Smart Transportation in Uptown Innovation Corridor
University of Cincinnati | Uptown Consortium
About Project
Under the support of the UC Forward Mini-Grant, multiple UC departments designed the project to develop a collaborative coursework that aims to create a conceptual design and/or analytics of a smart eco-transportation network for Uptown Cincinnati. The goal of the proposed project is to adapt and integrate a series of disciplinary courses from the existing CEAS and DAAP curriculums to produce products that proactively enhance the Uptown Innovation corridor from “smart” multimodal choice, transit-bike-pedestrian friendly, residential-business favorably perspectives. These collaborative courses will primarily target undergraduate students.
We designed seven year-long classes from Engineering, Architecture, and Planning departments in 2018 Fall and 2019 Spring and the final project results were delivered in two Uptown Transportation Corridor Forums in Niehoff Urban Studio. Students were applying their knowledge to a challenge or problem in the real world through these projects. The courses let students explore innovative solutions from the perspectives of technology, engineering, planning and architecture design, and maybe that brings some insight or inspiration to local professionals. Moreover, it also provides the involved graduate research assistants a great chance to exercise their role in helping the undergraduate students to conduct the problem-solving projects while accumulating data for their thesis research.
Click HERE to find the final project report.
The project is based on a set of interdisciplinary courses at the University of Cincinnati.
The two Uptown Innovation Transportation Corridor Forums were held in 2018 Fall and 2019 Spring to present the research results.
This StoryMap was designed to present the project outcomes from different research teams. It begins with introduction of Uptown Cincinnati with its historical growth and future development plans, which will give you a sense of the place and its future as an innovative knowledge center. It then presents what the research teams found about the future transportation demand and forecasting via traffic forecast modeling and transportation demand survey. Finally, they provide three suggestions to improve the transportation network in Uptown Cincinnati.
Structure of this StoryMap
Uptown Cincinnati?
1819 Innovation Hub in Uptown Cincinnati
Uptown Cincinnati, which consists of five Cincinnati neighborhoods located immediately north of downtown/OTR and between I-71 and I-75 highways, is the region’s largest center for economic growth and urban development outside downtown Cincinnati. The medical and educational institutions make the district the recognized regional center for innovation. In alignment with the needs of capturing new development to support Uptown’s medical, research, and innovation industries, Uptown Innovation Corridor has been envisioned to be centered near the new highway interchange at I-71 and MLK Blvd. The corridor will provide accesses to a new employment centers and more travel demands will likely be attracted and generated through the district. An efficient transportation system in support of the transit-oriented multimodal development in Uptown, is expected to foster livable communities. This StoryMap presents a picture of future transportation system in Uptown Cincinnati as a final research outcome from the University of Cincinnati.
More information about Uptown Innovation Corridor at: http://www.uptowncincinnati.com
This video provides the picture of Uptown Cincinnati in the near future Created by Uptown Consortium
Uptown Cincinnati is a home to nationally-known medical institutes, University of Cincinnati, and Cincinnati Zoo and Botanic Garden Photo by Uptown Consortium
History of Uptown Cincinnati
1891- A North Town
Uptown Cincinnati was developed as a north town near the downtown in 19th century. The location of Burnet Wood was same, although it is larger then current size, and there was Cincinnati Zoo named as the Cincinnati Zoological Garden. There were no large institute in the area.
The Zoological Society of Cincinnati was opened in 1875. (Source: Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden)
The street structure was similar to the modern structure. Although the MLK and Reading Road intersection existed, Shillito Street was where MLK would later be placed, and Reading Road was named Hunt Street. Much of the network west of the intersection has slightly changed.
This map shows what the street network looked like in 1891 using Sanborn maps compared to current map. You can interact with the map by moving the slide and zoom-in and -out.
Early 1900s- An Emerging Job Center
Uptown Cincinnati, in early 1900s, was formulated as a center of educational and medical center of the Cincinnati region. The University of Cincinnati expanded its campus and Cincinnati General Hospital was established, which was renamed University of Cincinnati Medical Center later. Good Samaritan Hospital was also established.
University of Cincinnati in 1904 (Source: United States Library of Congress)
Cincinnati General Hospital in 1951 (Source: University of Cincinnati Library)
This map shows what changes made between 1891 and 1935 in Uptown Cincinnati. You can interact with the map by moving the slides.
Late 1900s - Expansion of Uptown
The major change in Uptown Cincinnati in late 1900s was construction of new interstate highways, I-71 and I-75. Those two highways changed the structure of this area and Martin Luther King Drive connected those two highways across Uptown Cincinnati. In addition, extensions of University of Cincinnati, UC Health, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Trihealth Hospital and Cincinnati Zoo led growth of the area as a second largest employment center in the Cincinnati region.
I-71 and I-75 across downtown Cincinnati and Uptown, Martin Luther King Drive is across Uptown connecting I-71 and I-75
This map shows what changes made between 1935 and 1990 in Uptown Cincinnati. You can interact with the map by moving the slides.
2010s - Innovation Corridor Development
New I-71 Interchange on MLK Drive Source: Uptown Consortium
- The New I-71 MLK INTERCHANGE brought a potential of Uptown Cincinnati to be grown as a largest job center in the Cincinnati region. Following development projects made this area as one of the fastest growing innovation hub in the nation.
- NIOSH
- UC Gardner Neuroscience Institute
- 1819 Innovation Hub
- Uptown Gateway
- Queen City Hills
- University of Cincinnati
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital
- UC Health
- TriHealth Group
Uptown Development Plans
In 2000s, Uptown Cincinnati developed various site plans to grow. The key was to be developed as a technology center based on the institutes in the area.
2004- Strategic Plan
The recent history of the Uptown Corridor originated in 2004 is the creation of the Uptown Cincinnati Strategic Opportunity Plan. In this plan, this area was designated as a possible "Technology Corridor." This plan was made by Uptown Consortium, which was founded in that same year.
You can learn more about this plan by visiting the consultant's website located here .
Gateway plan of Uptown area Source: beyer blinder belle
2014- The MLK/Reading Road Corridor Study
In 2014, Uptown Consortium and the City of Cincinnati teamed together to create the MLK Reading Road Corridor Study. Through this plan there was a conceptual site plan created as well as a Capital Improvement Plan. The plan also suggested three phases of development projects. The study provides strategic plans to be completed within 5 years, 10 years and 20 years. These plans became the basic concept of the latest site plan of Uptown Cincinnati.
Check out the strategic plans in the map.
For more information, check out the final study report HERE .
The study proposes transportation and gateway plans Source: City of Cincinnati
2018- Innovation Corridor
Uptown Innovation Corridor Plan was introduced in 2018. It includes new development of residential, office, research institutes, hotels, and retails to reform Uptown Cincinnati as a new innovation and technology hub. According to Uptown Consortium, more than 1.1 million square feet of new space totaling more than $1 billion of investment has been completed or is currently underway. When fully implemented, the Corridor master plan anticipates $2.5 billion of project investment, more than 3.5 million square feet of mixed-use development (research, office, clinical, residential, hotel, and retail) and 7,500 jobs.
Green corridor is the key design theme Source: Uptown Consortium
Innovation Corridor Master Plan
The Uptown Innovation Corridor Master Plan was created in the fall of 2018. This is the latest plan for the area to come out by Uptown Consortium. This conceptual site plan was created as part of the plan.
You can click the buildings in the 3d model plan (left) to get more information about the plan of each building.
3D Mixed-use development plan Source: Uptown Consortium
Check out for more information:
Transportation Demand
Those development plans will bring a significant changes in Uptown Cincinnati, particularly in transportation demand and needs. In order to understand the future changes in the area, our research team conducted a study to forecast future transportation demand after development. They also conducted a survey to the workers and residents in Uptown area to understand people's needs in transportation.
Forecasting transportation demand after development
One of our research teams estimated daily trip generation and parking demand based on new buildings in the new development area. And they also identified critical roadway segments impacted by increasing travel demand measured by volume/capacity (v/c) ratio.
Based on the research of travel demand forecasting model, there will be a significant increase in trip generation after Uptown Innovation Corridor development. In addition, Parking demand increases significantly with the new development. All demands for parking more than double. A key note would involve residential parking essentially being introduced to the area. The existing residential parking is only near 100 spaces and will increase 900%. With the modeling, CO2 emissions could be increased significantly with the new developments in place. These new changes in transportation demands will required an innovative change of transportation system in Uptown Cincinnati area. Check out more detail Here .
Student Poster
Transportation Demand Survey
In the fall of 2018, we conducted surveys of people who live and work in uptown to learn about their travel behaviors, and what they think about the current system. They also asked how willing people would be to use alternate means of transportation if the system was improved.
People commute mostly for work and school in this area. And 54% of people drive although 18% use public transit system.
Where do Uptown workers live?
Home zip codes of the workers are various although work zip codes are concentrated near Uptown area. This means that Uptown Cincinnati attract people from outside of the Uptown area and is an employment center of the Cincinnati region. In addition, this picture of home location distribution emphasizes the need of multimodal transportation system in this area.
Interviews on transportation needs
However, people in Uptown Cincinnati think there is not enough transit system in the area currently. Particularly, multi-modal transportation system including bus, bike, and walking infrastructure is not well established in the area. They expressed their needs of those new infrastructure.
They also showed their willingness to change their commuting mode from driving to multimodal transit if a new infrastructure is constructed.
The slides provide brief summary of the transportation demand and planning survey result which was conducted in 2018 Fall.
Uptown Cincinnati requires a new approach to smart transportation system
Based on the research on current transportation system and the survey, the UC interdisciplinary research team which consists of departments of Transportation Engineering, Urban Planning, and Architecture conducted studies on the smart transportation system in Uptown in 2018 and 2019. First, they suggest a new Smart Multi-modal hub in the area. Second, they provide new green transportation system to serve the residents and workers in the area. Lastly, they conducted a base research for the smart street system in the area.
Multi-Modal Transit Hub
Based on the results from transit demand survey and forecast, we suggest development of multi-modal transit hub in Uptown Cincinnati. The multi-modal transit hub will bring high connectivity and accessibility to people living and working in Uptown area. Our planning and architecture teams conducted a series of study on the development by
- Finding the best location of the multi-modal transit hub through suitability analysis
- Assessing impact of the multi-modal transit hub development
- Creating architecture design of the multi-modal transit hub with virtual reality technique
Finding best location of Multi-modal Transit Hub
The key for the new development is the location. We conducted suitability analysis to find the best location of multi-modal transit hub. The research team used 8 criteria (slope, ownership, vacant parcel, main roads, bus routes, red bike station, number of jobs, number of services) to build three scenarios with different weights:
1. More job-accessible
2. More transit-connected
3.More service-accessible
These three scenarios place higher importance of the criteria corresponding to the name. These scenarios were built using communityViz program. The video (left) shows how the communityViz interface look like when we change the weights in different scenarios. The table below shows the weights assigned to each criteria.
Weights assigned to three different scenarios
Job-accessible scenario
This scenario emphasizes accessibility to more jobs. There are multiple large medical and research institutes in Uptown area and the hub should be located with high accessibility to those job centers.
The red grids indicate the most suitable location of the multi-modal transportation hub with high accessibility to jobs. According to the model result, the area around the intersection of MLK and Reading Road is the most suitable for the transit hub.
You can click grids in the maps to see the model results and suitability scores.
Those are the major employers in Uptown and should be accessible easily from the transit hub
Transit-connected scenario
The second scenario is designed to find the best location of multi-modal transportation hub with high connectivity to existing transit opportunities. This scenario assumes that the transportation hub should be located in a place where existing transportation facilities and routes can be connected. The red grids indicate the most suitable locations that have high connectivity to pedestrian street, bus routes and stops, and red bike stations and routes.
This scenario shows the area around the intersection of University Avenue and Eden Avenue as the most suitable location for the hub.
You can click grids in the maps to see the model results and suitability scores.
Red Bike and Metro Transit are in service in Uptown. Streetcar is planned to be extended from downtown Cincinnati to Uptown. The multi-modal transit hub should be able to connect multiple transit modes seamlessly.
Service-accessible scenario
The third scenario is designed to find the most suitable place of the multi-modal transportation hub in Uptown Cincinnati with high accessibility to surrounding services. Services include various service providers such as retail, grocery, public service, hospital, and education. This scenario assumes that the hub should be located in a place where people can access to various service providers from the hub location without driving.
The results of the third scenario indicate the area around the intersection of MLK and Reading Road as the most suitable for the transit hub with high accessibility to service. The result shows very similar pattern with the first scenario.
You can click grids in the maps to see the model results and suitability scores.
Hospital, education and other daily services in Uptown Cincinnati should be accessible from the transit hub
Impact of Multi-modal Transit Hub
The impact analysis aims to identify what changes the transportation hub development will bring into the Uptown area. This analysis is based on the assumption that people from outside of uptown will use the transit hub as a starting point to go to their destination. Based on the two locations determined from the suitability analysis, our research team estimated how many jobs and services can be reached out from the possible hub locations within 5 minutes and 10 minutes by public transit and walking using current infrastructure and routes.
People can reach out to key institutes in the Uptown area such as medical centers and University of Cincinnati within 5 minutes by Metro service and walking. Both locations can also provide accessibility to Cincinnati downtown area within 10 minutes by Metro service. This research indicates that both potential hub locations can serve as a good location to reach out to key institutes and services in Uptown Cincinnati without driving.
Scenario 1: More accessible to jobs and services
This scenario assumes that the transit hub will be located at the intersection of MLK drive and Reading road and estimated the total number of jobs from the proposed location within 5 and 10 minutes. Within 5 minutes, 64,041 jobs are accessible from MLK/Reading location, while 149,399 jobs are accessible from the location within 10 minutes.
Scenario 2: More connectivity to transportation
Eden/University intersection is the most suitable location of the transit hub when we consider public transit connectivity as the most important factor. According to the result of the impact analysis, 52,619 jobs are accessible within 5 minutes and 132,929 jobs are accessible within 10 minutes.
Check out the final poster of this study
Architecture Design of Transportation Hub Center
Our architecture design studio's project is to design a new transportation hub located within the proposed “Cincinnati Smart Corridor”. The building will enhance the Cincinnati Uptown Innovation corridor from “smart” multimodal choice, transit-bike-pedestrian friendly, residential-business favorably perspectives. The studio presents a study investigating the urban mobility with an emphasis on the simulated human behavior cues and movement information as input parameters. The research is defined as a hybrid method which seeks logical architecture/urban forms and analyzes its’ performance. The studio project extends urban mobility study by exploring, collecting, analyzing, and visualizing geospatial information and physically representing the information through various computational technologies.
You can learn more about this studio by clicking here .
Complex Transfer Center
- Jianna Lee
It is designed to provide a seamless linkage between light rail train and other modes of transportation such as hyper-loop, BRT (Bus Rapid Transit), air taxi, passenger car, bicycle or scooter, which facilitate the connection between transportations that are integrated and gathered in one single place. CUTHC is a concept of a ‘Complex Transfer Center’ concentrated in one stop solution. The cultural, commercial, and business facilities are also provided to accommodate the high-density floating population. Here, the Hyperloop, which is a high-speed railway, runs interstate underground with rapid speed and economic cost compared to an airplane. It is possible that all the transfer between transportation from the city railroad, metropolitan bus, to even future-oriented air taxi take place within 10 minutes. . With the creation of a complex transit center, it will not only improve the traffic environment in the region but will also contribute to economic benefits such as job creation and leading the tourism industry.
Multiflux Transit Hub
- Ganesh Raman
A major aspect of design for the current studio is the navigation through a transport hub where people coming to the hub and make decisions on where to go to transport them from the hub to their destination. Thus, the objectives of the people visiting the space are clear, the form of the building introduces the perception of being in a constant flux of motion within the building through the typology of the architectural form, geometry of the spaces intended for circulation and therefore the emotion of the people navigating through the building. The author’s design vision for the design of the transport hub is to translate the physics of dissemination of kinetic energy in motion as a static representation of architecture for the premise of design of the transport hub that attracts and moves people from/to the focal point of its location – similar to the formation of a hurricane, centriole motion of an ice-skater. The organization is similar to the arrangement of iron filings around a magnet, with movement in repeating split-offset helical paths, similar to the formation of stars.
Interconnected Pathways
- Josiah Ebert
The major problem of the project was creating a series of interconnected pathways for the transit of different types such as cars, buses, bicycles, and pedestrians, while at the same time holding these pathways separate to increase the efficiency of movement and safety of different user groups within the space. To accomplish this, the designer created a central pedestrian promenade that ramps above and over a set of intersecting paths for vehicle transit. The vehicles are allowed to pass under the promenade, while a series of loading and unloading platforms both divide the vehicle lanes and become the link between them and the pedestrian pathway overhead. Finally, because of the simple method of pedestrian circulation, additional programmatic elements such as lounges, restaurants, and customer service are able to be slotted along the promenade path without interrupting the previously established efficiency of the circulation. These additional programs create alcoves and outcroppings from the path that offer points of repose for people without delaying their movement if they are in a hurry.
Hyperloop Hub
- Grant Koniski
It’s the year 2035, autonomous cars dominate the market, 60% of people in urban areas use an autonomous car daily. A Hyperloop has been introduced on the East and West Coast, coming as far inland as Chicago. Cincinnati has been chosen as a mid-point for this Hyperloop. Many people rent autonomous cars daily; the cars come from a dispatch center and roam the streets taking rides and switching users efficiently. Once the cars are spent, they make their way back to the station. When the autonomous cars arrive, they drive up onto a hydraulic lift and are lifted into the vault where they can be charged and maintained if need be. From the vault, the cars are queued up onto the upper ring of the station by users and the programmed expected need. The cars are then on a rotating queue around the exterior of the building; the ring has lights under the car to tell you if it has been officially reserved or not; if not then you can rent the car straight out of the queue and pick it up on the ground floor. This allows the users to see their choice of cars while they experience the dining, exercise and green spaces.
Virtual reality simulation
In this project, VR was used to understand the scale of the building. Being a transportation hub involving many different modes of transport it becomes important to understand the scale of the space and how each mode works in tandem with the other and how the travelers navigate through each one of them or independently to reach them. In this project, the three modes of transport are branched into three different levels and the user uses the central ramp to spiral up to each level. The levels are also connected through two cores at the end two ends of the building for faster vertical transportation across the hub.
Green Transportation
:Reducing Carbon Dioxide Footprint
According to the survey result, there are high demand on non-motorized transportation system including sidewalk and bikeway and high needs on improvement of the current public transportation system. We suggest to introduce green transportation system in the Uptown area to serve these needs. The Green Transportation system will not only provide better transportation experience to people in the area, but also reduce carbon dioxide emission.
- New Bikeway Route Design
- Upgrading Current Public Transit System
- Autonomous Shuttle System Design
New Bikeways in Uptown
One of our student teams explored the bikeway planning to improve bicycling connectivity through evaluation of the existing bikeway network connection and identification of improvement needs.
Problem usually lies in that most of the bike routes are street – majority being “Use with Caution” and the surrounding region has steep grades in conjunction with busy roads. A comparative study was made with pedestrian-transit or bicycle-transit with only transit. The study indicates that, if the pedestrian lane be widened to accommodate bicycles as well, there is reduction of crashes with injuries by 17%. Pedestrian injuries can be down by 22%. 75% decrease in average risk of serious injury to cyclists can be achieved.
The research team proposed some practical recommendations to introduce new bike ways on MLK drive and Central Parkway in Uptown Cincinnati
Student Poster
Improving public transit connectivity
For securing the green transportation system in Uptown, it is important to improve connectivity to public transit system by walking and biking. The research team identified the connectivity problem in the area and provided some recommendations to improve it.
The research found that the connectivity for walkability is 67.3%, and is based on 0.25-mile walkability service area. The connectivity for bikeability is 100% (within UC Campus Area), and is based on 1-mile bikeability service area.
For better connectivity in Uptown area, the team provides some recommendations. Explore the map at the right to identify the solutions they suggest.
Student Poster
Autonomous Shuttle
With advanced development of emerging technologies, the autonomous shuttle has been viewed as a disruptive transportation solution. It would offer ease of use and significant green mobility advantage over walking and biking modes while bring no inequality impact. The autonomous shuttle routes were expected to connect major medical and research intuitions and innovation industries, as well as major roadway infrastructures in the Uptown Cincinnati area. Two autonomous shuttles are proposed to serve the north part to MLK corridor (North Route) and south part to MLK (South Route).
What is the Autonomous shuttle?
Autonomous Shuttle System is currently constructed in many US cities.
Student Poster
The research team focuses on adapting the existing roadways along the selected route and make them ready for autonomous shuttle deployment. They assume the existing horizontal and vertical lines of the roadway will stay unchanged. They adapted the cross-section design to accommodate AV lanes and lanes for pedestrians/cyclistss.
Smart Street System
MLK Drive is the busiest street in Uptown and expected to be much busier once the new developments of Innovation Corridor completed. Our transportation engineering team conducted a series of research project to improve the street system in Uptown Cincinnati with innovative ways:
- Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Strategy using Connected-Vehicle-Enabled Sensing Technique
- Speed Harmonization of Interrupted Traffic Flows on Martin Luther King Drive
- Intersection Improvement
Adaptive Traffic Signal Control Strategy
Concept of Adaptive Traffic Signal Control system in the Connected-Vehicle-Enabled Floating Sensing system
Introduction to Adaptive Traffic Control System 🚦
The research team proposes an Adaptive Traffic Signal Control in the Connected-Vehicle-Enabled Floating Sensing Environment which operates based on time-series prediction of traffic demand using VISSIM Modeling. The technology uses floating connected vehicle information in order to improve the signal timing and phasing using an algorithm. The intersection of MLK – Reading was selected to identify the effect of the technique on the traffic flow.
VISSIM simulation example
The simulation results show that the average delay in the intersection of MLK drive and Reading road reduces by 16% and the average speed increases by 11% after the optimization.
Adaptive Traffic Signal Control has shown to improve traffic flow. In areas having outdated traffic signal timings, travel time reliability can be improved, thereby progressively moving vehicles through green lights. It also make traffic signal operations proactive by monitoring and responding to gaps in performance.
Student Poster
MLK Drive Traffic Improvement
Speed Harmonization research targets MLK Drive in Uptown
Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. is a highly connected, interwoven network of urban arterials in Uptown. The research team investigated the existing condition and problems that the street has and suggests two recommendation to improve the traffic in the area by investigating
- How changing or varying the speed limit on Martin Luther King Drive (Future Uptown Smart Corridor) affects travel time
- How geometric transformation of the intersection with fully actuated signal control design increase level of service in the intersection of MLK drive and Reading road
Outcomes of increasing or decreasing the speed limit based on volume to reduce congestion and number of stops can decrease que length and facilitate smooth traffic flow.
The result indicates that speed harmonization of 35 mph on Martin Luther King Jr. Drive can theoretically decrease travel time by minutes, which is massive for every-day commuters. It also has the most potential in stopping non-injury traffic accidents with average non-injury crash per mile per year by –31.3.
Student Poster
Intersection Improvement
The team also found out that the current intersection has a big problem along the east approach with excessive delay in the Eastbound during the peak hour. They suggest two changes in the intersection:
- Geometric change for layout of new lane to the downstream of the Eastbound
- Right Only Lane of the Eastbound will be changed to shared lane allowing through traffic
Geometric cut off in the intersection of MLK and Reading can improve the level of service significanly
According to the VISSIM simulation with the two changes, overall delay of the intersection reduces from 68.3 sec to 52.1 sec and the level of service of Eastbound improved from F to D. The lane group capacity increases from 1674 to 2204 vehicles.