

Helicopters spread mulch from on-site logs across 507 acres of high and moderate severity fire effects. Current science supports this approach, however there can be a trade-off between reduction of short-term erosion and slowed vegetation recovery (Bontrager et al. 2019). However, due to high risk to the community, opting for reduced erosion in the short-term is the preferred choice. Drainage expansion and stabilization, closures, and prevention of invasive weed introduction are among other BAER treatments.

All FWPP partners are committed to complete future treatments and follow up with maintenance in the future. The hope is that the community will continue to support the project into the future. 


Post-fire Flood Risk Assessment

Museum Fire Burned Area and Potential Flood Depth in the Flagstaff Area

Potential flood depth in different areas is shown here.

Low maximum potential flood depth is shown in blue, ranging to high potential depth in purple.

Museum Flood Total Mitigation & Response Costs to Date: $5.2 million

  • Coconino County Flood Control District has invested over $3.4 million since July 20, 2019
  • The City of Flagstaff's response costs exceed $1.8 million since July 13, 2021

What neighborhoods are affected?

Flooding from the Museum Fire burn scar may affect over 400 homes and 35 businesses, particularly in the Mt. Elden Estates area. The City of Flagstaff installed debris bollards at Linda Vista and Dortha culvert locations in addition to implementing channel improvements from Cedar to Dortha avenues, but flooding still occurs during periods of heavy rainfall.

Public meetings

Before the 2021 monsoon season began, there was a series of “Meet In the Street” community meetings. In another outdoor meeting, Mount Elden Estates residents reviewed the emergency project plan funded by the Flood Control District (FCD) and Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Such meetings explain and refresh public knowledge about what to do in case of another flood event.

2021 record monsoon season

  • Two dry years following the Museum Fire led to a reprieve and some complacency before the record 2021 monsoon season
  • Flagstaff receives 7.68" of rainfall during its monsoon season on average, while 2021's monsoon rainfall reached 10.90" (National Weather Service 2021)
  • During the largest 2021 flood event, occurring August 17th, 3.07" of rainfall was measured in the South Gauge, equating to a 200- to 500-year rainfall event
  • Total damage is estimated to be $2.3 million on public infrastructure, $1 million on private property within the flood area, and $4.5 million outside of the flood area within city limits
  • The Coconino County Flood Control District has invested over $3.4 million since July 20, 2019
  • City of Flagstaff response costs have exceeded $1.8 million since July 13, 2021
  • Government agencies declared a state of emergency on July 15 and 16, 2021 to provide reimbursement opportunities for up to 75% of eligible flood response costs

In total, 700,000 sandbags and 7,600 lineal feet of barrier have been installed in the Museum Flood area.


A Personal Story: Grandview Drive Becomes a River in 2021

By Jennifer Beltz, a resident in the Grandview Neighborhood impacted by postfire flooding.

"While traveling in Oregon we received the news that the Museum Fire in Flagstaff, Arizona was burning in the Coconino National Forest in an area of the forest not far from our Grandview neighborhood. Hearing of the fire while we were on vacation in Oregon, we needed to race back home knowing that there could be potentially heavy monsoon rains and we were advised to protect our property with sandbags.

Due to the severity of the fire, our street and the properties on it were suddenly in the bullseye for flooding that could emanate from this burn scar at the Spruce Avenue drainage.

After aborting the remainder of our vacation we began a frantic drive home to Flagstaff, and communicated with my insurance agent en route to secure flood insurance should any flood related property damage occur. Upon arrival in town we attended “Meet in the street” gatherings, talks at the high school and saw county and city workers walking our neighborhood communicating the severity of the situation and urging the application of sandbags to our properties.

With the help of friends and feeling an urgency for action precipitated by the beginning of the monsoon season, we mounted a sandbag brigade made up of willing hands, backs and vehicles. Initially the county wanted us to surround our houses so we outlined the house with sandbags. We made multiple trips to the high school to secure sandbags — filled with local cinders, not sand — which had been filled by volunteers. We were able to secure about 15 sandbags per trip in the backs of cars and trucks. As soon as we would get back home, friends would unload the bags and trudge to the growing wall and pile them up. More and more and more… 

Not more than a few days later, the county changed their instructions and told us that now we were to line the front of our yards with sandbags to create a channel for future flooding. We had to undo much of the original work while re-laying the 40-60 pound sandbags at the property perimeter. The sandbags were piled as outlined by the county in some of their communications in a pyramid shape to increase stability in a 4-3-2-1 configuration. Our walls were 4-5 sandbags high in 2019, roughly to a height of 3 feet. We calculated there were upwards of 1000 sandbags on our property.

We experienced no flooding or any appreciable rain for the remainder of the 2019 monsoon season. The following monsoon — roughly July-September of 2020 proved to be exceedingly dry as well. Almost two years of “non-soon” passed with no significant rainfall on the burn scar during 2019 or 2020. By the time the winter of 2021 arrived the sandbags had been in place for two plus monsoon seasons and were disintegrating from 18 months of sun and weather. Little by little we removed the roughly 1000, 40-60 pound sandbags from the yard, to the bed of the pick-up, 20 at a time, and took them to the county location where we could unload them onto an ever-growing discard pile of sandbags. By the early spring we had removed nearly all of the sandbags from our property.

County officials told us the summer of 2021 was likely to be a greater than normal monsoon and we needed to prepare ourselves with sandbags once again. Frustrated, I contacted the county and some of their volunteers helped us reinstall the foundation of our new sandbag wall in June of 2021, with the start of the monsoon anticipated for the beginning of July.

Many in the neighborhood did not rebuild or reinforce their sandbag fortifications. Like us, they were likely tired of having a wall of sandbags for what seemed like no reason. 

On July 13th we experienced our first major flood. Then one the next day. Then another two days after that. The county engineers and consultants had been right. Our street, Grandview Drive, became ground zero for the runoff from the Museum Fire burn scar. It also affected many other neighborhoods as far as a half mile away from our property. 

Can you imagine an actual river of 1000+ cubic feet per second (CFS) roaring down your street in a flash flood? On July 13th we received warnings from Coconino County and the National Weather Service on our phones, having previously signed up for the alerts. With little time to spare we took our reserve sandbags and blocked off our driveway. In the meantime, we’d moved one of our vehicles to a parking lot at the nearby shopping center, blocking in the other with the sandbags at the base of the driveway. All vehicles were to be cleared from the street. What was coming? Were we adequately prepared? 

The flash flood from the burn scar arrived about 20-40 minutes after the alert and lasted about 45 minutes. The flooding was unlike anything ever seen in the neighborhood. The street filled up. Cars on the street traveling upstream quickly backed their way downstream in terror as they saw the water coming. Not only did the street fill, bank to bank, but it kept rising. We had no idea if the sandbags would hold, if they would be overtopped, if our property would be inundated, damaged, destroyed. It was hard to look away. We got soaked in the rain. We took videos. We cursed the water. Our adrenaline surged. We were mesmerized by the flooding. We got too close. We texted our neighbors and family. We walked the perimeter of our property. We monitored the flooding at the property just upstream from us where there were no sandbags, worried about it overtopping our sandbag fortifications as the muddy water continued to flow onto the neighbor’s yard and fill up her driveway. Then it began to subside and when the water finally cleared from the street we met our neighbors, shared videos and then walked the street to see what the flood left behind. Woody debris littered the street. Sticks, logs, piles of pine needles, branches, and mud, mud and more mud. It filled the driveways which hadn’t been blocked off. It filled the cul-de-sacs which acted as eddies where the water slowed and the silt and mud was deposited as it lost momentum. The drainage up the street was woefully inadequate. Debris from the burn scar blocked the water from continuing through the culvert and down the drainage as normal so, instead it crawled upslope, out onto the cross street and tumbled down Grandview Drive, the path of least resistance. 

On July 14th, fearing the next flood event, we joined others at county services to obtain more sandbags. This time we filled them ourselves. There were volunteers there too. What else could we do but build higher and stronger sandbag walls? That afternoon we had our second flood. Then two days later we had our third flood. When would this end? We were tied to our property every afternoon in case we had flooding. July 16 we were caught away from home, having lunch with out-of-town friends. When the alerts came on our phone I stayed with our friends while my partner Jeff hopped our back wall with the help of our neighbor and her ladder to be at home because our street was already inundated. 

Then came a month of tentative forays from the house. We barely ventured far from home, let alone out of town, especially in the afternoons when the rain would most likely occur. On August 17 the worst of the flooding came. A flood bigger than any we’d experienced. And I was by myself at home. The rain came, then the alert. The rain poured down. I ran outside to begin walling up the driveway with sandbags and my neighbors came to help. But they needed to tend to their properties across the street so I finished closing off the driveway by myself with 40+ pound. sandbags five layers high in the pyramid formation as they ran across the street in ankle-deep water to their own properties to secure them.

And what have we experienced since August? Meetings with elected officials, meetings with the City public works department, letters to politicians, sympathetic gestures, street sweepers, dust clouds, continued fears, anxieties, nightmares, apparent greater and swifter mitigation in more affluent neighborhoods... 

What happens now? Sandbags forever? There is real risk of a rain-on-snow event causing another flood event this winter or spring.

‘Lookie-loos’ drive the neighborhood even though the sign says 'road closed to local traffic,' potholes made bigger but neglected because 'we don’t know what future mitigation measures might be taken.' We’ve been told it could take 5-10 years for some type of mitigation. Will it be enough? US Forest Service, Coconino County, City of Flagstaff, red tape, no money, ongoing flood threats, property depreciation, lives disrupted, access to homes reduced, parking inconvenience, flood related Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)*, snow removal, and further deterioration of existing sandbags…and climate change making these floods — said to be 250-500 year events — more common than we care to imagine.

And even in October we were stuck at home as another flash flood threat emerged and we monitored local rain gauges throughout the day as the rains came and went. The threat and worry is ongoing and, at times, all-consuming. The unknown future flood that will cause damage, not feeling truly safe in our own home, not knowing if this situation will ever improve. Are sandbags and promises enough to keep us safe?"

*It should be noted that PTSD is a known potential outcome for some individuals who experience natural disasters. ( Lee et al. 2020 ,  Belleville et al. 2019  and  Bryant et al. 2014 )

Flood Zone, Fire Perimeter, and Public Damage Assessments Map

Click map features for more information.

Museum Fire Flooding

What Will The Future Bring?

Click the arrow to the right to continue.

The Forest Service will allocate $54 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 as part of the Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI) to mitigate wildfire impacts on communities spanning ~135,000 acres, including FWPP areas.

These funds will treat 86,000 acres using prescribed fire and non-commercial thinning on the Tonto and Kaibab National Forests. Additional assessments will follow for 300,000-350,000 acres to identify priority treatment areas for FY2023. This funding will also allow for the installation of stream channel catchment-type structures to trap water and debris flows, similar to plans implemented on sites above the Timberline community following the 2010 Schultz fire.

To date, Coconino County has applied for a total of $4 million in grants from the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The Forest Service will supply $3.5 million to build infrastructure in private property areas and property owned by the City of Flagstaff. This infrastructure will reduce the amount of sediment and debris eroding from the Museum Fire burn scar into storm water. The Forest Service will route funds through the Coconino Flood District as part of broader policy shifts expediting the availability of disaster relief funds (Skabelund 2021).

Conclusion

FWPP continues operations to reduce fire hazard within the Flagstaff Watershed and improve forest health

  • Hand thinning, helicopter logging, and steep slope operations
  • Road repair
  • Postfire streamflow monitoring
  • Maintaining communication among collaborators and partners

FWPP On-Site Chip Mulch and Log Decks

More projects like FWPP could help avert costly impacts

Fuel treatments, such as those conducted by FWPP, reduce fire behavior and allow fire managers to use fire as a tool to improve forest health.

Collaborative efforts are needed with an all-inclusive approach (Schultz & Moseley 2019).

One example of such coordination is the  Greater Santa Fe Fireshed Coalition . Through this partnership, the planning and use of wildland fire is flourishing across boundaries in New Mexico.

Good Fire and Active Forest Management Protects Watersheds and Communities: the 2020 Medio Fire

Post-fire flooding following the Museum Fire remains a dynamic situation as partners continue to adapt to changing conditions.

For additional information, please see:

References

Ecological Restoration Institute, 2021. A Full Cost Accounting of the 2010 Schultz Fire. http://openknowledge.nau.edu/id/eprint/1282/1/Combrink_EtAl_2013_ERIWhitePaper_SchultzFullCostAccounting.pdf

Ecological Restoration Institute, 2021. A Full Cost Accounting of the 2010 Schultz Fire. http://openknowledge.nau.edu/id/eprint/1282/1/Combrink_EtAl_2013_ERIWhitePaper_SchultzFullCostAccounting.pdf

Koontz, T.M., Steelman, T.A., Carmin, J., Korfmacher, K.S., Moseley, C. and Thomas, C.W., 2010. Collaborative environmental management: What roles for Government (1). Routledge.

National Weather Service, 2021. Yearly Monsoon Statistics for Flagstaff. https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/twc/monsoon/monsoon_flg.php

Schultz, C.A. and Moseley, C., 2019. Collaborations and capacities to transform fire management. Science, 366(6461), pp.38-40.

Schultz, C.A., McCaffrey, S.M. and Huber-Stearns, H.R., 2019. Policy barriers and opportunities for prescribed fire application in the western United States. International journal of wildland fire, 28(11), pp.874-884.

Skabelund, Adrian, 2021. During visit Forest Chief Moore provides Coconino County $3.5 mil for post-fire flood mitigation. Arizona Daily Sun. Nov. 11, 2021. https://azdailysun.com/news/local/enviro/during-visit-forest-chief-moore-provides-coconino-county-3-5-mil-for-post-fire-flood/article_ee20651b-2820-5c6e-a1e0-bd80fbdb52d9.html

Skabelund, Adrian, 2021. Coconino County receives $3.5M in flood grants, bringing total federal aid to $7M for Museum Flood response. Arizona Daily Sun. Nov. 20, 2021. https://azdailysun.com/news/local/coconino-county-receives-3-5m-in-flood-grants-bringing-total-federal-aid-to-7m-for/article_339d5426-0988-57b3-8f37-a4b40723b069.html

Southwest Fire Consortium, 2021. The Bootheel is Burning Again! Cross-boundary Success in the New Mexico Bootheel. Nov. 22, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YS5QHtpe6o

Credits

We thank the contributors who provided materials for this story map:

Aerial burn photo

Coconino National Forest

"Grandview Drive" story, 2021 flood photographs

Jennifer Beltz

Aerial footage of 2021 flooding

KPNX Channel 12 News

FWPP Photos

Neil Chapman

Storymap Materials

FWPP, USDA Forest Service, Coconino National Forest, Southwest Fire Science Consortium, City of Flagstaff, Coconino County Flood Control District

Story Map

Erana Taylor

In total, 700,000 sandbags and 7,600 lineal feet of barrier have been installed in the Museum Flood area.