Adapting to rising sea levels in Marshall Islands

Understanding the Pacific atoll nation's adaptation pathways to build resilience to sea level rise and climate change

The Republic of Marshall Islands, like many Pacific island nations, is leading the world in planning and consideration for climate adaptation, as it looks to urgently respond and adapt to the threat of climate impacts and rising sea levels.

As citizens of a low-lying atoll nation, the Marshallese face an existential threat from climate change-induced sea level rise. This study and visual tool has been produced under the Building Resilience in Pacific Atoll Islands initiative to visualize the long-term climate impacts on Marshall Islands' urban communities and clearly show the adaptation pathways available to the Marshallese under various sea level rise scenarios.


I. 'Ad jolet jen Anij': Atolls of the Republic of Marshall Islands

The Republic of Marshall Islands emerged as volcanoes in the Pacific Ocean 70 million years ago. The reefs that formed around the sinking volcanoes became the atolls we see today. They were called

Ad jolet jen Anij ("Our Blessed Inheritance from God")

by the Marshallese - descendants of Micronesian sailors who arrived more than two millennia ago.

The unique physical features and ecology of the atoll with its coral reefs and lagoons enabled a rich and thriving way of life for the Marshallese. Villages and cities grew within the thin strip of land between the lagoon and the ocean, where life and culture adapted to the tides and currents of the sea.

Today, around 60,000 Marshallese live on 182 kilometers (km²) of land spanning an oceanic territory of 200,000 km².

Marshall Islands’ constitution grants all citizens a natural and inalienable right to land. However, climate change and sea level rise threatens to submerge low-lying lands, disrupt coastal livelihoods and uproot traditional patterns of life.

Click through the slides below to view the location of Marshall Islands, the Pacific island nations, and their relationship to sea level rise in the South Pacific Ocean →

Alongside Kiribati and Tuvalu in the Pacific, and the Maldives in the Indian Ocean, Marshall Islands is one of our planet’s four atoll nations.

Each have developed unique cultures and livelihoods adapted to the ocean. 

Globe showing four atoll nations in the Pacific Ocean

Faced with an existential threat, fourteen Pacific Island Countries and Atoll nations including the RMI are collectively working on long-term adaptation plans.

Globe showing fourteen Pacific Island and Atoll nations

Sea level rise will have a global impact on coastal communities everywhere. However, sea levels around the Pacific Islands rose at an average of 7mm/year since 1993. This is more than double the global average rate of sea level rise.

Globe showing increased sea surface height change around South Pacific ocean

However, without any climate adaptation and mitigation measures, Marshall Islands will be one of the first nations to experience sea level rise as a genuine existential threat.

As such, long-term adaptation is critical to giving Marshallese the choice to continue living in the places they have called home for centuries, even as sea levels rise.

Location of urban atolls Majuro, Kwajalein with their respective urban centers Delap-Uliga-Djarrit (D-U-D) and Ebeye

In particular, climate adaptation in urban atolls is critical. Today, the urban areas of Majuro and Kwajalein are home to 74% of Marshall Islands’ population, and in the coming decades, these urban atolls are expected to become home to an even greater share of the population.

Climate Change Scenarios and Sea Level Rise

Long-term climate adaptation planning involves anticipating, limiting, and adapting to the potential impact of sea level rise over the next 100 years. Considering this long time line the planning process needs to prepare for a number of scenarios linked to how high the sea level might rise.

This study modeled and visualized the impact from three sea level rise intervals: 0.5 meters (m), 1m, and 2m. Exactly when Marshall Islands will face a specific sea level rise scenario cannot be determined. However, the likelihood of facing a sea level rise scenario by 2120 depends on the global community’s ability to meet the commitments outlined in the Paris Agreement.

The urban center of Djarrit-Uliga-Delap in Majuro is at significant risk of inundation from 1m sea level rise. Swipe across the image below to view potential impact →

Slider map showing elevation profile of D-U-D and the impact of 1m SLR

Areas at risk of inundation from 1m sea level rise in Delap and Uliga - the urban heart of Majuro atoll.

Buildings and communities in the urban atolls of Majuro – Marshall Islands’ capital, with a population of more than 20,000 people –  and Kwajalein are at high risk of inundation from sea level rise. Without any form of adaptation, 37% of Majuro's building stock is at risk of permanent inundation from a 1m sea level rise. In Ebeye, more than half the building stock could be permanently inundated by 1m sea level rise.

To better understand how Majuro's building stock is impacted by different sea level rise scenarios, click through the slideshow below →

Gridded map of Majuro atoll showing building density and impact of SLR under various scenarios

Buildings along the lagoon side of Delap-Uliga-Djarrit up to Rairok are at high risk of inundation from 0.5m of sea level rise.

Gridded map of Majuro atoll showing building density and impact of SLR under various scenarios

With 1m of sea level rise, Djarrit is almost entirely inundated with significant parts of Uliga, Delap, and Rairok going under water.

The secondary city of Laura is relatively safe from permanent inundation in this scenario.

Gridded map of Majuro atoll showing building density and impact of SLR under various scenarios

With 2m of sea level rise, Majuro's entire building stock is at risk of permanent inundation or at high risk to coastal flooding.

Without any adaptation measures in place, a 2m sea level rise is catastrophic for RMI.

Three key questions inform preliminary priorities for long-term climate adaptation planning in Majuro and Ebeye.

1. How can land and housing stock be protected from various sea level rise scenarios;

2. How many people need to be housed in urban atolls due to growth, displacement or inter-atoll migration; and

3. How much land needs to be developed, raised, or reclaimed to accommodate this demand?

There is a great deal of uncertainty when answering these questions because varying degrees of sea level rise can radically alter land availability and trigger new patterns of migration.

__________________


II. Climate Risk in the Urban Atolls of Majuro and Ebeye

Climate change is introducing unprecedented challenges that disrupt traditional atoll livelihoods like fisheries and agriculture. Faced with warming lagoons and rising sea water, outer atoll communities are now having to consider moving away from their traditional homes. This has led to increased inter-atoll migration towards urban atolls and out-migration to countries abroad; most notably to the United States – which is home to approximately 27,000 Marshallese.

While education, health, and economic opportunities are the main drivers of out-migration today, climate-related stressors may become a dominant driver for migration in the future.

Due to consistent out-migration, the Pacific Community (SPC) projects a reduction in the national population by 2050. While Marshall Islands’ population is likely to decline over the next hundred years due to out-migration, the growth trajectory of urban atolls like Majuro and Ebeye will be more varied and complex. The image below summarizes the demographic trends that climate adaptation needs to consider.

Based on data from the past few decades, trends suggest that housing demand in urban atolls have to negotiate the influx of outer atoll migrants while facing increased international out-migration

Over the planning horizons of 30, 50, and 100 years, the resilience of Majuro and Ebeye's communities will be tested by fluctuating housing demands and sea level rise.

Coastal Hazards in Urban Atolls

Communities in Majuro and Ebeye face multiple coastal hazards with varying intensities and frequency. The Marshallese are already seeing coral bleaching, more frequent flooding, more intense cyclones, and droughts. As oceans warm, Marshall Islands' water and food security will soon be threatened by collapsing reefs, saline intrusion into the aquifer, and more frequent storm surges or recurring king tides that damage agro-forestry systems. Sea level rise will exacerbate existing hazards and introduce new risks to urban atoll communities.

Every household is within reach of the ocean or lagoon and their exposure to coastal flooding or permanent inundation can vary greatly due to the form of the atoll lands, reef bed structures, and small differences in elevation. Atolls are mostly low-lying, with land along the ocean side often rising to between 3 and 4 meters. The lagoon side of atolls is more sheltered from waves but much lower in elevation.

Click through the slideshow to view the typical climate change hazards urban atolls may face under various sea level rise intervals without adaptation measures in place →

Localized Understanding of Hazards in Majuro and Ebeye

The small differences in land width and height above sea level will inform the urgency and viability of adaptation pathways in Majuro and Ebeye.

In Majuro, the urban center of Delap-Uliga-Djarrit – the most densely populated area of Marshall Islands – is spread along a narrow land mass with a low-lying lagoon side and a relatively elevated ocean side ridge. Rairok spans over an islet fewer than a few hundred meters wide. In Laura, the land fans out more than a kilometer wide and is sheltered by elevated ridges on both sides. All the settlements in Majuro are connected to critical facilities and the airport by the Lagoon Road. This lifeline corridor is quite exposed to inundation from 1m sea level rise.

The urban settlements of Ebeye in Kwajalein atoll span a consistently narrow and uniformly low-lying atoll and highly exposed to 1m sea level rise.

With relatively limited land at higher elevations, the focus of this study is to identify options that limit loss of housing by protecting the coast and raising or reclaiming land for development that are relatively safe from sea level rise. To prioritize investments towards these pathways, multiple places in Majuro and Ebeye have been visualized.

The visualizations offer an intuitive reading of hazards and assets at risk of exposure under three sea level rise scenarios. They offer a place-specific understanding of land elevations and potential settlement exposure, but are not meant to portray exact location of impact.

The slides below illustrate the impact of inundation and coastal flooding in Delap-Uliga-Djarrit under various sea level rise scenarios →


III. Adaptation Pathways: Building a Resilient Future

There are a number of proven, robust, and resilient adaptation options that Marshall Islands can embrace and implement to withstand the long-term impacts of climate change. However, there is a great degree of uncertainty around the magnitude of sea level rise over 100 years, the success of global climate mitigation efforts, and the amount of financing that will be made available for climate adaptation.

This study uses the Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways to suggest adaptation pathways that are able to deal with deep uncertainties. It explores sequences of decisions or mitigation measures under multiple futures, and illuminates any path-dependencies between multiple adaptation strategies.

Adaptation Pathways and Options

The specific conditions of Marshall Islands' urban atolls make the following adaptation pathways viable:

1) Protect, 2) Raise, 3) Reclaim, 4) Relocate, and 5) Migrate.

These pathways supplement no-regret adaptation strategies like Early Warning Systems and investing in Nature-based Solutions.

Protecting urban atolls from the effects of sea level rise requires non-structural and structural measures with uncertain design lives that may fail sooner as conditions change. A Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways approach uses the 'Metro-map' decision tree (seen below) to visualize multiple pathways that would enable Marshallese to continue living on their land under various sea level rise intervals.

Each adaptation pathway has a limit to their effectiveness or 'tipping point' before which, preparation to transition to a different track is advised. Adaptation pathways can be followed sequentially or simultaneously.

While certain pathways can withstand even extreme sea level rise scenarios of two meters or more, they are usually very expensive to implement. It is important to weigh the trade-offs between different adaptation pathways and consider the sequence of investments to make the right transition around tipping points while retaining the flexibility to respond to changing rates of sea level rise. For example, prioritizing robust but costly actions early on may turn out to be an overinvestment or lock-in strategies with negative environmental and cultural impact.

One pathway that needs to be financed and implemented in the short-term is 'Protect'. This involves strategies to reinforce the coastal edges of urban atolls to withstand moderate sea level rise and the elevated risk of coastal flooding.

The slides below show adaptation options under 'Protect' and the benefits, costs, and consequences of implementing them

The coastal edges of urban atolls have largely been modified by residents who have built sea walls incrementally to keep tides and storm surges out as sea levels rise.

Incremental and informal solutions to coastal protection in the form of concrete walls, sand bags, and debris are not resilient to accelerated sea level rise

Seawalls are an upgrade from existing coastal protections and offer reinforced protection designed to withstand sea level rise of up to 0.5 meters.

Concrete seawalls can be built quickly but are expensive. They have a cultural and environmental cost as they may limit visual and recreational access to the sea, and damage beaches and coral reefs.

Partially built seawalls increase land erosion at the ends of the wall. With these considerations in mind, seawalls can be designed and implemented fairly quickly to limit the impacts of sea level rise.

Revetments use various layers of concrete, small aggregates and rocks to reinforce the coast and reduce the risk of inundation and flooding for up to 0.5m of sea level rise.

Compared to seawalls, revetments have lesser cultural or environmental impact. The cost of implementing revetments depend on whether the outer layer uses local or imported rocks, or concrete breakwater blocks.

Other variations of revetment design can use precast concrete armoring units that could be manufactured locally and provide jobs. Precast cells can also be designed to attenuate waves and support marine life.

Coral reefs help limit the impact of storm surges. Reef conservation can ensure they continue to function within warming oceans while benefiting biodiversity and local livelihoods.

As oceans warm, coral reefs will need active measures like reef gardening or hybrid structural solutions. While NbS may not limit inundation risk, they can improve the resilience of protective coastal infrastructure.

The measures under Protect are only effective for low to intermediate levels of sea level rise. With 0.5m sea level rise, around 80km of Majuro and 20km of Ebeye's shoreline need to be protected. As sea-levels continue to rise, and coastal inundation increases, it is likely that more transformational resilience measures will be needed in the medium to long-term.

Protect is a short-term adaptation strategy that buys time to plan for and invest in pathways like Raise or Reclaim. These are expensive but robust pathways that can withstand sea level rise of 1 to 2 meters, or more.

Protect and Raise

Raise involves elevating buildings and raising land above the design flood elevation level to avoid inundation or flooding for a given sea level rise scenario. Raising Buildings hits a tipping point at 0.25m sea level rise whereas Land Raising can be a long-term adaptation solution for even extreme sea level rise scenarios. However, Land Raising can be an expensive and significantly complex undertaking that requires a lead time for planning and implementation (shown as dotted line on the Metro Map).

Land is a scarce resource within urban atolls and solely raising vacant or under-developed land may not be sufficient. In such a scenario, Land Raising requires temporary relocation, demolition and redevelopment which brings challenges around existing land-uses, ownership, tenure, customary land rights and livelihoods.

Protect and Reclaim

Reclaim involves building developable land on the sea — specifically over shallow beds within lagoons — that are designed to withstand extreme sea level rise scenarios. Land reclamation is an expensive and technically complex process with long lead times and high environmental impact. Reclamation will become necessary in 1 and 2m sea level rise scenarios if atolls do not have enough land to raise or relocate to.

More developable land is needed to accommodate population growth and house those affected by inundation or flooding. An estimated 630-730 ha of additional land would be required in Majuro under various sea level rise scenarios while 130-160 ha of additional land would be needed in Ebeye. Reclaim and Raise pathways can supplement each other in Majuro and Ebeye.

Reclaim adaptation strategies that create new land for development over shallow beds within lagoons are highlighted in the slides below

Land Reclamation can be a lengthy and expensive process when designed to withstand extreme sea level rise scenarios so it has to be planned, financed, and implemented well before the anticipated interval occurs.

Once a suitable shallow bed site is identified, it has to be prepared for fill by building sea walls. This construction step within a wet area requires more investments than building sea walls on land.

As the shallow bed is prepared for land filling, the constructed seawall must be reinforced to withstand future sea level rise intervals using revetments (local rocks, imported rocks, or precast concrete blocks)

Using engineered soil and imported aggregates, the bed is filled to create land that is elevated to eliminate the risk of inundation from extreme sea level rise and reduce coastal flooding risk.

To justify the high costs of land reclamation, developments on reclaimed land need to be designed as denser neighborhoods that are served by better amenities, and more climate-resilient to coastal water and wind hazards.

This strategy would be an over-investment in a 100 year timeframe if global climate targets are met. In an extreme sea level rise scenario, "Reclaim" with "Raise" are the only pathways that enable the Marshallese stay on in the atolls.

The most important objective of long-term climate adaptation for the Marshallese is to ensure future generations can live and thrive on their ancestral atolls. However, under extreme sea level rise scenarios if Marshall Islands could not adequately protect urban shorelines or implement the ambitious raise or reclaim options in time, Marshallese face the difficult pathways of Relocate or Migrate.

Protect and Relocate

Relocate pathways can include multiple options including pre-emptive retreat from the coastal edge to relocate landwards. This option is not viable for many stretches of narrow urban atolls specially with high sea level rise. Incentives in the form of amenities or livelihoods could allow residents to relocate to safer areas while retaining their connection to the atoll. Relocate may be supplemented by land raising to create developable sites that are resilient to extreme sea level rise and storm surges. These sites may be built on other islands that are better suited for reclamation or land raising projects.

Leading with Protect would buy more time to plan options for relocation in a more strategic manner rather than a reactionary adaptation response. While moving away from one's land comes with enormous sentimental cost and cultural impact, planning for relocation can limit socio-economic fallout and offer viable livelihoods for future generations within Marshall Islands.

Protect and Migrate

Inter-atoll migration from outer atolls to urban atolls and international out-migration from Marshall Islands to the United States and other countries is already occurring today. There are economic, medical, and educational reasons for moving, however, some migration is also climate change related. In the coming decades, migration may be a climate-induced response rather than a strategic option for Marshallese households.

Migration would become the adaptation option of last resort if Marshall Islands faces extreme sea level rise scenarios without large scale adaptation options in place. In some ways, the Marshallese diaspora in places like the US can be seen resource that could help migrants find cultural roots and economic opportunities outside the atolls. While preparing for gradual international migration can soften the social and cultural impacts for households, the collective loss of a way of life and community is unquantifiable. Migration may well remain a "choice" for the Marshallese in the coming decades, but other adaptation pathways could make sure this is not forced upon a nation facing an existential threat.

Concluding Thoughts

As residents of a low-lying atoll nation, the Marshallese are already facing the impacts of climate change, but they do so with adaptation options. Through long-term climate adaptation planning, Marshall Islands can pursue a number of pathways to prepare their urban atolls for increased risk of flooding and inundation from moderate sea level rise. A sea level rise of up to 0.5 m greatly increases risk to coastal hazards but can be managed via multiple pathways by 2120. Moderate sea level rise of up to 1 m brings much tougher but ultimately surmountable challenges, with advanced preparation and ambitious projects.

If global emissions continue unchecked, the Marshallese could experience rising sea level that represent an existential threat to their land and culture. In extreme scenarios where sea level rise levels reach 2 m or more, the only viable options are massive land reclamations, and land raising that includes relocating part of the population. These options would cost billions of dollars and require investments far higher than current adaptation projects. Alternately, the Marshallese would be forced to rely on inter-atoll or international migration as an adaptation option.

The Marshall Islands are at the frontlines of climate change but there are opportunities to avert the worst case scenarios. In the words of former Marshall Islands Foreign Minister Tony De Brum: “If we manage to save my country, we’ll manage to save the world.”

Over the next hundred years, Marshall Islands will have to embark upon ambitious initiatives and make tough decisions that require enormous political will, significant climate financing, and community cooperation.


About

This project was made possible through support from the World Bank, with funding and technical support from the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery.

This product was created as a part of the World Bank’s work, ‘Building Resilience in Pacific Atoll Island Countries ’ which aims to support Pacific atoll island countries to boost their resilience and manage the long-term adverse impacts of climate change.

The World Bank works in partnership with 12 countries across the Pacific supporting 87 projects totaling US$2.09 billion in commitments in sectors like agriculture, health, education and employment, climate resilience and adaptation, energy, fisheries, rural development, economic policy, macroeconomic management, aviation and transport, telecommunications, and tourism.

Technical Details

Coastal flooding due to wind-driven surges, tides and wave set-up was estimated for Majuro and Ebeye for events with return periods of 1, 5, 10, 50 and 100 years using local LiDAR survey data of 5m resolution.

All simulations have been performed by Deltares for the current situation and in combination with fixed sea level rise magnitudes of 0.25, 0.50, 1.0 and 2.0 m.

An interactive webmap produced by GeoAdaptive under this study allows users to explore multiple sea level rise scenarios in Majuro and Ebeye, click below to explore:

Disclaimers

The data and visualizations shown in the maps, drawings, and other web tools illustrate the potential risk of inundation and flooding under various sea level rise and storm event scenarios. They are not meant to suggest exact location of impact, and do not account for erosion, subsidence, other geophysical or climate stressors or future development.

The information shown is meant for screening-level decisions by relevant stakeholders in climate adaptation planning or management. All buildings, roads, and their characteristic features should be verified by site visit and surveys. Any risks associated with using this data for purposes other than long-term planning is assumed by the user. These visualizations should be used strictly as a decision support tool and not for permitting, or other legal purposes.

Credits

This StoryMaps project including visualizations, maps, 3D models, and narrative has been developed by GeoAdaptive with training and engagement support from Cadmus.

Modeling of sea level rise and storm surge impacts, adaptation pathway recommendations, and building digitization has been developed by Deltares with costing and technical support from Tonkin+Taylor.

Photos of Marshallese residents with their permission by Dustin H. Langidrik

The content of this website and the overall study has been reviewed by members of Marshall Islands’ National Adaptation Planning Working Group.

Areas at risk of inundation from 1m sea level rise in Delap and Uliga - the urban heart of Majuro atoll.