Mapping Montana Wetlands

A Guide to Montana’s Statewide Wetland and Riparian Mapping Framework

Introduction

Montana’s statewide Wetland and Riparian Mapping Framework provides a digital map layer of wetlands, deepwater habitats and riparian areas across the state. The layer is part of the  Montana Spatial Data Infrastructure , co-stewarded by the University of Montana, the Montana State Library, and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. 

The following story map introduces standard wetland mapping nomenclature used in Montana’s statewide wetland and riparian mapping layer and offers brief descriptions of habitat and function for each wetland type present in Montana. 

This mapping product is an estimation of where wetlands and riparian features may be on the landscape, and is not intended to be used as an actual representation of on-the-ground conditions for regulatory purposes. All wetland and riparian mapping represents photo interpretation from aerial imagery. 

Slide left to view Montana's statewide wetland and riparian mapping layer Slide right to view aerial imagery


Wetland mapping follows the US Fish and Wildlife Service definition and classification system.

There is no universally accepted definition for wetlands, with established definitions varying based on their intended use. The term generally refers to land supporting vegetation and soils that reflect permanent or periodic saturation or inundation. The most widely recognized definitions refer to three characteristics of wetlands: hydrology, hydric soils and hydrophytic vegetation. The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) and Montana Statewide Wetland and Riparian Mapping Layer follow the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) definition below:

"Wetlands are lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water... Wetlands must have one or more of the following three attributes: (1) at least periodically, the land supports primarily hydrophytes; (2) the substrate is predominantly undrained hydric soil; and (3) the substrate is nonsoil and is saturated with water or covered by shallow water at some time during the growing season of each year" [1].

For more information on NWI Wetland Mapping, follow this  link .

NWI Wetland Classification System

Wetland classification systems are used to group wetlands based on features such as vegetation, water source, function, or landscape position. A standardized classification system provides consistent units to inform use, management, and planning decisions.

Montana's Statewide Wetland and Riparian Mapping Framework adapts the standard NWI wetland classification system to map form using a system of alphanumeric codes. The codes are structured hierarchically, from System and Subsystem at the broadest levels to Classes, Subclasses, and Water Regime at finer scales [2].


Montana is home to many wetlands and waterbodies that provide critical habitat and important ecological functions.

Scroll down to see examples of characteristic Montana wetlands and their corresponding NWI wetland codes.

Prairie Potholes

Wetland codes: PEM1A, PEM1C, PEM1F 

Prairie potholes occur in Montana within intermontane glaciated valleys and in the northeastern great plains [4, 5].

Blackfoot River

Wetland codes: R3UBH, R3USA, R3USC, Rp1FO, Rp1SS, Rp1EM

A free-flowing, fifth order tributary of the Columbia River, The Blackfoot River spans 212 river-kilometers (132 river-miles) from its headwaters along the continental divide near Rogers Pass, Montana to the confluence with the Clark Fork River just east of Missoula, Montana [10].

Lower Perennial Rivers of Montana

Wetland Codes: R2UBH, R2USA, R2USC, Rp1FO, Rp1SS, Rp1EM

The Milk River and the Powder River are two of Montana's characteristic lower perennial rivers.

Beaver Influenced Wetland Complexes

Wetland codes: PEM1Bb, PEM1Eb, PEM1Fb, PSS1Bb, PSS1Eb, PSS1Fb

Beaver influenced wetlands occur adjacent to ponds, small lakes, streams, and rivers throughout the state of Montana [12].

Existing dam building capacity throughout Montana modeled by the  Montana Beaver Restoration Assessment Tool (BRAT) 

Bowman Lake

Wetland codes: L1UBH, L2ABG

Bowman Lake is the third largest lake in Glacier National Park with a surface area of 7 square kilometers (2.7 square miles) and a depth of 77 meters (253 feet).

Emergent Marsh

Wetland codes: PEM1C, PEM1F

Emergent marshes are widespread throughout Montana from foothill to upper montane elevations [16].

Emergent marsh habitat in Montana based on  2017 Landcover 

Rocky Mountain Subalpine-Montane Fens 

Wetland codes: PEM1D, PEM1B, PSS1D, PSS1B 

Rocky mountain subalpine-montane fens occur sporadically throughout western Montana.

This map broadly outlines where subalpine-montane fens may occur in Montana based on landcover.


Explore the interactive map to learn about habitat and function of Montana's wetlands and waterbodies.

Click individual features below to read habitat and function descriptions for each wetland type in Montana. For more information on the Statewide Wetland and Riparian Mapping Framework, visit our website.

ArcGIS Web Application

Credits and References

Thanks to Andrew Britton, Kelsey DeRose, Shelby Erwin, Phoebe Ferguson, Kay Hajek, Sam Isham, Jennifer Jones, Kory Kolis, Sara Owen, Ryhan Sempler, Nomi Sherman, and Samuel Wilson for contributing to this Story Map. Images are property of EMMA unless otherwise noted, special thanks to Sara Owen. Maps were created using ArcGIS® software by Esri. ArcGIS® and StoryMap™ are the intellectual property of Esri and are used herein under license. Copyright © Esri. All rights reserved. For more information about Esri® software, please visit www.esri.com.

[1] Federal Geographic Data Committee. 2013. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FGDC-STD-004-2013. Second Edition. Wetlands Subcommittee, Federal Geographic Data Committee and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 

[2] Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-79/31. Washington, DC.

[3] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2019. A system for mapping riparian areas in the western United States. Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation, Branch of Resource and Mapping Support, Arlington, Virginia.

[4] Prairie Potholes. Next Steps for a Healthy Gulf of Mexico Watershed. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2019. Retrieved on March 02, 2021, from https://www.fws.gov/southeast/gulf-restoration/next-steps/focal-area/prairie-potholes/.

[5] Great Plains Prairie Pothole. Montana Field Guide. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Retrieved on February 12, 2021, from http://FieldGuide.mt.gov/displayES_Detail.aspx?ES=9203.

[6] U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2002. A Regional Guidebook for Applying the Hydrogeomorphic Approach to Assessing Wetland Functions of Intermontane Prairie Pothole Wetlands in the Northern Rocky Mountains,. Retrieved on February 18, 2021, from https://erdc-library.erdc.dren.mil/jspui/bitstream/11681/6985/1/EL-TR-02-7.pdf.

[7] Johnson, Rex R., F.T. Oslund, D.R. Hertel. 2008. The past, present, and future of prairie potholes in the United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 63 (3) 84A-87A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.3.84A.

[8] Hauer, F.R., B.J. Cook, M.C. Gilbert, E.J. Clairain Jr., and R.D. Smith. 2002. A Regional Guidebook to Applying the Hydrogeomorphic Approach to Assessing Wetland Function of Intermontane Prairie Pothole Wetlands in the Northern Rocky Mountains. ERDC/EL TR-02-7. Wetlands Research Program, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington DC.

[9] Great Plains Prairie Pothole. Montana Field Guide. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Retrieved on February 12, 2021, from http://FieldGuide.mt.gov/displayES_Detail.aspx?ES=9203.

[10] The Blackfoot Challenge, 2014. Blackfoot River Watershed Restoration Plan: A Water Quality Addendum to the Blackfoot Subbasin Plan. Retrieved on February 18, 2021, from https://deq.mt.gov/Portals/112/Water/WPB/Nonpoint/Publications/WRPs/BlackfootWRP_FINAL_123014.pdf.

[11] Pierce, Ron and Craig Podner, 2013. Response of Wild Trout to Stream Restoration over Two Decades in the Blackfoot River Basin, Montana. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142:68-81; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2012.720626.

[12] Beaver — Castor canadensis. Montana Field Guide. Montana Natural Heritage Program and Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Retrieved on March 30, 2021, from http://FieldGuide.mt.gov/speciesDetail.aspx?elcode=amafe01010.

[13] Vance, L., Tobalske, C., and Hart, M. 2020. Applying the Beaver Restoration Assessment Tool (BRAT) in Montana and South Dakota. Montana Natural Heritage Program. 

[14] Lakes and Ponds. Glacier National Park. National Park Service, 2016. Retrieved on March 02, 2021, from https://www.nps.gov/glac/learn/nature/lakesandponds.htm.

[15] Frendenberg, W., M. Meeuwig, and C. Guy. 2007. Action Plan to Conserve Bull Trout in Glacier National Park, Montana. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Geological Survey, Montana. Retrieved on February 18, 2021, from https://www.fws.gov/montanafieldoffice/Fisheries_Research/Fisheries_Files/Fredenberg_et_al_2007_GNP_Action%20Plan.pdf.

[16] Emergent Marsh — North American Arid West Emergent Marsh. Montana Field Guide. Montana Natural Heritage Program Retrieved on March 30, 2021, from http://FieldGuide.mt.gov/displayES_Detail.aspx?ES=9222.

[17] Rocky Mountain Subalpine-Montane Fen. Montana Field Guide. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Retrieved on February 18, 2021, from http://FieldGuide.mt.gov/displayES_Detail.aspx?ES=9234.

[18] Reid, Leslie M. and Robert R. Ziemer. Evaluating the Biological Significance of Intermittent Streams. USDA Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Research Station; text available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/rsl/projects/water/2IntermitStr.htm

[19] Levick, L., J. Fonseca, D. Goodrich, M. Hernandez, D. Semmens, J. Stromberg, R. Leidy, M. Scianni, D. P. Guertin, M. Tluczek, and W. Kepner. 2008. The Ecological and Hydrological Significance of Ephemeral and Intermittent Streams in the Arid and Semi-arid American Southwest. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and USDA/ARS Southwest Watershed Research Center, EPA/600/R-08/134, ARS/233046, 116 pp. 

[20] Knight, S. J. Hauxwell, E.A. Haber. 2014. Distribution and Abundance of Aquatic Plants—Human Impacts, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. 

[21] Sidder, A. 2019. Modeling river boulders to improve hydropower sustainability, Eos, 100, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EO121023.

[22] Branco, P., I. Boavida, J.M. Santos, A. Pinheiro, and M.T. Ferreira. 2013. Boulders as Building Blocks: Improving Habitat and River Connectivity for Stream Fish. Ecohydrology 6.4 (2013): 627-34. Web.

[23] River Sediment Dynamics. Southwest Biological Science Center. U.S. Geologic Survey, 2019. Retrieved on February 18, 2021, from https://www.usgs.gov/centers/sbsc/science/fluvial-river-sediment-dynamics?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects

[24] Riparian Areas Environmental Uniqueness, Functions, and Values. RCA Issue Brief #11. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1996. Retrieved on February 18, 2021, from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/technical/?cid=nrcs143_014199

[25] The Task Force on the Natural and Beneficial Functions of the Floodplain, 2002. The Natural and Beneficial Functions of Floodplains: Reducing Flood Losses By Protecting And Restoring The Floodplain Environment, from https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/DOC_14217.PDF

[26] Vance, L., C. McIntyre, T. Luna, 2020. Field Guide to Montana's Wetland and Riparian Ecological Systems. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Online at http://fieldguide.mt.gov/displayES.aspx?id=8

[27] De Sosa, L. L., H. C. Glanville, M. R. Marshall, A. P. Williams, and D. L. Jones, 2018. Quantifying the Contribution of Riparian Soils to the Provision of Ecosystem Services. Science of the Total Environment 624: 807-819.

[28] Seena, S., F. Carvalho, F. Cassio, and C. Pascoal. 2017. Does the Developmental Stage and Composition of Riparian Forest Stand Affect Ecosystem Function in Streams? Science of the Total Environment 609: 1500-1511.

[29] Riis, T., M. Kelly-Quinn, F. C. Aguiar, P. Manolaki, D. Bruno, M. D. Bejarano, N. Clerici, M. R. Fernandes, J. C. Franco, N. Pettit, A. P. Portela, O. Tammeorg, P. Tammeorg, P. M. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, and S. Dufour. 2020. Global Overview of Ecosystem Services Provided by Riparian Vegetation. BioScience 70 (6): 501-514.

[30] Håkanson, L., 2012. Sedimentation Processes in Lakes. In: Bengtsson L., Herschy R.W., Fairbridge R.W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Lakes and Reservoirs. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht, DOI: https://doi-org.weblib.lib.umt.edu:2443/10.1007/978-1-4020-4410-6_3

[31] Coveney, M.F, Stites, D.L, Lowe, E.F, Battoe, L.E, and Conrow, R., 2002. Nutrient Removal from Eutrophic Lake Water by Wetland Filtration. Ecological Engineering 19.2 (2002): 141-59. Web.

[32] Dubrovsky, N.M., K.R. Burow, G.M. Clark, J.M. Gronberg, P.A. Hamilton, K.J. Hitt, D.K. Mueller, M.D. Munn, B.T. Nolan, L.J. Puckett, M.G. Rupert, T.M. Short, N.E. Spahr, L.A. Sprague, and W.G. Wilber, 2010. The quality of our Nation’s waters—Nutrients in the Nation’s streams and groundwater, 1992–2004: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1350, 174 p. More information online at http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/nutrients/pubs/circ1350

[33] Gingerich, R. R. and J. T. Anderson, 2011. Litter decomposition in created and reference wetlands in West Virginia, USA. Wetlands Ecological Management 19:449-458 

[34] Gutzwiller, K. J. and C. H. Flather. 2011. Wetland Features and Landscape Context Predict the Risk of Wetland Habitat Loss. Ecological Applications 21 (3): 968-982. 

[36] Brinson, M., A. Lugo,and S. Brown, 1981. Primary Productivity, Decomposition and Consumer Activity in Freshwater Wetlands. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 12, 123-161. Retrieved February 24, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2097108

[37] Painter, L. 2009. Redefining Old-Growth in Forested Wetlands of Western Washington. Environmental Practice; Cambridge 11 (2): 68-83. 

[38] Smith, L. M., D. A. Haukos, S. T. McMurry, T. LaGrange, and D. Willis. 2011. Ecosystem Services Provided by Playas in the High Plains: Potential Influences of USDA Conservation Programs. Ecological Applications 21 (3): S82-S92. 

[39] A Guide to Montana's Freshwater Aquatic Plants. Montana Department of Agriculture, Montana Noxious Weed Education Campaign. https://agr.mt.gov/_docs/weeds-docs/aquatics/Aquatics_Guide.pdf

This mapping product is an estimation of where wetlands and riparian features may be on the landscape, and is not intended to be used as an actual representation of on-the-ground conditions for regulatory purposes. All wetland and riparian mapping represents photo interpretation from aerial imagery. 

Slide left to view Montana's statewide wetland and riparian mapping layer Slide right to view aerial imagery

Existing dam building capacity throughout Montana modeled by the  Montana Beaver Restoration Assessment Tool (BRAT) 

Emergent marsh habitat in Montana based on  2017 Landcover 

This map broadly outlines where subalpine-montane fens may occur in Montana based on landcover.