IDMC Severity Assessments

Unlocking displacement insights: assessing the severity of displacement conditions

Understanding the severity of displacement conditions is essential for more effective, evidence-based policies and programmes to achieve lasting solutions for the 71.1 million IDPs globally. The  IASC Framework for Durable Solutions  calls for an effective mechanism to monitor the conditions of displacement and the process of supporting durable solutions. To this end, IDMC’s severity assessments leverage existing data from REACH’s Multi-Sector Needs Assessments (MSNAs) to assess progress against the key components of the IASC Framework Criteria and provide a country-level snapshot of conditions for internally displaced people (IDPs) compared to those of the host community. This includes their access to adequate housing, stable income, food security and education, as well as the risk of exposure to conflict or violence, and experience of natural hazards and other threats, to help identify remaining challenges that need to be addressed to support the achievement of a durable solution.

This analysis enhances understanding of the protection and assistance needs of IDPs in the 13 countries assessed, supporting the objectives of the  Secretary-General’s Action Agenda on Internal Displacement.  Moreover, it aims to assist government, humanitarian and development actors in identifying sectors and areas that require increased support in order for IDPs to progress towards durable solutions.

Integrating quantitative analysis with additional contextual information is crucial to ensure that findings are appropriately contextualized. For further details regarding the countries where severity assessments have been conducted this year, please refer to their respective  country profile pages  on the IDMC website.

Insights by dimensions

The section below explores further the different challenges and risks experienced by IDPs and host community members across the four dimensions of the assessment.


Safety & security

Equitable and effective protection for IDPs is crucial, given persistent safety and security disparities compared to host communities.


Standards of living

Ensuring a durable solution for IDPs is contingent on providing an adequate standard of living, yet pervasive challenges require targeted interventions to enhance the overall well-being of IDPs.


Livelihoods & shelter

Access to adequate housing is essential for IDPs to reach lasting solutions. However, challenges in securing a stable income, humanitarian aid access, and risks to housing, land and property rights can all hinder progress.


Civic & social rights

Securing full enjoyment of civic and social rights, free from discrimination, is crucial for IDPs to achieve durable solutions. Challenges in obtaining key identity documents and restrictions on freedom of movement require urgent attention.


Exploring additional analysis

The MSNA datasets present ample opportunities for in-depth analysis, a focus that will be explored extensively in future updates of the severity assessments. To provide a glimpse into the potential of these additional analyses, severity assessments in specific countries have been disaggregated based on duration, cause, and location of displacement:

  • Duration of displacement: In both Somalia and Burkina Faso, a nuanced assessment of severity is conducted based on the duration of displacement—those displaced for less than 12 months and beyond 12 months in Somalia, and within 6 and 12 months versus over 12 months in Burkina Faso.
  • In-camp/out-of-camp IDPs: The analysis for Central African Republic and Iraq further distinguishes severity results between in-camp and out-of-camp IDPs, providing additional insights into the impact of living situations for displaced populations.
  • Causes of displacement: Examining Somalia, a comparison is drawn between the severity of conditions for those displaced by conflict and those affected by disasters.
  • Location of displacement: Analysis in the Central African Republic, Iraq, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo delves into location-based disparities, assessing severity at prefecture, governorate and province (Admin 1) levels.


Data dashboard

Explore the data dashboard below to see a summary of the results for each country. Navigate by zooming in or clicking on your selected country to filter the data and see the results for each indicator within the four dimensions. You can delve deeper into the data by using the dashboard or downloading the complete dataset. More information on the methodology can be found in the concept note.

 Note*: The "Sig." column indicates statistical significance based on t-tests assessing differences in means between IDP and host community households. If there is an asterisk (*) in the "Sig." column, it means the difference in means is statistically significant at the 1% level (p < 0.01). This suggests a significant distinction between the two groups. The absence of an asterisk indicates that the difference is not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.01). In such cases, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude a significant distinction between IDPs and host community households on this indicator. The dashboard does not show results for indicators if data is unavailable for both IDP and Host households. Kindly download the dataset to access all identified results. 

Data used in the analysis is courtesy of REACH: https://www.reachresourcecentre.info/

Contact

For more information contact the lead researcher, Alesia O'Connor: info@idmc.ch

Data used in the analysis is courtesy of REACH: https://www.reachresourcecentre.info/