Managing woody plant expansion in native grasslands

Integrating GIS and remote sensing

Worldwide, natural grasslands are threatened by the expansion of unwanted woody plant species. This also holds for Canada; a Saskatchewan rancher who wrote to us said: “When my grandfather came over 100 years ago, there was not a tree that could stop a plow. This piece of land today is 70% covered in trees and bushes”. Woody plant encroachment (WPE) has become the second most important process that leads to grassland loss in the Great Plains Biome (Working Lands for Wildlife, 2022), affecting the food industry, the economy, and the environment. For grassland management practices to be effective, accurate monitoring of grassland health is important. The advantages of using GIS and remote sensing data to achieve this goal are many: large-scale coverage, near-real time monitoring, cost-efficiency, consistency, and visualization attributes (Soubry et al., 2021).


Goal

In a literature review that we conducted, we found that there is no universal remotely sensed WPE monitoring framework available (Soubry & Guo, 2022). Therefore, the objectives of this study are:

  1. to explore remote sensing and GIS approaches for appropriate detection of WPE in grasslands,
  2. to investigate factors that are influencing WPE using spatial analysis, and
  3. to identify areas most vulnerable to WPE to enable better land management practices.

Our study areas include native prairie regions in the Moist Mixed, Mixed grassland, and Cypress Upland ecoregions of Saskatchewan (SK) (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Map of study areas in grasslands of Saskatchewan, Canada  (Soubry et al., 2022; Soubry & Guo, 2021a)


What I did

The steps followed for each objective are summarized in the flow chart below (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Methods flow chart

For the first objective, I collected field data (vegetation cover, plant area index, soil moisture, vegetation reflectance, and biomass) in my first study areas (Kernen Prairie, Saskatchewan (SK)) and identified the optimal season and spectral regions to estimate shrub cover in grasslands. Detailed information can be found in Soubry and Guo (2021a).

I also looked a the seasonal spectral separation between two common shrub species found in Saskatchewan; (a) Western Snowberry (Symphoricarpos occidentalis), an (b) Wolfwillow (Elaeagnus commutata (personal collection). More detailed information can be found in Soubry and Guo (2021b)

For my second objective, I used 30 cm aerial imagery from 2018 to quantify the distribution of shrub cover with an object-based approach in Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park (CHIPP), West Block, Saskatchewan. A shrub cover map was generated, and GIS was used to investigate the relationship between shrub cover and topo-edaphic and anthropogenic variables (Table 1). More details can be found in Soubry et al. (2022).

Category

Layers

Source

Topo-edaphic

Landscape Unit, Rangeland Ecosite, Topography

2018 CHIPP Forest Inventory

Topo-edaphic

Elevation, Slope, Aspect

Saskatchewan Geospatial Imagery Collaborative

Topo-edaphic

Soil Moisture Regime

2018 CHIPP Forest Inventory

Topo-edaphic

Distance from waterbodies, wetlands, and watercourses

Government of Canada, National Topographic Data Base, Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport (Saskatchewan, Canada)

Anthropogenic

Grazing Intensity

2020 Fieldwork conducted by Ms. Larissa Robinov and myself, and from interviews with Mrs. Melody Nagel-Hisey and Mr. Kevin Redden (Park Managers)

Anthropogenic

Distance from roads

Ministry of Parks, Culture and Sport (Saskatchewan, Canada)

Anthropogenic

Haying impact

Provided by Ministry of Parks, Culture & Sports – reviewed by Mrs. Melody Nagel-Hisey

Table 1 Variables used to model their relationship to shrub cover in CHIPP

To examine the relationship between the variables in Table 1 and shrub cover in the park, I developed multiple models that combined variables related to topography and soil, anthropogenic influences, and a mixture of both. A simple ordinary least square regression was used to examine these relationships, and spatial autocorrelation in the residuals of each model were accounted for.

For objective 3, eight priority parameters related to high shrub cover in the park were selected based on the models’ results. I conducted feature overlay analysis of these priority parameters in ArcMap to get a feature overlay count, which was then translated into management priority classes, and a management priority map was created.


What I found

From objective 1, I found that spring was the best season to distinguish shrubs from grass (using the blue and red wavelength regions) while each season had a different spectral region that was more correlated to shrub cover. Summer was the best season to spectrally discriminate western snowberry from wolfwillow; with red and blue wavelength regions being more important.

From objective 2, the object-based classification of shrub cover resulted in an overall accuracy between 91%-95% (from visual photointerpretation) for the final shrub cover map (a). From validation with field data in both of our study areas, we found that shrub cover is spectrally not detectable when its cover is between 10%-30% of an image pixel. The image on the right shows shrub cover presence in the park depicted in red color.

Our model results showed that road closeness, high grazing, and haying absence related to high shrub cover in 2018. Topo-edaphic variables facilitating shrub expansion were loam, flat, upland areas closer to waterbodies and watercourse lines. The image on the right shows shrub cover (b) close to roads, (c) outside of hayed areas, (d) close to watercourses, and (e) close to waterbodies (Soubry et al., 2022).

The methods from objective 3 resulted in a management priority map (Figure 3). These results were then incorporated by the Ministry of Parks, Culture, and Sport of Saskatchewan in a management plan to address woody plant expansion in CHIPP. More details can be found in Government of Saskatchewan (2022).

Figure 3 Shrub management priority areas based on feature overlay count of statistically significant variables related to shrub cover in the grasslands of CHIPP (Guo & Soubry, 2022)


Where do we go from here

This research serves as the base for achieving long-term resilience of native grassland species and their habitats by better understanding the interaction of local factors on WPE expansion. Future work will focus on the integration of satellite and climate data to look at historical trends of WPE.

Acknowledgements

I am deeply grateful to Dr. Xulin Guo, my supervisor, Mr. Merek Wigness for inspiring us into this research topic, to Dr. Thuan Chu and Dr. Eric Lamb for provision of study areas and field data, to Larissa Robinov for assistance with publication writing and editing, to the rangeland managers at CHIPP, West Block, and to the numerous people that facilitated fieldwork. Lastly, I am thankful for funding from the University of Saskatchewan, the Government of Saskatchewan, and NSERC.

References

Government of Saskatchewan. (2022). Management Plan to Address Woody Plant Expansion in Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park (Issued March).

Guo, X., & Soubry, I. (2022). Final Report for Monitoring of Shrub Component to Support for Ecosystem Management in Saskatchewan Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park.

Soubry, I., Doan, T., Chu, T., & Guo, X. (2021). A Systematic Review on the Integration of Remote Sensing and GIS to Forest and Grassland Ecosystem Health Attributes , Indicators , and Measures. Remote Sensing, 13(3262), 1–30.

Soubry, I., & Guo, X. (2021a). Identification of the Optimal Season and Spectral Regions for Shrub Cover Estimation in Grasslands. Sensors, 21(3098), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.3390/s21093098

Soubry, I., & Guo, X. (2021b). Seasonal Spectral Separation of Western Snowberry and Wolfwillow in Grasslands with Field Spectroradiometer and Simulated Multispectral Bands. Environments, 8(7), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8070060

Soubry, I., & Guo, X. (2022). Quantifying Woody Plant Encroachment in Grasslands: A Review on Remote Sensing Approaches. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2022.2039060

Soubry, I., Robinov, L., Chu, T., & Xulin, G. (2022). Mapping shrub cover in grasslands with an object-based approach and investigating the connection to topo-edaphic factors. Geocarto International, .

Working Lands for Wildlife. (2022). Dr. Dirac Twidwell: Saving the Last Grasslands. https://www.wlfw.org/ask-an-expert-dr-dirac-twidwell-saving-the-last-grasslands/ (last accessed on 23 October 2023)

About the author

Irini Soubry is a PhD Candidate at the Department of Geography and Planning, University of Saskatchewan. She has an MSc. in Geoinformation in Environmental Management from the Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania, Greece, and a MEng in Rural and Surveying Engineering from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, where she specialized in Remote Sensing, Photogrammetry, Cartography, and Cadastre. She has done research in Europe and Canada involving grassland and forest health, precision agriculture, wildfires, land surface phenology, and cultural heritage, with remote sensing, UAVs, GIS, and Laser Scanning. Her current interests lay in grassland ecology and ecosystem health monitoring through remote sensing approaches.

Follow Irini on LinkedIn

Follow Irini on Twitter (X)

@ISoubry

Figure 2 Methods flow chart

Figure 3 Shrub management priority areas based on feature overlay count of statistically significant variables related to shrub cover in the grasslands of CHIPP (Guo & Soubry, 2022)

Figure 1 Map of study areas in grasslands of Saskatchewan, Canada  (Soubry et al., 2022; Soubry & Guo, 2021a)