Popillia japonica

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Alice Delbianco and Melanie Camilleri

Updated 27 February 2023 ( Version 2 )

Abstract

This document is an update of the pest survey card on the Japanese beetle Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae) that was prepared in the context of the EFSA mandate on plant pest surveillance (M-2017-0137), at the request of the European Commission. Its purpose is to guide the Member States in preparing data and information for P. japonica surveys. These are required to design statistically sound and risk-based pest surveys, in line with current international standards. Popillia japonica is a clearly defined taxonomic entity native to northern Japan and in the far east of Russia. Popillia japonica is a Union quarantine pest, also listed as a priority pest. It is currently present in the EU in Portugal (Azores) and in Italy, and as a result of the Italian outbreak it has also been detected in Switzerland. It is a highly polyphagous pest and surveys should target the most abundant host crops in the area. The main factors that may limit the potential spread of the beetle into new areas are temperature and soil moisture. However, host availability and climatic conditions are suitable for the establishment of P. japonica in most EU Member States. Popillia japonica adults spread by flight and hitch-hiking, while the eggs and larvae spread through the movement of potential host commodities. In northern Italy, where the pest is already established, the spread rate is on average 10 km/year. Trapping adults with traps baited with dual lures (food attractant plus a sex pheromone) is the recommended surveillance method for detection surveys. The pest can also be detected by visual examination for the presence of adults, or the symptoms they cause. Soil sampling for larvae detection should be conducted if turf damage is evident. In northern Italy, June and July are the preferred months to detect the adults and symptoms by visual examination, while traps are set up from mid-May until the end of September. Soil samples to detect larvae should be taken when most of the larvae are nearer to the surface, and if symptoms of turf damage are evident. In northern Italy, soil sampling is conducted from February until May and from mid-August until October. Collected larvae and adult beetles should be sent to the laboratory for confirmation. Morphological keys and molecular methods are available for identification of adults and larvae.

© European Food Safety Authority, 2023

Heading picture: © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Maurizio Pavesi, Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano (IT).

Authors' affiliation: Alice Delbianco, European Food Safety Authority; Melanie Camilleri, European Food Safety Authority.

Copyright for non-EFSA content: EFSA may include images or other content for which it does not hold copyright. In such cases, EFSA indicates the copyright holder and users should seek permission to reproduce the content from the original source.

The designations employed and the presentation of material on the maps in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Food Safety Authority concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.


Introduction

The objective of this pest survey card is to provide the relevant information needed to prepare surveys for P. japonica in EU Member States (MSs) following the methodology described in  EFSA et al. (2018) . It is part of a toolkit that has been developed to assist the MSs with planning a statistically sound and risk-based pest survey approach in line with the recommendations and guidelines provided by the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) in the various International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures ( ISPM 6: FAO, 2021a ;  ISPM 31: FAO, 2021b ) and surveillance guide ( FAO, 2021c ). The  EFSA Plant Pest Survey Toolkit  consists of pest specific documents and more general documents relevant for all pests to be surveyed:

i.             Pest-specific documents:

a.    The pest survey card on Popillia japonica

ii.            General documents:

b.    The statistical tools:  RiBESS+  and SAMPELATOR.

This document is an update of the pest survey card on P. japonica ( EFSA, 2020 ) that was prepared in the context of the EFSA mandate on plant pest surveillance (M-2017-0137) at the request of the European Commission. The information presented in this pest survey card was summarised from a pest risk assessment of P. japonica for the UK territory (Korycinska et al., 2015), the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection (EPPO) Datasheet ( EPPO, 2022a ), the EPPO diagnostic protocol ( EPPO, 2006 ), the EPPO Standard on National Control Systems ( EPPO, 2016 ), the EPPO Global Database ( EPPO, online ), the Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI) datasheet on P. japonica (CABI. 2020), the P. japonica (Japanese beetle) Fact Sheet from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA, 2017), the EFSA pest categorisation of P. japonica ( EFSA PLH Panel, 2018 ) and other documents. 

The main challenges relevant for the surveillance of P. japonica are related to its polyphagous nature and its gregarious behaviour.

1. The pest and its biology

1.1. Taxonomy

Current scientific name: Popillia japonica Newman, 1841 Class: Insecta Order: Coleoptera Family: Scarabaeidae Subfamily: Rutelinae Tribe: Anomalini Genus: Popillia Species: Popillia japonica EPPO Code:  POPIJA  Common name: Japanese beetle Taxonomic rank: species

Popillia japonica is native to northern Japan and in the far east of Russia and is a pest of a great variety of trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants, which could be both cultivated and wild conditions. It is a clearly distinguished species among others of the same genus.

1.2. EU pest regulatory status

Popillia japonica is a Union quarantine pest listed in Annex II Part B (Section C – Insects and mites) of  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 . This part of the Annex contains the list of Union quarantine pests known to occur in EU territory.

Popillia japonica is also listed as a priority pest under  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1702 , for which annual surveys are required by the MSs. Popillia japonica is a highly polyphagous pest. The introduction into the EU of the potential host commodities of P. japonica and soil from third countries is either prohibited or regulated (Annex VI and Annex VII Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072). Special requirements for P. japonica are laid down in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 for the introduction of plants for planting from third countries (Annex VII, Point 4.2) and also for the movement of plants for planting within the EU (Annex VIII, Point 2.1).

The general requirements for survey of quarantine pests in the EU territory are laid down in  Regulation (EU) 2016/2031  and  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1231 .

1.3. Pest distribution

The Japanese beetle originates from north-eastern Asia where it is native to Japan and the far east of Russia (Fleming, 1972). It was introduced into North America in 1911 and has become a more serious pest in the USA than in its area of origin ( EPPO, 2006 ).

In the EU, the pest occurs in the Azores (Portugal) where it was detected in the early 1970s, and in northern Italy (Pavesi, 2014) where it was initially found in the Ticino Valley Natural Park between the Lombardy and Piedmont regions in 2014 ( EPPO, 2014 ). Since then, the outbreak in Italy has spread to other areas ( EPPO, 2022b ), and as a result from this outbreak in Italy, P. japonica is also present with restricted distribution in Switzerland ( EPPO, 2021 ). Additionally, one female was caught in a trap in Sardinia in 2021 near the main airport ( EPPO, 2022b ).

In 2018, a dead female beetle was intercepted in a pheromone trap located at Schiphol airport, in the Netherlands ( EPPO, 2019 ). Recently, one specimen was trapped in Germany, close to a railway track in Baden-Wuerttemberg ( EPPO, 2022c ).

Note: the information included in this section is aligned with the EPPO map updated on 03-11-2022

1.4. Life cycle

Popillia japonica normally has one generation per year but, at the northern edge of its range, it could take up to two years to complete its life cycle ( EPPO, 2022a ). Kistner-Thomas (2019) projected that in many areas where it has a biennial life cycle, it will transition to an annual life cycle by 2050 as a result of climate change.

The life cycle illustrated in the figure in the right panel indicates the seasonality of the different life stages of the pest. Larval development, adult emergence, subsequent mating and oviposition vary with latitude and year according to the temperature (Fleming, 1972). Thus, Member States must take into consideration the climatic conditions of the area under surveillance. In fact, the reported life cycle in northern Italy is anticipated several weeks earlier than in the US.

In northern Italy, adults emerge in late spring (end of May to the beginning of June) and climb or fly onto the foliage at the top of low-growing hosts before later moving to feed on trees. The average life span of the adult P. japonica is 30–45 days and the adults are present between June and September. The population peak of adults is mid-July, following which, a substantial decline of the population (to negligible) occurs by the end of the month (Gilioli et al., 2021). Aggregation of the adults to feed and mate on individual host plants causes some hosts to be heavily infested while nearby hosts may remain uninfested.

Adult activity is at its peak on warm sunny days, with optimum temperatures for flying in the US between 29°C and 35°C (Kreuger and Potter, 2001). However, if disturbed, the adults will fly at 21°C (Fleming, 1972). Following mating, the females burrow up to 10 cm into the soil for oviposition.  EPPO (2016)  highlighted the importance of the oviposition sites for the females with a preference for moist grassland and turf. After laying eggs the females exit the soil to feed and then return to oviposit in the soil again. A female will usually lay between 40 and 60 eggs in total (Campbell et al., 1989). The eggs are not cold hardy and viability decreases at temperatures below 10°C, while seven days at 0°C led to 100% egg mortality (Fleming, 1972). Depending on temperature, the eggs usually hatch after about 2 weeks and then larvae develop through three instars. In northern Italy, the eggs are present from mid-June to the end of August. The first instar (L1) develops in 2–3 weeks followed by the second instar (L2) in 3–4 weeks. The third instar (L3) overwinters 10–20 cm below ground and will only move towards the turf and start feeding on roots in the spring, before pupation ( EPPO, 2022a ). Adults emerge at the end of May to the beginning of June to repeat the cycle (Ciampitti and Buonopane, 2017). In a physiologically based model predicting larval diapause termination and adult emergence of P. japonica in the outbreak area of Lombardy in Italy, the soil temperature threshold that triggered diapause termination was found to be 12.8°C (Gilioli et al., 2022). The abundance of P. japonica larvae is higher in cool soils and they are less likely to occur in soils with extremely humid conditions (Simonetto et al., 2022)

2. Target population

This section provides the information needed to characterise the population of host plants to target in a survey, as described in the  ‘General guidelines for statistically sound and risk-based surveys of plant pests’  (EFSA et al., 2020). This includes the pest’s host range and main hosts in the EU ( Section 2.1 ), the suitability of EU environments to the pest’s establishment ( Section 2.2 ), the ability of the pest to spread ( Section 2.3 ), and the identification of risk factors associated with an increased probability of presence ( Section 2.4 ).

Once the above parameters have been defined, the target population can be structured in multiple levels. At level 1 is the survey area, which corresponds to the entirety or part of the Member State. At levels 2 and 3 are the epidemiological units that can be distinguished within the survey area. Epidemiological units can be chosen as administrative regions (e.g. EU NUTS areas or Member State-level regions) if they are homogeneous, or further subdivided into the environments where host plants are present using a land-use categorisation (e.g. urban, agricultural and natural areas, nurseries). At level 4, if risk factors are identified, the risk areas are defined around the risk locations. At level 5 are the inspection units, the elementary subdivisions of the target population that are inspected for the detection of the pest (e.g. host plants), depending on the pest detection method ( Section 3 ). For the definitions of the target population, epidemiological units and inspection units, see also the  glossary  of terms available at the end of this document.

The hierarchical structure of the target population should be tailored to the situation in each Member State. A possible structure of the target population for surveys of P. japonica within the EU is proposed in  Section 2.5 .

2.1. Host range and main hosts

Popillia japonica is a highly polyphagous species, and the adults can be found feeding on a wide range of wild, cultivated and ornamental plant species ( EPPO, 2016 ). According to the USDA (2016), the pest has a host range of more than 300 plants in 79 plant families. CABI (2020) and  EPPO (online)  provide an exhaustive list of host plant species reported so far worldwide. Following exclusion and inclusion criteria, ANSES (2022) selected 131 main host plants from 39 different families that are associated with a higher phytosanitary risk.

Popillia japonica can cause significant damage to seedbeds, orchards, field crops, landscape plants, turf and garden plants due to the larval feeding. The main species attacked by larvae within the grassland belong to the genera Festuca, Poa and Lolium ( EPPO, 2016 ).

In northern Italy, the plant species, and their respective categories attacked, are illustrated in the table below (Servizio Fitosanitario Regione Lombardia, 2022).

The host plant species, and their respective categories, which are attacked in northern Italy by P. japonica. Species in bold are included in detection surveys in pest-free areas while species with an asterisk (*) are inspected with particular attention in delimiting surveys (Servizio Fitosanitario Regione Lombardia, 2022)

In the Azores (Portugal), the adult beetles were reported to feed on a wide range of hosts: Acer spp. (maples), Asparagus officinalis (asparagus), Glycine max (soybean), Malus spp. (apples), Medicago sativa (alfalfa), Phaseolus vulgaris (pea), Populus spp. (poplar), Prunus spp. (stone fruits including plums and peaches), Quercus spp. (oaks), Rosa spp. (roses), Rubus spp. (blackberry, raspberry), Tilia spp. (lime trees), Ulmus procera (English elm), Vitis spp. (grapes) and Zea mays (maize) (Vieira, 2008).

Given the polyphagous nature of P. japonica, detection surveys should target the most abundant host crops in the area, while in high-risk areas (see  Section 2.4 ) all the host plants should be considered. The information available from the outbreaks in northern Italy and the Azores (Portugal) shows that Vitis spp., Prunus spp., Zea mays, Glycine max and Rosa spp. are very attractive hosts and therefore, if present, these should be prioritised in detection surveys.

In the event of an outbreak, all the known host plants of P. japonica should be included in delimiting surveys. The MSs should evaluate their territory and identify whether P. japonica exhibits any preference for specific host plants. In northern Italy, wild Vitis spp., Rosa spp., Tilia spp., Parthenocissus spp. and Carpinus spp., which are widely present as ornamentals, are inspected with particular attention in delimiting surveys, as they have been found to be very attractive plants for P. japonica (Servizio Fitosanitario Regione Lombardia, 2022).

2.2. Environmental suitability

Soil moisture and temperature are the key parameters that may limit the potential establishment of the Japanese beetle in new areas. In North America, P. japonica distribution has been described as being adapted to regions where the mean soil temperature is between 17.5°C and 27.5°C during the summer and above -9.4°C in the winter (Fleming, 1972).

In Simonetto et al. (2022), soil and weather variables were the main factors in driving the presence of P. japonica larvae in northern Italy. Popillia japonica larvae showed a preference for less acidic soil, especially with sandy skeletal particles, and were found in high densities in soils with medium organic carbon content. Long drought periods or high precipitation levels reduce the probability of the presence of P. japonica (Simonetto et al., 2022).

A review of the thermal requirements of P. japonica for climate mapping was summarised from rearing experiments by Korycinska et al. (2015, table below).

Thermal requirements for the development of Popillia japonica (rearing experiments) (Source: Korycinska et al., 2015)

Based on Régnière et al. (1981), the sum of degree days the beetle might need to complete its development into an adult is one or two years. In places with degree days above 1,422 and a threshold of 10°C the insect can complete its life cycle in one year, whereas in places with degree days above 711 and the same threshold, the life cycle is completed in two years (figure in the right panel). It is important to note that soil moisture – which corresponds with rainfall – is not considered in the figure in the right panel, but it is a relevant factor, since precipitation and soil moisture should be taken into account when considering establishment of P. japonica. In fact, despite the projection illustrated in the figure in the right panel, P. japonica completes its life cycle in one year in the current outbreak in Canton Ticino (Switzerland) (C. Marazzi, personal communication).

Given the polyphagous nature of P. japonica, many hosts are widely available throughout the EU MSs ( EFSA PLH Panel, 2018 ) and thus host availability is not a limiting factor for pest establishment. Therefore, it is expected that P. japonica could become established in all Member States where climatic conditions are suitable. The beetle is already established in the Azores (Portugal), Switzerland and northern Italy, and a high risk of spread to other countries with favourable conditions is assumed.

According to Bourke (1961) the Mediterranean region is not suitable for the establishment of the beetle due to the lack of summer rainfall, while in northern Europe, establishment was predicted to be less likely because summer temperatures are lower. In central Europe the climatic conditions for establishment were assumed to be most suitable, since summer rainfall is abundant and the temperature is favourable. In addition, extensive irrigation could increase suitability in some areas of southern Europe ( EFSA PLH Panel, 2018 ).

2.3. Spread capacity

Natural spread

Adults disperse naturally by flight. Given the wide host range and the broad thermal suitability of P. japonica, the exact flight period may vary at different latitudes. Flight activity is initiated on clear days when the temperature is higher than 21°C and relative humidity is lower than 60%, while colder temperatures, higher humidity and windy days prevent flight (Fleming, 1972).

In Fleming (1972), it was reported that although the beetles can fly up to 8 km, they rarely do and only less than 1% were recaptured at 1 km. A much higher spread rate (16–24 km per year) was found in the decade after P. japonica establishment in the USA (EPPO, 2006). After that period, Fox (1932) found spread rates varying between 3 and 24 km per year.

Allsopp (1996) estimated P. japonica spread at 7.7 km/year between the years 1927 and 1938, followed by 11.9 km/year between the years 1939 and 1951 in North America.

The flight activity of P. japonica was studied in Italy in 2017–19 by Lessio et al. (2022) using a protein immunomarking technique (PIT). The mean flight range of the beetles was between 1.37 km and 7.04 km, and 75% of the marked specimens were captured at distances between 5 km and 9 km, depending on plot source, sex and time elapsed. Since these distance values were calculated over a maximum time of seven days, and some specimens were found up to 12 km away after only 24 hours, these results are consistent with the spread rate reported by Allsopp (1996) in North America. Both studies illustrate a natural spread which is initially slower and as the population abundance increases, the spread increases too. In the outbreak in northern Italy, the rate of natural spread gradually increased over the years as the population size grew, until it stabilised at an average value of around 10 km/year (M. Ciampitti, personal communication).

Human-assisted spread

Human-assisted spread is facilitated by the movement of eggs, larvae and pupae in the soil and growing media accompanying host plants for planting. Movement of infested host plants for planting, cut flowers and cut branches contribute to the spread of adult P. japonica (EFSA PLH Panel, 2018). Long-distance spread through hitch-hiking, for example, adult beetles carried in cars, trucks and on aircraft and without association with any plants, could also be responsible for human-assisted spread (EFSA PLH Panel, 2018). When eggs or larvae survive the transport, the larvae still need to pupate and then reach the adult stage which is dependent on the temperature. The adult beetles, once emerged from the soil, will subsequently need to locate both a suitable mate and a suitable host plant in order to feed and complete the life cycle.

2.4. Risk factor identification

Identification of risk factors and their relative risk estimation are essential for performing risk-based surveys. A risk factor is a biotic or abiotic factor that increases the probability of infestation by the pest in the area of interest. The risk factors that are relevant for surveillance need to be characterised by their relative risk (should have more than one level of risk for the target population) and the proportion of the overall target population on which they apply. The identification of risk factors needs to be tailored to the situation of each Member State. This section presents examples of risk factors for P. japonica and is not necessarily exhaustive. 

For the identification of risk areas, it is first necessary to identify the activities that could contribute to introduction or spread of P. japonica. These activities should then be connected to specific locations. Around these locations, risk areas can be defined, knowing that their size depends on the spread capacity of the target pest and the availability of host plants around these locations.

The Member States can opt to utilise the information available on the EU Platforms of TRACES NT, EUROPHYT Interceptions and EUROPHYT Outbreaks. The information available, in particular, relating to the country of origin, type of commodity and hosts of intercepted or outbreak reports can be extracted from such platforms for specific harmful organisms. This information can allow Member States to identify potential pathways of introduction from previous historical findings. Thus, Member States might consider focusing their surveillance efforts around activities and locations related to previous interceptions and outbreaks.  

Such information should only be considered as indicative and given the possible dynamic changes, it should be reviewed and analysed periodically.

Example 1: Trade and movement of plants for planting and growing medium

The main pathway of entry for P. japonica is through the movement of eggs, larvae and pupae in the soil and growing media accompanying host plants for planting. The trade and movement of infested plants for planting and cut flowers are also possible pathways for introduction of adult P. japonica. This is particularly true when the commodities originate from areas where P. japonica is present. Thus, activities which trade, store and move potential host commodities of P. japonica could be considered to be risk activities. Border control sites, points of entry, garden centres and nurseries could be considered risk locations, while the areas with host plants surrounding these risk locations can be considered risk areas. Since areas with abundant grassland and turf are suggested in  EPPO (2016)  as the most attractive oviposition sites for the females, these could also be considered risk areas. Airports are usually surrounded by abundant grassland or susceptible plants and, thus, the combination of both risk factors increases the probability of finding the beetle in these areas.

Example 2: Human-assisted spread via hitch-hiking adults of P. japonica

The pathway for introduction by human-assisted spread via hitch-hiking is another risk activity. Therefore, airports, ferry docks, bus stations and railway stations would be locations with a higher probability of finding the pest and can be considered risk locations. Areas surrounding these risk locations where host plants are present can be considered risk areas.

The table on the right panel shows some examples of risk activities and corresponding risk locations that are relevant for surveillance of P. japonica.

2.5. Structure of the target population

The figure on the right panel gives examples of the components of a target population for P. japonica and is not necessarily exhaustive.

3. Detection and identification

3.1. Detection and identification in the field

Popillia japonica can be detected in the field either by visual examination for the presence of adults on the host plants and/or the symptoms caused by the larvae and adults, and by setting up traps.

Trapping the adults is the preferred method to be used in detection surveys, i.e. in pest-free areas, possibly integrated with visual examination for the presence of adults or the symptoms caused by them. In the event of an outbreak, delimiting surveys should rely on visual examination for the adults and symptoms, while traps should not be used to avoid further spread of the beetles to pest-free areas. Soil sampling for larvae detection should be conducted if significant turf damage is evident.

3.1.1. Visual examination

Pest

The larvae live in the fibrous root zone of the plants and, therefore, can be detected only by soil sampling (refer to the section "Symptoms and signs"). The figure below shows a typical C-shaped creamy white grub of P. japonica in the soil. A distinctive morphological characteristic of P. japonica larva is the ventral side of the tenth abdominal segment which bears two medial rows, usually of six to seven spines (four to nine may be possible) in a characteristic V shape ( EPPO, 2022d ). They may be seen with a hand lens and if they are not present, the larva belongs to a species other than P. japonica (CFIA, 2017). Further microscopic identification in the lab might be needed to distinguish P. japonica larvae from closely related species ( EPPO, 2016 ).

Larvae of Popillia japonica in the soil (Source: © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Martino Buonopane, Plant Protection Service, Lombardy Region (IT))

Popillia japonica larva (A) side view (B) detail of the ‘raster’ on the last sternite (Source: © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Gilles San Martin, CRA-W)

Adults of P. japonica can be detected by visual examination of the leaves, flowers and petals and fruits of host plants (figures below). Adult beetles feed in groups initially at the top of the plant and move downwards (Vieira, 2008). The adults are more visible on the vegetation during cooler times of day. For visual examination of adult beetles, it should be kept in mind that odour and sun exposition are very important factors for plant selection by the P. japonica. The Japanese beetle tends to feed on full-sun plants with a top-down feeding pattern (Rowe and Potter 1996; Zavala, et al., 2009).

Adult Popillia japonica on leaves (Source: (A) © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Matteo Maspero (IT); (B) © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Maurizio Pavesi, Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano (IT))

Adult Popillia japonica on flowers (Source: (A) © M.G. Klein, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Bugwood.org; (B) © Mariangela Ciampitti, Plant Protection Service, Lombardy Region (IT))

Adult Popillia japonica on fruits (Source: (A) © Plant Protection Service, Piedmont Region (IT); (B) © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Martino Buonopane, Plant Protection Service, Lombardy Region (IT))

The adult beetle is brightly coloured metallic green and coppery bronze, oval in shape, and varies in size from 8 to 11 mm in length and 5 to 7 mm wide (figure below). The female is typically larger than the male. There are five lateral tufts of white hair on the abdomen plus one patch of white hair on the pygidium (total six) for each side of the body ( EPPO, 2006 ). Male and female beetles can be differentiated from each other by the shape of the tibia and tarsus on the foreleg. The male tibial spur is more sharply pointed, and the tarsi are shorter and stouter than those of the female ( EPPO, 2006 ).

Further details on how to carry out visual examinations for the adult beetles can be found in Appendix 2 of  EPPO (2016) .

The adult Japanese beetle Popillia japonica (Source: © Emmy Engasser, Hawaiian Scarab ID, USDA APHIS ITP, Bugwood.org)

Symptoms and signs

Turf damage is an indication that a large number of larvae could be present in the soil (figure in the right panel). If symptoms of larval damage are observed, soil should be sampled to confirm P. japonica detection. However, damage from larvae has been observed in Italy with a 2–3-year lag (M. Ciampitti, personal communication), thus visual examination for larval damage is not the recommended method for early detection. The larvae cause feeding damage to the roots of host plants and the signs caused are not at all specific ( EPPO, 2006 ). The larvae prefer areas with moist, loamy soil covered with turf or pasture grasses. They feed just below the surface, cutting and consuming the grass roots. Early symptoms include thinning, yellowing and wilting of grass (CABI, 2020).

Symptoms caused by the adults of P. japonica include defoliation and feeding holes in host leaves (figure in the right panel). The leaves can be skeletonised, leaving only the mid-vein intact ( EPPO, 2006 ) but this cannot be considered as confirmation of the presence of P. japonica, as other organisms such as small snails and insects can cause similar symptoms ( EPPO, 2016 ). The adult beetles can also feed on flower petals and cause direct damage by feeding on ripening fruit such as peaches, apples and small fruits (Davis, 1920) (figure below).

Adults feeding on (A) yellow rose flowers and (B) raspberry fruit (Source: © EPPO Global Database)

On corn, the beetles feed on the maturing silk, preventing pollination; this results in malformed kernels and a reduction in the yield (CABI, 2020). In northern Italy in extreme drought conditions, in addition to damage to the silk, damage inside the corn cobs was also observed (M. Ciampitti, personal communication) (figure in the right panel).

Popillia japonica feeding can facilitate feeding and aggregation of other scarab species. In the US, the green June beetle Cotinis nitida has been observed to aggregate in large numbers, to feed on ripening grapes whose skin has been previously pierced by feeding adults of P. japonica (Hammons et al., 2008). Similarly, in northern Italy the green rose chafer Cetonia aurata can be seen aggregating in high numbers (M. Ciampitti, personal communication). Thus, an increase in aggregation of scarab beetles can indicate the presence of P. japonica (figure in the right panel).

3.1.2. Trapping

Traps are the recommended method for detection surveys and early detection of adults of P. japonica. The combination of sex pheromones and several synthetic floral volatiles produce a synergistic effect (Althoff and Rice, 2022), and thus traps should be baited with a combination of floral attractant (phenethyl propionate, eugenol, and geraniol (PEG)) and a sex attractant ((R,Z)-5-1-decenyl)dihydro-2(3H)-furanone) (Ladd et al., 1981; Ebbenga et al., 2022). In northern Italy, the lures last for one entire summer season (M. Ciampitti, personal communication).

Even though early studies reported beetle attraction to white, green and yellow, recent studies report that solid green traps reduce pollinator capture and trap beetles effectively (Sipolski et al., 2019). It is recommended that traps should be placed in a position so as to receive all-day sun or at least mid-day sun (10:00–15:00) ( EPPO, 2006 ). Traps should be placed 3–7.5 m away from hosts (excluding turf), to ensure that the beetles fall into the trap, rather than landing on the host plant. Traps placed immediately adjacent to tall, bushy plants or other objects could be of lower efficacy since dissemination of the lure may be hindered (USDA, 2016). It is thus recommended that traps are not set up on the hosts themselves but set up on a separate support.

The use of traps is not recommended in buffer zones, as this may contribute to further spread of the beetles from infested areas to previously pest-free areas due to the attractiveness of the traps. Traps in infested areas can be used as sentinel traps to monitor the flight period of the adults in the territory and for mass trapping. However, as a precaution, it is recommended to use the traps at least 1 km inside the boundary of the infested area.

Further information and details on how to set the traps for detection of adult beetles are provided in Appendix 4 of  EPPO (2016) .

Standard green trap used for P. japonica (Source: © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Plant Protection Service, Lombardy Region (IT))

3.1.3. Sample collection

Any beetles found in traps set up for detection surveys should be examined for the distinctive features of P. japonica. Specimens identified should be sent to the laboratory for confirmation ( EPPO, 2016 ). Traps should be checked at least once per month from June to September.

As previously stated, sampling the soil for larvae is ineffective for ensuring early detection, and should only be conducted when turf damage is evident, indicating the possible presence of larvae. The most used method for detecting P. japonica larvae is to extract cubic portions of soil, 20×20×20 cm. After extraction, the soil sample is inspected for the presence of larvae by breaking the soil into a tray using hand tools. Collected larvae should be put in sample tubes containing 70% alcohol and sent to the laboratory for confirmation. For further information on larva sampling refer to Appendix 3 of  EPPO (2016) .

3.1.4. Timing of detection and identification

The exact timing of the survey is dependent on the life cycle of the beetle, which depends on environmental conditions. Therefore, the timing for detection surveys should be dependent on the field conditions and on the life cycle occurring in the different MSs.

Flight activity is initiated on clear days when the temperature is higher than 21°C and the relative humidity is lower than 60%, while colder temperatures, higher humidity and windy days prevent flight (Fleming, 1972). Popillia japonica flies actively mainly during the hottest hours of summer (10:00–16:00), when wind streams are weak (Borgogno Mondino et al., 2022).

Popillia japonica adults feed extensively on clear summer days, when the temperature is between 21°C and 35°C and the relative humidity is above 60%. Adults feed less on cloudy and windy days and do not feed on rainy days (CFIA, 2017).

If the field conditions and life cycle of P. japonica are similar to the situation in northern Italy, it is recommended that visual examination for the adult beetles and the associated damage on the preferred host plants is conducted during June and July (figure below).

Traps should be set up when conditions favour the emergence of the adults. In northern Italy, traps are usually set up from mid-May and kept until the end of September (figure below).

Soil samples for larva detection should be taken when most of the larvae are in the second or third instar and they are nearer to the surface, and if symptoms of turf damage are evident ( EPPO, 2016 ). In northern Italy, soil sampling is conducted from February until May and from mid-August to October (figure below).

Annual cycle of Popillia japonica indicating the potential timing to detect the pest at the various life stages, based on the information from northern Italy

3.2. Detection and identification in the laboratory

3.2.1. Morphological identification

Collected larvae and adults need to be examined in the laboratory under the microscope to identify the distinctive morphological characteristics of the pest. Further details on the morphological identification and a dichotomous key for Scarabaeoidea families and the Popillia genus are provided in Appendix 1 of  EPPO (2006) . ERSAF (2016) recommends morphological identification with a binocular microscope as a diagnostic method. For detailed diagnostics, refer to EPPO Standard PM 7/74(1) ( EPPO, 2006 ).

Risk of misidentification

Popillia japonica larvae and adults are very similar to the pest of European cultivated grasslands Phyllopertha horticola (figure below), which has a similar life cycle and biology (Korycinska et al., 2015). Popillia japonica can be distinguished from the latter by its shiny golden green thorax, and there are five lateral tufts of white hair on the abdomen plus one patch of white hair on the pygidium (total six) (figure in the right panel) on each side of the body ( EPPO, 2006 ).

Adult of (A) Popillia japonica and (B) P. horticola (Source: (A) © Darren Blackford, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org; (B) © Malcolm Storey, www.bioimages.org.uk)

3.2.2. Laboratory testing and other methods of identification

Molecular identification methods are available to identify P. japonica. Molecular identification can be used to confirm morphological analysis or when there are fragments of larvae or adults that are not well preserved. Molecular analysis consists of PCR testing with universal barcode primers and then sequencing. The sequences obtained can then be compared with standard P. japonica sequences, deposited in international databanks.

A diagnostic protocol for PCR test (LCO1490/HCO2198) has been prepared by Folmer et al. (1994). Rizzo et al. (2022) recently developed a SYBR green-based real-time PCR test for the identification of adults and larvae of P. japonica.

4. Conclusion

Information on whatwherewhen and how to conduct survey activities for P. japonica is summarised in the Table on the right panel. The identification of the target population needs to be tailored to the situation in each Member State (example shown below).

5. Survey framework

The figure below shows the next steps after the survey preparation for designing statistically sound and risk-based detection and delimiting surveys of P. japonica. Guidance on selecting the type of survey, related survey preparation and design, is provided in the the  EFSA general guidelines for pest surveys  on the right panel (EFSA et al., 2020).

Glossary

Scroll down the right panel to access the definitions included in the glossary.

Acknowledgments

EFSA wishes to acknowledge Gritta Schrader of the Julius Kuehn Institute (JKI) in Germany in the context of the grant GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02 and EFSA staff Sybren Vos for the preparation, Alan MacLeod for the review, and EFSA trainees Melanie Camilleri, Ramona Mihaela Ciubotaru and Makrina Diakaki for finalisation and publication of the first version of the survey card on Popillia japonica (EFSA-Q-2018-00348).

EFSA wishes to thank EFSA trainee Giulia Mattion for the preparation of the first version of the survey card in story map format (EFSA-Q-2020-00234).

EFSA also wishes to thank EFSA staff Alice Delbianco and Melanie Camilleri, ISA expert Giulia Mattion (in the context of procedure EOI/EFSA/SCIENCE/2020/01) for the preparation and publication, and Mariangela Ciampitti for the review of this update of the pest survey card Popillia japonica (EFSA-Q-2022-00138). EFSA also wishes to acknowledge Cristina Marazzi (Servizio fitosanitario cantonale, Switzerland) for providing additional information for this pest survey card.

Suggested citation: EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2023. Pest survey card on Popillia japonica. EFSA supporting publication 2023:EN-7809. Available online:  https://efsa.europa.eu/plants/planthealth/monitoring/surveillance/popillia-japonica . Last updated: 27 February 2023.


References

Allsopp PG, 1996. Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica Newman (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): rate of movement and potential distribution of an immigrant species. The Coleopterists' Bulletin, 81–95.

Althoff ER and Rice KB, 2022. Japanese Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Invasion of North America: History, Ecology, and Management. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 13. doi: 10.1093/jipm/pmab043

ANSES, 2022. AVIS et RAPPORT de l'Anses relatif à une évaluation du risque simplifiée (ERS) lié à Popillia japonica, le scarabée japonais, pour la France métropolitaine. Report referral number: 2021-SA-0090. Available online:  https://www.anses.fr/fr/content/avis-et-rapport-de-lanses-relatif-%C3%A0-une-%C3%A9valuation-du-risque-simplifi%C3%A9e-ers-li%C3%A9-%C3%A0-popillia 

Borgogno Mondino E, Lessio F, Bianchi A, Ciampitti M, Cavagna B and Alma A, 2022. Modelling the spread of Popillia japonica Newman (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from a recently infested area. Entomologia Generalis, 42, 5, 713–721. doi:10.1127/entomologia/2022/1370

Bourke PMA, 1961. Climatic aspects of the possible establishment of the Japanese beetle in Europe. TechnicalNote 41, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, 9 pp.

CABI, 2020. Popillia japonica (Japanese beetle). CABI Compendium Datasheet last modified 3 December 2019. Available online:  https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/43599 

Campbell JM, Sarazin MJ and Lyons B. 1989, Canadian beetles (Coleoptera) injurious to crops, ornamentals, stored products, and buildings, 491 pp.

CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), 2017. Popillia japonica (Japanese Beetle). Fact Sheet. Available online:  https://inspection.canada.ca/plant-health/invasive-species/insects/japanese-beetle/fact-sheet/eng/1328165101975/1328165185309 

Ciampitti M and Buonopane M, 2017. Popillia japonica, nuovo coleottero fastidioso per orti e giardini. Vita in campagna. Supplemento 05/2017, 2 pp.

Davis JJ, 1920. The Green Japanese Beetle Problem. Journal of Economic Entomology, 13, 2, 185–194. doi: 10.1093/jee/13.2.185

Ebbenga DN, Burkness EC and Hutchison WD, 2022. Optimizing the Use of Semiochemical-Based Traps for Efficient Monitoring of Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): Validation of a Volumetric Approach. Journal of Economic Entomology, 115:869-876. doi: 10.1093/jee/toac049

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2020. Story map for survey of Popillia japonica. EFSA supporting publication 2020:EN-1828. Version 1, 26 March 2020. Available online:  https://arcg.is/1HbK9q0 

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Ciubotaru RM, Cortiñas Abrahantes J, Oyedele J, Parnell S, Schrader G, Zancanaro G and Vos S, 2018. Technical report of the methodology and work-plan for developing plant pest survey guidelines. EFSA supporting publication 2018: EN-1399. 36 pp.  doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.EN-1399 

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Lázaro E, Parnell S, Vicent Civera A, Schans J, Schenk M, Cortiñas Abrahantes J, Zancanaro G and Vos S, 2020. General guidelines for statistically sound and risk-based surveys of plant pests. EFSA supporting publication 2020:EN-1919. 65 pp.  doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1919 

EFSA PLH Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Health), 2018. Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Popillia japonica. EFSA Journal, 16(10), 5438, 30 pp. doi:  10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5438 

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2006. PM 7/74 (1). Diagnostic Popillia japonica.  EPPO Bulletin, 36, 447–450 .

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2014. First report of Popillia japonica in Italy. EPPO Reporting Service no. 10–2014. Available online:  https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-3272 

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2016. PM 9/21(1). Popillia japonica: procedures for official control. EPPO Bulletin, 46, 543–555.  doi:10.1111/epp.12345 

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2019. Dead beetle of Popillia japonica found in trap at Schiphol airport (NL). EPPO Reporting Service no. 02 – 2019. Num. article: 2019/034. EPPO Global Database. Available online:  https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-6464 

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2021. Update on the situation of Popillia japonica in Switzerland. EPPO Reporting Service no. 05 – 2021. Num. article: 2021/104. Available online:  https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-7043 

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2022a. Popillia japonica. EPPO datasheets on pests recommended for regulation. Available online:  https://gd.eppo.int 

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2022b. Update of the situation of Popillia japonica in Italy. EPPO Reporting Service no. 04 – 2022. Num. article: 2022/081. Available online:  https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-7312 

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2022c. First finding of Popillia japonica in Germany. EPPO Reporting Service no. 01 – 2022. Num. article: 2022/010. Available online:  https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-7240 

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation), 2022d. Addendum – PM 7/74(1) Popillia japonica. 52, 192–192. doi:  10.1111/epp.12827 

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), online. EPPO Global Database. Available online:  https://gd.eppo.int  [Accessed: 16 February 2022]

ERSAF (Ente Regionale per i Servizi all’Agricoltura e alle Foreste), 2016. Procedure for larval monitoring for Popillia japonica. Available online:  https://www.ersaf.lombardia.it/it/file/2568/021b66df/EN_Lomb+Pj+procedure+Larve+rev_784_26596.pdf 

Eurostat, 2022. Statistical regions in the European Union and partner countries – NUTS and statistical regions 2021, Edition 2022. Available online:  https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/ks-gq-22-010 

Fleming WE, 1972. Biology of the Japanese beetle. USDA Technical Bulletin 1449. Available online:  https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/CAT87201410/PDF  [Accessed: 10 December 2018]

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2021a. ISPM (International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures) 6. Surveillance. FAO, 14 pp. Available online:  https://www.ippc.int/en/publications/615/ 

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2021b. ISPM (International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures) 31. Methodologies for sampling of consignments. Rome, FAO, 31 pp. Available online:  https://www.ippc.int/en/publications/588/ 

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2021c. Surveillance guide: A guide to understand the principal requirements of surveillance programmes for national plant protection organizations. Second edition. Rome, FAO on behalf of the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention. Available online:  https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb7139en 

Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R and Vrijenhoek R, 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 294–299.e.

Fox H, 1932. The known distribution of the Japanese beetle in 1930 and 1931, with special reference to the area of continuous infestation. Journal of Economic Entomology, 25, 396–407.

Gilioli G, Sperandio G, Simonetto A, Colturato M, Battisti A, Mori N, Ciampitti M, Cavagna B, Bianchi A and Gervasio P, 2021. Modelling diapause termination and phenology of the Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica. Journal of Pest Science, 95, 869–880. doi: 10.1007/s10340-021-01434-8

Hammons DL, Kurtural SK and Potter DA, 2008. Japanese Beetles Facilitate Feeding by Green June Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on Ripening Grapes. Environmental Entomology, 37, 608–614. doi: 10.1093/ee/37.2.608

Herms DA, 2004. Using degree days and plant phenology to predict pest activity. In: Krischik V and Davidson (eds). JIPM (Integrated Pest Management) of midwest landscapes. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Publication, St Paul, MN, pp. 49–59.

Hodgson E and Kuntz C, 2013. Japanese beetles begin emergence. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, Ames, IA. Available online:  https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/cropnews/2013/06/japanese-beetles-begin-emergence 

Johnson WT, 2000. Growing degree days for insects affecting ornamental plants. Available at: http://extension.psu.edu/plants/green-industry/landscaping/integrated-pest-management/fact-sheets/growing-degree-days-for-insects-affecting-ornamental-plants

Korycinska A, Baker RHA and Eyre D, 2015. Rapid pest risk analysis (PRA) for: Popillia japonica. DEFRA, London, 34 pp. Available online:  https://planthealthportal.defra.gov.uk/pests-and-diseases/uk-plant-health-risk-register/downloadExternalPra.cfm?id=4106 

Kreuger B and Potter DA, 2001. Diel feeding activity and thermoregulation by Japanese beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) within host plant canopies. Environmental Entomology, 30, 172–180.

Kistner-Thomas EJ, 2019. The Potential Global Distribution and Voltinism of the Japanese Beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Under Current and Future Climates. Journal of Insect Science, 19, 2, 16. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iez023

Ladd TL, Klein MG and Tumlinson JH, 1981. Phenethyl propionate + eugenol + geraniol (3:7:3) and Japonilure: a highly effective joint lure for Japanese beetles. Journal of Economic Entomology, 74, 665–667.

Lessio F, Pisa CG, Picciau L, Ciampitti M, Cavagna B and Alma A, 2022. An immunomarking method to investigate the flight distance of the Japanese beetle. Entomologia Generalis, 42, 1, 45–56.

Ludwig D, 1928. The effects of temperature on the development of an insect (Popillia japonica Newman). Physiological Zoology, 1, 358–389.

Pavesi M, 2014. Popillia japonica, an invasive species reported in Lombardy, Italy. Inform. Agrario, 32,

Rizzo D, Da Lio D, Bruscoli T, Cappellini G, Bartolini L, Salemi C, Aronadio A, Del Nista D, Oliver JB and Rossi E, 2022. SYBR Green-based real-time PCR test for the identification of adults and larvae of the Japanese beetle Popillia japonica Newman (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae). EPPO Bulletin, 52:141-148. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12839 

Rowe WJ and Potter DA, 1996. Vertical stratification of feeding by Japanese beetles within linden tree canopies: selective foraging or height per se? Oecologia, 108, 459–466.

Régnière J, Rabb RL and Stinner RE, 1981. Popillia japonica: simulation of temperature-dependent development of the immatures, and prediction of adult emergence. Environmental Entomology, 10, 290–296.

Servizio Fitosanitario Regione Lombardia, 2022. Popillia or Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica) – Visual Inspections – Main host plants. Available online:  https://fitosanitario.regione.lombardia.it/wps/wcm/connect/ccef1c61-744f-4331-86a1-a522be5e026d/Popillia+japonica_piante+ospiti.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-ccef1c61-744f-4331-86a1-a522be5e026d-oeKCgS9 

Simonetto A, Sperandio G, Battisti A, Mori N, Ciampitti M, Cavagna B, Bianchi A and Gilioli G, 2022. Exploring the main factors influencing habitat preference of Popillia japonica in an area of recent introduction. Ecological informatics, 70, 101749. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101749

Sipolski SJ, Datson SW, Reding M, Oliver JB and Alm SR, 2019. Minimizing bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) bycatch in Japanese beetle traps. Environmental Entomology, 48:1203-1213.

USDA (US Department of Agriculture), 2016. Japanese Beetle Program Manual. USDA, Washington, DC. Available online:  https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/domestic/downloads/japanese_beetle.pdf 

Vieira V, 2008. The Japanese beetle Popillia japonica Newman, 1938 Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae in the Azores islands. Boletin Sociedad Entomologica Aragonesa, 43, 450–451.

Zavala JA, Casteel CL, Nabity PD, Berenbaum MR and DeLucia EH, 2009. Role of cysteine proteinase inhibitors in preference of Japanese beetles (Popillia japonica) for soybean (Glycine max) leaves of different ages and grown under elevated CO 2 . Oecologia, 161, 35–41.

The host plant species, and their respective categories, which are attacked in northern Italy by P. japonica. Species in bold are included in detection surveys in pest-free areas while species with an asterisk (*) are inspected with particular attention in delimiting surveys (Servizio Fitosanitario Regione Lombardia, 2022)

Thermal requirements for the development of Popillia japonica (rearing experiments) (Source: Korycinska et al., 2015)

Larvae of Popillia japonica in the soil (Source: © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Martino Buonopane, Plant Protection Service, Lombardy Region (IT))

Popillia japonica larva (A) side view (B) detail of the ‘raster’ on the last sternite (Source: © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Gilles San Martin, CRA-W)

Adult Popillia japonica on leaves (Source: (A) © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Matteo Maspero (IT); (B) © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Maurizio Pavesi, Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano (IT))

Adult Popillia japonica on flowers (Source: (A) © M.G. Klein, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Bugwood.org; (B) © Mariangela Ciampitti, Plant Protection Service, Lombardy Region (IT))

Adult Popillia japonica on fruits (Source: (A) © Plant Protection Service, Piedmont Region (IT); (B) © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Martino Buonopane, Plant Protection Service, Lombardy Region (IT))

The adult Japanese beetle Popillia japonica (Source: © Emmy Engasser, Hawaiian Scarab ID, USDA APHIS ITP, Bugwood.org)

Adults feeding on (A) yellow rose flowers and (B) raspberry fruit (Source: © EPPO Global Database)

Standard green trap used for P. japonica (Source: © EPPO Global Database, courtesy of Plant Protection Service, Lombardy Region (IT))

Annual cycle of Popillia japonica indicating the potential timing to detect the pest at the various life stages, based on the information from northern Italy

Adult of (A) Popillia japonica and (B) P. horticola (Source: (A) © Darren Blackford, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org; (B) © Malcolm Storey, www.bioimages.org.uk)