Exide Technologies: A Cycle of Environmental Injustice

A historical timeline of the battery recycler's violations, failed regulatory structure, and the struggle for community cleanup.

Introduction

This timeline will walk you through some of the most critical dates and events that led to the collapse of the hazardous waste facility and the role government, community activism, and systematic racism took over the course of approximately 41 years.

We will show you how many violations were reported between the time that Exide was given an interim permit in 1981 to their last inspection on record in 2015. An interim permit indicates that the facility did not have a valid license to operate and therefore had not met certain requirements. Therefore, Exide operated at full capacity for 19 years without a valid license. Photos included from the official inspection reports will add context to the violations and will shed light on the extent and lack of proper documentation carried out by the  California Department of Toxic Substance Control .

The purpose of this timeline is to serve as a case study of environmental racism in California and highlight the harmful impacts of hazardous waste facilities, which are often located in low-income communities of color.

The Exide facility polluted over 10,000 residential properties with lead and arsenic in Southeast Los Angeles, impacting more than 110,000 residents.

It is unacceptable to pollute any community, and it is egregious when the government agencies we rely on to protect us allow facilities to operate deceitfully without complete retribution. This type of misconduct is certainly not the first or last case. However, it is crucial to continue documenting environmental injustice and hold our government agencies accountable.

Please note this timeline is a living document. Please email  linderrmarie@g.ucla.edu  for inquiries on adding new dates and details to the timeline.  

Who is Exide Technologies?

An interactive map of the affected community in South East Los Angeles. On the left hand side, you will find a legend of the number of hazardous waste facilities in different communities. This information is overlaid by the communities living two times below the federal poverty level and who speak English as a second language. You also have the ability to see racial demographic breakout per city. If the shape is difficult to see it is an indication of a small population. If you zoom out, you can look at the rest of Los Angeles and how it compares to the communities surrounding the Exide facility. The simplest way to look at this map is understanding that the bigger the bubble or shape, the more hazardous waste facilities, non-English speaking communities, higher poverty, and type of culture per community. To learn more about these socioeconomic and environmental indicators on an individual level, visit  CalEnviroScreen. 

Exide Technologies (once known as GNB) covered approximately 24 acres and was located on the  northwest corner of Bandini Boulevard and Indiana Street in the City of Vernon .

The treatment facility was a generator of hazardous waste. Its industrial processes included crushing lead-acid batteries, separation of battery materials, components, and smelting of lead.

To better understand the danger posed by incorrectly managing hazardous waste, it is important to understand how the facility operates.

When treating hazardous waste, the first step involves crushing batteries in a hammermill. Battery components including pieces of casing, posts, grids, etc. are transported to a sink/float tank. Sulfuric acid drained from the batteries is clarified (lead oxides and lead sulfates settle out) and is stored for use in the wastewater treatment system (WWTS) as a reagent.

The separated battery components such as metallic lead, lead oxide, lead sulfate pastes, rubber chips, and polypropylene chips are stored separately. The polypropylene chips are washed and blown into truck trailers which would eventually ship to the reclamation facility they worked with, KW Plastics, located in Bakersfield.

The Problem

You will find in the timeline that California regulators let the facility in Vernon operate with only a temporary permit for more than three decades despite repeated violations of air pollution limits and hazardous waste rules.

The plant  shut down permanently in 2015  under a deal between Georgia-based Exide and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. The company, which at the time was undergoing a previous bankruptcy reorganization, admitted to years of environmental crimes  but avoided prosecution  by agreeing to close and pay for the residential and facility cleanup. However, as previously mentioned, there are many homes that have not been cleaned up.

Therefore, a real solution requires a comprehensive overhaul of the state Department of Toxic Substances Control, which has a history of slow response to urgent health threats and poor oversight of hazardous waste facilities. 

Timeline

The GNB Era 1888 - 2000

1888

Exide was founded under the  Electric Storage Battery Company  and has since expanded and changed names several times.

1922

15-acre plant  opens  in Vernon about five miles south of downtown Los Angeles.

1969

Gould Inc. was said to have risen through  William Ylvisaker  who became chief executive in 1969. At the time, they made car batteries, ball bearings, and other engine parts.

1981

California regulators issue Gould Inc. a permit to operate the Vernon battery recycling plant under “ interim status ”.

1970

1982

February 2nd

 Gould sent a letter to the DTSC  requesting delisting to generator status.

1985

July 5th

The facility was sold to a group of Gould executives and became GNB, Inc. Ken Clark, Technical Manager of GNB,  sent a new Part A application to the U.S. EPA .

July 18th

In response to the new Part A application,  Mr. Feeley of the U.S. EPA sent a letter to John Masterman , Permit Coordinator, Department of Health Services, Toxic Substances Division, Sacramento, stating permit applications for secondary lead smelters are not required in California by State or Federal Agencies.

1986

September 3rd

Robert McCormick of the Alternative Technology and Policy Development Section of the Department  wrote a letter  to Chief John Hinton, Facilities Permitting Unit, Toxic Substances Control Division, Los Angeles Region stating that GNB does not need a permit.

1987

May 5th

Greg Holmes and Chong Kim of the DTSC conducted a Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI).  The violations cited were :

- No waste analysis plan;

- No facility inspection log;

- No facility training records;

- Incomplete contingency plan;

- Incomplete operating record;

- No closure plan;

- No closure cost estimate;

- No hazardous waste warning signs; and 

- No accumulation dates on batteries or on battery cases/separators accepted.

September 29th

The  DTSC conducted sampling at GNB . The DTSC’s sampling team consisted of Greg Holmes, Ken Hughes, Tina Roberson, and Tina Mizunoue. High levels of lead and antimony were detected in the unpermitted waste pile.

1989

May 30th

 A Corrective Action and Order for Penalty was issued  to GNB for the violations found in May 5, 1987.

July 7th

 A follow-up inspection was conducted  by Dave Rasmussen and Jerry Lile, DTSC.

August 23rd

August 30th

The  DTSC issued a Directive to Comply Order  directing GNB to cease shipments of polypropylene waste to KW Plastics.

September 1st

A  follow-up inspection  was conducted by Dave Rasmussen.

September 7th

The  DTSC issued a letter to GNB  stating that their polypropylene waste has been found to be hazardous and, therefore, must be managed according to the state laws and regulations.

September 14th

September 26th

The  DTSC issues a letter to GNB  requesting them to cover and clean-up the crucible in the southwest area of the facility.

October 17th

November 17th

1990

May 9th

A  Report of Violations was issued  to GNB covering all the violations found on 7/7, 8/23, 9/1, 9/14, 10/17, and 11/17 of the 1989 inspections.

May 17th

Proposition 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act.  Notice on Prop 65 filed by Dave Rasmussen . Prob 65 requires businesses to provide warnings to Californians about significant exposures to chemicals that cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

June 24th

 California Department of Justice issued a letter to GNB’s counsel  outlining the more serious violations observed during the previous inspections.

September 21st

The  DTSC issued a letter  directing GNB to manage second-run slags and drosses as hazardous waste.

December 6th

1991

February 11th

The  DTSC issued a letter  to KW Plastics stating that the plastic chips received at KW Plastics are hazardous waste and must be managed in compliance with state laws and regulations.

May 23rd

The  DTSC issued a letter to GNB  stating that GNB should be operating according to its Interim Status Document issued in 1981 and limiting the amount of hard rubber casing material placed in the furnace. 

1992

February 11th

A  Compliance Evaluation Investigation was conducted  by Nancy Steele, DTSC. Violations found included storage of batteries at under permitted areas and release of wastewater treatment filter media near the wastewater treatment plant onto the ground during a rainstorm.

April 2nd

 A  Report of Violations was issued  to GNB for violations found on 2/11/92 inspection.

April 27th

GNB responded to the April 2, 1992 Report of Violation. The specific response was not recorded in the DTSC report.

1993

July 19th

The  DTSC issued a Consent Agreement and Order , No. HWCA 93/94-006 to GNB containing all counts for the inspections conducted between May 5, 1987, to October 28, 1992. GNB paid a civil penalty in the amount of $162,500 and agreed to a Corrective Environmental Commitment.

1994

~ 1994

Exide combined all their departments under the Exide name. GNB is an abbreviation for Gould National Batteries and is recognized as a company under Exide.

July 8th

Nancy Carder of the  DTSC conducted a complaint investigation  for alleged illegal disposal of hazardous waste. Levels of lead above the regulatory limits at the exterior southern boundary of the facility were identified as a result of the investigation.

July 27th

A CEI was conducted by Jose Diaz, DTSC. The following violations were cited and subsequently included in the Judgment Order dated 11-15-96: - Unlabeled and improper labeling of HW containers;

- Open and damaged HW containers;

- Illegal storage for longer than a year; 

- HW spills near the wastewater treatment plant;

- Inadequate aisle space;

- Inadequate inspection logs; and 

- Incomplete information on manifests.

1995

 DTSC released a Biennial Report  which outlined GNB output. GNB generated and treated about 2048 lbs. on-site and shipped about 20,000 gallons of lead-bearing sludge off-site. It also generated and treated about 79,636,000 gallons of lead-bearing wastewater on site.

1996

June 21st

 Focused Compliance Investigation Evaluation was conducted  by Razel Trigilio. A Summary of Violations was issued for the following Class I and II violations:

- Improper storage and labeling of damaged lead-acid batteries;

- Inadequate aisle space;

- Inadequate labeling of drums;

- Poor housekeeping; and 

- Inadequate inspection records.

November 15th

The DTSC and GNB  signed a Consent Agreement and Stipulation for Entry of Final Judgement  (Consent Judgment) for civil penalties of $80,000 and implementation of $784,000 worth supplemental environmental projects (Attachment 1). As of this date, the Consent Judgement had not been signed by the Judge of the Supreme Court.

December 11th & 12th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of GNB. Eight violations were noted. The inspection was conducted by DTSC & CalEPA representatives; (1) Kaoru Morimoto, (2) Charito Pinon, (3) Razel Trigilio, and (4) David Stuck. Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervisor under the Statewide Compliance Division. Clear photos included of the facility and violations.

December 11 & 12th 1996 Inspection Photos

DTSC Inspection Photos

1997

April 30th, May 1st, May 2nd

 An inspection by DTSC was conducted of GNB . Ten violations were noted. The inspection was conducted by DTSC & CalEPA representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, Hazardous Substances Scientist (HSS), and (2) Dave Stuck (only May 1st). Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervisor under the Statewide Compliance Division. Photos included of the facility that are blacked out and of poor quality. 

May 1, 1997 DTSC inspection photos.

1998

June 30th, July 1st, July 6th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of GNB. Seven violations were noted. The  inspection  was conducted by DTSC representative; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS. Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervisor under the Statewide Compliance Division. Clear photos included of the facility and violations. 

November 30th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of GNB. Five violations were noted.  Inspection  was conducted by DTSC representative; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS. Mukul Agarwal did not appear to have signed off on the report as the Supervisor under the Statewide Compliance Division. Clear photos included of the facility and violations.

July 7, 1998 Inspection Photos

DTSC Inspection Photos

November 30, 1998 DTSC Inspection Photos

1999

June 30th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of GNB. One violation was noted. The  inspection  was conducted by DTSC representative; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS. Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Statewide Compliance Division. Clear photos included of the facility and violations.

June 30, 1999 Inspection Photos

DTSC Inspection Photos

The Exide Epoch 2000 - 2015

2000

May 10th

The Exide Corporation agrees to take over the plant as part of its acquisition of GNB Technologies.

May 23rd, June 6th, 8th, 12th, and 19th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of GNB. Three violations were noted.  Inspection  was conducted by DTSC representative; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS. Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Hazardous Substances Scientist I under the Statewide Compliance Division, Southern California Branch. Clear photos included of the facility and violations.

June 8, 2000 Inspection Photos

DTSC Inspection Photos

2001

February 27th, March 6th, 12th, and 13th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide. This is the first report that GNB Technologies is referred to as Exide Technologies. Four violations were noted.  Inspection  was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS and (2) Tina Roberson-Holefied, HSS (only on the 27th). Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Statewide Compliance Division, Glendale Office. Clear photos included of the facility and violations. 

March 12, 2001 Inspection Photos

2002

April 16th

Exide files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to restructure its debts and seek protection from any penalties and corrective actions by DTSC.

Inspection Date Unkown

Despite annual inspections conducted at the Exide facility through DTSC, there is no report found on the department's website for 2002. This was cited in  an article  although the department's page did not host the report. This is significant as a violation was cited for 2002.

2003

April 28th, 29th, May 1st, 6th, 9th, and 12th

 An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide . Six violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representative; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS. Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Unit Chief under the Statewide Compliance Division, Southern California Branch. No photos included of the facility and violations. 

2004

May 25th, June 4th, 7th, and 8th

 An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide . Two violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS and (2) Liang Chang, HSE (only on the 25th). Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Unit Chief under the Statewide Compliance Division, Southern California Branch. No photos included of the facility and violations.

2005

May 31st, June 14th, and 16th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide. Nine violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS and (2) Brian Wu, HSS. Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Statewide Compliance Division, Southern California Branch. Dark photos included of the facility and violations that are difficult to identify.

2006

May 30th, June 14th, and 16th

An  inspection by DTSC was conducted  of Exide. Three violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS and (2) Brian Wu, HSS. Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Statewide Compliance Division, Southern California Branch. No photos included of the facility and violations.

2007

June 29th, July 3rd, 5th, and 10th

 An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide . One violation was noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS and (2) Tina Roberson-Holefield, HSS (only June 29 & July 10). Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Enforcement and Emergency Response Program, Glendale Office. Dark photos included of the facility and violations that are difficult to identify.

2008

June 20th

After months of elevated lead emissions,  air quality officials ordered Exide to cut production by almost half . Regulators began investigating after receiving complaints about ash fallout and damage to car rooftops across the street in an industrial area of Vernon.

April 30th, May 2nd, 5th, and June 10th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide. Five violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS, (2) Brian Wu, HSS (only April 30, May 2, May 5), (3) Tina Roberson-Holefield, HSS (only June 10). Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Enforcement and Emergency Response Program, Chatsworth Office. Dark photos included of the facility and violations that are difficult to identify.

April 3th, May 2nd, 5th, and June 10th 2008 Inspection Photos

DTSC Inspection Photos

May 5, 2008

DTSC Inspection Photos

2009

April 29th, May 8th, and 11th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide. Two violations were noted. The Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS, (2) Michael Haynes, Air Quality Inspector from South Coast Air Quality Management District (only April 29), (3) Brian Wu, HSS (only May 8, 11). Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Enforcement and Emergency Response Program, Chatsworth Office. Dark photos included of the facility and violations that are difficult to identify. 

April 29th, Mary 8th & 11th

DTSC Inspection Photos

2010

April 13th, 15th, 22nd, and 28th

An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide. Three violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS, (2) Michael Haynes, Air Quality Inspector from South Coast Air Quality Management District (only April 13), (3) Brian Wu, HSS (attended all inspections). Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Enforcement and Emergency Response Program, Chatsworth Office. Dark photos included of the facility and violations that are difficult to identify. 

April 13th, 15th, 22nd, and 28th

DTSC Inspection Photos

2011

January 6th, March 7th (Sampling); February 28th, March 2nd, 3rd, 7th (Comprehensive Evaluation)

 An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide . Three violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS, (2) Brian Wu, HSS (attended all inspections). Sampling was collected the first two dates to determine if standing water contained lead or other toxic chemicals. Could not locate a signature by Mukul Agarwal on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Enforcement and Emergency Response Program, Chatsworth Office. Dark photos included of the facility and violations that are difficult to identify.

January 6th, March 7th, February 28th, March 2nd, 3rd, 7th Inspection Photos

DTSC Inspection Photos

2012

March 29th, April 2nd, and 4th

 An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide.  Four violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS, (2) Tina Roberson-Holefield, HSS (attended all inspections). Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Enforcement and Emergency Response Program, Chatsworth Office. Dark photos included of the facility and violations that are difficult to identify.

March 29th, April 2nd, & 4th Inspection Photos

Photos from DTSC Inspection.

2013

January

 AQMD explained  that upwards of 250,000 residents in East Los Angeles face a chronic health hazard from lead and arsenic exposure from Exide. 

April 4th, 5th, 8th, 11th, and 12th

 An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide.  Five violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, HSS, (2) Tina Roberson-Holefield, HSS (attended all inspections), (3) Chia Rin Yen, HSS (only April 5). Mukul Agarwal signed off on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Enforcement and Emergency Response Program, Chatsworth Office. Dark and completely blacked out photos included of the facility and violations that are difficult to identify.

April 4th, 4th, 8th, 11th, and 12th 2013 Inspection Photos

Photos from DTSC inspection.

March 24th

 Exide is told to reduce its emissions  after recent tests showed it is posing a danger to as many as 110,000 people living in an area that extends from Boyle Heights to Maywood and Huntington Park. 

June 27th

Bill SB 712 was passed in June 2013.  SB 712 establishes  deadlines for the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) to issue final decisions on a hazardous waste facility operating under an interim status permit. It terminates any interim permit status granted for a hazardous waste facility five years from the date on which the status was granted. Allows DTSC to temporarily suspend the operation of a facility operating under an interim permit in order to protect public health and safety or the environment.

August 27th

 State officials order Exide to begin testing  dust and soil in the neighborhoods around its plant to determine whether dangerous metals have accumulated and are posing a health risk to the community.

September 12th

 The LA County Department of Public Health begins  offering free blood testing for lead poisoning to address worries that the Exide plant has jeopardized the health of more than 110,000 residents in southeast L.A. County.

September 19th

 Air quality regulators order Exide to cut production  after an air monitor revealed lead emissions had exceeded health standards over a 30-day period. 

Protesters rally in October outside Exide Technologies, which has been required to set aside $7.7 million to replace leaking wastewater pipes and further reduce its arsenic emissions. (Christina House / For The Times)

October 30th

Massive march and protests outside Exide. Residents throughout SouthEast and East Los Angeles were in attendance.

December 19th

The state Department of Toxic Substances Control issues  an emergency order  directing Exide to cleanup lead and other metals that have been deposited near the plant.

2014

January 15th

About 50 impacted residents take a bus to Sacramento to push for state officials to provide funding for the community cleanup. Due to this advocacy, they were able to get the governor to provide $176.6M to put toward the cleanup.

March 10th

 Elevated levels of lead are found  in the soil of residential properties and a preschool near the Exide plant in southeast LA County. Officials were prompted to issue health precautions and order expanded testing in additional neighborhoods.

Yesterday both the Superior Court and the AQMD Hearing Board denied Exide's attempts to avoid having to comply with the deadline of April 10th. In Rule 14201 that requires them to operate with negative pressure in order to reduce emissions. In theory, it means Exide can't operate until it can modify the facility to comply with the rule.  CBE Staff Attorney, Maya on April 9, 2014. 

April 9th

 Exide not allowed to resume lead smelting  until it's furnaces can operate in compliance with tough new air district rules on arsenic emissions. 

Jonathan Sanabria participates in a rally outside Exide Technologies, which is the only major hazardous-waste facility in California that has never acquired a full permit. (Christina House / For The Times)

April 14th

In collaboration with Californians for Environmental Justice Alliance and other statewide partners, Communities For A Better Environment co-led a rally in support of AB 1330 Healthy Hoods Action in front of Exide Technologies. Members created a street theatre piece called "La Lucha Libre del Pueblo."

April 29th and June 10th

 An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide.  Four violations were noted. Inspection was conducted by DTSC representatives; (1) Ruth Williams-Morehead, Environmental Scientist (ES), (2) Brian Wu, ES (both days), (3) Ellen Pates, ES (note-taker on the 29th), (4) Tolu Awosika, ES (photographer on the 29th). Sampling was taken on both days. Could not locate a signature by Mukul Agarwal on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Enforcement and Emergency Response Program, Chatsworth Office. No photos of the facility or violations were included.

August 8th

Exide was under federal criminal investigation for emitting high levels of harmful pollutants from its battery recycling plant in Vernon, CA.  Exide receives a grand jury subpoena from the Department of Justice  in the Central District of California in connection with a criminal investigation involving its Vernon, California, recycling facility.  Exide reported this in documents  that were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The subpoena requested documents related to materials transportation and air emissions. This subpoena was targeting Exide and certain unidentified individuals. 

August 11th

 State regulators greatly expand the area of homes,  schools, and parks that will be tested for lead-tainted soil near Exide. Crews begin removing contaminated soil from residential properties in Boyle Heights.

August 22nd

  AB 1330 was amended in the senate  to restrict the ability of chronic violators from receiving hazardous waste permits. The bill also directs DTSC to develop a plan to reduce the generation and disposal of hazardous waste under the guidance of an oversight committee.

September 29th

 Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bil l setting a deadline for the state Department of Toxic Substances Control to either grant Exide a full hazardous-waste permit by the end of 2015 or shut the facility down. The state had allowed the plant to operate for decades with a temporary hazardous waste permit.

October 15th

 Hazardous waste from the facility  dripped from tractor-trailers on public roadways. An environmental inspector called the leaks of acid - and lead-tainted liquid an, “on-going problem” that “needs to be addressed immediately.”

November 6th

 The state orders Exide  to pay for the cleanup of homes and yards contaminated by its battery recycling plant in Vernon. Regulators fine Exide $562,000 for improperly managing hazardous waste.

November 30th

Consideration of Governor's veto dies on file for SB 812. SB 812 was meant to establish a community oversight committee for DTSC along with other reforms.

December 24th

 A complaint for negligence lawsuit filed  at the Superior Court of the State of California County of Los Angeles, Central District, said that  Exide officials willfully endangered  the health of more than 60 children living near the company.

2015

January 20th

 An inspection by DTSC was conducted of Exide . Eleven violations were noted. Inspection was signed off by DTSC representative; (1) Brian Wu, ES. Could not locate a signature by Mukul Agarwal on the report as the Supervising Senior Hazardous Substances Scientist under the Enforcement and Emergency Response Program, Chatsworth Office. No photos of the facility or violations were included.

January 28th

 Exide is cited  for eight new hazardous-waste violations after inspections find the plant was treating and storing contaminated sludge in unauthorized tanks that lacked an adequate containment system to prevent spills. Inspectors also find holes in the facility’s walls and roof, among other problems.

February 9th

Rally to pressure DTSC to deny Exide's permit request. This took place in Maywood.

Communities For A Better Environment Press Release From February 9, 2015.

Vernon Cleanup

March 11th

 Under a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Attorney Office , Exide admitted to nearly two decades of illegal activity and agreed to  permanently close , demolish and clean up the facility. To avoid criminal prosecution for 10 years the agreement entailed payment of $50 million to clean up the site and surrounding neighborhoods.

March 13th

Community gathering and celebration upon the news of Exide's permanent shutdown at a resident's home in Boyle Heights.

Local Battery Recycling Plant Closes In Face Of Criminal Charges

Gladys Limon on the Closure of Exide, a Major Battery Recycling Plant in California - Except

June 24th

 California passed bill SB 83  to establish the assistant director for the environmental justice position at DTSC. SB 83 includes the creation of an independent review panel to advise the department on issues related to the department’s reporting obligations, make recommendations for improving the department’s programs, and advise the department on increasing levels of environmental protection in the department’s programs.

Workers remove topsoil in March from homes in Boyle Heights that may have been contaminated by lead that possibly came from Exide Technologies, a battery recycling plant in Vernon. (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

August 14th

 Soil tests show lead contamination  from the Exide plant extends over a much larger area than previously estimated. The California Department of Toxic Substances announces that it possibly reaches as many as 10,000 residential properties, with the majority being homes up to 1.7 miles away.

Workers remove topsoil from homes in the 1200 block of South Indiana Street in Boyle Heights that may have been contaminated by lead from an Exide Technologies plant in Vernon.(Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

August 18th

 Authorities say  the removal of lead-contaminated soil from 10,000 residential properties near the Exide plant would be the largest cleanup of its kind in California and among the biggest conducted nationwide.

August 19th

 LA County Supervisor Hilda Solis calls for the state  to appoint an independent expert to oversee the cleanup of residential properties near Exide and a commission to investigate exactly what happened and who is responsible. Senate leader Kevin de Leon did not support outside oversight because it would add “more layers of bureaucracy.” 

Community members and activists gather in a backyard of a home east of downtown Los Angeles to celebrate the closure of the Exide Technologies battery recycling plant on March 12.(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times)

August 20th

 California regulators announce a plan  to use $7 million in state money to quickly expand testing and cleanup of lead-contaminated properties surrounding a closed battery recycling plant in Vernon. Residents accuse state officials of being slow to acknowledge the extent of contamination and taking appropriate cleanup measures.

October 8th

 SB 673 was signed into law.  SB 673 requires that DTSC update all its hazardous waste permitting criteria including addressing chronic violators and cumulative impacts and community vulnerability.

October 27th

 LA County supervisors approve  spending $2 million to "speed the removal" of lead from homes and yards near the Exide plant.

Inside the fight to shut down a dangerous polluter

The Aftermath 2016 - Present

2016

February 12th

 Jose Huizar urged state officials and legislature  to accelerate the removal of toxic lead contaminations surrounding the Exide facility. At this point roughly 200/10,000 residential properties had been estimated to be cleaned up at an average cost of about $45k per home.

Cleanup Nowhere Near Finished At Exide Battery-Recycling Facility

February 17th

 Gov. Jerry Brown proposes  spending $176.6 million to accelerate the testing and cleanup of residential properties in Vernon. The Director of Toxic Substances Control, Barbara Lee, stated that the funds would be utilized to test 10,000 homes within 1.7 miles of the closed plant and to remove lead from about 2,500 homes where levels pose the greatest risk of poisoning.

March

 The LA County Department of Public Health completed  its project for lead sampling of 500 properties in Commerce, Maywood, and unincorporated East Los Angeles. The County will no longer conduct lead testing. Notification of test results were hand delivered to residents by nurses and health educators.

Grace Potvin and her grandson Shaun, 2, at home in Commerce. The Potvin home was found to have lead levels requiring cleanup. (Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)

March 26th

 The LA Times reported  that the state of California had blood tests results showing high levels of lead in children living near the Exide plant but still had not been using the information to direct the cleanup of contaminated homes. The Times obtained and analyzed blood test records from the LA County Department of Public Health and found that 547 people under the age of 21 living in the Exide area had high levels of lead in their blood from 2010 to 2014.

Homes near Exide battery plant tested for lead contamination

Glen Van Eekout, an environmental health specialist for the L.A. County health department, collects a soil sample from the front yard of a home in Commerce.(Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)

March 30th

 State officials say  they will begin using data on levels of lead in children’s blood to help focus the massive cleanup of contaminated homes. Public health experts say California regulators directing which neighborhoods have priority in cleanup should use blood testing data in addition to factors such as soil sampling, wind patterns and proximity to the facility.

Environmental health specialists Jaime Jarrett, left, and Glen Van Eekout test the soil from the front yard of a home on Hepworth Avenue in the City of Commerce for possible lead contamination from the now-closed Exide battery plant on Feb. 29. (Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)

April 8th

 The Department of Public Health analysis found  children living near the now closed battery recycling plant had higher levels of lead in their blood by 3.58% than those living farther away.

2017

June 10th

With the support of Supervisor Hilda L. Solis,  the Department of Public Health led  a door-to-door community outreach event to homes within 1.7 miles from the Exide Technologies facility. A health survey was conducted to understand the concerns and needs of residents. Health education materials and resources were also provided.

Reporting in 2017 from LA Times. (Angelica Quintero / @latimesgraphics)

Materials provided to community members with contaminated homes by the Department of Public Health.

Exide Content: Starting at 1:12 and ending at 11:43 minutes.

Dispute Continues Over Cleanup From Exide Battery Recycling Plant

2019

Hilda Solis: Community, Environmental Justice, Health, In the news, Press Release

April 16th

 The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted  to take the necessary steps to launch the Exide Area Lead-Based Paint Hazard Mitigation Program. As part of Los Angeles County’s settlement with SoCalGas over the Aliso Canyon gas leak, LA County Department of Public Health received $5.2 million for the removal of lead-based paint in homes surrounding the Exide battery recycling plan.

May 6th

 USC The Truth Fairy study , lead from babies matched the lead collected from DTSC clean up efforts. Researchers collected 50 baby teeth from 43 children in five communities including Boyle Heights, Maywood, East L.A., Commerce, and Huntington Park. These findings were corroborated through the pairing of samples collected from upper layers of soil on approximately 8,000 properties with unsafe levels of lead. 

USC Truth Fairy Study Findings

2020

October 16th

 Chief Judge Christopher Sontchin of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware allows  Exide to abandon a toxic site in Vernon. The Trump administration, through the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, supported Exide's plan to leave behind toxic sites in several states. Taxpayers will fund the massive cleanup of lead and other toxic pollutants at the site and in surrounding neighborhoods.

We have a very dangerous element that will cause long-term health effects and it takes time to accumulate. I don’t think any of that indicates there’s an imminent, immediate harm to the general public if this property is abandoned.  Chief Judge Christopher Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware  

The legal system is not meant to protect our environmental justice communities, this is an example of an environmental injustice we experience.  Staff Attorney Idalmis Vaquero of Communities for a Better Environment 

Bankruptcy Settlement Allows Exide To Abandon Battery Recycling Plant In Vernon, Leaves State With Cleanup

October 27th

 The Auditor of the State of California submitted  a report that confirmed DTSC was behind on its cleanup efforts. In addition, it was noted that the cost of the cleanup would cost an additional $390 million more than had already been allocated. It was very concerning that 31 areas that hosted children on a daily basis had yet to be cleaned up.

December 7th

 AB-1 was introduced  and would create the Board of Environmental Safety in the California EPA. The bill would provide duties to the board such as reviewing policies, processes, and programs within the hazardous waste control laws. In addition, proposing statutory, regulatory, and policy changes. As well as, hearing and deciding appeals of hazardous waste facility permit decisions.

December 14th

 California sues  former owners and operators of Exide Technologies' Vernon site seeking to hold parties accountable for contamination and cleanup at the former battery recycling facility.

2021

July 13th

 SB 158 was signed  by Governor Newsom. This hazardous waste control law requires that the Department of Toxic Substances Control regulates and handles the management of hazardous waste. A violation of this will be considered a crime. This bill will establish the Board of Environmental Safety in the department to manage activities surrounding the management of hazardous waste at facilities.

June 29th

 The California Legislature passed  SB 158 to create structural changes in DTSC. This budget trailer bill is set to create the first environmental justice advisory board and increase remediation funds and community resources. In addition to developing plans to reduce hazardous waste generation, and add safeguards and guidelines to reduce the backlog of expired permits. 

Present Community Cleanup

Only 3,596 parcels out of 10,000 have been cleaned despite spending approximately $580 MILLION being spent over the course of SEVEN years.

 https://dtsc.ca.gov/residential-cleanup/

DTSC's Pace of Cleanup Infographic.

Looking Toward The Future

How can we prevent history from repeating itself?

  • Push for legislature to require stricter financial assurances that require facilities that pollute to allocate funding for community clean-up after operations halt.
  • DTSC should not allow facilities that fail to comply with environmental laws to continue operating.
  • Inspections of hazardous waste facilities must document infractions utilizing clear photos to provide greater transparency to the public and prevent evidence from being concealed.
  • Encourage land use to be utilized for clean energy facilities or facilities that will support a future with zero-emission vehicles.
  • We are happy and proud to say that bills  SB 712 ,  SB 83,   SB 158 , and  SB 673  have been passed to help prevent public health disasters, such as the Exide case study. We thank all members of the community who helped make these environmental justice strides and we look forward to continuous progress.

Just Transition: People Over Capital

A Just Transition that moves us away from an extractive economy to a regenerative and renewable economy requires systems change. This includes practicing "deep democracy", involving members of the community to participate in the decision-making process surrounding land use. We are building the good by restructuring land use and zoning policies in consultation with those who reside in the community itself. Positive change begins by following leadership from Black, Indigenous, people of color, and low-income communities who have been historically excluded from the decisions that will affect them directly.

A Just Transition leads to real solutions and processes that address historical and generational trauma through intersectional organizing thereby building a movement of movements. This means advocating for local representation, racial justice, and social equity, advancing ecological restoration, and transitioning from an extractive economy of exploitation into a regenerative economy based on building community and healthy environments.

Examples of Just Transition for the former Exide Site:

  •  Listening to community members' needs when considering potential uses that will lead to positive change through the space to the community.
  • Encouraging land use to be utilized for clean energy facilities that will support a future with zero-emission vehicles in a community that experiences higher rates of pollution and fewer job opportunities.
  • Utilizing the location as a training site for future occupational opportunities with zero-emission infrastructure.

A Strategy Framework For Just Transition

We must build a visionary economy that is very different than the one we now are in. This requires stopping the bad while at the same time as building the new. We must change the rules to redistribute resources and power to local communities. Just transition initatives are shifting from dirty energy to energy democracy, from funding highways to expanding public transit, from incinerators and landfills to zero waste, from industrial food systems to food sovereignty, from gentrification to community land rights, from military violence to peaceful resolution, and from rampant destructive democracy in which workers and communities have control over the decisions that affect their daily lives.  Climate Justice Alliance 

Communities For A Better Environment Press Release From February 9, 2015.

Reporting in 2017 from LA Times. (Angelica Quintero / @latimesgraphics)

DTSC's Pace of Cleanup Infographic.

A Strategy Framework For Just Transition