
Beneath the Soil of Blair Mountain
Guns are now silent! The blood stained earth, spent shell casings, and unmanned cannon stand as the silent evidence of what happened on old Blair Mountain...[100] years now she's kept the past a secret -Wilma Steele, founding board member of the West Virginia Mine Wars Museum and retired art teacher
The Battle of Blair Mountain was the culmination of decades of violence in the coalfields of West Virginia. For 100 years the story of the Battle of Blair Mountain was been buried. Buried both beneath the soil of the mountain and within the memory of those involved. For decades, the miners kept quiet fearing prosecution by the state or federal government while West Virginia State officials worked to keep accounts of the Mine Wars out of textbooks and the larger national history of the United States. All the while, the material evidence of the battle, bullets and shell casings laid below just a few inches of soil. "The land will tell the story, you follow the land to find the history." -Donald McCoy
What Can Archaeology Tell Us?
Archaeology is a subdiscipline of anthropology, which is the study of humans and their societies, past and present. Archaeologists are scientists who seek to understand past human cultures through the study of artifacts and other forms of evidence that can be gathered from archaeological sites. In West Virginia, archaeological sites span nearly the entire history of the human occupation of North America, from the Paleo Indians to the recent past. In particular, archaeological excavations in the areas surrounding Blair Mountain have helped to illuminate portions of our history that had not previously been told in history books. With each passing year the introduction of stripmining practices such as Mountaintop Removal on the battlefield has threatened to destroy evidence of the war that occurred there in 1921. Coal companies have used the passage of time against coalfield communities, hoping that as evidence of the battlefield faded so too would memory of the struggle. Not only have these artifacts played a key role in helping activists prove the importance of preserving Blair Mountain but they have also helped archaeologists to recreate portions of the battlefield revealing previously unknown aspects such as tactics, access to materials, and battle formations.
1810
First commercial coal mine opens in West Virginia.
1838
The first archaeological excavation was conducted in West Virginia at the Grave Creek Mound in Moundsville.
1846
The second major archaeological excavation in West Virginia was conducted by Ephraim G. Squier and Edwin H. Davis documented the Salt Rock Petroglyphs in Cabell County, beginning a long relationship between the Smithsonian Institution and West Virginia Archaeology.
August 31-September 3, 1921
The Battle of Blair Mountain began on August 31st 1921 as striking union miners clashed with an ad hoc army funded by private coal operators. On September 2nd after two days of fighting, the United States Secretary of War ordered two thousand US soldiers to Logan, WV to intervene. The battle ended on Sept 4th as federal troops arrived. The miners surrendered to federal troops in part because many were veterans of the First World War who viewed their fight as not with the federal government but with the coal operators.
1991
A team from West Virginia University's Institute for the History of Technology and Industrial Archaeology survey the battlefield.
2006
The first professional archaeological excavation was completed on the battlefield by Dr. Harvard Ayers of Appalachian State University.
2009
Additional excavations are conducted. Additionally, due in part to evidence from the 2006 excavations, the site of the Battle was selected to be placed on the National Registry of Historic Places.
2010
Representatives from Arch Coal, Inc. and Massey Energy Company sue to have the ruling overturned.
2011
March to Save Blair Mountain recreates the miners original path from 1921.
2016
The order to remove the Blair Mountain Battlefield from the National Register of Historical Places was overturned by a federal court. While this order offers greater protection for the battlefield from further stripmining it does not guard against all forms of extraction, such as logging or drilling for natural gas.
June 27th, 2018
The Blair Mountain Battlefield site was officially re-listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
The Archaeology of Blair Mountain
Many of the artifacts collected during archaeological excavations are items that were used or discarded during the battle, like this grouping of .45 caliber shells recovered from the Crooked Creek area.
A lot can be learned from these artifacts and their physical attributes, including their caliber and manufacture on the headstamp of each casing. Their usage marks help archaeologists to reveal previously unknown historical elements of the battle, such as site occupancy and firepower capabilities.
During the excavations between 2006 and 2011 archaeologists were able to identify 21 sites of fighting with 10 being defensive and three being offensive.
There were 798 artifacts discovered in the defensive sites, including 20 different calibers. 237 artifacts were collected at offensive sites representing 26 different calibers.
The defensive sites show heavy concentrations of ammunition in the .30 caliber range, This indicates that the weapons used by the Logan defenders were coming from more centralized sources, such as the state government, which could draw heavily on military-surplus weapons and large amounts of funds to buy high-grade weapons.
Pictured: Winchester 1873 carbine rifle, recovered from Blair Mountain battlefield.
There were some calibers discovered at the Blair Mountain sites that deserve mention because of their uniqueness. The .250 HP, the .256 Newton, and the .303 SAV were all “wildcat” or experimental rounds based on preexisting rounds that were in use for a relatively short time. The .280 Ross and the .351 SL were rounds that did not find widespread popularity and were discontinued shortly after the battle. Maybe the most unique round is the .41 Swiss-Verletti, which is a foreign cartridge that found extensive usage in the terrain of southern West Virginia. Developed in the 1860s and 1870s, the round was popular in Central Appalachia due to its stopping power in confined, brushy areas. The .41 Swiss, along with the .45–70 “trapdoor Springfield,” are the archetypical “old mountain rifles” that some of the battle participants were described as carrying.
What we can learn from the distribution of bullet casings is that the defenders were well equipped with modern weapons and ammunition while the striking miners utilized a variety of weapons, many grabbing whatever old hunting rifle they had available. This accounts for why the striking miners who outnumbered the ad hoc army of defenders, were unsuccessful in taking the mountain.
Two boys was killed. Both were just out of the service and had on their uniforms. They thought they'd go up around a machine gunner and capture the gunner...both of them were killed. One boy was hit six or seven times -Bert Castle, Commander of a miners' squad near Crooked Creek Gap.
From Mine to Consumer
01 / 08
1
The Life of an Object
The artifacts in the West Virginia Mine Wars Museum are not simply inanimate objects from the past. They are alive with memories and histories that inform our present and our future. We encourage you to think of each object as one point within a vast constellation of stories, people and places. Part of the work of anthropologists is to illuminate this network by tracing the object’s “life story”. In doing so, it is possible to take an object that was mass produced, like a .30 caliber shell casing, and reveal its connections to the specific places, people and times that make it unique.
Pictured: The West Virginia Mine Wars Museum in Matewan, WV
2
This .30 cal shell casing was recovered by the Ayers team in 2006 from Crooked Creek Gap, a site of intense fighting during the Battle of Blair Mountain.
Pictured: A .30 casing recovered from the area of Crooked Creek gap in 2006.
3
The .30 caliber bullet became popular among both military and civilians in the 19th century. The casing is likely made of brass, an alloy of copper and zinc, commonly used in the manufacture of shell casings due to physical properties that lend itself to more industrialized methods of construction.
Pictured: A grouping of shells of various calibers recovered from the Crooked Creek area.
4
While it is difficult to locate exactly where the brass used to create this shell casing was sourced, much of America’s brass production by the 1920’s was centered in the Naugatuck Valley, CT. Brass companies grew into some of the first truly global corporations investing in copper and zinc mines in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Chile and Peru.
Pictured: Winchester Repeating Arms Co. Assembly Line 1914-1918
5
Many of the shell casings in our collection were manufactured through a highly industrialized process at the Winchester Factory in New Haven CT. This process started in the mine, as coal from Appalachia was transported to factories in the North East. With each mile gained the train worked to turn human labor into a commodity. This process anonymized the textures that made Southern West Virginia unique, turning coal into commodities and coal field immigrants into consumers.
Pictured: Winchester Repeating Arms Co.
6
The manufacture of shell casings starts with wide brass coils that are fed into a cupping press which shapes the brass sheets into a desired shape. The cups are then passed through a series of draw presses which lengthen the cup into a narrow cylinder. Once the cup has reached its targeted length the top is trimmed and tapered. The bottom of the casing is formed into a primer pocket and the headstamp is applied. The process continues with the cutting of the extraction groove, the punching of the flash hole and the annealing of the mouth and neck and finished with a chemical wash. The manufacturing process is largely similar today to the techniques used in the early twentieth century.
Pictured: Manufacture of Ordnance Material 1917-1918, US National Archives
7
After being manufactured, bullets and rifles were transported from the Winchester factory to be sold around the world. In Southern West Virginia, however, the distribution of weapons and ammo was often closely watched by government officials and Baldwin-Felts agents. During the Paint Creek and Cabin Creek Strikes, Joe Aliff’s mother lived in the tent colony and would often help to smuggle ammunition into the camp. Joe remembers his mother telling him how "the coal companies simply came in and threw everybody out of their houses and the government brought tents in to give them a place to live…my mother being only a barefoot girl of twelve years old well they would let her go out of this place, you see its guarded, they’re simply prisoners, they would let a little barefoot girl go out, well mother would take her little bucket and go to get milk and they would put shells in her bucket and she could walk past the guards and smuggle shells into this camp…we had a full-fledged war down here, but the government keeps it quiet" (Aliff Hufford 1995).
Pictured: Residents of Holly Grove mining tent colony in West Virginia during the Paint/Cabin Creek strike from 1912-1913. Author Unknown
8
For 100 years objects from the Battle of Blair Mountain have laid below just a few inches of soil. The geological processes that contributed to the formation of large coal deposits beneath the Appalachian Mountains also influence the preservation of archaeological materials. Over time metal objects like shell casings, rifles and other artifacts can become brittle with corrosion, while organic artifacts like leather and paper fade into the soil completely. Each individual object is affected by its environment in a particular way. The most visible factors that determine artifact preservation are moisture and heat as well as human and non-human intervention.
Pictured: A .32 caliber Smith and Wesson revolver recovered during the 2006 survey of the battlefield.
It's about remembering past struggles when people today are having to fight to keep rights won a century ago -Lou Martin History Professor and Museum Board Member
Why Should I Care?
Today, the battle of Blair Mountain continues in the fight to preserve its legacy from the mining conglomerates who own most of the battlefield’s nearly 1,700 acres. The continued mining of Blair Mountain and its surrounding areas has the potential to disturb archaeological sites. Bill Price, a senior organizing representative with the Sierra Club, has stated “It would be a disaster to blow up a mountain of such significance. It would be like blowing up Gettysburg.”
This map shows the area around Blair Mountain and the amount of mining that has occurred since the battle in 1921. The orange areas represent underground mines while the purple shows above ground mines.
The 2011 March to Save Blair Mountain
In June of 2011 nearly 1,000 protesters began to march the exact route of the 1921 march on Blair Mountain. By marching, they were seeking to contest the “legally sanctioned definition of the mountain, and by extension all mountains as valuable only for the resources (they) can yield (Brown 2016, 87). In the words of many protest signs, in saving the mountain they were also hoping to save our history. In 2009, the mountain had been selected for placement on the National Register of Historic Places, but was removed after legal action taken by coal companies. The protesters hoped their march would “bring attention to and prevent the impending destruction of the site of the Battle of Blair Mountain by... mountaintop removal”(Brown 2016, 90).
Pictured: Artifacts from the 2011 March to Save Blair Mountain.
Memory and Archaeology
"to articulate the past historically does not mean to recognize ‘the way it really was’. It means to seize hold of a memory as it flashes up at a moment of danger” -Walter Benjamin
Remembering
Artifacts don't simply tell us about our pasts, they also inform our present and our futures. In stating that memories are alive in objects and in places, we acknowledge their potential to spark hope, and to inspire other possibilities. In telling the “life story” of an artifact we are participating in an act of remembrance. We are remembering the labor that went into its creation and the labor that each bullet was used to suppress. Through this memory it becomes possible to decenter narratives of production and consumerism that work to erase the textures which make Blair Mountain special. Doing so can inspire us to think critically about the past, to question our traditions and our narratives of the way things are. As Viet Thanh Nguyen writes “all wars are fought twice, first on the battlefield and second in memory” (2016, 4). The bullets of Blair Mountain were fired twice, first in 1921 and again in 2009, when they were used as ammunition in the fight to preserve the Mountain.
Between 1997 and 2004 Kenny King made repeated attempts to place Blair Mountain on the National Register of Historic Places each of which was rejected by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) because of the view that the mountain had no remaining historical or archaeological integrity. After the 2006 survey, however, the application was unanimously approved.
Forgetting
For one hundred years the story of Blair Mountain has been mediated by federal and state governments as well as the ambitions of coal companies. MountainTop Removal and other forms of mining on Blair Mountain represent a continued effort to obscure the mountain’s place in American history by destroying important archaeological evidence. The practice of remembering and forgetting is rooted, not only in the complicated ways in which memories become histories, but also in the manner in which artifacts end up in the ground and the care that that ground receives over time. The archaeological investigations in 2006 and beyond justified the placement of the Mountain on the National Registry of Historic Places but what separates the bullets, casings and other artifacts from the coal being extracted from the mountain is the care that these objects receive.
Pictured: A piece of wood with an embedded bullet that appears to be a .45 ACP round recovered from Crooked Creek. The presence of this bullet along with 57 .45 ACP caliber casings suggest the presence of a Thompson Submachine Gun. Indicating one of the first instances of a "Tommy Gun" beings used in battle.
Listening/Care
Anthropologists and museum professionals have worked to preserve artifacts from the Battle of Blair Mountain as evidence of what happened there. The existence of these objects makes it harder for those who would like to forget what happened 100 years ago to continue to shape the narrative. Care, however, is not simply fostering objects through time, it is also recognizing the networks that these objects are part of. In reconnecting them to their vast constellations of stories, people and places, they regain their uniqueness and their power.
Each piece of coal that was sent to the Winchester Factory was mined by an individual with hopes and struggles. Coal piled into train cars dims the power of an individual piece of coal. The harsh edges created by explosions, pick axes and hard labor become rounded with time and distance. With each mile gained the train turns human labor into a commodity, losing its connection to the people and places where it was mined. Coal built the fires that fused copper and zinc to create brass and powered the machines that turned steel into the rifles used to shoot at the miner who fought for human rights. Care is breaking free of these cycles of production and consumption in an attempt to build a picture of the past, by taking hold of a just memory that pays respect to what happened on Blair Mountain 100 years ago ( Nguyen 2016).
Pictured: A sign carried during the 2011 march on Blair Mountain.
People Funded. People Powered. People's History.
If you would like to support efforts to preserve the history of Blair Mountain you can become a museum member or make a one time donation by following the link below. With your support, we're able to share the legacy and impact of thousands of people fighting for human rights, civil liberties & labor justice in Appalachia, past and present.
About the Catalog
The artifacts that we’ve pulled together for The Land Will Tell The Story have been organized from several boxes that comprise a large portion of the results of several archaeological digs throughout the Spruce Fork Ridge area between 2006-2009. The digs were all conducted by one or more people from the same group, which included Harvard Ayers, Brandon Nida, Zan Rothrock, and Kenneth King. Ayers, a professor at Appalachian State in Boone, NC led the earliest digs, later digs were probably conducted independently by Nida and King or King independently.
We lack the full records for the work that was done, but in cataloging these artifacts, we’ve pulled together everything currently available to use. Description notes describe the objects and the area, if much is known. The 2006 surveys included narratives for each site, which are here in the Context notes. If artifacts were identified previously, we preserved those details and elaborated on them where possible.
Catalog entries are divided into two types. Some of these document the full array of a documented archaeological site, and contain several different types of artifacts within one entry. This preserves the organization of objects as they originally came into our possession, and provides a platform for further site research. Many other catalog entries narrow the lens to specific objects -- coins, for example, or unique ammunition calibers, which begin to weave stories of their own.
All of these artifacts are now on loan to the West Virginia Mine Wars Museum through the collection of Kenny King.
Land Acknowledgement
We acknowledge and pay deep respects to the original people whose lands along the Kanawha, Tug Fork and Guyandotte waterways where Blair Mountain sits today. The Tutelo, S’atsoyaha (Yuchi), Shawandasse Tula (Shawanwaki/Shawnee) and ᏣᎳᎫᏪᏘᏱ Tsalaguwetiyi (Cherokee, East) are often backgrounded or erased from public discourse and popular culture. We recognize their presence, their history, and their enduring and continuing contributions to our collective lifeways. In recognizing the Native peoples on whose ancestral land this museum sits we would like to set the stage for us to bring together diverse migrants, from the earliest settlers and enslaved peoples to the most recent immigrant communities to celebrate our collective histories as West Virginians.
This exhibit is done in solidarity with the Battle of Blair Mountain Centennial and is supported in part by a grant from the National Coal Heritage Area Authority.
Meet the Team
Ethan Karnes (exhibit layout, mapping and essay) is an archaeologist/anthropologist, West Virginia native, graduate of Marshall University and current PhD student at George Washington University . His work explores the connections between memory, materiality and landscape focusing on regions confronting the legacies of long-term resource extraction. He is interested in how the continual modification of the landscape, as well as the legacy of the early 20th century labor movement, is reflected in memory and materiality and the ways these issues have come to impact, adapt to, and produce narratives of climate change, resistance, and identity within Appalachia.
Shaun Slifer (artifact photography and cataloging) has worked as the creative director of the West Virginia Mine Wars Museum since the museum first opened in 2015. He designs and builds the exhibitions, has developed branding for both the museum and the Blair Centennial, and serves as a kind of ad hoc collections manager for our collection of over 700 artifacts.. An artist, nonfiction author, and museum professional based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Shaun is a founding member of the Justseeds Artists’ Cooperative , and an original member of the now-disbanded Howling Mob Society . His book, So Much To Be Angry About: Appalachian Movement Press and DIY Radical Publishing 1969-79 (West Virginia University Press) is now available.
Citations
- Anne T. Lawrence. Anne T. Lawrence Mine Workers Oral History Collection 1972-1973.
- Benjamin, W. (2009). On the concept of history.
- Brown, Richelle C. “Power Line: Memory and the March on Blair Mountain.” In Excavating Memory. University Press of Florida, 2016.
- de La Bellacasa, Maria Puig. Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Vol. 41. U of Minnesota Press, 2017.
- Duafala, A. P. “The Historiography of the West Virginia Mine Wars.” West Virginia History: A Journal
- of Regional Studies 12, no. 1 (2018): 71–89. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/703896.
- Gordillo, Gastón R. Rubble. Duke University Press, 2014.
- Halbwachs, Maurice. La mémoire collective. Albin Michel, 1997.
- Karnes, Ethan. “Mining for Memory in the Coalfields of southern West Virginia.” Unpublished
- Keeney, Chuck. “The Mind Guard System: Mine Wars and the Politics of Memory in West
- Virginia.” West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies 12, no. 1 (2018): 47–70.
- https://muse.jhu.edu/article/703895.
- Kopytoff, I. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective, 68, 70-73, 1986.
- Latour, B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press, 2005
- Nida, Brandon, Trevor Harris, A. Rochelle Williams, and Lou Martin. "What Did the Miners See?: Archaeology, Deep Mapping, and the Battle of Blair Mountain." West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies 12, no. 1 (2018): 97-120.
- Nida, Brandon, and Michael Jessee Adkins. "The social and environmental upheaval of Blair Mountain: A working class struggle for unionization and historic preservation." In annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Saint Louis. MO. 2010.
- Nguyen, Viet Thanh. Nothing Ever Dies. Harvard University Press, 2016.
- Ricoeur, Paul. Memory, history, forgetting. University of Chicago Press, 2004.
- Slavin, Peter. "Historic Blair Mountain Battlefield Wins Recognition." The Appalachian Voice . Last modified April 10, 2009.
- Soodalter, Ron. "In the Battle for Blair Mountain, Coal is Threatening to Bury Labor History." The Progressive Magazine. Last modified January 31, 2018.
- Steele, Wilma. "The Wisdom of Old Blair Mountain." Appalachianhistory.net. Last modified September 15, 2014.