Recovering the Golden-winged Warbler

A Look at Declining Populations, Habitat and a Chance for Recovery

 Over the past 60 years , a tiny songbird has lost nearly 66% of its breeding population, making it the smallest population of any songbird not on the Endangered Species List. This is the current situation of the Golden-winged Warbler (Vermivora chyrsoptera). 

This reduction in breeding population (down to approximately 400,000 individuals) has occurred in both of its regional populations – The Great Lakes and Appalachian Mountains – but the largest decline at 98% has been observed in the Appalachian Region.

Basic Biology

Appearance

 Breeding males  are mostly silver or gray with gold markings on the wing below the shoulder and atop the head. Males also have a black mask and throat, two white face marks, and a light chest. 

Appearance

Breeding females have very similar markings as the breeding males, although their colors are a bit more dull, with the gold marks having a slight green tint and the throat patch resembling a dark gray rather than black. Females do not display a face mask. They also have a sharply pointed thin bill. 

Songs and Calls

Males sing a buzzy, two part song: a long note on a high pitch followed by 3-6 shorter, lower notes.

Songs and Calls

Another song, often given repeatedly before dawn, is a rapid stutter followed by lower buzzy notes. It is associated with territorial defense. 

Range

The  golden-winged warbler  migrates between summer breeding grounds in eastern and north central areas of the United States – The Great Lakes Region (including southern Canada) and the Appalachian Mountain Region – and winter grounds in Central and northern South America. The long distance migration takes place down through the eastern and mid-western regions of the US, between the Mississippi River and the Appalachians. This migration south typically takes place in late August into September. To return to their breeding grounds, migration to the north will begin in the in April. The animation from Cornell Lab of Ornithology's abundance animation below represents this migration below by week.

 Source    (used here for educational purposes only).

Preferred Habitat

 Preferred habitat  are areas that are recovering from heavy cuts, such as clearcutting or overstory removal. This early successional habitat is shrubby, providing plenty of cover for protection over nests (which are typically on the ground, below the thick understory growing in.

 Photo Source  (used here for education purposes only)

Preferred Habitat

Wet thickets, bogs and willow stands are also preferred habitat (as being a more open landscape with low growing cover) Once fledglings have left the nest, they fly into adjacent mature forest stands, where they find cover from any type of predators. These warblers need both types of habitat to successfully thrive. 

 Photo Source  (used here for education purposes only)

Nesting

 Females  are likely to be the nest builders, selecting sites within the early successional/shrubby area to place the next – fairly close to the adjacent forest edge. The nests are typically well concealed, built at the base of a stout herbaceous plant, such as goldenrod or blackberry for cover and support. 

( Picture  displays male feeding chicks-used here for educational purposes only)

Population in Decline

From the prior animation, the viewer can see that part of the migration route of the warbler takes place through the Midwest region. That geographical area between the current two sub populations was once part of the breeding Range (during the 1970’s). Facing the sharpest decline of any songbird, there are three main reasons for suspected decline.

(#1) Breeding Habitat Loss: Nature has always done its due diligence in creating ideal golden-winged warbler habitat, from natural storm events, forest fires and beaver dams emerged the early successional habitat patches needed for nesting, adjacent to mature forests for fledgling and adult survival. Due to large-scale timber harvesting over several years (and regrowth of the those harvests), expansion of human activity, fire suppression, and a lack of abandoned farm ground, major habitat loss has occurred, leaving less breeding grounds available.

 Image Source  - used here for education purposes only.

(#2) Winter Habitat Loss: The wooded areas needed for overwintering habitat in Central America has also shown a decline as forests are cleared for agricultural production (palm oil and sun grown coffee). 

(#3)  Hybridization with Blue-winged Warbler: The blue-winged warbler is very closely related to the golden-winged warbler and the two species have been known to interbreed over time. Resulting offspring are known as the Brewster’s and Lawrence’s warblers. While these hybrids occur naturally and are fertile – the continued hybridization lead to less pure golden-wings, further decreasing the population. Shifting ranges is at play in leading to increase interaction between the two species, with golden-wings preferring the ridge tops/higher elevations, and blue-wings in the valley areas. Shifts in climate have lead to blue-wings moving to higher elevations. 

Male 'Lawrence's Warbler', Frontenac, ON, 23 June. The F1 'Brewster's Warbler' show the dominant traits of the pair; the F2 hybrid 'Lawrence's Warbler' shows the recessive traits, namely yellow underparts and bold head pattern. Jun 24, 2009; photographer  Frode Jacobsen  (used here for educational purposes only)

Male Golden-winged Warbler (right) with hybrid 'Brewster's Warbler', Opinicon Lake, ON, 20 June. Hybrids between Golden-winged and Blue-winged Warbler are common. Most F1 hybrids have white underparts like Golden-winged, but a reduced head pattern with a dark eyeline like Blue-winged Warbler. Jun 21, 2009; photographer  Frode Jacobsen  (used here for educational purposes only)

Map displays overlapping range of the golden-winged and blue-winged warblers (as of 2011-2012).  Source  (used here for educational purposes only)

Early Successional Habitat Dwellers

 Golden-winged warblers  are not the only species that rely on early successional habitat to survive and thrive. Focusing specifically in the eastern United States, several other bird species utilize similar habitat: including, but not limited to ruffed grouse, American woodcock, eastern whip-poor-will, oven bird, wood thrush, and so on. 

The underlying map displays an overlay of three different early successional species:  American woodcock ,  ruffed grouse , and  golden-winged warbler .

In addition to these avian species, many mammal species including black bear, Appalachian cottontail, snowshoe hare, and fishers hid in the dense understory/shrubby cover of early successional habitat. Not surprisingly, many of these species are declining in numbers as well. 

Recovery and Conservation Efforts

Specifically - let's focus in on the Appalachian Mountains sub-population, as it has lost approximately 95% of it's breeding numbers.

In November of 2011, a collaboration of those that make up the Appalachian Join Venture, US Fish and Wildlife Services, and the American Bird Conservancy occurred to develop a guide,  "Golden-winged Warbler Habitat: Best Management Practices for Forestlands in Maryland and Pennsylvania".  Which provides a wonderful descriptive habitat development layout for landowners and forest managers to utilize in creating the most effective habitat - particularly in Maryland and Pennsylvania. All information within the section is from the guide.

As is evident - early successional habitat does not stay in its early successional stage. After approximately 10-15 years (depending on location), stands that were cut to create early successional habitat will be "overgrown" in a sense, no longer providing the most ideal nesting habitat. Short interval management is an important factor in continuation of habitat for the golden-winged warbler. This guide also outlines the features that will allow for maximizing the best outcome of habitat. I'll outline a few, but the guide provides much greater detail.

Landscape Scale

Golden-winged warblers need that early successional habitat with surrounding mature forests - approximately 70% of the landscape within 0.5 miles of the harvest site should be forested. Elevations of 950' and higher are recommended to minimize interactions between golden-winged and blue-winged warblers. Areas where populations of blue-winged exists - higher elevations are preferred. Landowners should take advantage of other previously disturbed sites, planned future harvest in where habitat will be created. Habitat should be created within 1 mile of existing habitat, as golden-winged warblers tend to return to the same sites each year.

Three early successional stands within the forested landscape (photo by John Long). Used here for education purposes only.

Temporal Scale

Providing young forest/early successional habitat over a large project area might be most ideal for that warbler and will require some in depth and long term planning. As stated before, warblers may not utilize stands older than 15 years old to nest, but need (post-harvest) vegetation approaching the 4 year mark up to 15 years (or 20). Before harvest, successful regeneration of desirable hardwoods species should be present - including lack of interference from invasive species, and protection from deer browse pressure. Site prep of these sites can take several years, showing an even greater need for active management. Creating several different age patches within a large area over time might be the best approach.

Stand Scale

As nest building typically takes place along the edge between shrubby open habitat and the forest (within 250 feet), project boundary shape is important. The longer and more irregular the shape of the area is, the more forest edge is created, leading to an increase in possible nesting sites. Feathering (or thinning) of the forest edge also provides a bit more diversity for the site and can be beneficial for other species that will utilize the area.

Left image displays irregular shape for an increase in forested edge; Right image shows a feathered edge. (Photo by Andrew Vitz). Used here for educational purposes only.

Overall, creation of this early successional habitat is beneficial, not only to a small bird that has a rapidly declining population, but for other species that may dwell in similar types of habitat. I do believe that creating wildlife habitat can also be tied into better forest stand management overall. Landowners can couple efforts to boost habitat with maintaining healthy stands of for timber projection and recreational use. Financial and technical assistance can be found assistance within the sub-population areas through contacting state departments of natural resources, as well as federal agencies, such as the USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Additional Habitat Guides

References (Information, Media, Spatial)

 Bakermans, M. H., J. L. Larkin, B. W. Smith, T. M. Fearer, and B. C. Jones. "Golden-winged Warber Best Management Practices for Forestlands in Maryland and Pennsylvania". November 2011. American Bird Conservancy. The Plains, Virginia. 26 pp. Retrieved 13 July 2020.

The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. “Golden-winged Warbler: Conservation Strategy and Resources”. Date n.d. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology Website. Retrieved 30 June 2020 

The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. “Golden-winged Warbler”. Date n.d. All About Birds Retrieved 30 June 2020.

The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. “Golden-winged Warbler”. Date n.d. All About Birds Retrieved 30 June 2020.

https://www.birds.cornell.edu/home/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Laurie-Johnson_clearcut_1800-e1557246063433-720x444.jpg

The Cornell Lab of Ornithology.”GWWA_BWWAOverlapMap”. May 2019. Gathered through “Golden-winged Warbler: Conservation Strategy and Resources”.Tvhe Cornell Lab of Ornithology Website. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 

Fink, D., T. Auer, A. Johnston, M. Strimas-Mackey, O. Robinson, S. Ligocki, B. Petersen, C. Wood, I. Davies, B. Sullivan, M. Iliff, S. Kelling. 2020. eBird Status and Trends, Data Version: 2018; Released: 2020. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.

Jacobson, Frode. Photo displaying Brewster's warbler and golden-winged warbler. 21 June 2009. Cornell Lab of Ornithology Website. Retrieved 13 July 2020.

https://cdn.download.ams.birds.cornell.edu/api/v1/asset/24915401

Jacobson, Frode. Photo displaying Lawerence's warbler. 24 June 2009. Cornell Lab of Ornithology Website. Retrieved 13 July 2020.

https://cdn.download.ams.birds.cornell.edu/api/v1/asset/24948101

U.S. Geological Survey - Gap Analysis Project, 2017, Golden-winged Warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) bGWWAx_CONUS_2001v1 Range Map

http://doi.org/10.5066/F747492D

U.S. Geological Survey - Gap Analysis Project, 2017, Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) bRUGRx_CONUS_2001v1 Range Map

http://doi.org/10.5066/F7QN65ZK

U.S. Geological Survey - Gap Analysis Project, 2017, American Woodcock (Scolopax minor) bAMWOx_CONUS_2001v1 Range Map

http://doi.org/10.5066/F7862FJG

 Image Source  - used here for education purposes only.

Left image displays irregular shape for an increase in forested edge; Right image shows a feathered edge. (Photo by Andrew Vitz). Used here for educational purposes only.

Male 'Lawrence's Warbler', Frontenac, ON, 23 June. The F1 'Brewster's Warbler' show the dominant traits of the pair; the F2 hybrid 'Lawrence's Warbler' shows the recessive traits, namely yellow underparts and bold head pattern. Jun 24, 2009; photographer  Frode Jacobsen  (used here for educational purposes only)

Male Golden-winged Warbler (right) with hybrid 'Brewster's Warbler', Opinicon Lake, ON, 20 June. Hybrids between Golden-winged and Blue-winged Warbler are common. Most F1 hybrids have white underparts like Golden-winged, but a reduced head pattern with a dark eyeline like Blue-winged Warbler. Jun 21, 2009; photographer  Frode Jacobsen  (used here for educational purposes only)

Map displays overlapping range of the golden-winged and blue-winged warblers (as of 2011-2012).  Source  (used here for educational purposes only)

Three early successional stands within the forested landscape (photo by John Long). Used here for education purposes only.