State of the Eastern Mojave Desert - 2019
Conditions, Trends, and Issues of the Eastern Mojave Desert
The State of the Eastern Mojave Desert
This Storymap highlights conditions and trends across the eastern Mojave Desert. To interpret the overall health of the landscape, partners of the Eastern Mojave Conservation Collaborative have jointly identified "Indicators of Landscape Health" that could be measured over time. The status of these indicators is reported in this Storymap.
The Indicators of Landscape Health are not meant to declare the entire eastern Mojave Desert in "good" or "bad" condition. Rather, they provide generalized information to inspire and guide partners in exploring the nuances that affect ecological health. Therefore, this Storymap also provides information on available data, highlights of partner work, links to relevant resources, and ongoing management questions.
For more background on the Eastern Mojave Desert and the Eastern Mojave Conservation Collaborative, please view the storymap below.
Outline
The Storymap is organized into 10 sections, each including maps and information that describe the status of the Indicators of Landscape Health.
- Section I. Land Use
- Section II. Weather and Climate
- Section III. Biodiversity and Connectivity
- Section IV. Restoration
- Section V. Desertscrub Ecosystems
- Section VI. Dune Ecosystems
- Section VII. Playa Ecosystems
- Section VIII. Riparian, Spring, and Wetland Ecosystems
- Section IX. Forested Ecosystems
- Section X. Conclusions
Using the Storymap
- Click on the icon in the lower lefthand corner to view the legend of each map:
- Links to relevant resources are denoted by red buttons:
Please note that for all data related to proportion of total area, 12,494,789 acres is the figure used as the entire Eastern Mojave area of interest.
The EMCC Data Viewer
Many sections of this Storymap refer to The EMCC Data Viewer. The Data Viewer is a GIS platform containing over 100 data layers relevant to management the eastern Mojave Desert. It contains all data supporting this Storymap plus many other layers and charts on land use, vegetation, hydrology, and other topics. With the Data Viewer, you can look at combinations of layers, analyze data trends by creating charts, and upload your own data temporarily.
Once in the Data Viewer, the website will automatically load the Eastern Mojave area of interest. From there, click the layer list button in the top left-hand corner to display the available data. With the buttons next to the layer list, you can view legends, create charts, upload your own data temporarily, or print your map.
For questions about the State of the Eastern Mojave, The EMCC Data Viewer, or supporting data, please contact Julia Sittig, julia@swdresources.com
Section I. Land Use
Land Managed for Conservation
Indicator 1: Portion of Land Managed for Conservation
For this analysis, lands managed for conservation were considered areas required by law or policy to conserve natural resources. As of 2019, these lands include:
- 3,877,282 acres of Congressionally designated Wilderness
- 3, 545,103 acres of National Parks (with some areas also being designated Wilderness)
- 1,205,310 acres of National Wildlife Refuges
- 572 acres of conservation easements listed in the National Conservation Easements database
Together, these four types of designations comprise 8,628,267 acres, or 69.1% of the total 12,494,789 acres of the Eastern Mojave area of interest.
Conservation easements included in this analysis were derived from the National Conservation Easement Database (NCED). The easements included can be found here:
More information about the Wilderness Areas layer can be found here:
The National Park Service unit layer was updated in 2019; more info can be found here:
The National Wildlife Refuge layer was created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service and is downloadable from this location:
Land Managed for Development
Portion of Land Managed for Development
Major types of development within the Eastern Mojave desert are include urban areas, roads, and areas prioritized for renewable energy installations.
There are three major urban areas within the study area: Las Vegas (169,685 acres), Pahrump (28,246 acres) and Boulder City (3,892 acres). Approximately 15,047 acres of roads transverse the study area.
Three areas hold priority status for utility-scale solar energy development on federal lands: the Amargosa Valley and Gold Point Solar Energy Zones and the Ivanpah Solar Energy Facility. Together, these cover 14,536 acres in Nevada and 6,720 acres in California. No utility-scale wind energy projects occur in the area of interest.
The map opposite includes roads and urban areas in red and solar development areas in yellow.
More information about the Major Roads layer can be found here:
More information about the Solar Energy Zones layer can be found here:
More information about the Urban Areas layer can be found here:
Change in Portion of Developed Area
Indicator 2: Trend in portion of land used for development
Areas managed for development have been analyzed nationwide by the National Land Cover Database. Across the Eastern Mojave Desert area of interest, the total developed area grew by 21% between 2001 and 2016.
The National Land Cover Database has information about many different aspects of the Earth's surface. The latest dataset available is from 2016. More information about National Land Cover Database products can be found here:
Land Managed for Agriculture
Indicator 3: Portion of land cultivated for agricultural use
Approximately 909 acres were actively cultivated for agricultural purposes during the years 2014 and 2018, and this comprises less than one percent of the Eastern Mojave area of interest.
The agricultural land area calculation was derived from the National Agricultural Statistics Service Cultivated Layer. More information can be found here:
Changes in Agricultural Use 2001-2016
Between 2001 and 2016, the National Land Cover Database reports a decreasing trend in agricultural use. No areas of new agricultural use were detected, and some areas near Pahrump saw a decline in agricultural usage.
More information about National Land Cover Database products can be found here:
The National Agricultural Statistics Service Website is below:
Management Questions on Land Use
Questions EMCC partners would like to explore further related to land use include:
- How can we refine and distribute geospatial tools to facilitate responsible siting and design of renewable energy facilities?
- How can we cost-effectively gather data needed to better manage recreational uses?
Section II. Weather and Climate
Air Temperature
30-Year Average Annual Air Temperature
For information on weather and climate, the PRISM database is an excellent source. The map opposite shows PRISM data for mean daily temperatures over 30 years (between 1981 and 2010) across the Eastern Mojave Desert. These 30-year averages ranged from 76 degrees Fahrenheit and 39 degrees Fahrenheit.
In the map, warmer temperatures are shown in red and cooler areas are shown in blue.
Average daily temperatures ranged from 76 to 39 degrees Fahrenheit between 1981 and 2010.
The PRISM Climate Group gathers climate observations from a wide range of monitoring networks, applies sophisticated quality control measures, and develops spatial climate datasets to reveal short- and long-term climate patterns. The resulting datasets incorporate a variety of modeling techniques and are available at multiple spatial/temporal resolutions, covering the period from 1895 to the present. More information about PRISM Climate Data products can be found here:
Indicator 4: Range of departure from 30-year average air temperature
Mean annual temperatures in 2018 across the Eastern Mojave Desert ranged between 10 degrees Fahrenheit cooler and 17 degrees warmer than the 30-year averages shown in the map above.
This data shows how observed values deviate from the 30-year normals (long-term averages). More information about PRISM Climate Data Anomaly products can be found here:
Precipitation
30-Year Average Annual Precipitation
The map opposite shows mean annual precipitation gathered by PRISM between 1981 and 2010, as well as the snow monitoring stations that measure snowmelt.
Mean annual precipitation between 1981 and 2010 ranged from 46 mm to 712 mm. Areas with more precipitation are visualized in blue, while areas with less precipitation appear yellowish. Three SNOTEL stations and six SCAN stations record information on snowmelt within the study area.
Precipitation ranges from 46 mm to 712 mm over the study area.
The normals are baseline datasets describing average monthly and annual conditions over the most recent three full decades. The current PRISM normals cover the period 1981-2010. Long-term average datasets are modeled with PRISM using a digital elevation model (DEM) as the predictor grid. Given their importance, the normals were subjected to extensive peer review. More information about PRISM Climate Data products can be found here:
More information about Snow Monitoring Station Data can be found here:
Indicator 5: Range of departure from 30-year average annual precipitation
The map opposite illustrates departures in 2018 from mean daily precipitation for the prior 30 years. Across the Eastern Mojave Desert. precipitation averages in 2018 ranged from 30-130% of the 30-year average between 1981 and 2010.
This data shows how observed values deviate from the 30-year normals (long-term averages). More information about PRISM Climate Data Anomaly products can be found here:
Section III. Biodiversity and Connectivity
Biodiversity
Biodiversity Models
Maintaining and improving biodiversity is a priority for conservation efforts across the globe.
Various national models have been created at coarse scales (such as The Nature Conservancy's NatureServe website and the IUCN's World Database on Key Biodiversity Areas); a regional biodiversity model for southwestern states including Nevada has been developed (called Southwest REGAP); and local governments (such as Clark County, NV) have created smaller-scale biodiversity models. However, a single model that covers the entire Eastern Mojave area of interest has not been found.
Explore The Nature Conservancy's NatureServe dashboard, which includes indicators of biodiversity and species observation lists:
View the Southwest ReGAP tool here:
Read the Clark County biodiversity modeling report here:
Highlight on a Biodiversity Hotspot: Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge
Biodiversity
Part of the Amargosa River watershed, the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge is a spring-fed oasis in the eastern Mojave Desert and a major discharge point for the Death Valley regional lower carbonate aquifer. This extensive aquifer spans approximately 100,000 km2 from the Oasis Valley in the north-west near Beatty, Nevada to Death Valley National Park, California to the south-west. Comprised of nearly 24,000 acres of spring-fed wetlands and alkaline desert, Ash Meadows contains the highest rate of endemism in the United States, and second highest in all North America (surpassed only by Cuatrocienégas UNESCO Biosphere Reserve in Coahuila, Mexico). This incredibly biodiverse, lush landscape was distinctly recognized as a Wetland of International Importance by the Ramsar Convention, a global intergovernmental treaty formed in 1971 to address increasing loss and degradation of wetland habitat for migratory water birds. Ash Meadows was included in 1986, one of the first four wetlands designated in the United States.
In addition to prime bird habitat, Ash Meadows is also home to 26 known endemic species, including several endangered spring fishes, a threatened aquatic insect, and a variety threatened and endangered plants. Flora and fauna, both aquatic and terrestrial alike, depend on these water sources for survival in this harsh desert environment.
Protection
Despite its recognized ecological value, Ash Meadows was not always afforded the protection it has today. Before the refuge was established in 1984, the entire area was heavily farmed and its hydrologic characteristics were severely impacted by human use. Springs were pumped, dredged, and filled in, and outflows channelized. Peat marshes once blanketing the area were completely harvested and will never return. Other past activities in Ash Meadows included commercial fish farming, establishment of a resort and brothel, and landscape disturbances related to proposed development of a planned community of 30,000 – 50,000 houses, which thankfully never came to fruition.
Over the past three decades, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and partner agencies have made significant strides to reverse the effects of these impacts and restore the historic condition of the spring systems and surrounding landscape. Efforts have included returning natural topography, flows, and connectivity to waterways, invasive plant and animal removal and control, revegetation and riparian restoration, and other ongoing conservation and management for species, communities, and habitats.
To learn more about Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, please visit: https://www.fws.gov/refuge/ash_meadows/
Photo: Crystal Spring, courtesy Ambre Chaudoin.
Connectivity
CHAT and ACE analyses
At the state scale, maps of habitat quality in California and Nevada have been developed by the states' respective departments of fish and wildlife. These tools incorporate multiple datasets on species presence, habitat quality, and other metrics to support decisions surrounding conservation, development, connectivity, and climate change resiliency. The two tools measure slightly different aspects of habitat quality, but can both be used to identify habitat and corridors.
The California Areas of Conservation Emphasis (ACE) tool combines data on biodiversity, presence of habitat important to species prioritized by policies, habitat connectivity, and climate resilience in a single map (displayed opposite in the California portion fo the EMCC area). In the map opposite, areas of highest conservation value are colored in green.
The Nevada CHAT tool has a Landscape Condition layer, shown on the Nevada portion of this map. Each one-mile hexagon was assigned a ranking of overall landscape condition, from 1 (most crucial) to 6 (least crucial). This map can be used to identify areas multiple wildlife species can best utilize, as well compare conditions and trends over time as the map is updated. The most crucial habitat on the map opposite is colored in green.
Overlaid on the CHAT and ACE models are points suggested by EMCC partners as hotspots for biodiversity in 2018. These points are not scientifically referenced, but can be considered starting points for planning around natural resource conservation. Click on the points to learn about the resources in the area and the partners who suggested them.
More information about Nevada Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool products can be found here:
More information about California Areas of Conservation Emphasis Tool products can be found here:
Desert Tortoise Suitable Habitat
Desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) is a focal species of managers across the Mojave Desert, and existing tortoise habitat signifies suitable areas for other desertscrub species. Partners of the USGS Western Ecological Research Center have developed a sophisticated model for suitable desert tortoise habitat. The citation is below:
Nussear, K.E., Esque, T.C., Inman, R.D., Gass, Leila, Thomas, K.A., Wallace, C.S.A., Blainey, J.B., Miller, D.M., and Webb, R.H., 2009, Modeling habitat of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in the Mojave and parts of the Sonoran Deserts of California, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1102, 18 p.
Desert Tortoise Connectivity Model
Based on information established on habitat potential (places desert tortoise may occur), Gray et al. produced a model for connectivity (ability for tortoise to move through the landscape). This map can be used at the local scale to make inferences about connectivity for other species.
Areas with greater connectivity are colored yellow or orange. Areas with lower connectivity are colored black or purple.
Estimated connectivity for the Mojave desert tortoise.
You can find more details on the model in the journal Ecosphere using the following citation: Gray, M.E., B.G. Dickson, K.E. Nussear, T.C. Esque, and T. Chang. 2019. A range-wide model of contemporary, omnidirectional connectivity for the threatened Mojave desert tortoise. Ecosphere 10(9):e02847. 10.1002/ecs2.2847
Management Questions about Biodiversity and Connectivity
Partners of The EMCC would like to explore the following questions related to biodiversity and connectivity:
- How can existing models for connectivity be integrated into large-landscape planning?
- What types of efforts (removing barriers, creating linkages, etc.) should partners collaborate on?
Section IV. Restoration
Invasive Weeds
Indicator 6: Total area of invasive weed infestations
It is both important and difficult to track infestations of undesirable plants, and no comprehensive dataset exists. However, the Bureau of Land Management has documented some infestations (shown in the map opposite).
As of 2019, the BLM documented approximately 672 acres of infested areas in the eastern Mojave Desert. The BLM and other organizations are working to develop new tools for tracking invasives; it is likely that in the future, data on a greater number of infestations in 2019 will be available.
More information about the BLM National Invasive Species Information Management System Data can be found below:
Fire Impacts
Indicator 7: Total area impacted by fire in the past decade
The following acreages of land across the eastern Mojave Desert have been impacted by fire over the past four decades:
- 1984-1990: 65,259 acres
- 1990-2000: 6,117 acres
- 2000-2010: 188,009 acres
- 2010-2017: 45,896 acres
- Total from 1984-2017: 305,281 acres
Between 1984 and 2009, a total of 259,385 acres burned; in the past seven years, 45,896 acres burned.
More information about the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Data can be found here:
Indicator 8: Portion of total area at high risk of fire
This Wildfire Hazard Potential map illustrates the level of calculated risk of fire, and it can provide important guidance for fire mitigation. As of 2019, about 4% percent of the Eastern Mojave study area has a Wildfire Hazard Potential of High or Very High.
More information about the Wildfire Hazard Potential Data can be found here:
Soil Erodibility
Erodibility of soils can indicate areas where soils are more or less stable. Soil erodibility can provide insight into where restoration may need to occur or where land is too unstable for restoration activity. The NRCS has mapped soil erodibility in select locations, and the EMCC has compiled those maps for the Eastern Mojave area.
Interact with the soil erodibility layer in The EMCC Data Viewer; click on the "Soil Erodibility" layer.
Here is the source data from NRCS:
Seed Sources
Seed Transfer Zones
An important consideration for restoration actions is whether a seed or plant may survive if transferred to a restoration area. A map of seed transfer zones based on climate has been created for the eastern Mojave Desert; each zone on the map represents a different suite of conditions that would allow certain species to survive there.
The total number of seed transfer zones provides information on the diversity of conditions present.
Case Study: Plant and soil salvage methods for revegetation
A recent example of successful restoration of a desertscrub site bordering a road was conducted by UNLV, NPS, the FHA, and Natural Resource Conservation, LLC. A road in the Lake Mead National Recreation Area was widened and straightened, and disturbed areas next to the road were restored in order to re-establish habitat that might not have otherwise recovered. Vegetation and topsoil were salvaged and transplanted back to the site after construction, and multiple three water treatment method were utilized on multiple species.
Case Study: Desert Tortoise habitat restoration
An ongoing restoration project is occurring to improve habitat quality at a desert tortoise translocation site on Bureau of Land Management land. Seeding, grazing excisions, and watering treatments were applied to provide information on the resulting changes to vegetation composition and cover.
Management Questions for Restoration
Management questions about restoration that EMCC partners would like to explore include:
- How do different invasive species affect fire risk?
- What is the potential for invasive weeds to spread into a given area?
Section V. Desertscrub Ecosystems
Greenness of Desertscrub
Indicator 9: Areas of Increased and Decreased Greenness in Desertscrub
This map shows trends in greenness for scrublands between 2000 and 2017. Areas in red and orange demonstrate a decrease in greenness, and areas in green and light green demonstrate an increase in greenness. Areas not classified as scrubland are white.
Between 2000 and 2017, approximately 1,499,543 acres of desertscrub experienced an increase in greenness, and 901,394 acres experienced a decrease in greenness.
The extent of Desertscrub ecosystems is based on delineations created by Brown and Lowe. More information about the Brown and Lowe's Biotic Communities of the Southwest can be found here:
More information about MODIS greenness data can be found here:
Herbaceous Cover
Herbaceous Cover in Desertscrub
This map shows the percentage of herbaceous cover within desertscrub ecosystems. The desertscrub ecosystems are colored, and other ecosystems are not colored (appearing gray). HUC 12 watershed boundaries have been overlaid.
Areas displayed in darker shades of green have more herbaceous cover.
In this analysis, more herbaceous cover appears along watershed boundaries (generally higher elevation areas) than in lower valleys.
More information about MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields data can be found here:
More information about HUC data can be found here:
Indicator 10: Areas of increased and decreased herbaceous cover - desertscrub
This map shows the percent change in herbaceous cover within desertscrub ecosystems. HUC 12 watershed boundaries have been overlaid.
Approximately 29% of the desertscrub ecosystems saw a decrease in herbaceous cover.
Approximately 62% of the desertscrub ecosystems saw an increase in herbaceous cover.
More information about MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields data can be found here:
More information about HUC data can be found here:
Tree Cover
Tree Cover in Desertscrub
This map shows the percentage of tree cover within desertscrub ecosystems. Trees in this dataset were considered to be vegetation greater than 10 meters tall. HUC 12 watershed boundaries have been overlaid.
As anticipated, very little tree cover was detected in the Eastern Mojave Desert. However, monitoring tree cover can provide insight into the condition of tree species that grow in certain watersheds, elevations, or soils.
Areas displayed in darker shades of green have more tree cover.
More information about MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields data can be found here:
More information about HUC data can be found here:
Areas of Increase and Decrease in Tree Cover
This map shows the percent change in tree cover within desertscrub ecosystems between 2000 and 2016. HUC 12 watershed boundaries have been overlaid. Areas in white are ecosystems not classified as desertscrub.
More information about MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields data can be found here:
More information about HUC data can be found here:
Bare Ground
Indicator 11: Average Percentage Bare Ground in Desertscrub
This map shows the percentage of bare ground within desertscrub ecosystems. In this dataset, bare ground is considered any non-vegetated area (bedrock, gravel, sand, etc.). HUC 12 watershed boundaries have been overlaid.
The total average bare ground cover is 77%. This average may be compared to future averages to calculate a trend in bare ground.
Areas displayed in darker shades of brown have more tree cover.
More information about MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields data can be found here:
More information about HUC data can be found here:
Areas of Increase and Decrease in Bare Ground in Desertscrub
This map shows the percent change in bare ground cover (non-vegetated areas) within desertscrub ecosystems. HUC 12 boundaries have been overlaid. The legend below states that greener areas (negative values) represent places where bare ground has decreased, and yellow and orange areas (positive values) represent areas in which bare ground has increased. The legend is below:
More information about MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields data can be found here:
More information about HUC watershed boundaries can be found here:
Fire in Desertscrub Ecosystems
Indicator 12: Fire extent in the past decade in Desertscrub ecosystems
In total, 146,434 acres of desertscrub in the eastern Mojave were burned between 1984 and 2017 (2017 is the most recent year for the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Data). Breakdowns by decade since 1984 are as follows:
- 1984-1990: 39,627 acres
1990-2000: 3,505 acres
2000 - 2010: 8,8654 acres
2010-2017: 14,648 acres
More information about the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Data can be found here:
Management Questions for Desertscrub Ecosystems
Questions EMCC partners would like to continue exploring related to desert scrub ecosystems include:
- How should we prioritize areas for restoration projects?
Section VI. Dune Ecosystems
Dune Movement
Individual dune systems can have unique movement characteristics, because the environmental forces that shape the areal extent and composition of dunes can act in unique combinations. Factors influencing dune mobility include wind transport capacity, sand supply, sand particle size distribution, the extent of surface stabilization by vegetation cover, and overall moisture balance in the dune.
For the long-term protection of dune systems, it is important to conserve sand transport corridors between dunes and their sand sources, including dry lake playas, ephemeral rivers, and mountainous canyons with associated alluvial fans. Furthermore, understanding past sand dune movements and any known impacts on nearby infrastructure installations can enable assessments of future risks to facility operations in proximity to active desert dunes.
Dune Movement Analyses
NASA satellite data has been used to precisely map and monitor the direction and distance of annual dune migrations in Mojave Desert. This image processing methodology is based on Bi-Temporal Layer Stacking (BTLS), in which two multi-spectral satellite images, collected on dates separated by a year or more, are overlaid to determine the locations where sand has been removed or deposited as a result of transport by wind and surface water flow.
In the map shown opposite, the red shades identify areas in dune systems where sand has recently been deposited and the blue shade shows areas where sand has recently been removed. Gray areas indicate no significant change,
Recent work was published in the Journal of Remote Sensing and can be referenced as follows:
Potter, C., and J. Weigand, 2016, Analysis of desert sand dune migration patterns from Landsat image time series for the southern California desert, Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 5:164.
Management Questions for Dune Ecosystems
Questions EMCC partners would like to continue exploring related to dunes include:
- What can we monitor as an indicator related to dune movement in the future?
- What vegetation species are able to grow on certain dunes, and why? Which plants be able to establish in the future?
- What are the current patterns of recreational use of dunes, and what are their impacts on vegetation and wildlife?
- Which dunes may affect potential areas of development over time?
Section VII. Playa Ecosystems
Playa, Vegetation, and Wildlife
The vegetation surrounding playas can provide important habitat for wildlife. The most common vegetation communities surrounding playas in the Eastern Mojave Desert are mesquite bosques, which support native birds and other wildlife. Unfortunately, some of these habitats are being invaded by plants such as Russian thistle, which replace natural habitat of birds and other wildlife. Invasions of exotic species may contribute to declines in wildlife populations.
Aerial images can help distinguish whether the vegetation around playas are native or invasive. Analyzing the greenness of vegetation can help determine which species are growing around playas. For example, measuring greenness before and after the growing season of Russian Thistle, which has a growing season different from that of native vegetation, can provide information about the how much thistle grew in a given year.
Playa Greenness Trends
This map shows trends in greenness for playas between 2000 and 2017. Areas in red and orange demonstrated a decrease in greenness. Areas in green and light green demonstrated an increase in greenness. For this analysis, the EMCC analyzed the greenness within playas, which are outlined in pink in California and black in Nevada.
More information about MODIS greenness data can be found here:
More information about Nevada Playas data can be found here:
More information about California Sand/Dune Systems data can be found here:
Greenness Analyses: Stewart Valley Playa and Ivanpah Lake Playa
These maps show areas of the Stewart and Ivanpah playas that are being analyzed by NASA for trends in greenness.
Management Questions on Playas
Questions EMCC partners would like to continue exploring related to playas include:
- What should we measure as indicators of ecosystem health for playas?
- What times of year are different playas wet and dry?
- Which water sources (aquifers, precipitation, etc.) affect the wetness of playas?
- How do we best protect playas from negative human impacts?
Section VIII. Riparian Areas, Springs, and Wetlands
Water Sources of the Eastern Mojave
Water in the Eastern Mojave Desert comes from recent precipitation (rain or snow) and water that has infiltrated and moved underground over many years. Water can run underground or manifest itself on the surface as streams, springs, and wetlands.
This graphic illustrates the relationships between groundwater, surface water, aquifers, springs, streams, wetlands, and wells (courtesy Digital Atlas of Idaho ).
Highlight on a spring system: Devils Hole
Devils Hole-a detached unit of Death Valley National Park--is habitat for the only naturally occurring population of the endangered Devils Hole Pupfish (Cyprinodon diabolis). The 40-acre unit is a part of the Ash Meadows complex, an area of desert uplands and springfed oases designated a national wildlife refuge in 1984.
An Indicator of Water Use
Devils Hole is a window into this vast aquifer and an unusual indicator of seismic activity around the world. The Devils Hole unit was added to Death Valley National Monument by presidential proclamation in 1952. Ten years later the NPS installed a hydrograph in the Hole to monitor water levels. In 1967, a farming corporation secured ownership of 12,000 acres (4,900 ha) in the Ash Meadows area, and by the following year, the hydrograph had begun to register a decline as large capacity wells were drilled and pumped in Ash Meadows.
Devils Hole Pupfish Conservation
In 1967, the Devils Hole pupfish was officially listed as an endangered species. That same year, the alarming water drop that occurred with the arrival of the adjacent agricultural operation threatened to expose the rock shelf critical for fish spawning and feeding. By 1970, drastic conservation efforts had been undertaken: refugia populations were established, and a floating artificial shelf, artificially lighted, was suspended in Devils Hole to substitute for the partially exposed natural rock shelf. The fish never used the artificial shelf.
In August of 1971, a federal court issued an injunction to halt further pumping that threatened to completely expose the natural shelf in Devils Hole. Further litigation finally resulted in the landmark Supreme Court decision of 1976 (Cappaert vs. U.S.), which recognized the prior water right of Devils Hole vis-a-vis its designation as part of a national monument. The permanent injunction did not halt pumping, but limited it to a level which guaranteed sufficient water to inundate the natural rock shelf.
Current Scientific Efforts
The National Park Service continues a rigorous monitoring program of Devils Hole and the pupfish. The agency monitors water levels, temperature, pupfish population and reproduction, and other biotic and abiotic ecosystem parameters such as nutrients, carbon inputs, and the aquatic community as a whole.
Since 1969, scientists, managers, and conservationists have been meeting annually as part of the Desert Fishes Council to discuss research and work occurring in and around Devils Hole and the greater desert southwest region. More recently, hydrologists, biologists, and managers have convened the Devils Hole Workshop which focuses on issues pertaining to the Death Valley regional lower carbonate aquifer and the systems it supports. These conferences facilitate important information sharing that leads to partnerships and innovations across the region.
Fish and Wildlife Dependent on Riparian and Wetland Ecosystems
The Devils Hole pupfish and countless other vertebrates and invertebrates rely on the water sources of the Eastern Mojave Desert. Below is a list of fish, amphibians, and aquatic invertebrates currently considered threatened and endangered by the United States, California, or Nevada. The list is part of a larger compilation of riparian and aquatic species compiled by Ambre Chaudoin, National Park Service fish biologist, in November 2019.
Fish
- Amargosa Canyon speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus spp.) Status: California Species of Critical Concern
- Ash Meadows speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus nevadensis). Status: Federally endangered.
- Amargosa River pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis amargosae). Status: California Species of High Concern
- Amargosa River pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis amargosae). Status: California Species of High Concern
- Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis mionectes). Status: Federally endangered
- Devils Hole pupfish (Ash Meadows) (Cyprinodon diabolis). Status: Federally endangered; IUCN critically endangered
- Saratoga Springs pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis nevadensis). Status: California Species of High Concern
- Shoshone pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis shoshone). Status: Not listed* *Previously considered extinct by 1969; possibly rediscovered in 1986. Species confirmation pending genetic analysis
- Warm Springs pupfish (Ash Meadows) (Cyprinodon nevadensis pectoralis). Status: Federally endangered
Amphibians
- Amargosa Toad (Anaxyrus nelsoni [=Bufo nelsoni]). Status: IUCN endangered; NV Protected, Conservation Priority
- Aquatic Invertebrates (Federal T&E only)
- Ash Meadows naucorid (Ambrysus amargosus). Status: Federally threatened
Photo opposite: Devils Hole Pupfish, courtesy O. Feuerbacher.
Streams
Indicators 13 and 14: Streamflow and Groundwater Levels at Key Locations
Streams occur where groundwater reaches the surface; some reaches flow on the surface year-round (these are called "perennial"), while other reaches flow underground only during some periods and rise to the surface during other periods (called "ephemeral.")
The EMCC has selected a group of stream gauges and groundwater wells that will help indicate the overall amount of water in certain areas. These gauges and wells are illustrated in the map opposite, overlaid with aquifers.
The EMCC hopes to analyze trends in streamflow and groundwater levels at the locations on the map. They also hope to determine perennial stretches of the Amargosa River as an additional Indicator of Landscape Health.
Layers of all current USGS stream gauges and groundwater wells can be found on the Eastern Mojave Data Viewer.
More information about Stream Gauges can be found here:
Streams
Indicators 13 and 14: Streamflow and Groundwater Levels at Key Locations
Streams occur where groundwater reaches the surface; some reaches flow on the surface year-round (these are called "perennial"), while other reaches flow underground only during some periods and rise to the surface during other periods (called "ephemeral.")
The EMCC has selected a group of stream gauges and groundwater wells that will help indicate the overall amount of water in certain areas. These gauges and wells are illustrated in the map opposite, overlaid with aquifers.
The EMCC hopes to analyze trends in streamflow and groundwater levels at the locations on the map. They also hope to determine perennial stretches of the Amargosa River as an additional Indicator of Landscape Health.
Layers of all current USGS stream gauges and groundwater wells can be found on the Eastern Mojave Data Viewer.
More information about Stream Gauges can be found here:
USGS Stream Gauges
The USGS provides records for the gauges they manage. This map shows only USGS stream gauges with available data. Click on gauge of interest and then click View in the Popup to download a record from that gauge.
If you would like to quickly graph stream flow at any of the gauges on the map head over to SnowView.
Wetlands
Indicator 15: Portion of total area experiencing increases and decreases in Wetland Area
Between 2001 and 2016, less than 1% of the Eastern Mojave area experienced a decline in wetlands, and less than 1% experienced an increase in wetlands. This map shows locations where wetland area increased and decreased, according to the National Land Cover Database.
More information about National Land Cover Database products can be found here:
Case Study: Amargosa Vole Habitat Restoration
The Amargosa vole is an endemic species that is one of the rarest mammals in North America. The Amargosa vole’s range is limited to the Amargosa River watershed and is entirely dependent on stands of wetland vegetation dominated by three-square bulrush, of which only an estimated 50-60 acres remain in the lower Amargosa River. A collaborative team has combined monitoring and modeling to develop habitat and population projections for the future. Based on their fundings on vole population dynamics and habitat requirements, they introduced voles to suitable habitat and are monitoring the population
Wetlands
Indicator 15: Portion of total area experiencing increases and decreases in Wetland Area
Between 2001 and 2016, less than 1% of the Eastern Mojave area experienced a decline in wetlands, and less than 1% experienced an increase in wetlands. This map shows locations where wetland area increased and decreased, according to the National Land Cover Database.
More information about National Land Cover Database products can be found here:
Case Study: Amargosa Vole Habitat Restoration
The Amargosa vole is an endemic species that is one of the rarest mammals in North America. The Amargosa vole’s range is limited to the Amargosa River watershed and is entirely dependent on stands of wetland vegetation dominated by three-square bulrush, of which only an estimated 50-60 acres remain in the lower Amargosa River. A collaborative team has combined monitoring and modeling to develop habitat and population projections for the future. Based on their fundings on vole population dynamics and habitat requirements, they introduced voles to suitable habitat and are monitoring the population
Springs
Springs are an extremely valuable resources in the Eastern Mojave Desert. The Spring Stewardship Institute (SSI) has conducted pivotal studies and efforts regarding stream conditions and conservation. They have inventoried spring locations and modeled anticipated future conditions that may affect spring health. Some of this information is available on the SSI website to anyone who creates a username.
The map opposite shows a screenshot of a dataset they developed for the Desert Landscape Conservation Collaborative effort.
Click on the link below to explore the SSI website.
Case Study: Spring and Lake Habitat Restoration for the Mojave Tui Chub
The Mohave Tui Chub, a federally endangered species and the only fish native to the Mojave River, currently only exists at one natural spring and four man-made lakes. The tui chub's persistence is owed to determined efforts by partners to create habitat and monitor and manage fish populations. Partners working on the recovery of the tui chub are looking for other suitable places to locate tui chub.
Management Questions for Riparian, Wetland, and Spring Systems
Questions EMCC partners would like to continue exploring related to water sources in the eastern Mojave Desert include:
- Where is riparian restoration needed, and how can we gather enough local-scale data to prioritize project locations?
- Where are treatments needed to slow wetland succession?
- What are the next steps in inter-agency data coordination on streamflow and groundwater?
Nevada's Hidden Water
The Nature Conservancy has created a story map and database to highlight the importance of groundwater in the state of Nevada.
Click the image to the right to check out the full story map.
Section IX. Forested Ecosystems
Forest Patches
Indicator 16: Areas of three largest forest Patches
Forested systems occur in isolated patches on mountaintops of the Eastern Mojave area of interest. Monitoring the size and location of large forest patches can provide insight into the effects of drivers of forest health such as temperature, precipitation, and soil condition.
The three largest patches of montane ecosystem are currently 278,791 acres, 192,332 acres and 104,101 acres. The sizes of these patches can be compared in the future to derive trends as forests respond to changing conditions.
More information about National Land Cover Database products can be found here:
Tree Cover
Tree Cover Trends in Forested Ecosystems
This map shows the percent change in woody cover within montane ecosystems between 2000 and 2016. When combined with other data, the locations of major tree cover change can provide insight into why those communities are changing.
More information about MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields data can be found here:
Insect and Disease Infestations
Indicator 17: Number of Insect disease locations
The U.S. Forest Service conducts inventories of disease infestations of National Forest, and tracking the number of infestations over time can help tell the story of the health of forested ecosystems.
In 2017, the Forest Service documented 210 points of damage or disease due to insects in the Eastern Mojave study area. This number can be compared to future points in a trend analysis.
More information about the Insect and Disease Surveys can be found here:
Fire in Forested Ecosystems
Indicator 18: Burned area in the past decade in Forested Ecosystems
In total, 84,169 acres of forested area have burned in the Eastern Mojave Desert between 1984 and 2017. Here are breakdowns by decade of forested areas impacted by fire :
1984-1990: 19,253 acres
1990-2000: 2,612 acres
2000-2010: 34,681 acres
2010-2017: 27,623 acres
More information about the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Data can be found here:
Indicator 19: Area of High Fire Risk in Forested Ecosystems
This map displays the degree of fire risk within forested ecosystems in the Eastern Mojave Desert according to the Wildfire Hazard Potential database.
As of 2019, 6% of forested areas in the eastern Mojave Desert are at high risk of fire. This is higher than the 4% at high fire risk across the entire Eastern Mojave area of interest.
More information on wildfire risk can be found on the Wildfire Hazard Potential website:
Management Questions for Forested Ecosystems
Questions EMCC partners would like to continue exploring related to forested ecosystems include:
- Where is vegetation type conversion occurring, and why?
- How have fires affected forest vegetation and ecological succession?
Section X. Conclusions
2019 is the first year for the State of the Eastern Mojave effort, and a main purpose of the Storymap and Data Viewer are to connect previously fragmented or siloed information across jurisdictions.
EMCC partners successfully located, compiled, and analyzed various data on land use, vegetation cover, greenness, fire, dune movement, and observation points for water and precipitation. However, many data gaps still exist - particularly data available across the entire Eastern Mojave area of interest. For instance, quantitative indicators were not chosen for dune or playa ecosystems because existing quantitative data across the landscape could not readily be found.
The EMCC identified critical questions for management that helped drive the selection of indicators and data. Future concepts the EMCC would like to explore include:
- Indicators of health in cave and karst ecosystems
- Patterns of vegetation greenness surrounding solar energy facilities
- Recreation use of dunes and playas
In November 2019, partners of the EMCC will discuss their perspectives on the conditions and trends revealed through the Indicators of Ecosystem Health. Their interpretations will be written in a State of the Eastern Mojave report.
Special thanks to the following EMCC partners who contributed content for the Storymap:
- Kyle Hartfield, Arizona Remote Sensing Center
- Chris Potter, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Roy Averill-Murray, US Fish and Wildlife Service
- Judy Perkins, Bureau of Land Management
- Ambre Chaudoin, National Park Service
- Boris Poff, Bureau of Land Management
- Nifer Wilkening, US Fish and Wildlife Service
The future generation of the Eastern Mojave Desert