Contributing knowledge for society in the Barents Sea

- The Nansen Legacy -

Periods of increased ice cover in the Barents Sea are possible and predictable

In a warming world, ten-years of increased sea ice expanses in the Barents Sea are still possible. 

 In a recent study, Marius Årthun and co-workers  demonstrate that it is possible to predict these natural variations in sea ice extent based on the strength of the Atlantic water inflow.

Using this method, Årthun and colleagues were already in 2015 able to foresee sea ice pilling up in the Barents Sea in the winter 2018/2019. The reason: A weaker and colder Atlantic current in recent years.

Seasonal forecasts of sea ice edge position

The variability in sea ice extent affects human activities. Seasonal forecasting of the ice edge position is therefore required for safe operations in the Arctic. 

Seasonal sea ice forecasting is still in its infancy, but different algorithms already produce seasonal sea ice edge forecasts. In a recent study,  Cyril Palerme and co-workers  compared historical 25-member ensemble ice edge forecast to satellite ice observations, and showed that different methods for verification for probabilities of meeting ice covered waters have different strengths and weaknesses. The choice of method will therefore depend on the purpose of the seasonal forecast.

Validation of short-term sea ice forecasts

In addition to seasonal forecast, ship navigation in the Arctic requires shorter-term ice forecasts of high quality. 

For this purpose, there are many monitoring and forecast products available. Information on the expected accuracy of data or model results from these are traditionally available as a set of metrics that comes with the products.  Arne Melsom and colleagues  examined a large number of metrics used, and concluded with a recommended best practice for the validation of sea ice edge forecasts. 

New method for weather forecasting in the Arctic

One of the key elements for understanding the rapid climate change in the Arctic is the surface energy budget. In the Arctic this budget is not consistently described across the various climate models, reanalyses and observation products. Recognising the physical causes of these inconsistencies is highly relevant for improving climate predictions and projections. 

 Yurii Batrak and Malte Müller  show that a 5 to 10 °C warm bias of the sea ice surface temperature in global atmospheric reanalyses and weather forecasts is mainly caused by a missing representation of the snow layer on top of the sea-ice.  

The work has improved Norwegian weather forecasts.

Predicting the Barents Sea cod stock for multiple years in advance

Predicting fish stock variations on interannual to decadal time scales is one of the major issues in fisheries science and management.  

Based on the strong co-variability between subpolar North Atlantic water temperature anomalies and the Barents Sea cod stock,  Marius Årthun and co-workers  show that retrospective predictions for the period 1957-2017 capture well multi-year to decadal variations in cod biomass in the Barents Sea.  

The study demonstrates the potential for ecosystem-based fisheries management, which could enable strategic planning on longer time scales. Future predictions show a gradual decline in the cod stock towards 2024.

Could "Balanced Harvesting" increase Norway's fishing yield in the Barents Sea?

"Balanced harvesting” management aims at increasing fishing yields while protecting the oceans. The Barents Sea has been managed according to an ecosystem-based approach for many years, not been subjected to the fishing pattern proposed by the «Balanced harvesting» approach. 

Using model simulations,  Ina Nilsen and co-workers  show that implementation of “Balanced harvesting” practice would hardly increase the yields of currently commercially exploited fish stocks. However, expanding the fishery to include species that are not commercially exploited today can produce higher total yields.

Reconciling scientists and non-scientists by modelling

Sound participatory management requires that different actors – from fishermen to scientists – can understand and trust one of the most important tools in fisheries management: numerical models. This implies that assumptions behind the models are presented in a transparent way.

Therefore,  Benjamin Planque, proposes  the use of a new kind of simple model. The proposed model creates outputs covering a range of possible ecosystem states and dynamics. The existence of these multiple possibilities represents the starting point for discussions among scientists, managers, and stakeholders.

The new model is proposed as a quantitative tool for the ecosystem assessment work conducted by ICES.

All pictures (c) Christian Morel / christianmorel.net / The Nansen Legacy