The Glacier - Climate Connection

Building on the past to inform the future: The USGS Benchmark Glacier Project delivers science to a world adapting to rapid glacier loss

A scientist measures a snow depth stake near a crevasses on Wolverine Glacier, Sept. 2017.

USGS Benchmark Glacier Project

 Mountain glaciers are melting faster than the Greenland or Antarctic ice sheets ( Huggonet and others, 2021 ). This loss of ice has consequences that extend far beyond mountain landscapes, impacting ecosystems and humans on every continent. The repercussions of mountain glacier loss include changes to global sea level ( Zemp and others, 2019 ), which will cost coastal communities more than a trillion dollars by 2100 ( Neumann and others, 2015 ) and  freshwater delivery to rivers and oceans , which will affect millions of people living downstream who rely on those rivers for irrigation and drinking water ( Milner and others, 2017 ).

The  U.S. Geological Survey Benchmark Glacier Project  is one of the longest running studies of glaciers on Earth.  For over six decades, this project has coordinated intensive glacier field research to better understand the physics that control a glacier's behavior, the connections between climate and glaciers, and downstream impacts of glacier loss ( O'Neel and others, 2019 ).


Take a look at these examples of glacier change. What differences do you see?

A black and white photo from 1910 shows Grinnell Glacier covering the entire glacier basin
A photo taken in 2016 shows two small glaciers and a turquois lake, where once there was a large glacier covering the entire basin

Click and drag the center slider to reveal changes in Grinnell Glacier from 1910 to 2016 1910 (Elrod, U of M Archives) - 2016 (McKeon, USGS)

 Now, at a time when glaciers are changing rapidly, the long-term data and ongoing efforts of the USGS Benchmark Glacier Project provide key scientific insight that can inform sea level and water resource management strategies.  

Since the mid-1950s, the USGS Benchmark Glacier Project has documented changes at five glaciers located between 48° N in the U.S. Northern Rockies and 63° N in the Arctic.

Image: South Cascade Glacier, Sept. 2015.

A scientist stands on a rocky outcrop with South Cascade Glacier in the background.

Glacier change is the sum result of multiple years of response to atmospheric conditions, or  climate . Each of the five mountain glaciers studied represents a distinct climate region in Western North America. This diversity allows scientists to tease apart complex regional climate conditions that impact glaciers ( O'Neel and others, 2019 ).

Image: Weather station at Wolverine Glacier measures site-specific climate parameters at regular intervals. Sept. 4, 2015.

Weather station equipment on ridgetop with Wolverine Glacier in background.

Measurements of glacier mass balance (gain or loss of snow and ice) track seasonal and year-to-year change as each glacier responds to winter snow accumulation and summer melt. This provides a close-up look at the connection between glaciers and climate.

Image: Scientist prepares to extract a snow core on Wolverine Glacier, Sept. 2018.

Scientist uses a snow core drill to take a density measurement of Wolverine Glacier, 2015.

Combining field measurements with remote sensing (satellite) technologies and big data processing capabilities, the project is now positioned to deliver regional estimates of glacier change.

Satellite image showing the extent of South Cascade Glacier on October 14, 2015 (cyan line) and August 8, 1958 (green line). Data from  McNeil and others, 2019 

Background Image: Satellite view of South Cascade Glacier terminus, Aug. 17, 2015. (@2015 DigitalGlobe Next View License)

The USGS Benchmark Glacier network is contained within North America, but findings empower scientific discovery that applies to glaciated mountain systems around the world.

Image: Scientists look for an ablation stake on Lemon Creek Glacier, Sept. 17, 2021.


Glaciers Have Far-Reaching Impacts

Glaciers are more than melting icons of climate change. What are the biological and ecological services that glaciers provide? Why is glacier loss relevant to human society?

Examples of local, regional and global impacts to humans and the environment resulting from glacier loss, such as water availability, sea level change and ocean circulation impacts.

Examples of the impacts of glacier loss at local, regional and global levels. USGS.

As reservoirs of frozen fresh water, glaciers are a key component of mountain ecosystems, sustaining species adapted to cold-water habitats ( Fell and others, 2017 ). Glaciers provide human services too, including drinking water, irrigation, hydroelectric power, and recreation ( Milner and others, 2017 ).

Examples of the connections between glaciers, ecosystems and society: (photo 1) infrastructure damage from sea level rise, (photo 2) hydroelectric power and water availability from glacial-fed reservoirs, (photo 3) recreation opportunities, (photo 4) species threatened by reduced streamflow such as Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) , (photo 5) drinking water availability.

As climate warming speeds glacier loss, additional glacier meltwater alters the hydrologic cycle and sometimes creates environmental hazards, including outburst flooding ( Carrivick and Tweed, 2016 ). Glacier retreat has additional impacts to tourism and mountain recreation.

Mountain glacier melt contributes to changes in sea level around the world ( Zemp and others, 2019 ), impacting tens of millions of people who live along coastlines. Amplified stormsurges, high tides, coastal erosion, and wetland loss, are consequences of sea level rise.

Diagram depicting the multiple ways that glaciers impact Alaska's coastal ecosystems such as supporting fisheries, providing bioavailable carbon, creating habitat and helping to drive the Alaska Coastal Current.

"From Icefield to Ocean graphic" illustrates the important linkages between Alaskan glaciers and the coastal ecosystem.


Discovery Grounded in Diversity

For decades, key glaciers across western North America have been closely monitored. These consistent field measurements have provided valuable “benchmarks” to understand the linkages between glaciers and climate, ecosystem, and hydrology.

  • Benchmark Glaciers

    • Gulkana Glacier, AK
    • Wolverine Glacier, AK
    • Lemon Creek Glacier, AK
    • South Cascade Glacier, WA
    • Sperry Glacier, MT

Location of the five USGS Benchmark Glaciers. Click on black pins to learn more about each glacier. ( O'Neel and others, 2019 )

USGS Glacier monitoring began with mass balance measurements at South Cascade Glacier (WA) in 1958. The project then expanded to Gulkana and Wolverine Glaciers (AK) in 1966 and Sperry Glacier (MT) in 2005. Close collaboration with the  Juneau Ice Field Research Program  (JIRP) yields mass balance measurements at Lemon Creek Glacier (AK) since 1953.

These five USGS Benchmark Glacier sites span mid- to high-latitudes, providing a broad sample of glacier response to climate across the continent.  The sites also represent two kinds of  alpine  glaciers, cirque glaciers and valley glaciers, representing different stages of glacier retreat.


USGS Benchmark Glacier Tour

Click on the arrow on the right to learn about each Benchmark Glacier.

Gulkana Glacier

Gulkana Glacier (AK) is a valley glacier situated in high latitude, continental climate. Relative to other glaciers in Alaska, the Benchmark Glaciers are small. 

Image: Gulkana Glacier, Sept. 2, 2016.

Gulkana Glacier area change, from 1957 - 2016 based on aerial and satellite imagery. Axis numbers identify North (y-axis) and East (x-axis) UTM coordinates. ( McNeil and others, 2019 )

Gulkana Glacier fills a valley between rocky peaks

Lemon Creek Glacier

Lemon Creek Glacier (AK) is a valley glacier situated in high latitude, maritime climate.

Image: Lemon Creek, Sept. 17, 2021.

Lemon Creek Glacier area change, from 1948 - 2018 based on aerial and satellite imagery. Axis numbers identify North (y-axis) and East (x-axis) UTM coordinates. ( McNeil and others, 2019 )

A person carrying a large backpack stands on a glacier with rocky peaks in the distance

Wolverine Glacier

Wolverine Glacier (AK) is a valley glacier situated in high latitude, maritime climate.

Image: Wolverine Glacier, Sept. 4, 2015.

Wolverine Glacier area change, from 1950 - 2019 based on aerial and satellite imagery. Axis numbers identify North (y-axis) and East (x-axis) UTM coordinates. ( McNeil and others, 2019 )

Two small figures walk along an expanse of glacier ice near Wolverine Glacier's terminus.

Sperry Glacier

Sperry Glacier (MT) is a small cirque glacier situated in mid-latitude continental climate. As a cirque glacier, ice mass loss at Sperry Glacier is buffered by shading along the headwall and snow deposition from wind and avalanches. 

Image: Sperry Glacier, Sept. 25, 2015.

Sperry Glacier area change, from 1950 - 2014 based on aerial and satellite imagery. Axis numbers identify North (y-axis) and East (x-axis) UTM coordinates. ( McNeil and others, 2019 )

South Cascade Glacier

South Cascade Glacier (WA) is a valley glacier situated in mid-latitude maritime climate. As the glacier retreats up the valley, the shape and physics of the glacier change as it eventually morphs into a cirque glacier.

Image: South Cascade Glacier, Oct. 2, 2017.

South Cascade Glacier area change, from 1958 - 2015 based on aerial and satellite imagery. Axis numbers identify North (y-axis) and East (x-axis) UTM coordinates. ( McNeil and others, 2019 )

All five benchmark glaciers are responding to warming climate. However, glacier response across the five sites is not synchronous or uniform due to site specific factors that can buffer or hasten ice loss ( Florentine and others, 2020 ).

Image: Scientists ski between mass balance survey points on South Cascade Glacier, June 7, 2022.

The Benchmark Glacier Project tracks glacier response to climate change across various stages of life (time) and various climate regimes (space). 


Blue-grey jagged glacier ice

Seracs (fins of ice) and crevasses (deep blue cracks) in the Wolverine Glacier icefall, June 29, 2014.


Research at the Glacier Scale

Graph displaying annual mass balance data and the trend of glacier loss for each of the 5 benchmark glaciers

Results of glacier mass balance at the five benchmark glaciers shows a trend in glacier loss for all glaciers. USGS

The Benchmark Glaciers have been monitored for decades. To maximize the scientific value of these long-studied glaciers, the USGS Benchmark Glacier Project reanalyzed the data and consolidated field practices and data processing among the five sites in 2019. ( O'Neel and others, 2019 ).

Graphic: Cumulative mass balance (net gain or loss of snow over one year) for each USGS Benchmark Glacier. Despite occasional positive years, the overall trend indicates glacier loss for all glaciers.

Experimentation with early survey methods on these glaciers evolved into some of the standard practices used today in glaciology.  

Image: Sperry Glacier at the end of the summer melt season. The ablation stake held by the researcher was placed upright through meters of snow the previous spring. The horizontal length of the stake shows how much snow and ice has melted from this site since it was placed. Sept. 26, 2021.

Scientist holds a long measurement stake representing many feet of snow melted since being installed on Sperry Glacier the previous spring.

In addition to closely  monitoring seasonal and annual changes  in mass balance, these glaciers have been the hub of research focused on physical glacial processes, including how glaciers form and flow, erode rocks, influence nearby stream water, and react to changes in climate. 

Image: A scientist skis to the weather station on Wolverine Glacier, Dec. 14, 2021.

Scientist skis toward weather station equipment with large backpack

For example, early research at South Cascade Glacier contributed to the understanding of how water flows through snow and under the glacier ( Fountain and Walder, 1998 ).

Image: Tracer is added to glacier runoff to document sub-glacial flow on Wolverine Glacier, Aug. 17, 2016.

Scientist pours white liquid into stream on a glacier to trace the water as it percolates through the glacier 

Ongoing Glacier Scale Research

Maintaining the Mass Balance Record

Direct measurement of mass balance at the five benchmark glaciers track the  annual cycle of accumulation and loss  across the glacier surface, essentially taking the pulse of the glacier’s health. 

Collection of mass balance data includes: (photo 1) scientist locates and records snow level on ablation stake, (photo 2) snow pit is dug to the glacier surface and sampled from top to bottom, (photo 3) wedge-cutter samples from snow pit are weighed to obtain snow density, (photo 4) results are recorded in field notebook, (photo 5) snow corer is used to obtain snow samples as an alternative to digging a snow pit, (photo 6) snow core samples are cut in sections to weigh to obtain snow density, (photo 7) layers within snow core samples are measured and recorded.

Maintaining the Benchmark Glacier Project involves visiting each glacier twice every year, to measure snow depth and density in the spring, and to measure melt in the fall, across each glacier’s elevation range.

This work requires scientists skilled in glacier travel. Site visits are labor-intensive, but provide a detailed record of each glacier’s response to climate and geographic factors that that cannot be replaced by remote sensing or modeling approaches to understanding glacier behavior. 

Image: Scientists record snow density measurements at a snow pit on Gulkana Glacier, April 30, 2020.

Two scientists and an assortment of measurement devices, shovels, and a snowmobile surround a snowpit where one scientist is recording data in a notebook.

Use of identical methods across all USGS Benchmark Glacier sites allows for the comparison of apples to apples across the different glacier settings.

Video: Scientists use a wedge cutter to collect snow samples on Gulkana Glacier. Each sample is weighed to determine the density of the snowpack on the glacier, a necessary measurement for calculating mass balance. April 4, 2019, USGS.

 Climate Connections 

High elevation weather stations are maintained near the glacier margins. They provide complementary weather data to assess how local climate influences glacier change. 

Image: USGS scientist adds new sensors to the weather station on Gulkana Glacier, April 30, 2020.

Firn Evolution   

To calculate glacier mass balance, scientists must know the density of snow and ice. However, glaciers are comprised of not only ice, which has a known density, and snow, which has density that can vary, but also firn, which is the transitional material between snow on the surface and the glacier ice below. Firn density is less than that of glacier ice, but more than that of snow. Furthermore, the thickness of the firn layer varies across the glacier. Scientists with the USGS Benchmark Glacier Project are working to understand the density of firn, the final puzzle piece needed to provide the best estimate of mass balance possible.

Image: Layers within a segment of a Wolverine Glacier snow core show how density varies in the snow. May 13, 2016.

USGS scientists measure firn density and track the thickness of firn below the glacier surface. Additional instrumentation tracks the temperature of the firn throughout the year and is used to understand the evolution of firn density through compaction and potential freezing of surface melt water.

Image: A snow core is weighed and measured to support firn evolution studies on Wolverine Glacier, Sept. 2018 .

Refining mass balance calibration

At Wolverine Glacier, scientists are quantifying mass balance with geophysical techniques, including ground penetrating radar ( GPR ) and  LiDAR  data collected during intensive field campaigns.  While not feasible to undertake each year or at regional scale, the data is used to provide corroborating information on snow accumulation and ice melt, to complement mass balance estimates derived from the traditional stake method.

Image: Scientists set up ground penetrating radar equipment on Wolverine Glacier, April 23, 2015.

Such analysis helps scientists refine their methods to continually improve the accuracy and understand the uncertainties of their mass balance estimates, which are crucial to translating these data on glacier loss into actionable information for water resource management.   

Image:  Scientist takes a repeat phase-sensitive radio-echo-sounding system measurement to study firn compaction, May 24, 2021.

Time lapse video showing the installation of ablation stakes using a steam drill at South Cascade Glacier, June 16,2022.

(Including some interesting ice worm activity in the foreground!)


Research at the Regional Scale

In the past, state of the art technology was limited to direct glaciological measurements – digging snow pits and installing  ablation stakes  – and using surveyor's tools. Technological advances over the ensuing decades provide an assortment of techniques which broaden the project’s perspective.

A scientist probes the glacier surface with a long pole next to a stake used to measure snow depth on the glacier surface

Image: Long measurement poles are used to probe snow depth around an ablation stake on Wolverine Glacier, June 3, 2016.

High-resolution photographs taken from satellites in space (a type of  remote sensing ) and methods for generating regional elevation maps (digital elevation models) enable comprehensive ice elevation surveys and calculation of glacier volume change. By comparing glacier surface elevation between different years, scientists determine the loss of water in relation to climate records, linking climate to glacier change across regional scales.  

Image: Satellite image of glaciers near the central region of Glacier National Park, MT. USDA image, August 27, 2005.

Color satellite image showing several glaciers and surrounding mountainous landscape of Glacier National Park, Montana, USA.

Ongoing Regional Scale Research

Regional Analysis

Using repeat imagery from satellites and aircraft, scientists are analyzing glacier change across  Glacier National Park  (GNP), Montana.  This effort will help resource managers plan for ecosystem and hydrologic changes in this UNESCO  World Heritage Site .  Scientists will then scale up, applying techniques honed for GNP, to analyze regional glacier change in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) and Alaska.

Image: Glacier margin perimeter and area are determined by aerial photo analysis. Historic (1966) and contemporary (2015) images of Grinnell Glacier, GNP, show how the glacier shape and size have changed.  USGS Data 

Side by side aerial images of Grinnell Glacier showing glacier loss between the years 1966 and 2015


Contributing to Global Studies

South Cascade, Gulkana, Wolverine and Lemon Creek Glaciers have the longest continuous mass balance records in the United States and are among the 40 longest in the world. As world ‘reference’ glaciers, they are among the sites included in the World Glacier Monitoring Service’s internationally coordinated  glacier monitoring network , which tracks global glacier change as a resource for the  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change  (IPCC) and climate scientists across the globe. Tracking these glaciers for decades has helped scientists unravel how glaciers respond to climate, which in turn helps policy makers prepare for glacier loss as the climate continues to warm. 

Images: The USGS Benchmark Glacier Project advances the understanding of the climate - glacier connection as it applies to mountain glaciers around the world. (photo 1) Scientist carrying a steam drill, en-route to install a new ablation wire on Wolverine Glacier, Sept. 7, 2018, (photo 2) Alpinglow on peaks surrounding Wolverine Glacier, Dec. 21, 2021, (photo 3) Scientist measuring ablation wire on Wolverine Glacier, Sept. 7, 2018. USGS images

Decades of Discovery

Since benchmark glacier monitoring began in 1958, these glaciers have been a hub of field research, yielding hundreds of scientific publications relating to how glaciers work and how glaciers are impacted by climate.

In particular, a reanalysis of benchmark glacier data between 1983-2017 ( O’Neel and others, 2019 ) provides insight regarding how climate and regional factors influence glacier change:

  • All five Benchmark glaciers lost ice mass since the start of measurements  
  • Increased summer warming is the primary cause of glacier loss 
  • Elevation, shading, wind, avalanches, and glacier surface features influence melt rates 
  • Preexisting ice thickness and distribution of ice across elevation control glacier retreat 
  • Continentality (distance from the coast) impacts glacier loss more than latitude 

Informing the Future

Scientist holds long ablation stakes while skiing on a glacier

Image: Scientist holds ablation stakes used to measure the change in snow depth on Gulkana Glacier, April 25, 2019.

Continuous research endeavors lasting decades such as the USGS Benchmark Glacier Project are rare. The project’s value has been newly invigorated by the imperative to understand the physics that control glacier response to climate in our warming world. Researchers have honed glaciological methods to track the changing benchmark glaciers with consistent field measurements and produce intercomparable results. Innovation in remote sensing techniques have broadened the project’s scope by providing the means to calculate glacier change across regions, leading to improved understanding of the utility of the benchmark glacier datasets in regional assessments of changes. Sixty years into its history, this project will continue its monitoring legacy to reveal the physics that govern glacier response to climate and the resultant downstream impacts of glacier change. This information will provide resources managers and decision-makers what they need when considering the ecologically important resource of dynamic ice.

 


Click and drag the center slider to reveal changes from 1908 to 2015 at Sperry Glacier, one of the USGS Benchmark Glaciers 1908 (Leibig, GNP Arvchives) - 2015 (Clark, USGS)

Resources

USGS Glacier Websites

USGS Glacier Factsheets

Outside Resources

Resources for Educators

Comparison of two aerial photos of Gulkana Glacier, taken in 1967 and 2016, show that the glacier has melted and has a different shape in the 2016 image.

Photo comparison shows mass loss during the first 49 years of the Benchmark Glacier Project at Gulkana Glacier.


All photographs by U.S. Geological Survey unless otherwise noted

Disclaimer: Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 

Geo-narrative created by Lisa McKeon and Caitlyn Florentine, USGS Benchmark Glacier Project

August 2022

Click and drag the center slider to reveal changes in Grinnell Glacier from 1910 to 2016 1910 (Elrod, U of M Archives) - 2016 (McKeon, USGS)

Examples of the impacts of glacier loss at local, regional and global levels. USGS.

"From Icefield to Ocean graphic" illustrates the important linkages between Alaskan glaciers and the coastal ecosystem.

Seracs (fins of ice) and crevasses (deep blue cracks) in the Wolverine Glacier icefall, June 29, 2014.

Results of glacier mass balance at the five benchmark glaciers shows a trend in glacier loss for all glaciers. USGS

Image: Long measurement poles are used to probe snow depth around an ablation stake on Wolverine Glacier, June 3, 2016.

Image: Scientist holds ablation stakes used to measure the change in snow depth on Gulkana Glacier, April 25, 2019.

Click and drag the center slider to reveal changes from 1908 to 2015 at Sperry Glacier, one of the USGS Benchmark Glaciers 1908 (Leibig, GNP Arvchives) - 2015 (Clark, USGS)

Photo comparison shows mass loss during the first 49 years of the Benchmark Glacier Project at Gulkana Glacier.

Satellite image showing the extent of South Cascade Glacier on October 14, 2015 (cyan line) and August 8, 1958 (green line). Data from  McNeil and others, 2019