Pacoima & Whiteman Airport: A History of Harm

Whiteman Airport is a regional general aviation airport located in Pacoima, Los Angeles. But Whiteman wasn't always here. In fact, the Whiteman Airport is built upon a legacy of displacement, disinvestment, and devaluing of working communities.
Scroll to learn more about the land that Whiteman Airport sits on and the regional context of Pacoima, Los Angeles.

Table of Contents:
Pacoima: A History of Displacement and Disinvestment
Whiteman Airport: A History of Exclusion
Pacoima & Whiteman: Health and Harm in the Present Day

How to use this StoryMap:
- Scroll to explore.
- Certain slides are interactive. SLIDER TOOLS will be indicated with a vertical bar between two graphics. Drag the bar across the screen to reveal each graphic.
- Maps are interactive, including pop-ups with more information, location searching, and more. Use the zoom features, search bars, and point clickers to navigate them.
Specific instructions for interactive tools will be included on relevant slides.
PACOIMA: A HISTORY OF DISPLACEMENT AND DISINVESTMENT
From displacement, to redlining, to racism, Pacoima residents have been subject to discriminatory policies and practices.
Pacoima resides on Native Land
450 AD - 1797: The San Fernandeño Tataviam Band of Mission Indians are the Native peoples of the Pacoinga land that Pacoima now resides on.
For over 7000 years, they cared for and inhabited the land, naming the town "Pacoinga" in their native language. In 1797, Spanish colonizers came up from Mexico and established the San Fernando Mission, beginning the massive displacement and abuse of Natives in Pacoima.
Map displays indigenous territories that intersect with the land that Pacoima now presides on. Data from native-lands.ca and tataviam-nsn.us.
Stolen Land & Displacement
1834 - 1891: The United States breaks multiple treaties and laws in refusing to recognize the Tataviam tribe's rights to the land that Pacoima now resides on.
One Native resident, Rogerio Rocha, who retained some of his native land, was forcibly evicted off of his own property by Charles Maclay, one of Pacoima's earliest land investors. His story is just one of many in the brutal displacement of Native peoples from Pacoima.
Redlining & Federal Disinvestment
1939: The Federal Housing Administration redlines the area surrounding what is now the Whiteman Airport, deeming it unfit for investment.
Redlining meant that potential developers and homeowners who sought loans to invest in the area were barred from federal loans and that the government officially advised against investing in the area at all.
Slide the bar left and right to see present day Pacoima and the original redlining map produced by the Federal Housing Administration. Whiteman Airport is displayed in gray.
Redlining & Racism
1939: The Federal Housing Administration redlined this area of Pacoima because it deemed that the working-class, Mexican community had no significance.
“This is a Mexican settlement... Mexican farm laborers moved in and occupied the old residences and today goats graze in the streets and cactus plants are greatly in evidence. The area has no residential significance and is merely set up as a matter of record.” - Federal Home Owner's Loan Corporation (HOLC)
Redlining & Racism
1939 - 1968: Redlining left Pacoima vulnerable to low quality land uses and segregated the community on the basis of race and class.
The railroad along San Fernando boulevard unofficially divided Pacoima between upper-income White neighborhoods (to the West) and lower-income Black, Latino, and other communities of color (to the East), including the redlined tract.
Other areas in the Valley, such as Lake View Terrace-Sunland and Burbank, remained unsafe for Black residents of Pacoima to enter. This photo depicts the KKK parading down Van Nuys Blvd in 1966.
Pacoima Stands Up
1961: Pacoima activists are a leading force in outlawing housing discrimination
The San Fernando Valley NAACP branch, founded in Pacoima, played a key role in achieving the Fair Housing Act of 1968, which outlawed racist housing practices such as redlining.
However, racist practices persist for decades after, and the consequences of segregation still impact the community.
WHITEMAN AIRPORT: A HISTORY OF EXCLUSION
We know that Whiteman Airport was built in the context of racist, exclusionary zoning practices that affect the wellbeing of people in Pacoima to this day. But who was Whiteman built for, and who does it serve today?
Founded for the Few
1946: Whiteman Air Park is founded on what was originally farm land, primarily serving a wealthy select few residents from outside Pacoima.
Founded by Marvin E. Whiteman originally as a private storage facility and then opening as a private airport, it primarily served Hollywood stars in storing their planes, filming movies, and providing a venue for entertainment, including a pool.
Generations of Pacoima Residents Have Sought to Shutdown Whiteman Airport
1961: Pacoima residents living near the airport file a petition to the LA City Planning Commission demanding that Whiteman Airport halt operations.
The conclude that:
"ANY AIRPORT IN A DENSLEY POPULATED AREA IS OUT OF PLACE, reflecting the lack of care for Pacoima community members in the establishment of an airport land use in the neighborhood."
Swipe to read the group's 8 reasons for halting operations at Whiteman Airport.
Investment in Land, not Community
1973: Despite complaints from residents, LA County purchases Whiteman Airport for $1.7 million ($10.8 million inflation-adjusted) and converts over 100 acres of Roger Jessup Park into airport space.
This purchase also made the airport eligible for future local, state, and federal funding. However, the surrounding community does not see any parallel investment in their safety or wellbeing.
Zoned for Harm
As noted by the original activists in opposition to the airport, many residential properties and schools are proximate to Whiteman Airport, putting families and children in danger of safety risks associated with airports.
Similarly, Santa Monica Airport, an airport that is set to be shut down in 2028 due to similar concerns, is also surrounded by a high number of residences.
There are 16 schools and 512 residential parcels located within 1 mile of the airport, exposing thousands of students and community members to emissions and the dangers of crashes.
Pacoima residents face high risks of danger from pollution and crashes from Whiteman Airport because of planning that did not value the livelihood of its residents.
Serving the 1%
2018: “Our council and community, in solidarity, want to close the airport that predominantly caters to the 1% that can afford to travel by private jet”
- Santa Monica Mayor Pro Tempore
Whiteman Airport currently houses mostly small private planes. On average, a small, single-engine plane costs $75,000 up front, plus $5,000 - $10,000 annually for oil, maintenance, insurance, inspections, hangar fees, and landing fees. This map displays which census tracts can afford the cost of a recreational plane at the median annual income level.
It would take over 1 and 1/2 years of dedicating one's entire income at the median income level in Pacoima to purchase a recreational aircraft.
It costs 42% percent more of median income in Pacoima to purchase a recreational plane in Pacoima than in Santa Monica.
If a recreational airport wasn't okay for a wealthier community, why is it okay in Pacoima?
Pacoima & Whiteman: Health and Harm in the Present Day
Historic racism and inequity has a detrimental impact on the health and wellbeing of present-day Pacoima residents.
Lead & Particulate Matter Poisoning
Lead is banned in all fuels except for avgas, which is used in small recreational planes like those at Whiteman Airport. Lead is associated with a variety of dangerous health impacts, from
Children living downwind of the recreational airport Reid-Hillview Airport in San Jose, CA had .40 micrograms per deciliter increase of lead in their blood compared to those children who lived upwind. Lead exposure is associated with anemia, weakness, kidney and brain damage, and reproductive issues/birth defects, especially when exposed as a child.
Research from Santa Monica Airport shows similar results. Studies found that plane take-offs injected significant and dangerous amounts of ultrafine particulate matter into the air, which contributes to a number of health concerns including asthma, which also increases individuals' likelihood of severe COVID-19 illness.
Recreational airplanes are poisoning Pacoima.
Noise Pollution
Noise pollution from aircraft takeoffs greatly impacts the quality of life of Pacoima residents living near the airport.
There are an average of 315 take-offs per day at Whiteman Airport. Noise pollution from these take-offs can impact residents even throughout the night.
Noise pollution negatively impacts stress, sleep, mental health, blood pressure, and more.
Click "Unmute Background Audio" to experience the noise pollution that Pacoima residents face on a daily basis.
Community Impacts
Pacoima residents have spoken up about the impacts of Whiteman Airport on their health and wellbeing.
Read testimonies shared by community members at the January 27th, 2022 CAC Meeting.
Special thanks to Wendy Casillas, Luis, Helen Tran, and Julio Rodriguez for sharing their testimonies.
Conclusion
From a history of racist zoning, to Whiteman's exclusive origins, to its present day impact on the physical and mental health of the community, it is clear that Whiteman Airport does not serve the community of Pacoima. For this reason, we call on LA County to #ShutdownWhitemanAirport.
Demands for Whiteman Airport
- We demand the County to immediately install noise cancellation windows.
2. We demand the County to immediately support the community in dealing with noise pollution from Whiteman Airport by providing and establishing a Flight Curfew on Whiteman Airport operations.
3. We demand that LA County and FAA shut down Whiteman Airport.
Support the Campaign
1) Sign the petition: https://www.pacoimabeautiful.org/programs/shutdown-whiteman-airport
2) Attend the CAC meetings to learn more and share your testimony (online in writing or in-person).
3) Spread the word by sharing your knowledge, history, and experiences with your communities and networks.
Bibliography and Further Resources: