Discovering the Rougarou

Amanda Yeo, Nikhil Daga, Charlie Parsons

The Rougarou: Louisiana's Werewolf


Origins of the Rougarou

  • Myth originated in France
  • In French called 'Loup-Garous' which mean werewolf
  • The French Catholics claimed you would be turned into a Loup-garou if you didn't follow the rules of Lent for 7 consecutive years
  • When the French migrated to the southern United States they took the legend with them
  • Legend has changed to match the Cajun dialect -> name changed from Loup-garou to Rougarou

Legends of the Rougarou

  1. Cajun legend says that the beast hunts down Catholics who don’t follow the rules of Lent
  2. Another telling of the story says that the Rougarou is under a 101-day curse, unless the affected person can transfer the curse to another human being. Their curse usually comes from a local witch, sometimes a voodoo priestess.

Fun Fact!

  • Can't count past the number 12
  • It is said that you can protect yourself against the Rougarou by laying 13 small objects by your doors
  • Apparently, when a person changes into a Rougarou they forget how to count past 12

General Habitat

Preferences

  • Lower Elevation
  • Marsh/Swamp Areas
  • Low Population Areas

Threats

  • Cities
  • Fire

Home Range: 260 km^2

Expected Population Density: 3.7/1000 km^2

Louisiana

Unique Features

Has more than 4,000 miles of navigable waterways and 3,260 square miles of river surfaces, land-locked bays and inland lakes

Why it's a Suitable Habitat

  • Lots of land at low enough elevation for Rougarous
  • Many heavily forested/swamp areas
    • Large Catholic population
    • 28% Catholic
    • Historically Catholic state

Research Question:

How can we maximize human safety while still protecting the native rougarou safety?

Factors

Habitat Preferences

    Elevation

    Land Cover

Anthropogenic Threats

  • Population Density
  • Catholic Churches

Data Management

Projection

NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Louisiana South FIPS 1702

Clipped

High resolution LA state shapefile

Snap Raster

Louisiana Elevation

Population Density

Weight : 0.35

Justification: Rougarous are renowned for not being able to count past 12 and getting confused and freezing up if they see things in groups of 13+. Therefore, areas with large population densities with more people per km^2 are less likely to be suitable for Rougarous to live in. Additionally, we were trying to maximize both rougarou population potentials while also protecting humans and therefore it is important to weigh heavily the possible interactions between the two species.

Land Cover

Weight: 0.5

Justification: We weighed land cover the heaviest because habitats with cover, prey, and water. We wanted to prioritize areas of deciduous forest and woody wetlands because they provide plenty of cover to hide, as well as also having optimal prey for the rougarou. Highly developed land and open water are extremely dangerous with little reward, and therefore the least suitable.

Distance from Catholic Churches

Weight: 0.05

Justification: While it would theoretically make sense to weigh churches highest because in many Louisiana legends rougarou are known to prey on Catholics who observe lent, there is a limited Catholic churches data set. In addition the population data tends to encompass churches as well, as areas with large populations naturally tend to have more Catholic churches.

Elevation

Weight: 0.1

Justification: Rougarous prefer areas of lower elevation. While we believed this was an important factor to consider, if an area is of low enough elevation for it to be a suitable habitat for the rougarou but there is a big city is also located there then it would no longer be a suitable habitat for them. This is why we weighed elevation less than land coverage and population density, because they wouldn't live in an area primarily because it was of low elevation. In addition we have already weighed the land cover data very highly, and there is some overlap between elevation and land cover. This is as swamps and marsh lands generally tend to be found at lower elevations.

Weighted Analysis Classification and Justification

Model Builder

Model Builder showing the steps from when all files had been converted to rasters through the making and reclassifying of a weighted model.


A Comparison of our Weighted Models

Comparison of Weighted Models


Habitat Calculations

Species Home Range: 260 km^2

Suitable Range: 77,899.87 km^2

Percent Study Area Classified as Suitable: 57.42%

Number of Suitable and Highly Suitable Areas Large Enough to Support Species: 26

Area of Suitable and Highly Suitable areas large enough: 52,631.49 km^2

Maximum Population Size: 195

Interactive Map

This map shows only the areas that were considered suitable and highly suitable in our weighted map

The colors were selected to indicate that the land was a good habitat because these are more forested and less populated/developed areas

    Darker Green = Highly Suitable (5)

    Lighter Green = Suitable (4)

Policy Recommendations

We recommend that all possible lands that are suitable for rougarou habitation be left aside for rougarous. The reason for this is there are a maximum of 195 rougarous in the state making them a critically endangered species. We must do all that is possible to protect them. In addition many leading experts in the field believe Rougarous are humans, and as a result it would be unethical to kill them. They are also important predators who are vital to the ecosystem of Louisiana as they can eat invasive species and are the only natural predator to the overly populated alligator. 

It would also not be difficult to maintain rougarou habitats as their natural areas tend to be away from human populations. This is shown by the fact rougarous tend to live away from cities and churches and in marsh lands and more forested areas. It is vital to keep human and especially catholic populations away from these regions as rougarou/ human interaction can lead to danger for all involved.

References

Model Builder showing the steps from when all files had been converted to rasters through the making and reclassifying of a weighted model.

Comparison of Weighted Models