Housing Displacement
Keeping DC Landlords Accountable
The Team



Noah Congdon, Alexa Coon, Spencer Duncan

Goal:
Create policy interventions that discourage displacement trends observed in Wards 7 and 8.

DC Wards 7 & 8
Problem:
In many cases, DC policy struggles to hold landlords sufficiently accountable for maintaining a standard level of quality housing for their tenants. This is especially prevalent in areas undergoing redevelopment.
We are looking at mechanisms that can be employed to hold landlords accountable to their tenants and to maintaining their properties
Acknowledgement:
Current scope includes all private landlords regardless of number of units, but we understand that different building sizes do affect intervention efficacy.
Challenges
Challenge #1 - Markets
- The current incentive structure is either lacking or works against good management
- Because of rising property values, landlords may be looking to sell their properties for higher profits and redevelopment
- The culture of the "new" city moving in may inhibit actions that would help preserve affordability and prevent displacement
- Managing buildings can be expensive and labor intensive, which negatively impacts tenants
- Some landlords create Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and place properties under these companies' ownership. This allows landlords to keep liability at arm's length, which can result in negligence that affects the living standard of apartments
- Absentee landlords are often notorious for not maintaining sufficient living standards in their properties
Challenge #2 - Structural
- Current compliance monitoring is minimal due to multiple factors, including capacity
- Repercussions, whether legally, monetarily, or through licensure, for non-compliance are often minimal, meaning the cost of censure is often outweighed by payments from potential buyers (whether developers or new landlords)
- Government disfunction (struggles within the DC Housing Authority in particular) do not help the landscape for keeping landlords accountable for providing quality housing. Landlords are able to take advantage of the disfunction to avoid censure for non-compliance, public programs, such as those that address mold issues, may not be functioning correctly, further deteriorating housing quality, and the public compliance officers may lack capacity to enforce rules
- There are few avenues for taking legal action against negligent landlords
Challenge #3 - Environmental
- Housing and other buildings are often developed on land that is prone to natural disasters, such as floodplains.
- As flooding and other natural disasters increase in frequency and intensity due to climate change, it can be more difficult to maintain sufficient living standards of apartments.
- This can lead to negligence by landlords
Avenues for Intervention
- Third party investment
- Regular checks by government
- Legalizing Rental Strikes, other Tenant first avenues
- Disbar landlords or inflict hefty fines (last ditch option)
Regular checks by government
Buena Vista in Orange County, CA
- City Council passed a $2 million pilot program to have housing inspections to keep landlords accountable for providing a standard quality of housing ($106 per house)
- Desire to turn pilot program into a permanent program that regularly inspects the housing stock as it continues to age
Rental Strikes
- Legislating to allow rent strikes can give power back to tenants, rather than simply focusing on housing reform.
- This legislation can provide tenants with collective tools to improve access to housing that is both high quality and affordable.
- Scholars, organizers, and others are developing strategies that make spreading this power easier (Gowing 2022).