Sensors as a risk management tool

Measuring snow to help manage avalanche risks in Longyearbyen: Arct-Risk project report

Introduction

Natural hazards have a long history of impacting human life and infrastructure in Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway.

Located on the island of Spitsbergen at 78° North, Longyearbyen serves as the administrative center of the Svalbard archipelago.

You can explore this map - and all other maps and three-dimensional scenes in this StoryMap - using the interactive controls on the map or scene.

Longyearbyen's location in the glacially-sculpted Longyeardalen valley at the foot of steep mountain slopes exposes the community to a variety of natural hazards.

Here, a view south over Longyearbyen shows the town's proximity to the mountain slopes, small glaciers at the head of the valley, and Adventfjorden (the Advent fjord) in the foreground.

Snow covers the region for up to nine months of the year at sea level, exposing Longyearbyen's residents and infrastructure to snow avalanche hazards during the long Arctic winters.

Historically, snow avalanches have regularly occurred on the steep slopes of the Gruvefjellet, Sukkertoppen, and Platåberget mountains.

In addition, slushflows (or slush avalanches) can release from Vannledningsdalen, a side valley to Longyeardalen.

Two recent high-impact snow avalanche events in particular have influenced the community's contemporary approach to avalanche risk management.

A large slab avalanche - outlined in red - naturally released from the west-facing slope of Sukkertoppen on December 19th, 2015 immediately following a strong winter storm.

Photo: Erik Næss

This avalanche destroyed 11 houses and, tragically, resulted in two fatalities.

Photo: Erik Næss

The following winter another avalanche released from the same slope on February 21st, 2017. Although daily avalanche forecasting for Longyearbyen began after the avalanche in 2015, forecasters had insufficient data about the snow conditions in the upper portion of Sukkertoppen avalanche path and did not expect an avalanche to release.

These avalanches from Sukkertoppen ushered in a new era of snow avalanche hazard management in Longyearbyen. This StoryMap describes the development of a snow depth sensor system as it evolved over five winters from a proof-of-concept test of communication technology to a robust snow measurement program in Longyearbyen. With this work, we seek to present our experiences in developing this system and provide a framework to support improved sensor utilization in other risk management contexts.

Project context

The work described in this report has occurred as part of the research project Risk governance of climate-related systemic risk in the Arctic ( ARCT-RISK ). The ARCT-RISK project seeks to develop knowledge and tools to help society manage risks associated with climatic changes. In this project, we have used Longyearbyen as a case-study for managing climate-related risk, as climatic changes in this location presently occur faster than anywhere else in the world.

ARCT-RISK uses this diagram as a conceptual model for understanding and managing climate-related risk.

This model frames climate-related risk as the manner in which climate change impacts the type, frequency, and magnitude of the natural hazards which occur in a location. The natural hazards, in turn, have rippling effects on society's infrastructure, inhabitants, and societal functions. In the respect, we can view the effects of snow avalanches as climate-related risks, where climatic changes can modify the avalanche characteristics and timing, and avalanches in turn impact socio-technical systems (e.g. infrastructure, inhabitants, and societal functions).

The risk governance process serves as a structured approach which helps societies make decisions about risks. Risk governance involves the steps of Framing, Data collection, Sensemaking, Decision-making, and Risk treatment, with each step informed by communication and collaboration between involved actors.

Combined, the model offers a framework for addressing climate-related risk from both short-term and long-term time perspectives.

The sensor work we have conducted in the ARCT-RISK project focuses primarily on the data collection phase of risk governance, but also involves sensemaking (e.g. understanding the collected data) and incorporating this information into the decision-making process.

The initial impetus for this work began when, following the 2015 and 2017 avalanche events, the University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) received funding to install three snow monitoring stations in Longyeardalen for the 2017/2018 winter season. These sensors were intended to support snow research and site-specific avalanche forecasting services in Longyearbyen. We therefore installed these stations in know avalanche release areas to monitor snowpack condition throughout the snow season. This photo shows one of these stations installed on Sukkertoppen's western aspect (the "Lia" station) in the release area of the 2015 avalanche.

Concurrently, Telenor Svalbard decided to start exploring the possibilities of emerging Low Power Wide Area Networking (LPWAN) technologies with the goal of promoting a variety of new use cases in remote sensing and reducing data transmission costs with these low-power radio transmissions. Telenor initiated contact with the UNIS snow station project and agreed to install a low-cost prototype ultrasonic snow depth sensor onto the same mast as one of the UNIS stations to test data transmission via LPWAN, as shown in this photo.

This report describes the development of a sensor system based on this initial collaboration as it evolved from a proof-of-concept test of communication technology to a robust snow measurement program. We use this work as an example of a best-practice approach towards using sensors as a tool in the risk management of natural hazards. In this context, we propose seeking a sensor concept which:

1) Will measure a parameter relevant for the natural hazard in question;

2) Can measure this parameter at the most optimal location;

3) Will deliver the measured data to users in an operational timeframe.

Here, we address these objectives by describing:

Finally, we present  case studies  in terms of data analysis and future system development, and summarize a  best-practice approach  to developing a sensor concept suitable for monitoring natural hazards for risk management purposes. With this report, we intend to provide a framework for risk managers to develop sensor-based natural hazard monitoring systems and integrate these systems into their broader risk governance processes.

Snow depth measurements

Snowfall and wind which led to an avalanche from Gruvefjellet.

To best design a sensor concept for managing climate-related risks related to natural hazards, one must first decide on a specific parameter - or parameters - to measure. Avalanche risk management programs often focus on snow depth measurements as a first step in developing a snow monitoring network because information about changes in snow depth serve as a critical input to avalanche hazard forecasts and due to the availability commercially-available snow depth sensors. As Longyearbyen lacked automated snow depth measurements relevant for avalanche forecasters prior to the 2017/2018 winter season, our work has primarily focused on supplying hazard managers and researchers with information regarding this critical avalanche forecasting parameter.

Snow depth - measurement principles

We have primarily focused on measuring snow depth through two distinct sensor types and measuring techniques: ultrasonic snow depth sensors (pictured to the left) and ground-based LiDAR (Terrestrial Laser Scanning - TLS; pictured to the right).

Ultrasonic sensors have traditionally provided the majority of snow depth measurements to avalanche forecasting operations. Ultrasonic sensors measure distance based on the time-of-flight principle for a sound wave emitted from the device. This means the sensor emits a sound wave and accurately clocks the time it takes for the sound wave to reflect off the surface and return to the sensor. As the snow depth increases, the distance the sound wave must travel decreases and the time-of-flight therefore decreases as well.

Ultrasonic sensors have a relatively small measurement footprint and are most suitable for obtaining snow depth measurements for a single point-scale location.

Contrastingly, terrestrial laser scanning has historically been used in snow and avalanche research contexts and has only more recently begun to emerge as an operational tool. As an active remote sensing technology, ground-based LiDAR, or TLS, calculates the distance to a target surface (in this graphic, Gruvefjellet's western aspect serves as the target surface) by measuring the time-of-flight for a pulse of light emitted by the instrument to travel to the target surface, reflect off the surface, and travel back to the TLS. The scanner rotates through a user-defined scan window, scanning a swath of the surface and recording the position of millions of points on the surface in a three-dimensional point cloud which represents the scanned surface. We then use these point cloud data to create a digital elevation model (DEM) of the slope. The elevation difference between a scan or DEM of an area or slope with snow and the slope without snow represents the snow depth at each point on the surface.

Where an ultrasonic sensor measures snow depth at a single point, TLS technologies allow for the measurement of snow depths across an entire slope scale - or "spatially-distributed snow depths."

To better understand what the TLS "sees", we can compare photos from the scanning location at times without snow (left) and with snow (right). By calculating the difference between the DEMs from the scans taken at each time, we can determine the snow depth at each point on the surface.

We can then display these TLS snow depth data as a layer in a 3D map scene, with differing colors representing different snow depths draped over a model. In this map scene displaying TLS snow depths, darker greens and blues represent deeper snow depths on Gruvefjellet (click on the circle in the lower left corner to pull up the map legend). The deepest snow can be found along the ridgeline in the cornices and in the bowl-shaped features under the upper cliffs.

The present work focuses on ultrasonic and TLS-derived snow depth measurements in an avalanche risk management setting. We chose to employ ultrasonic snow depth sensors as the basis for our sensor system due to the availability of low-cost sensors which we could modify to interface with our communication technology and suit our low-power requirements. By contrast, we had access to the relatively expensive TLS technology through UNIS and had used this sensor extensively in a research context. While we present the sensor concept using these specific technologies, we discuss alternative sensors which can provide similar data (e.g. drones in lieu of TLS for snow depth mapping) in the  system flexibility  portion of this report.

Initial sensor placement

In general, the most relevant data regarding a natural hazard will come from an area in close proximity to where the natural hazard occurs. For snow avalanches in Longyearbyen, snow depth measurements in avalanche terrain which can impact infrastructure provide particularly useful data to hazard managers.

Avalanche terrain consists of steep slopes on which avalanches can release (avalanche release areas) and the areas into which an avalanche can run (avalanche runout zones). This scene displays avalanche terrain in Longyeardalen in terms of release area steepness (yellow indicates slopes between 30 and 35 degrees, orange indicates 35 to 40 degrees, and the various shades of red indicate increasing steepness from 40 to 90 degrees) and common runout zones (blue) relevant for snow avalanches.

Often, however, avalanches which impact infrastructure run much further than common avalanches. In Norway, three hazard zones which indicate the annual nominal probability of avalanche occurrence (1/100, 1/1000, and 1/5000) are used in community planning as a basis for risk management. These zones are often referred to based on the theoretical return period of an avalanche reaching the area - or 100, 1000, or 5000 year zones. Use the buttons below to explore the avalanche hazard zonation in Longyearbyen to get an idea of which areas of town are most exposed to avalanches.

All map data on these slides are courtesy of the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate's (NVE) thematic map for Svalbard for  avalanche terrain classification  and  hazard zones  with free data download and online mapping capabilities.

Certain locations in Longyeardalen develop recognizable patterns of avalanche activity based on the area's specific topography and common meteorological patterns. On Gruvefjellet, the primary avalanche hazard results from the cornices which build up on the edge of the plateau and slab avalanches which release on the slope below.

Avalanches on Gruvefjellet which released due to cornice failures.

Similarly, cornices and slab avalanches releasing in the avalanche paths on Platåberget threaten the Huset building and Vei 300.

Wet slab avalanches which released above Huset in May 2017.

Avalanche hazard on Sukkertoppen, as exemplified by the destructive avalanches in 2015 and 2017, primarily stems for easterly winds depositing wind-drifted snow in the more open avalanche paths on Sukkertoppen's western aspect.

The February 2017 avalanche from Sukkertoppen.

We used spatially-distributed snow depth data acquired with a TLS during the 2016/2017 season to help choose the locations for the first three original UNIS stations for the 2017/2018 season. We combined these data with the local knowledge about avalanche hazard described above to select station locations to best represent the avalanche hazard of concern. Explore the scene to the right to visualize the locations of these initial snow stations:

In general, we attempted to locate these stations directly in the avalanche release areas which threatened infrastructure. We used the TLS data to find areas where enough snow accumulated to be representative of the snow conditions in the avalanche release areas, but not so much snow as to bury the masts. Note that the deepest snow under the cliffs on Gruvefjellet can exceed 3 meters in depth.

The first season of automated snow measurements in Longyeardalen successfully acquired a snow depth dataset useful both for avalanche forecasting and research (see the International Snow Science Workshop proceedings paper  here  for details). However, departure of key project personnel after this initial season, requirements to move the sensors, and delayed data delivery due to power constraints all lead to the realization that we needed to rethink our sensor concept. The following section describes the redesigned sensor concept which better matched the available labor and financial resources available in Longyearbyen, relied on local knowledge and other data sources to better locate the sensors, and delivered data to users in a more timely and reliable manner.

The current sensor system

This diagram presents the overall sensor concept employed in this work.

In this concept, the pictured communication device transmits the data acquired by the ultrasonic sensor to a cloud-based data management system. The communication device transmits data via Telenor's Narrow Band Internet of Things (NB IoT) technology on their Low Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN). This technology allows data transmission anywhere with cellular coverage and significantly reduces the stations' power requirements.

From the data management system, users can access the data in real-time via a website data portal. This allows avalanche forecasters, snow observers, and other risk managers to view snow depth changes and make decisions based on the most up-to-date data.

Finally, data managers can also communicate with the sensor itself from the computer. This allows sensor managers to, for example, change the rate at which the sensor samples or troubleshoot sensor failures from the office.

The harsh Arctic conditions in Svalbard posed numerous challenges to sensor design. The complete lack of sunlight during three months (November-January) of the snow season means sensor and data transmission technology must use as little power as possible to function throughout the dark season without the possibility for solar recharge. Here, pairing a low-power ultrasonic sensor with efficient data transmission via Telenor's communication technology significantly reduced power consumption compared to the original UNIS stations. The sensors themselves required a robust housing to withstand Arctic storms and corrosion in the salty, maritime air. Finally, we sought a design which allowed for easy installation, maintenance, and replacement to improve usability in the field.

We have iteratively improved the sensor concept based on experiences from each successive winter season. The physical sensors, communication technology, and software design have evolved from prototype versions into a reliable, commercially-available product. The current generation of ultrasonic snow depth sensors uses so little power as to allow over a decade of year-round operation 11 years - and that figure can double with a sampling rate reduction during the summer. Finally, the communication device is now separate from the ultrasonic sensor, such that any type of sensor with standard wiring can easily transmit data via the system.

The photo to the left shows housing and internal configuration of an original prototype sensor. The photo to the right displays a mast in Honningsvåg with a previous-generation sensor (located to the left on the mast arm) side-by-side with a current generation sensor. The separate communication device for the newest generation is located on the vertical mast.

In addition to iterative sensor design, we have repeatedly updated the placement of the sensors based on local knowledge of accessibility and avalanche hazard combined with the snow depth data derived from the TLS. This scene provides an example of how station locations have evolved, using the March 2017 snow depth data from the TLS as reference.

From the original three UNIS stations...

...we added stations for better spatial coverage and to provide redundancy in the event of sensor failure. By the 2021/2022 season, we therefore had paired, redundant sensors installed on each of the mountain slopes of primary concern for avalanche forecasting in Longyearbyen. The relatively low sensor cost allowed us to place multiple sensors directly in avalanche paths, where possible sensor destruction might prevent placement of more expensive sensors.

Sukkertoppen, April 2023

We removed the sensors on Sukkertoppen prior to the completion of the avalanche protection fences in the summer of 2022. However, for the 2022/2023 winter season we added a sensor in one of the slushflow paths on the northern aspect of Platåberget:

While we did not have TLS data for this area, we used our knowledge of snow depths in this location from manual snow surveys (during the slushflow forecasting season) to choose this sensor's location.

On Gruvefjellet the current pair of sensors (Nybyen North and Nybyen South) replace the original single Nybyen sensor.

Sensor relocation in this location occurred primarily to improve access to the two sensors, as the original sensor could not be accessed throughout the majority of the winter due to avalanche hazard.

Now, Nybyen South can be accessed during periods of low avalanche hazard via the indicated route up under the cliffs above Nybyen.

However, data acquired in the new station location, while representative of the middle of the avalanche paths, is less representative of the upper release areas directly under the cornices. We therefore selected the location of Nybyen North in an area more representative of these upper release areas...

...but in a location where we could more easily and safely access the station throughout the winter season.

Compared to the original station location, the new station sites improve:

  • the spatial coverage of the point-scale measurements by having twice as many measurement locations,
  • accessibility to the stations while still providing data from areas of particular relevance to assessing avalanche hazard,
  • and the reliability of the overall sensor system by providing paired, redundant data from Gruvefjellet's western aspect such that one sensor will likely continue measuring should the other be destroyed or malfunction.

In practice (case studies)

In early February 2023, Longyearbyen experienced a winter storm with snowfall accompanied by winds from variable directions.

These graphs display the wind and precipitation conditions observed at the Svalbard Airport ("Lufthavn" in Norwegian) located just west of Longyearbyen from February 5th - February 10th, 2023.

The data show the period began with relatively strong easterly winds on February 5th. Wind speeds decreased throughout evening of the 5th, and precipitation began to fall around midday on the 6th (red arrow on the precipitation graph). A few hours later, the winds quickly shifted from an easterly direction to a westerly direction (red arrow on the wind direction graph). Westerly winds continued to increase in speed (red arrow on the wind speed graph) the evening of the 6th and remained elevated throughout the day on 7th.

In general, we expect the west-facing aspect of Gruvefjellet to accumulate snow when easterly winds place this slope in the lee. Similarly, we expect the east-facing aspect of Platåberget to accumulate snow under westerly winds.

We see these patterns reflected in the snow depths measured by the snow sensors on Platåberget (Huset High and Huset Low) and Gruvefjellet (Nybyen North and Nybyen South). Snow depths begin to increase midday on February 6th as it began to snow (black arrows). Later that evening when the winds abruptly switched from easterly to westerly and gained strength, however, snow depths on Platåberget began to increase as the wind transported snow into these slopes (red arrows). At the same time, snow depths on Gruvefjellet decreased dramatically as the westerly winds eroded snow from these west-facing, windward slopes.

Snow continued to accumulate under both the Huset High and Huset Low sensors throughout the day on February 7th ( dashed lines indicate missing data from the sensors) such that when the wind died on February 8th, at least 25 - 50 cm of snow had accumulated on Platåberget, while Gruvefjellet lost a similar amount of snow.

Compiled and available in real-time, these data can help avalanche forecasters and other hazard managers develop a "picture" of the snow situation on the slopes above Longyearbyen.

These data supported information from local snow and avalanche observers in town posted on regObs, the Norwegian Avalanche Warning Service's online portal for registering observations of natural hazards. During this particular storm, heavy snowdrift prevented direct observation of the avalanche paths on Gruvefjellet and Platåberget until the afternoon of February 7th, when the photos to the right were taken. However, data from the snow sensors showed what the photos eventually confirmed -- that snow accumulated on Platåberget and eroded away on Gruvefjellet.

In this way, the snow sensors serve as a valuable data source to help monitor snow and avalanche hazards, but most effectively contribute to hazard management when combined with knowledge of how various weather and snow conditions influence local avalanche hazard. To see what local snow and avalanche observers reported during this storm on regObs, click the link below:

Successful implementation of this sensor concept as described for Longyearbyen resulted in project expansion to Honningsvåg in Nordkapp kommune on the Norwegian mainland in 2020. Project reports as StoryMaps from this work in Honningsvåg include TLS data display, validation of snow sensor snow depth measurements with TLS data, and a case-study of snow measurements from February 2021.

System flexibility - emerging technologies and future work

Technological advancements, increasing system capacity in terms of labor or finances, and, over longer time perspectives, climatic changes can prompt adjustments to a sensor system.

As an example from Longyearbyen, a winter storm arrived much warmer than forecast in March 2022 and rained rather than snowed in the mountains around Longyeardalen. As a result of this rain-on-snow event, a slushflow released in Vannledningsdalen. Slushflows, in contrast to slab avalanches, form primarily as a result of the rapid introduction of liquid water into the snowpack. Ultrasonic snow depth sensors, unfortunately, do not directly detect the presence of liquid water in the snowpack and thus should not serve as the basis for a sensor concept to manage slushflow hazard. With slushflow and other wet avalanche hazards expected to increase in a warming climate, adequate avalanche risk management systems will need sensors to gather information about these processes.

For the 2022/2023 winter season, we thus installed a snow station in Vannledningsdalen to monitor water in the snowpack in addition to snow depths. This station served not only as a basis to develop strategies for managing slushflow risk, but also as a proof-of-concept test of the communication technology's flexibility. Results from this first season demonstrated the technology's flexibility to adapt to and transmit data from other, more complex sensors and provided a foundation for future slushflow risk management strategy development.

Testing two automated TLS systems for acquiring data from Gruvefjellet, April 2022.

Additional experimentation in our project included testing automated TLS systems for snow monitoring and using drones to observe the cornices on Gruvefjellet. The TLS workflow primarily employed in our work relied both on manual operation of the TLS in the field and manual data processing to provide an final, usable data product. Automated TLS systems could circumvent the extensive labor requirements of our current workflow and would ideally provide risk managers with, for example, the snow depth maps we have presented in this report on a daily basis. However, our pilot project in April 2022 indicated infrastructure costs and public eye safety concerns related to high-powered lasers present challenges to rapid implementation of an automated system.

Drone-based data acquisition techniques offer a relatively low-cost alternative to gather spatially distributed snow depth data. A side-by-side comparison of snow depth maps from Gruvefjellet taken with a drone and a TLS during the April 2022 test period yielded usable results from both techniques. The initial investment for the drone itself, however, presents a much lower barrier to entry than a TLS system. Additionally, 3D models, such as of the cornices on Gruvefjellet in April 2022 shown below, from drone data provide an excellent visualization tool which can help communicate about risks related to natural hazards.

Best practice

A best-practice approach to developing a sensor system suitable for monitoring natural hazards for risk management purposes will require sensors which measure a relevant parameter at the best possible location and deliver data in an operational timeframe. In our experience with measuring snow depth in Longyearbyen and Honningsvåg during the Arct-Risk project, we suggest such a best practice approach will:

-Choose sensor technologies and an overall sensor concept based on a physical understanding of the natural hazard and a realistic assessment of available labor and financial resources

Sensors should employ a measuring principle which addresses a key physical parameter governing the natural hazard in question. Parameter selection should be based on the current process understanding of the natural hazard. Development of the sensor system should take the best available sensor technology into account while designing around resource constraints which may restrict implementation of the absolute ideal sensor solution.

-Strive to minimize the financial cost and power usage of the system; e.g. employ low-cost, low-power solutions when available

Low-cost sensor concepts promote the installation of more sensors which in turn increases the spatial coverage of a sensor system while also permitting sensor installation in more dangerous locations where sensor destruction can occur. Low-power sensors limit maintenance time and costs, allow for sensor placement in locations with limited access or power supply, and help increase the temporal resolution of data delivery.

-Employ a variety of data sources, including local knowledge, to choose optimal sensor locations

As sensor placement plays a critical role in the overall performance of a sensor system, resource expenditure in the planning phase will help ensure system viability. Integrating local knowledge of historic natural hazard occurrence and location accessibility with information sources of increased spatial coverage such as satellite, drone-, or TLS-based data products will provide a strong foundation on which to base sensor placement decisions.

- Ensure redundancy and reliability in the system

Sensor system design should account for a variety of unforeseen and challenging circumstances through sensor redundancy (e.g. multiple sensors acquiring similar information), well-defined plans for both routine and emergency maintenance tasks, and modern data security protocols.

-Include flexibility to adapt to new sensor technologies and/or a changing risk picture as a central principle in the overall sensor system design

Flexibility will increase system longevity and robustness by allowing for adaptation to new sensor technologies or to incorporate sensors which measure a different parameter given a shift in the natural hazard to be monitored. Climatic changes can rapidly alter an area's overall risk picture and require sensor systems which can fluidly adjust sensor technology and measurement locations to best manage climate-related risks.

The work described here, focused primarily on data collection, forms only a portion of a comprehensive risk governance approach to managing natural hazards and climate-related risks. Addressing sensor system development from this broader risk governance perspective promotes more successful integration of information gathered from physical sensors with the sense-making, decision-making, and risk treatment phases of the process. With consistent, effective risk communication and stakeholder involvement, sensor systems serve as an integral component in the short- and long-term management of natural hazards and can contribute to more effective governance of climate-related risks.

This work has resulted from a collaboration between the Arctic Safety Centre at the University Centre in Svalbard and Telenor Svalbard AS. The Research Council of Norway-funded project Risk governance of climate-related systemic risk in the Arctic; Arct-Risk (grant number 315260) supported this work along with in-kind donations from Telenor Svalbard. All data used in this work can be freely provided upon request.

Holt Hancock, Einar Jenssen, Martin Indreiten, Eirik Albrechtsen

Snowfall and wind which led to an avalanche from Gruvefjellet.

Testing two automated TLS systems for acquiring data from Gruvefjellet, April 2022.

Photo: Erik Næss

Photo: Erik Næss

Avalanches on Gruvefjellet which released due to cornice failures.

Wet slab avalanches which released above Huset in May 2017.

The February 2017 avalanche from Sukkertoppen.

Sukkertoppen, April 2023