Streetcar rush puts Omaha Bike Network on slippery slope

Big-data and self-reported bike trips in Omaha show gaps in existing infrastructure and potential streetcar conflicts.

This report is a collaboration between the  Social Science Data Lab at Creighton University  and  Mode Shift Omaha .

Key Findings:

1. Comparison of Omaha Bike Network and Streetcar route show over a dozen points of potential conflict, not just along Harney Market to Midtown cycle track pilot.

2. Some of the city areas with high numbers of daily bike trips lack any permanent bike infrastructure, weakening east-west active mobility. Connecting the most active areas likely means needing to plan for safely traversing the streetcar route.


Streetlight LBS and Strava maps both show lack of permanent infrastructure despite frequent bike trips across streecar service territory

Mapping the relative frequency of bike trips in 2021 highlights the lack of E-W on-street bike infrastructure connecting downtown with Blackstone district, the University of Nebraska Omaha and Medical Center, and Aksarben district. Darker zones indicate higher numbers of average daily bike trips originating there. Purple dotted lines indicate wayfinding routes in the Omaha Bike Network and solid lines painted bike lanes. No bikelanes connect the most active biking zones east of 33rd St. and no wayfinding route exists along the development corridor slated for streetcar development. The wayfinding path east-west on Burt is undergoing a multi-year closure due to construction on Creighton's campus without any detour. If the Harney Market-to-Midtown cycle track is removed there will be no functioning E-W on-street infrastructure north of St. Marys.

 Streetlight data  for bike trips in 2021 is estimated based on a sample of location data for 164,000 trips recorded by 33,000 mobile devices, .e.g cellphones between April and October. This data comes from many types of sources, not exercise or biking apps, and so is more likely to measure a variety of rider types.

When looking at a different source of bike trip data the same pattern is visible.

 Strava data , on the right, are bike trips recorded on devices of app users in Omaha through all of 2021 (70,000+) and offer additional evidence of the area demand served by the Harney cycle track and still underserved further west along Farnam.


Despite promises to support "total mobility" Streetcar documents insufficiently address cycling infrastructure

The Streetcar Authority's  Alignment Recomendation Executive Summary  published Sept. 8 acknowledges that "[o]perating the streetcar on Harney near a cycle track would have potential conflicts between modes. A cycle track could be explored on another route, but there are not many alternative options for crossing Interstate 480." However, in contrast to the systematic consideration of impacts to vehicular traffic and pedestrian crossing conflicts, there is no consideration of how the route will interact with  city's current official bike network  beyond the Harney cycle track pilot. Yet, there are well over a dozen additional points of intersection and potential mode conflict. The map below shows these points of potential conflict. Bike infrastructure is illustrated in purple with a dotted line indicating the wayfinding for Omaha Bike Network and solid lines indicating painted bikelanes and the cycle track. Green traces the proposed streetcar route. Brighter teal zones indicate higher average daily bike trips according to the Streetlight data.

 A Portland Streetcar Safety video  warns of the dangers to cyclists.

Bikes ideally cross tracks at a 90 degree angle, and research suggests any shallower than 60 degrees increases the risk of accident (Chiccino et al 2020; Ling, Cherry, Dhakal 2017). The tour of intersections below illustrates a number of complex crossings of the proposed route with the Omaha Bike Network.

Second-best design forced by route constraints preventing wider-angle crossing from Ling, Cherry, Dhakal 2017 p.62

At Turner and 14th Street along Harney visualizations of actual bike traffic pathways detected by Numina sensors installed as part of a grant in May through June provide an indication of relative challenges in avoiding shallow angle encounters.

1

Wayfinding Route crosses Streetcar Route

2

Wayfinding Route crosses Streetcar Route

3

Cycletrack intersects Streecar Route

Numina Sensor "heatmap" of bicycle crossing pathways from SE corner of Harney and Turner May-July 2022.

4

Cycletrack runs parallel with Streetcar Route

5

Wayfinding Route crosses Streetcar Route

6

Wayfinding Route crosses Streetcar Route

7

Bikelane crosses Streetcar Route

8

Bikelane crosses Streetcar Route

Numina Sensor "heatmap" of bicycle crossing pathways from SE corner of Harney and 14th May-July 2022

9

Bikelane intersects Streetcar Route

10

Bikelane crosses Streetcar Route

11

Wayfinding Route crosses Streecar Route 3 ways

This wil be a potentially difficult intersection to ensure 90 degree crossings

12

Wayfinding Route runs parallel to Streetcar Route

13

Wayfinding Route intersects Streetcar Route

14

Cycletrack and Wayfinding Route both intersect Streecar Route

15

Multiple Wayfinding and Streetcar Route intersections

16

Wayfinding Route runs parallel to Streetcar Route


Overcoming a decade of lost ambition

In addition to the Streetcar Authority's warning of conflict between modes on Harney, Omaha community members have also raised  examples of problems encountered by other cities  in safely designing streetcar infrastructure in relation to cycling.

However, the original 2011 vision for the cycle track is very similar to Vision Zero best practices, while an artist rendering  released by the Omaha Chamber  and HDR depicts what safety research indicates are worst practices (street parking and a shared lane with tracks) (Chiccino et al 2020, Teschke et al 2016).

The original vision for a cycle track is compatible with Vision Zero best practices (left), whereas design visions released so far by Omaha Chamber and HDR (right) depict a combination of the most dangerous conditions identified by researchers (street parking, bikes share lane with tracks, etc.) (Chiccino et al 2020, Teschke et al 2016).

"On major streets with no bike infrastructure... those without parked cars had less than half the odds of track-involved crashes. ... Protected intersections [ that direct two-stage left turns ], cycle tracks and designated rail rights of way all follow the Swedish “Vision Zero” transport safety principle: acknowledging the inevitability of human error and providing route designs that minimize its consequences...They would prevent most of the track-involved injury scenarios observed in this study." (Teschke et al 2016, p.8-9).

While Teschke et al emphasize infrastructure predictors of crashes over rider characteristics, it is worth noting their findings also suggest that users of rentable bikes and scooters would be at significantly higher risk as less experienced or informed about the dangers of the tracks.  Although many documents referenced on the  official Streetcar Authority page  are not made available, none of those available indicate systematic consideration of integration with bike infrastructure in the same way pedestrian crossings are being considered.


Policy Recommendations:

1. Require Streetcar Design to follow Vision Zero best practices from the beginning 2. Financing for implementation of Vision Zero design features should be provided through the bonds issued for the streetcar, not left to philanthropy 3. Delay development if necessary to fully incorporate the forthcoming Vision Zero and Active Mobility Master plans

Designing a streetcar system based on Vision Zero principles the City has committed to for both pedestrians and cyclists should be financed as part of the cost of the project overseen by the Authority from the beginning, not left to be addressed after the fact by the City or philanthropy. City council has experienced difficulties in convincing the Mayor's office to allocate city budget resources toward these priorities in the past.

The rush for the library property/streetcar deal has already had  severe consequences on the Omaha Public Library system . City council can use it's authority to help ensure the "total mobility system" doesn't suffer the same fate.


Appendix- cycle track timeline

2010

The City's of Omaha's first bike lanes are striped.  Environment Element of the Master Plan adopted  calling for: 200 miles of on-street bike infrastructure 30% reduction in transportation-related GHG emissions

2017

Harney cycle track quietly deleted from Capital Improvement Plan budget

2020

-Privately funded pilot for 2 protected bike lanes announced, including Harney and Burt St. -Chamber of Commerce publishes ConnectGO transportation goals -MAPA releases Long Range Transportation Plan

2021

Market to Midtown cycle track Pilot begins (second pilot on Burt canceled due to lack of private funds)  Mayor Stothert vetoes City Council Amendment to publicly fund Harney Bikeway 

2022

Chamber of Commerce launches proposal for  Urban Core development  including streetcar and network of bikeways and trails  Metro Smart Cities and Bike Walk Nebraska official cycle track pilot evaluation  reports success according to City Council resolution criteria  Mayor indicates veto of second City Council resolution supporting permanent cycle track 

Current status

12 years after 2010 adoption of Environmental Element of City Masterplan: *Transportation-related per-capita emissions  increased 20%  out of 30% reduction goal *13 miles of on-street bike lanes (40 total miles of wayfinding network) out of 200 mile goal

2023

Council approval of Complete Streets Design Guide and incorporation into the Master Plan? Completion of the City's Active Mobility Master Plan for a more complete and connected citywide network active mobility travel modes in Omaha? Completion of the City's Vision Zero Action Plan? Will these be too late to influence Streetcar Design?

Streetlight and Numina Data provided by SPIN Mobility Data for Safer Streets Grant. Thanks as well to the City of Omaha for facilitating data collection through the grant and Strava Metro for access to their platform.

Cicchino, Jessica B., Melissa L. McCarthy, Craig D. Newgard, Stephen P. Wall, Charles J. DiMaggio, Paige E. Kulie, Brittany N. Arnold, and David S. Zuby. 2020. “Not All Protected Bike Lanes Are the Same: Infrastructure and Risk of Cyclist Collisions and Falls Leading to Emergency Department Visits in Three U.S. Cities.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 141:105490. doi:  10.1016/j.aap.2020.105490 .

Ling, Ziwen, Christopher R. Cherry, and Nirbesh Dhakal. 2017. “Factors Influencing Single-Bicycle Crashes at Skewed Railroad Grade Crossings.” Journal of Transport & Health 7:54–63. doi:  10.1016/j.jth.2017.01.004 .

Teschke, Kay, Jessica Dennis, Conor C. O. Reynolds, Meghan Winters, and M. Anne Harris. 2016. “Bicycling Crashes on Streetcar (Tram) or Train Tracks: Mixed Methods to Identify Prevention Measures.” BMC Public Health 16(1):617. doi:  10.1186/s12889-016-3242-3 .

 A Portland Streetcar Safety video  warns of the dangers to cyclists.

Second-best design forced by route constraints preventing wider-angle crossing from Ling, Cherry, Dhakal 2017 p.62