
Identifying Government-Owned Parcels
Read about our methodology for identifying potential buildable government lands in transit-accessible, urban areas.

Part 1: Getting the Full Picture
Our analysis requires both breadth and depth -- we seek to understand not only where government-owned parcels are, but whether these parcels are federal, state or local/other government owned. We were first tasked with putting together as comprehensive a picture of public ownership, at the parcel level, across the country.

Who Owns America®
We start by running our Who Owns America® (WHOA) national analysis . This analysis takes all available Regrid parcel data and, after extensive cleaning and normalizing of key fields, classifies each parcel in the nation into distinct ownership types. Our WHOA general ownership types include government, owner-occupied, in-state corporate, out-of-state corporate, in-state non-corporate, and out-of-state non-corporate entities.
Who Owns America® - Government Terms
For classifying government-owned lands, our WHOA analysis relies heavily on checking the owner name listed in the parcel dataset. We have compiled lists of federal, state, and local government terms to compare parcel owner names against, as well as match rules for each terms. Our model compares parcel owner names against our lists of government key terms to determine if they are in fact government-owned. To classify a parcel as government-owned, some terms must be an exact match (such as USA or U.S.A), and others can be a partial match (such as Commonwealth of [State Name] or [City] Redevelopment Authority). Our lists also attempt to take into account the many potential variations in spelling of a name -- for example, in our search on federal lands, we have found over 20 variations in the spelling of agency names like the Bureau of Land Reclamation or the US Army Corps of Engineers. Using a combination of word recognition algorithms, we aim to identify as many government key terms as possible through our search.
Authoritative Data Checks - National Datasets
We collected a number of datasets prepared by federal agencies and partners to crosscheck our parcel data against. By running spatial intersects, we compared what we classified as government-owned against what datasets recognized as government owned. For this initial sweep, we used data prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), such as the Protected Areas Database of the United States and various National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) data made available on Esri's Living Atlas, such as the USA Federal Lands layer.
Authoritative Data Checks - State Data
For a second pass, we compiled and collected state agency data, such as the Vermont Protected Lands Database (VLPD) , the State Owned Lands dataset for North Carolina , and the California State Property Inventory , to compare our parcel data against. As with the initial check against national, authoritative datasets, we compared our parcels against these state datasets to make sure we accounted for and included all government-owned lands in our parcel data.
Authoritative Data Checks - Local Data
We completed a third sweep of checks by compiling, where possible, local authoritative data on government-owned lands. Recognizing that many county and/or city governments maintain and share datasets on their properties, we searched and compiled local datasets from county and/or city agencies, such as Davidson County, Tennessee's Open Data Portal and the City of Phoenix Open Data Portal .
Government-Owned Parcels
These additional checks not only allow us to check our work, they also help us identify additional key government terms or additional variations in government names to consider. We then ran recursive searches back on our dataset to find additional parcels with owner names containing these additional government terms. These checks against federal, state and local data thus allow us to compile as complete a dataset as possible, of government-owned parcels across the country.
Part 2: Preparing Our Data
After compiling and cleaning our data, we also use collected authoritative datasets to add flags to our parcel data. These flags indicate particular land use types and/or development considerations to be mindful of. By marking parcels as, for example, open space, we are able to easily filter through our dataset and present a subset of information to our partners.
Tribal Lands
Using data pulled from the Living Atlas, we flag parcels that intersect with Federal American Indian Reservations , State American Indian Reservations , Off-Reservation Trust Lands , and American Indian Joint-Use Areas .
Open Space and Key Use Types
Using data from the Protected Areas Database of the United States , as well as USA Parks and previously collected local sources, we flag parcels that are protected and/or conserved as green space. We also used data from the Landmarks and Government Buildings dataset, as well as other layers made available through the Living Atlas, to flag parcels that represent particular types of use, such as medical response structures , law enforcement structures , educational structures and dams .
Flood Hazard Areas
We also flag parcels that intersect with flood hazard areas , using data derived from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's National Flood Hazard Layer .
Right of Ways
Starting with Regrid's right of way attribute, we flag parcels that appear to represent transportation and utility networks. To make sure we account for as many road networks as possible, we intersect our parcels against transportation networks, flagging those as Right of Ways if they are not already marked as such by Regrid.
Development Considerations
We end with flagging parcels that intersect with Qualified Opportunity Zones , Difficult Development Areas , and Justice40 census tracts .
Part 3: Narrowing Our Scope
We were asked to examine buildable parcels in transit-accessible, urban areas.
For the purposes of this study, we defined buildable as parcels that:
- are not flagged as open space
- are not identified as tribal lands
- meet either one of the following criteria:
- have no building or structures on the parcel, and where the parcel area is at least 20,000 sqft
- has a building/structure that is no more than 1000 sqft in area and where the building area is less than 5% of the total parcel area, which must be at least 20,000 sqft
To define transit-accessible, we turned to EPA's Smart Locations Mapping to have a consistent transit metric across the country. Using this data, we define transit accessible as census block groups that:
- have at least 1 transit stop within a quarter-mile radius of the block group
- with at least 1 active trip per hour during evening rush hour
Calculating 'Buildable' Areas
Using information provided through Regrid's parcel schema, we flagged parcels with no buildings and structures with a parcel area of at least 20,000 sqft. We then filtered to parcels with buildings, and calculated the building area percentage -- or the percent of parcel area covered by the building. Parcels where this percentage was less than 5%, where the existing building and/or structure was less than 1000 sqft, and where the parcel had an overall area of at least 20,000 sqft were flagged as buildable.
Flagging Transit-Accessible
Using a local copy of EPA's Smart Locations Mapping data, we created a subset of census block groups that met our condition for transit-accessible. We then flagged any parcels that are within one of these census block groups as transit-accessible.
Flagging Urban Areas
To define urban areas, we used The Census Bureau's 2020 USA Census Urban Areas dataset, flagging parcels that fall within a USA census urban area.
Part 4: Final Checks
Narrowing our analysis to developable, transit-accessible, urban communities yields a subset of approximately 88,000 parcels across the country. We performed final, manual checks on our parcels.
Airport Areas
We started by using the Federal Aviation Administration's Runways layer , flagging parcels that intersect this layer. We then used the Federal Aviation Administration's Airport points layer as a way to manually check and flag parcels near these points, comparing the parcels against an aerial imagery basemap to flag parcels that appeared to be part of the airport.
Right of Ways Manual Check
As a final step to try to remove as many road networks and slivers from our final dataset, we also ran searches for parcels with terms like ROADS, TRANSIT, TRANSPORTATION, and HIGHWAY and spot-checked results, manually flagging noticeable road slivers and segments as Right of Ways in the parcel dataset.
Part 5: Our Dataset
Through this process of classifying our parcels, running checks against authoritative sources, and defining parameters for developable, transit-accessible and urban, we end up with a final subset of 88,005 parcels representing a total of 276,047 acres of potentially developable, government-owned land.
We see this dataset as a starting point. Our methodology and analysis is not exhaustive and does not take into account local nuances and context. We look forward to hearing from and working with partners to refine our analysis and continue to uncover new insights regarding government ownership.
Explore Our Data
To see this dataset in action, explore our application and learn more about our work at the Center for Geospatial Solutions.