
LONDON TO SCOTLAND WEST (SOUTH)
ROUTE STRATEGY STORYMAP

This StoryMap is an abridged version of our full-length PDF report. To view the PDF and to also provide your feedback, please see the links at the end of this interactive report.
In this report, we detail the route context, current constraints on the route, and opportunities for improved connections with local roads and rail links. We set out intelligence-led route objectives aligned with the Department for Transport's six strategic objectives. These objectives aim to ensure the route can serve its function, while mitigating the identified constraints and challenges. They conclude with locations for further consideration to achieve the route objectives. The route objectives and locations for further consideration will be presented to the Department for Transport to inform future decision-making about investment planning through the Road Investment Strategy (RIS). It should be recognised that not all aspirations outlined in this report can be funded or delivered.
The route
The London to Scotland West (South) route is made up of approximately 185 miles of motorway providing part of a north-south strategic link between London and Scotland. The route consists of the M40 from London through Oxfordshire to the Midlands, includes the sections of M42, M5, and M6 around Birmingham, commonly called the Birmingham Box, and continues north up the M6 to Junction 16, near Stoke-on-Trent in Staffordshire. (The rest of the M6 north of Junction 16 is covered by the London to Scotland West (North) route strategy ). The route also includes short sections of the A45, A452, and A446 trunk roads, providing an alternative for drivers travelling from M42 Junction 6 to M6 Junction 4. These roads will provide access to the new High Speed 2 (HS2) station at Solihull.
The route serves a mix of long-distance car, heavy goods vehicles, and coach traffic to strategic destinations outside of the route corridor. These include links to Shropshire, Mid and North Wales via the M54, the South-West via the M5, and the East Midlands and North-East via the M42, A42, and M1. The M40 also fulfils a key strategic function from Southampton Port and Solent Freeport to the Midlands via the Solent to Midlands route strategy . However, local traffic is more common on the sections of the M42, M5, and M6 which make up the ‘Birmingham Box’.
The route is predominantly 3- and 4-lane motorway, with short sections of 2-lane motorway on the M40 and dual carriageway on the A45, A452, and A446. There are junctions integrating with the major and local road networks as well as with other parts of the strategic road network (SRN) including the A500, M54, A5, A38, A46, A404, A43, and A34. The A404 and A34 connect to the M4, providing access to Reading, Swindon, Bath, Bristol, and South Wales.
South of the West Midlands, the M40 connects commercial and other traffic to Heathrow Airport (via the M25) and key economic centres in Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, and Warwickshire, including High Wycombe, Oxford, Bicester, Stratford-upon-Avon, and Warwick.
In the Midlands, the route connects to Birmingham Airport and will provide access to the new HS2 stations at Solihull and Crewe. The HS2 Interchange station at Solihull will have a direct access from the A452, and HS2 Ltd will be continuing to make alterations to the A45, A452 and A446 during the third road period (2025-2030) to support this. The M42 Junction 6 will also be important for traffic travelling to HS2 Interchange station, whilst M6 Junction 16 will be used for traffic travelling to the Phase 2a station at Crewe. The M5 and M6 are also major access routes to and from the key manufacturing and industrial centres of Birmingham, the Black Country, and Staffordshire.
This route strategy is based on the road network as of the start of second road period (2020-2025). We recognise that some of the journeys on this route are part of longer trips and therefore need to be considered in conjunction with strategies on other routes.
Challenges and issues
We recognise that there are existing challenges and issues on the network and these are outlined against the Department for Transport's (DfT's) six strategic objectives as part of the route strategy evidence base.

All our route strategies need to show how they contribute to the delivery of the Department for Transport's six strategic objectives for our network, to ensure we meet future challenges. These help us create relevant, meaningful and effective strategies that address evolving concerns. Such concerns include decarbonisation, ecology, the need for new homes and the desire for a better connected country.
1. Improving safety for all
Improving safety and minimising collision rates is a key consideration for all our routes.
International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP) Star Ratings.
The International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP) Star Ratings are based on road inspection data and provide a simple and objective measure of the level of safety which is ‘built-in’ to the road. The higher the star rating, the safer the road. iRAP Star Ratings are produced for each 100-metre section of road, based on detailed inspections of roadside features as well as traffic flow, speed, pedestrian and cyclist use, and crash data.
Using the latest available iRAP data, the motorway sections of the London to Scotland West (South) route are classified as 3- and 4-star. (No data was available for M6 Junctions 13 to 15, as roadworks meant that it was not operating under normal conditions).
The exceptions to this are the A452 and A446, which are classified as 1-star and 2-star respectively. These roads will be under the control of HS2 Ltd during the third road period (2025-2030), as per the terms of the High Speed Rail (London to West Midlands) Act 2017. HS2 Ltd will continue to make alterations to the A45, A452, and A446, to support access to the new station, during this period.
STATS19 data
STATS19 data are the statistical data published by the Office for National Statistics about personal-injury road traffic collisions reported to the police. STATS19 remains the most detailed, complete, and reliable single source of information on road casualties covering the whole of Great Britain, in particular for monitoring trends over time.
STATS19 data show that there are concentrations of collisions and sections of the route where people were killed or seriously injured:
- M40 Junctions 2 to 5
- M40 Junctions 6 to 13
- M40 Junction 15 to the M40/M42 Interchange (M42 Junction 3A)
- M5 Junctions 2 to 1
- M6 Junctions 5 to 7
- M6 Junctions 12 to 13
- M6 Junctions 14 to 15
It should be noted that this data predates the completion of the M6 Junction 13 to 15 scheme, which opened in 2022.
Using the latest available data, the route is classified as low risk by the Road Safety Foundation Crash Risk Mapping, with the exception of the M42/M6 Interchange, which is classified as medium risk.
Key challenges
- Junctions and route sections on the M40, M42, M5, and M6 at sites where people have been killed or seriously injured in collisions
- The M42/M6 Interchange is classified as medium risk by the Road Safety Foundation
2. Network performance
We want to improve journey times on route sections which currently experience high levels of delay and are expected to worsen in the future
Delays on the London to Scotland West (South) route are a particular issue for freight and commuter traffic using the route. Sections of the route which experience the greatest delay are:
- M42 between Junctions 4 and 6
- M5 between Junction 3 and the M5/M6 interchange
- A446 approaching M6 Junction 4
- M6 between Junctions 6 and 8
- M6 between Junctions 7 and 10
National Highways has a suite of five regional traffic models (RTMs) covering England’s strategic road network. The models allow us to identify future performance and delay on the network, assisting with the development of the route strategies. The RTM models use projected growth, expected trends and changes to the network (including National Highway’s RIS2 schemes) to forecast the performance of the network in 2031.
Based on future forecasts, the following parts of the route are also expected to experience delay by 2031:
- M40 north of the M25
- M42 east of Junction 2 and between Junctions 3 and 3A
- M5 between Junction 3 and the M5/M6 Interchange
- M6 between Junctions 4 and 6
- M6 northbound between Junctions 8 and 10A
- M6 southbound between Junctions 10A and 7
The route serves a number of tourist centres or attractions, as well as two major airports. Traffic travelling to these destinations is particularly affected by seasonal delay, especially traffic travelling to airports, where arriving on time is important.
Parts of the route that experience the worst seasonal delays are:
- M40 between Junctions 7 and 9
- M40 at Junction 9
- M42 Junctions 4 to 5
- A446 approaching M6 Junction 4
- M5 Junctions 1 to 3
- M5 and M6 at the M5/M6 interchange
- M6 at Stafford, Junctions 13 to 14
Parts of the London to Scotland West (South) route which have unreliable journey times and where drivers cannot be confident of how long their journeys will take include:
- M40 Junction 4 at Handy Cross
- M42 between Junctions 3a and 7a
- M5 around the Birmingham Box
- M5 on the approach to the M5/M6 interchange
- M6 between Junctions 4a and 10
- M6 at Stafford, Junctions 13 to 14
Interested parties told us that traffic diverting off the M40 and M6 to avoid seasonal delay on the strategic road network also causes network performance issues on local roads such as the A40 in High Wycombe and the A454, A4148, and A34 in the Walsall area.
Key challenges:
- Seasonal delays on the M40
- Delays on the M42, M5, and M6 around the Birmingham Box
- Reliability at M40 Junction 4
- Reliability on the M42 and M5
- Reliability on the M6 around the Birmingham Box and near Stafford
- The impact of future development and traffic growth on delay and reliability along the route
3. Improved environmental outcomes
Where possible we will seek to protect environmentally important locations and reduce air quality and noise impacts on communities served by the route.
The M40 is in a deep chalk cutting within the Aston Rowant Cutting Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). This is on the north-western scarp of the Chiltern Hills and is located within the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, making it one of the most environmentally sensitive locations on the route. The road is also near to the Blenheim Palace UNESCO World Heritage Site and adjacent to the Cotswolds National Landscape.
In the West Midlands, the A45 crosses the River Blythe SSSI, while the A452, A446, and M6 Junction 4 are close to the Coleshill and Bannerly Pool SSSI.
In terms of air quality, there are receptors within 100 metres of the strategic road network which may be more likely to experience adverse air quality impacts:
- M40 between Junctions 4 and 5
- M40 northbound between Junctions 11 and 12
- M5 between Junctions 3 and 2
- M6 between Junctions 6 and 7
- M6 between Junctions 10 and 10A
- M6 southbound between Junctions 13 and 14
A 60 miles per hour speed limit is in place for air quality on the M6 between Junctions 6 and 7, and on the M5 between Junctions 1 and 2.
There are receptors within 300 meres of the strategic road network which may be more sensitive to high noise levels:
- M40 Junctions 2 to 5
- M5 southbound Junction 4A to Junction 4 M5 Junctions 3 to 1
- M5 northbound at the M5/M6 interchange
- M42 northbound from Junction 7A to M6 Junction 5
- M6 southbound from Junction 5 to 6
- M6 Junction 6 to Junction 10
- M6 southbound between Junction 10 and Junction 10A
- M6 southbound Junctions 13 to 14
- M6 southbound from Junction 15 to the motorway service area at Keele.
Through engagement with interested parties, it has been stated that severance (separation of people from facilities and services they use within their community) issues exist for pedestrians and cyclists, especially when attempting to cross at or near motorway junctions. Interested parties have also raised concerns that the M6, which forms the northern edge of the Birmingham Box, is used for a significant number of local trips. These trips could be made more sustainable by using alternative modes of transport such as public transport, walking and cycling.
Key challenges
- Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty with environmental designations and cultural heritage
- A desire to minimise greenhouse gas emissions
- Resilience to future climate change
- Presence of SSSIs along the M40 and A45
- Presence of SSSIs close to the A452, A446, and M6 Junction 4
- Receptors within 100 metres of the M40, M5, and M6 which may be more likely to experience adverse air quality impacts
- Receptors within 300 metres of the M40, M5, and M6 which may be more sensitive to high noise levels
- Air quality impacts on M5 Junctions 2 to 1 and M6 Junctions 6 to 7
4. Growing the economy
The strategic road network has a critical economic function in supporting national and cross border connectivity and areas with high levels of deprivation.
In order to understand the economic and housing growth aspirations of the area along the route we have considered key growth locations, such as those held in local plans and Freeports.
The London to Scotland West (South) route provides vital connections between key Economic Opportunity Areas including:
- Urban centres such as London, Oxford, Birmingham, Stafford, and Stoke-on-Trent
- Aylesbury Vale and Black Country Enterprise Zones
- Housing (at M40 Junction 10 and between M6 Junctions 15-16)
- Industrial clusters (M6 north of Junction 9)
- Birmingham Airport
- The Potteries urban centres and Ceramics Enterprise Zone
Locations along the route identified for future development in Local Authority Local Plans include:
- 10,000 homes near Bicester
- Arden Cross, a mixed-use development across more than 140 hectares with up to 3,000 homes and up to 6 million square feet of commercial development supporting up to 27,000 jobs near M42 Junction 6 and Solihull
- 20,000 new homes in Stoke-on-Trent
The route provides access to a number of key manufacturing centres, including Jaguar Land Rover (Birmingham, Coventry, Gaydon, and Solihull), Cadbury (Birmingham), and Aston Martin (Gaydon). Just-in-time deliveries and journey time reliability are particularly important for manufacturing companies such as these.
Heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) make up 16-20% of total traffic flow along much of the route, particularly the M40 between Junctions 10 and 15 and the M42 and M6 in the Birmingham Box. This increases to 45% on the M6 between Junctions 8 and 10A. The route has good connections to international gateways such as Birmingham Airport. Between 2011 and 2019, the West Midlands experienced the greatest growth in HGV traffic of any UK region, an increase of 15%.
However, with anticipated traffic growth and capacity constraints, interested parties have concerns around the route’s ability to maintain efficient access to key hubs such as airports, distribution centres and growth sites as well as serving areas on the levelling up agenda.
One of the key concerns for interested parties is maintaining access to growth sites and the potential Oxford Strategic Rail Freight Interchange (SRFI) at M40 Junction 10. Forecasting for Oxford SRFI demonstrates that future increase in traffic volumes before any additional developments may be sufficient for traffic volumes to exceed road capacity between M40 Junctions 9-10, by 2031. The proposed developments in close proximity to the strategic road network would add further pressure on traffic and exacerbate delays.
Office of National Statistics data shows that Birmingham has around 2,500 business premises associated with transport and storage, the 4th highest number in England. The point of entry onto the strategic road network for vehicles travelling from these premises will be the M42, M5, or M6.
There are concerns from interested parties about maintaining efficient access to freight distribution centres along the route, particularly the clusters that are located within the Birmingham Box. These clusters are located near M5 Junctions 2 to 1 and M6 Junctions 5 to 7. General traffic growth, without the addition of traffic associated with new developments, is likely to contribute to capacity constraints and delays along key freight corridors of the M40, M42, M5 and M6, inhibiting efficient freight movements.
In addition to connecting key employment centres, the route also serves areas of high deprivation that require increased economic growth, particularly around Birmingham and the Black Country. The Birmingham Box falls into the top 15% of most deprived areas in the UK. Approximately 40% of the population within the corridor are economically active. However, there are locations within the Birmingham Box where the economically active population is as low as 20%.
The index of priority places for Levelling Up Fund places local authorities into categories 1, 2 or 3, depending on their identified level of need, with category 1 representing places deemed in most need of investment through this Fund. The following sections of the route fall within areas which are ranked by Government as category 2 in terms of need for levelling up:
- M40 from south of Junction 10 to the M40/M42 Interchange
- M42 Junctions 3A to 7A
- M5 Junction 3 to M6 Junction 8
Parts of the route which run through areas ranked by government as being in greatest need of levelling up (category 1) are:
- M6 around the Birmingham Box
- M6 Junctions 15 to 16 near Stoke-on-Trent
The route is important in providing access to major tourist attractions including Birmingham City Centre, Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, the National Exhibition Centre (NEC), Oxford City Centre, Blenheim Palace UNESCO World Heritage Site, The Royal Shakespeare Theatre in Stratford-Upon-Avon, and Warwick Castle. This access to tourist attractions, as well as the prevalence of major towns and cities, and international gateways such as Heathrow airport, mean that the route (particularly the M42 and M40) is also frequently used for leisure traffic, including chartered and scheduled coach travel.
Key challenges
- Significant growth sites located in close proximity to the SRN along the route
- Proportion of HGVs (including coaches) ranges from 16% to 45% along the route
- Traffic volumes on M40 Junctions 9 to 10 expected to exceed capacity by 2031 as a result of wider economic growth
- Levelling up category 1 areas surrounding the SRN in the Birmingham Box and Staffordshire
- Levelling up category 2 areas surrounding the M40 south of Junction 10 to the M40/M42 Interchange, M42 Junction 3A to 7A, and M5 Junction 3 to the M5/M6 Interchange (M6 Junction 8)
- Freight distribution clusters near M5 Junctions 2 to 1 and M6 Junctions 5 to 7
- Frequent leisure travel along the route, especially on the M42 and M40
5. Managing and planning the SRN for the future
Road surface The measure for road surface condition has been updated for 2022/23 onwards. The condition is reported as one of our Key Performance Indicators and shows the condition of all available lanes of the main carriageway (excluding M40 Junctions 1 to 15, which is managed through a Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO) contract) based on three elements of the road surface condition namely - the levels of surface rutting (caused by wheel tracks being formed in the surfacing), skid resistance (how slippery the road is) and longitudinal profile (how bumpy the road feels) with a target of 96.2% or more in good condition. At the time of publication, the road surface had a score of 96.7% in good condition, thereby meeting the national surfacing condition target.
This route consists of approximately 1,400 lane-kilometres of road surfacing. The surface condition across the route is considered to be sound, with 97% of pavement asset not requiring investigation for possible maintenance.
Bridges and structures There are 2,036 structures across the route, including bridges and large culverts. According to an analysis of current data, 91% of our structures are in very good or good condition.
Drainage Drainage assets are represented by both linear assets (for example underground pipes, channels, ditches, drains) and nonlinear assets (for example gullies and chambers). At national level, 90% of the drainage assets are in good structural condition and 87% are in good service condition.
Geotechnical features The geotechnical asset, comprising over 12,000 kilometres of earthworks embankments and cuttings carrying the road network is assessed through a programme of inspections and rated for its ability to provide the right level of safe functionality. The condition assessment of this asset is that 99.61% is in good condition to continue to function correctly.
Future developments We have been transforming our approach to maintenance through our Operational Excellence and Asset Management Transformation Programmes. Bringing our key asset maintenance decision making and planning activities back in-house so that our own staff are responsible for planning maintenance activities, along with improving the consistency of our end-to-end maintenance and asset replacement programmes will bring significant benefits.
Operations We are establishing a nationally consistent approach to the management of our operational capability through our Operational Excellence change programme. This will deepen our understanding of how our interventions impact on the performance of the network and on the journeys of our customers.
Key challenges
- Contributing toward the national target of 96.2% or more of carriageway being in good condition
- Maintaining the good condition of the strategic road network’s geotechnical assets
- Ensuring that drainage assets are maintained so that their good structural and service conditions can be upheld
6. A technology-enabled network
We will support improved communications and facilities for all
The strategic road network (SRN) either side of the M40 has good provision of technology. Both the M25 (south of the M40) and the M42 (north of the M40) have frequent Variable Messaging Signs (VMS), which can be used to provide information to drivers during their journeys. However, there is limited VMS and other technology provision on the M40. This is a significant gap, and an inconsistency for drivers making strategic journeys.
Technology provision on the M5 between Junction 4 and the M5/M6 interchange is also more limited than the adjacent sections of the M5 and M6.
At present, VMS provision on the major road network (MRN) approaching the SRN junctions is limited and inconsistent. Interested parties commented that providing information about conditions on the SRN to drivers before they reach the motorway could help drivers to take more efficient decisions regarding their routes and help to manage delay on the SRN.
The driving experience along this route suffers from a lack of technology including digital connectivity, and communication of driving conditions on the SRN. These communications may include updates regarding conditions on local roads connecting to the SRN and communication of likely delays before drivers reach the end of a queue. Incorporation of new technology has the potential to improve safety along the route, in particular, by tackling poor driving behaviour or by changing how we react to incidents on the network. Electric vehicle charging epoints are located at the various motorway service areas along the route.
Key challenges
- Limited technology provision on the M40
- Technology provision is variable on the M42, M5, and M6, and on the MRN approaching the SRN
- Limited facilities for electric charging for all vehicles (private car and van, coach, and freight) to support transition to ending the sale of new petrol and diesel cars by 2030
Initial route objectives
We want to provide safer and more reliable journeys for all those who use or live alongside our network on the London to Scotland West (South), and help the region achieve its economic and housing growth ambitions. Based on our engagement and data analysis, we have defined six route objectives for the area.
We developed the route objectives based on:
- feedback from customers and neighbours.
- opportunities to collaborate with other network operators
- constraints and challenges
- how best to contribute to the Department for Transport's (DfT's) six strategic objectives
Each route strategy includes a series of specific route-based objectives. These objectives, informed by extensive data analysis and engagement with customers and neighbours, set out our ambition for each route. Although route objectives are route-specific, they should also be considered in the context of our commitments and ambitions for the whole network, as per our Licence agreement. This means that, while we may identify certain locations within a route for further consideration, we will seek to address these locations in line with our ongoing commitment to achieving our safety, environmental and technology obligations across the strategic road network.
It should be noted that there is overlap between the objectives, and we recognise they cannot be considered in isolation from each other.
The below maps for each route objective are for illustrative purposes only and do not explicit define the precise extents of objectives.
A. Improve safety for all
Objective:
Provide safe journeys on the M40, M42, M5, and M6 to benefit road users, including walkers, cyclists, and horse riders crossing motorway junctions
Outcomes
- Improved safety on identified links.
- Improved safety at identified junctions and motorway interchanges.
- Increased perception of safety for walkers, cyclists and horse riders crossing M6 Junction 7 and 9 circulatories.
DfT's strategic objectives
- Improving safety for all
- Network performance
Timeframe based on the issues and constraints identified
B. Provision of a resilient and consistent network
Objective:
Support reliable strategic and cross-border connectivity for the UK for goods and people between London, the Midlands, the North West, and Scotland, promoting the UK and regional economies
Outcomes
- Increased reliability and predictability of journey times for freight and leisure traffic
- Reduced delays at junctions on the M40 corridor and at junctions within the Birmingham Box, including motorway interchanges
- A better experience for heavy goods vehicle drivers including high-quality rest facilities
- A more resilient route which is better able to meet the needs of all users
DfT's strategic objectives
- Network performance
- Growing the economy
- A technology enabled network
Timeframe based on the issues and constraints identified
C. Support sustainable economic growth and development
Objective:
Support sustainable economic growth and development, including local authority plan development, at key sites around the M40 (Oxford and Banbury), M42 (Solihull), M5 (Bromsgrove), M6 (Stoke-on-Trent) and along the wider corridor
Outcomes
- Delivery of sustainable development along the route
- Improved connectivity for developments around Oxford and Warwick
- Improved support for sustainable economic development in Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, and Staffordshire
- Reduced delays on the M5 in the Birmingham Box and at M42 Junction 4 for access to future Economic Opportunity Areas
DfT's strategic objectives
- Network performance
- Growing the economy
Timeframe based on the issues and constraints identified
D. Support connectivity with sustainable transport modes
Objective:
Support effective local connectivity through improved integration with sustainable transport modes to minimise the impact of short distance trips on the M5 and M6 to benefit the environment and local communities.
Outcomes
- Improved multi-modal connectivity for local trips in the urban areas around the Birmingham Box and Staffordshire
- Improved connectivity and overall traffic flow between the strategic road network and the major road network and local road networks
DfT's strategic objectives
- Network performance
- Improved environmental outcomes
Timeframe based on the issues and constraints identified
E. Be a better neighbour
Objective:
Be a better neighbour by safeguarding the environment and reducing adverse air quality, noise, and severance impacts on local communities surrounding the route.
Outcomes
- Improved connectivity for communities which are severed by the strategic road network in the Birmingham Box
- Improved air quality in communities adjacent to the strategic road network
- Reduced noise impacts for communities adjacent to the strategic road network
DfT's strategic objectives
- Improved environmental outcomes
Timeframe based on the issues and constraints identified
F. Better informed drivers
Objective:
Improve communications to better inform drivers and improve driver experience throughout the route, including on local roads approaching strategic road network junctions
Outcomes
- Improved driver experience throughout the route
- Drivers are better informed
- More efficient freight movements and improved journey times
DfT's strategic objectives
- Network performance
- A technology-enabled network
Timeframe based on the issues and constraints identified
London to Scotland (West) South Initial Route Objectives map
How the route objectives map to the DfT’s strategic objectives for the route
Locational areas for future consideration
We know the importance that investment in our network can make locally, regionally and nationally. It can make areas more attractive for inward investment, unlock new sites for employment and housing and facilitate regeneration. It can also ease congestion, improve our customers’ journeys and support environmental improvements in urban and rural communities along our network.
We outline our proposed locational areas for further consideration, which will be explored in future road periods to achieve the London to Scotland West (South) route objectives and the Department for Transport’s (DfT's) six strategic objectives. These do not represent a commitment as funding will be considered as part of the development of the third Road Investment Strategy (RIS) and beyond as well as other investment processes. Furthermore, they do not represent a final list of our potential investment locations and will be refined in our final Route strategy overview report, published alongside our RIS3 Strategic business plan and Delivery plan for 2025-2030.
Locational areas for further consideration
The adjacent map highlights current RIS2 schemes, any applicable RIS4 pipeline schemes and locations for future consideration. Click on sections on the map to find out more information.
RIS2
RIS2 schemes are committed by the DfT to be delivered as part of the Road Investment Strategy. The statement of funding confirmed that £24 billion will be provided during the second road period (2020-2025) to deliver this work, noting that some RIS2 commitments will continue into the third road period (2025-2030).
RIS4 pipeline
RIS4 (2030-2035) pipeline schemes, previously earmarked for RIS3 (2025-2030), will continue to be developed in line with statutory processes and considered for inclusion within RIS4. These are potential future schemes originally identified by National Highways and set as part of RIS2 by the DfT. These schemes are not currently committed for construction.
Next steps
Our route strategies allow informed decisions to be made about our network. They have informed our Strategic Road Network (SRN) initial report , which sets our vision and priorities for the third road period (2025–2030) and beyond (from 2030). They are a forward planning tool for National Highways and our interested parties in their decision making, helping identify locations on our network for further consideration to inform investment opportunities, as well as to support decisions in prioritising potential solutions to enable us to continue to operate and maintain our network.
For both the Route strategy initial overview reports and Connecting the country: Our long-term strategic plan to 2050 , there will be an opportunity for stakeholders, road users and communities to provide their feedback. This will be alongside the Department for Transport's separate consultation on the SRN initial report published at the same time. The 20 finalised Route strategy reports and Our long-term strategic plan to 2050 will be published by 2025, the end of the current road period (2020-2025), informing the Strategic business plan and the Delivery plan.
Please click the button below to view the full-length report.
Please click the button below to provide your feedback.
To view another Route strategy, please click here to return to our landing page. For further information relating to route strategies, please visit our website , or email us directly.