Boyle Heights: Redeveloping Vacant and Underutilized Sites

Project Overview

WaterTalks

Funded by the California Department of Water Resources  Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Program ,  the WaterTalks program  is designed to generate and increase community involvement in planning a sustainable water future for California. This is one of the projects that stemmed from the WaterTalks program.

Project Concept

The project concept was initially related to industrial greening and brownfield remediation. Respondents of the community needs assessment identified trash and industrial contamination as their top water-related concern. Lack of shade trees and drinking water quality were a primary concern in this region as well. In addition to water quality concerns, the LA Countywide Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment (2016) pointed to high park need around Boyle Heights.  

The project team consisted of Stantec, Promesa Boyle Heights, and the Los Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust (LANLT). This project's objective was to increase access to parks and green space while improving soil and water quality through site restoration and redevelopment. As the team began the site selection, several factors (as described in the following sections) impacted the feasibility of restoring and redeveloping brownfield sites that were first identified and evaluated. The project later evolved to include vacant and underutilized sites in Boyle Heights to expand opportunities for park redevelopment and increase the odds of engaging with landowners. The project team also identified two existing parks within Boyle Heights that could be revitalized to bring more value to the community. 

Existing Context

Surrounded by five freeways and a railyard, the Boyle Heights community has historically been disproportionately exposed to higher concentrations of polluted air and water, contaminated soil, and waste facilities. According to CalEnviroScreen, a screening tool developed by the Office of Environmental Health Assessment, Boyle Heights ranks among the top five percent most environmentally burdened census tracts in California.

As shown in this map, the  LA Countywide Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment (2016)  also revealed that Boyle Heights has a very high park need. Park need was determined by several metrics, including park amenities, park access, park conditions, park land, and park pressure.

Project Challenges & Best Practices

Throughout this process, the project team encountered several challenges to landowner outreach and park redevelopment. Best practices to overcome some of these challenges were identified from a policy scan that analyzed state and local-level policies that impact park and open space development process. Reviews of local policies and programs were derived from small to mid-sized municipalities and non-profit organizations across the country. From the policy scan, we identified opportunities for policy innovation that revolve around vacant site management, private/public partnerships, and financing strategies that may help catalyze park development. The challenges and applicable best practices that address each challenge are listed below.

Barrier 1: Landowner Outreach

One of barriers the project team encountered during this process was reaching interested landowners. The County Accessor’s office had property owner names and addresses, however phone numbers and other forms of direct contact were not publicly available. With many of the sites owned by private entities, it was a challenge finding a representative to engage. Letters that were mailed out could also be mistaken as junk mail and discarded. Even if a willing seller is identified, property owners may sway toward more profitable end-uses, such as big box development instead of parks and green space.

Best Practices:

  • Establish a vacant properties resource team to conduct regularly scheduled inventory of vacant sites and property owner information, help stabilize vacant or brownfield sites, coordinate roles between multiple departments and public agencies, and facilitate their reuse. 
  • Engage with key partners in local government, including planning and recreation and parks departments, council districts, and local land use committees to stay up-to-date on any leads from interested property owners looking to sell or redevelop 
  • Use partnerships with nonprofits that focus on the development of data, tools, and systems to track and address vacant properties, such as the Reinvestment Fund and the National Neighborhood indicator 
  • Cities can spearhead public awareness campaigns to highlight the value of redeveloping vacant property, including creating new jobs, increasing property value, and adding more park space for residents.  

Barrier 2: Private Properties and Site Acquisition

Many project proponents, including the parks departments with the City and County,did not have the capacity or funding to acquire new sites for parks. Land acquisition for parks and green space needs to be mobilized by political will and community support,  which can be challenging to achieve by both cities and community organizations.  General lack of funding that can support the purchase of land from private owners for use as a public park or open space is also a barrier. Especially if the site is contaminated, extra costs for due diligence, including Environmental Site Assessment, boundary survey, and existing lease reviews may accumulate costs.

Best Practices:

  • Establish a land bank authority to help assemble parcels of land and legally transfer them to non-profits for development. Land banks are “public authorities or non-profit organizations created to acquire, hold, manage, and sometimes redevelop property in order to return these properties to productive use to meet community goals” (Local Housing Solutions). 
  • Identify public/private partnerships, including affordable housing developers and school districts looking to add more park space and community amenities and strategize shared-use agreements. Shared or joint-use agreements occur “when two or more private or public entities agree to open indoor or outdoor space for community use” (LA County). 
  • Formalize a stewardship or volunteer program for parks to offset liability and cost concerns related to operations and maintenance. 
  • Plan temporary interventions that incorporate short-term art uses, such as art installations, public events, and gathering spaces, to serve as a transition tool on vacant sites and/or buildings. Inspired by the Pop Up City initiative in Cleveland, these temporary projects shine light on the value and potential of vacant lots and can help catalyze redevelopment.   
  • Engage with key partners within the community (schools, places of worship, business owners, etc.) that may support park redevelopment. Promesa Boyle Heights in this project team brought invaluable local knowledge and relationships to the effort. Non-profit organizations such as the LA Neighborhood Land Trust can also provide resources to help with site acquisition and realize new parks with community input. 

Barrier 3: Lack of formal policy and enforcement that incentivizes vacant site development

Vacant properties offer an opportunity to add more park and open spaces to underserved communities. Our first scan of Boyle Heights revealed many vacant land or abandoned buildings. Although there are some policies related to blight in the City’s municipal code, incentives and enforcement may be falling short, leaving vacant properties and buildings abandoned for years and property owners unaccountable for the decline and disrepair.

Best Practices:

  • Apply a “carrot and stick” approach by establishing policies that incentivize the redevelopment of vacant land, and reinforce the application of code enforcement. Financial incentives cities can offer include property tax abatements or reductions, grants, or low-interest loans. Targeted code enforcement and vacant property registration requirements can motivate absentee owners to maintain properties or make the decision to sell. The city could also help interested property owners by providing resources to streamline the development process, support end uses (park design guidelines, gardening requirements, etc.), and identify funding opportunities to help them get closer to shovel ready
  • Cites can update their local zoning code to allow for more flexible land use and redevelopment options. Streamlining the process of redeveloping a site can also encourage property owners to sell or redevelop. This can include creating clear guidelines for park redevelopment, designating a team to process applications, and reducing the number of necessary approvals.  
  • Create an easy way for community members to suggest a site for acquisition and park redevelopment using applications available through the Recreation and Parks Department, their local elected representative office, and/or online. 
  • Keep property owners accountable by enacting vacancy registration ordinances that require the registration of vacant properties and yearly fees to the needed jurisdictions. If left unpaid and unregistered, fees escalate the longer the property remains vacant and thus disincentivizes property owners from continuing to abandon their property. The fees also work to assist with the many costs associated with vacant properties.    
  • Regularly communicate with the community organizations, land trusts, and city council and staff to help garner political support to develop parks.   
  • Community-Based Vacant Land Maintenance: This bottom-up strategy aims to give residents the opportunity to invest directly in the revitalization of their neighborhoods by hiring community members to maintain vacant parcels. The community organizations are charged with maintaining the vacant parcels and encouraging citizen stewardship. 
Director of Organizing at the Neighborhood Land Trust explains to Hancock Park Garden Club members how the community garden is operated by the local garden leadership

Case Studies

Redeveloping vacant sites is not a challenge unique to Los Angeles. Several case studies from cities throughout the United States have implemented some of the best practices discussed in the previous section. The following section highlights the process and strategies cities and organizations have taken around the United States that have successfully transformed vacant or hazardous sites into thriving community spaces.

Case Study #1: Madison Avenue Park and Community Garden 

Los Angeles, California

This project transformed an empty lot adjacent to an apartment complex, located down the street from the City of Los Angeles Cahuenga Branch Library, multiple schools, and a light rail station. Before this project, there were no parks or green space within a half mile of the site. The opening to this park added an additional half acre of parkland to the East Hollywood community and provided a space that allowed community members to gather and enjoy. This project was developed through public-private partnerships and a community design process that started when the Los Angeles Community Garden Council reached out to the Trust for Public Land inquiring about creating a new park that could appeal to a broad range of residents, including the feasibility of an urban garden and recreational facility. This facility includes a playground and a community garden with amenities designed to accommodate a variety of park uses for a wide range of ages and physical abilities.

Key Takeaways:

  • Public-private partnerships, such as The Los Angeles Garden Council reaching out to The Trust for Public land, can be powerful tools for the developing of new community space. This partnership, with the support of Los Angeles Department of Recreation & Parks as well as City Council District 13, made the development of this park possible
  • The half-acre pocket park was developed through a community-driven design process. Residents were involved in the creation of the park design and selection of park elements through a series of design charrettes - This helped to ensure the final product would be a park that adequately satisfied the neighborhood’s wants and needs
  • Developing toolkits to clearly explain the process, benefits, and strategies for developing park space in communities can help guide the development process

Case Study #2: H.A.C.E.R Project at Gilliam Family Community Garden and Park 

Logan Heights, San Diego, California

H.A.C.E.R. (Helping Achieve Community Empowerment & Revitalization) at the Gilliam Family Community Garden and Park is a community-led movement that transformed a vacant plot of land into a lively and vibrant community gathering space. Located in the Logan Heights neighborhood, there was once a scarcity of public parks in the area and little investment in meaningful public spaces.  

Avital Aboody worked in Logan Heights as a BAME Community Development Corporation staffer at the time and had been working for this community for years before she started looking for vacant lots to transform into green space, parks, and/or community areas. There were many vacant parcels in the area, but one specifically situated next to two restaurants and in the heart of the neighborhood caught her attention. She embarked on a journey to track down the parcel property owner. She eventually learned from the county assessor's office that it was in a trust and privately owned. With only an address, she proceeded to drop a letter in the mail as her next step. She received a call from Derrik Gilliam, who moved out of the neighborhood but owns the lot through family. He and his family supported her idea - and so, H.A.C.E.R. at the Gilliam Family Community Garden and Park came to life.  

Key Takeaways:

  • Revitalizing sites that are already located in key community focus areas lead to higher community interest and participation 
  • High levels of community input and involvement lead to a more informed development process 
  • Landowners can appreciate the opportunity to provide a community amenity and contribute to their legacy

 

Case Study #3: Harambee Community Garden 

Chicago, Illinois

The Harambee Community Garden is another example of a once vacant piece of land that was transformed into a community asset. This garden is in the Austin neighborhood of Chicago, surrounded by churches, a fire station, senior home, town hall, library, and a high school. Before it became the large community garden that serves many users to this day, it was a vacant lot filled with trash with little community interest. Community member and now co-founder of the garden, Seamus Ford, saw the large amount of unused space and decided to create community gardens to provide a sustainable and environmentally friendly addition to his community. The land was owned by a neighbor, and he received permission to transform the grass lot into the garden. The garden has been a shared asset in the Chicago community for the last 13 years. Churches surrounding the area conducted Sunday School classes in the garden, the firehouse supplied water, the local library introduced after-school programming, and senior home residents also participated in activities.  

Key Takeaways: 

  • Developing programming that builds on surrounding uses of the site can encourage higher levels of use, communal upkeep, environmental stewardship, and community involvement 
  • Leverage existing community relationships and partnerships at all stages of the planning and programming process, including operations and maintenance  

 

Case Study #4: Urban Farming  

Philidelphia, Pennsylvania

The mayor’s office of Philadelphia reports that there are approximately 40,000 vacant lots within the city, and among those lots 74% are privately owned. Changing those conditions have been a goal through the City’s Redevelopment authority as well as Land Management policies within their   Philadelphia2035   Citywide Vision Plan. Policies have been set forth to “reuse vacant land and structures in innovative ways”, and encourage the adaptation of vacant buildings and sites and the support of turning vacant land into expanded parks and recreation opportunities (Land Management, Vacant Land and Structures, 3.1.3). 

 The Zoning Code was updated in 2012 to bring the city closer to its healthy communities and sustainability goals, as mentioned in the  Greenworks  initiative. The new code now recognizes urban agriculture as a legitimate land use designation and made gardening and farming permissible activities on most land within the city. As mentioned in the Philadelphia Zoning code, “...the code official shall work cooperatively with other city and city-related agencies on any plans for the acquisition, disposition and re-use of vacant lots including, but not limited to: community development, housing, neighborhood gardening, landscaping, play areas, side yards, or any other legal uses” (PM-110.4). 

Key Takeaways:

  • Updating the zoning code and providing initiatives can encourage and catalyze the redevelopment of vacant land, as well as establishing urban agriculture as a legitimate land use designation to help streamline this kind of development
  • Informed guidance and community directed policy, processes, and programs are vital for the development of urban agriculture sites and work towards sustaining sites for future generations

Case Study #5: Green Healthy Neighborhoods

Chicago, Illinos

Prepared by the Department of Planning and Development, the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, and community members, the Green Healthy Neighborhoods Plan is being used as a 10-to-20-year strategy in maximizing the use of vacant land and other neighborhood resources. 

The strategies listed in the plan support urban agriculture, active and passive recreation, new industrial activity, housing preservation, and a variety of cultural resources within its planning area to address the challenges of blight and vacant space.

Approximately 50% of vacant lots are City-owned, and the City’s  Adjacent Neighbors Land Acquistion program  enables owners of existing residential buildings to acquire parcels with large discounts, where their  Large Lots Program  allows the transfer of these lots to residents for $1. The program began transferring lots in early 2015 and continued annual sales through 2019, enabling residents to have greater control over their land and neighborhood. Building on large lot parcels is allowed, and most owners have maintained them as private or shared community space with gardens, trees, and activity areas. 

Major findings from the programs and their implementation process were published in the  American Planning Association's Planning Magazine . This included:  

  1. Large Lots were observed to have a significant increase in condition in the year after purchase with improvements continuing over the next four years. At the same time, unsold city-owned lots saw a decline in conditions.  
  2. The Large Lot Program sells to both owners who live and don’t live on the block – upon observation, and condition-care was similar to both.  
  3. A focus group was evaluated and mentioned that owning these large lots provided some control over deterring undesirable conditions and activity, actually working to promote positive gathering space for activities like community gardening, play space for children, and overall community open space.  
  4.  The sense of ownership for these lots translated into areas outside of the major lot vicinity, and continued care beyond their lots. The city also incentivized this by developing financial and educational resources to create community-oriented spaces for their lots.    
  5. Those who had these lots had purposeful attachment to them and provided a multi-generational interest in these sites. 

Key Takeaways:

  • Developing programs that enable owners of already existing residential buildings to acquire parcels with large discounts allows community members to have greater control over their land and higher ownership of their neighborhood 
  • The development of this program allows city-owned vacant land to be disposed efficiently, creates wealth in communities through raising home values and potential for owners to sell after five years, and builds vital community focus areas

Case Study #6: Detroit Future City Field Guide to Working with Lots

Detroit, Michigan

The Detroit Future City Field Guide to Working with Lots was established through partnerships with over 50 organizations within the City of Detroit. This tool draws inspiration from these organizations, existing projects, and prioritizes the value of partnerships in public space and serves as a guide to developing vacant land into highly utilized and valued community spaces. The guide provides readers a resources and recommended actions to take to create these spaces, including information on soil, plant types, lot options, budgeting, as well as lists of organizations that those using this guide can draw resources from. As residents now have programs such as the Detroit Land Bank Authority's Neighborhood Lot program, having guides such as these are highly beneficial and work to streamline the process of vacant lot development.  

 The Neighborhood Lot Program   is an extension of the Side Lot Program – a successful initiative resulting in the sale of over 18,000 vacant side lots – and the City’s anti-blight initiative. Through the Neighborhood Lot Program, residents are given the option to purchase city-owned vacant lots near them (within 500ft of their home) for $250, or lots adjacent to their properties for $100. Those who buy these lots have the option to make their current lots larger but could also implement creative and useful communal options for their community. This is where the Working With Lots Field Guide comes in and provides a step-by-step process in developing different uses within these areas. Potential funding is also available to fix up vacant lots - Detroit Future City has awarded $400,000 to 50 different organizations to help with lot design and provide technical assistance to community members; the Michigan Department of Natural Resources also offers grants that can range from $500 - $20,000 for community forestry projects; and crowdfunding partnerships with matching grants from the Michigan Economic development Corporation are also available.

Canfield Consortium is a nonprofit community development organization that has come into existence through these programs. This nonprofit is working towards buying land that’s more frequently used as dumping spots and creating them into areas for tree plantings and a potential bus stop, where just in 2022 they have cleared 16 vacant lots, planted 25 trees, implemented 2 community flower gardens, launched a community pavilion, and installed a sculpture. This nonprofit has also been awarded 10 grants to fund their efforts and has been partnering with the Land Bank and Detroit Future City – along with the utilization of some of the implemented guides design strategies. Several community members have been utilizing these opportunities to improve their neighborhood as well, where garden beds and mini orchards have been implemented (Detour Detroit).

Key Takeaways: 

  • Establishing a field guide/toolkit provides community members, nonprofits, or any other user an easy-to-understand and thus easier-to-implement process for developing vacant parcels into community spaces 
  • Programs, such as the Neighborhood Lot Program, function to safely and efficiently distribute vacant land and develop it into successful community spaces. The success of this program also depends on the potential for funding through grants, partnerships, and incentives – which is where the guidance of the Lots Field Guide comes into play.

Helpful Resources

Parks and Open Space Best Practices 

Local Shared-Use Programs