
DVRPC's Bicycle Cyclical Count Program
Tracking bicycle volumes in the nine-county region (2014-2022)
Attention: This site is best viewed on a laptop or desktop computer.
About the Program
DVRPC’s Bicycle Cyclical Count Program, launched in 2014, collects and analyzes bicycle volumes to track trends at 134 locations in the nine-county region. These locations have at least 20 bicyclists per day and were selected for their representative attributes, geographic diversity, and facility types.
The purpose of this story map is to provide planners, lawmakers, and the public with a better understanding of changes in bicycle volumes over time, across different geographies, and on different bicycle facility types. The data is intended to inform policy decisions at the municipal and county levels and to help guide future bicycle infrastructure investments.
To view data for individual count locations, please click on a specific location. Explore this story map further to uncover cycling trends in the areas where you live, work, and visit.
The scope and longevity of the Bicycle Cyclical Count Program have led to certain limitations, including missing data due to locations added during the program or due to machine or human error. Some bicycle facilities at specific count locations have changed over the course of a decade. The DVRPC team attempted to represent the data collected and the most current bicycle facilities as accurately as possible.
Data Collection
Data is collected to uncover trends in cycling behavior and draw informed conclusions about what might be causing them. DVRPC deploys pneumatic tube counters and collects data for seven days at each of the 134 locations every three years. The tubes are connected to an electronic counter that takes a measurement every time the tube is compressed. The counters are sensitive to the weight placed on the tube and, therefore, can differentiate between cars and bicycles. This allows us to count the number of cyclists in areas where they share the road with drivers.
The bicycle cyclical counts shown are the annual average daily bicycles (AADB), calculated by multiplying the raw count collected by the seasonal adjustment factor, a correction factor for weather conditions, and seasonal and weekday variations. The raw counts, as recorded by the equipment, are also multiplied by an equipment factor -- a correction factor to account for equipment overcounting or undercounting the actual number of people biking. The count data can be viewed and downloaded at dvrpc.org/traffic , as well as in our geographic information system (GIS) data portal .
Bicycle Facilities
The facility types include multiuse trails or sidepaths, protected bicycle lanes, buffered bicycle lanes, conventional bicycle lanes, striped shoulders, sharrows, and mixed traffic.
Multiuse Trail or Sidepath
A trail is a multiuse, off-road facility used by cyclists, pedestrians, and other non-motorized transportation modes. Sidepaths are similar to trails but are typically shorter and immediately adjacent to the cartway. They are commonly used to fill segments that connect other trail segments or the on-road network.
Bicycle Lane - Protected
A protected bicycle lane is a designated space on the roadway for cyclists that separates them from motorists using vertical physical barriers placed in the buffer zone, such as bollards, planters, and flexible delineators. Some physical barriers provide more protection than others. Protected bike lanes can also be parking-protected, which places the protected bike lane between the parking lane and the adjacent to the curb.
Bicycle Lane - Buffered
A buffered bicycle lane designates a space for cyclists on a roadway using a painted buffer to separate them from motorists.
Bicycle Lane - Conventional
A conventional bicycle lane designates a space for cyclists on a roadway using pavement markings to separate them from motorists.
Striped Shoulder
A striped shoulder is a designated space for stopped vehicles and emergency vehicles. Cyclists will often ride on a striped shoulder in a less dense rural area. Pedestrians may also use the facility in the absence of a sidewalk.
Sharrow
A sharrow is a street marking placed in the travel lane to indicate where cyclists should position themselves for the best visibility and to avoid being doored if adjacent to on-street parking. Sharrows are often paired with signage to tell motorists they must share the road with cyclists.
Mixed Traffic
Mixed traffic is a road without a dedicated bicycle facility or sharrow. Cyclists must mix with drivers of motorized vehicles.
New Jersey Counties
The following maps showcase bicycle cyclical count data for DVRPC's New Jersey counties, including Mercer, Burlington, Camden, and Gloucester. The number of count locations and facility types varies from county to county. To view data for individual count locations, please click on a specific location on the county map.
Mercer County
Counter Locations - 9
Counters by Facility Type Mixed Traffic - 5 Multiuse Trail or Sidepath - 2 Bicycle Lane - Conventional - 1 Sharrow - 1
Counters by Municipality Hopewell Township - 2 Trenton City - 2 West Windsor Township - 2 Hightstown Borough - 1 Hopewell Borough - 1 Princeton - 1
Note: Rings of the same size indicate the location experienced little or no change from the previous time period.
Data is missing from some locations in Mercer County; please see below for the time period missing in the chart. **location missing data from 2017-2019 ***location missing data from 2020-2022
Burlington County
Counter Locations - 14
Counters by Facility Type Mixed Traffic - 7 Striped Shoulder - 5 Multiuse Trail or Sidepath - 1 Bicycle Lane - Conventional - 1
Counters by Municipality Evesham Township - 3 Bordentown City - 1 Burlington City - 1 Edgewater Park Township - 1 Mansfield Township - 1 Maple Shade Township - 1 Medford Lakes Borough - 1 Moorestown Township - 1 Mount Holly Township - 1 Palmyra Borough - 1 Riverside Township - 1 Tabernacle Township - 1
Note: Rings of the same size indicate the location experienced little or no change from the previous time period.
Data is missing from some locations in Burlington County; please see below for the time period missing in the chart. *location added after 2016 ***location missing data from 2020-2022
Camden County
Counter Locations - 17
Counters by Facility Type Mixed Traffic - 7 Multiuse Trail or Sidepath - 7 Bicycle Lane - Conventional - 3
Counters by Municipality Camden City - 5 Collingswood Borough - 3 Cherry Hill Township - 1 Gibbsboro Borough - 1 Gloucester Township - 1 Haddon Heights Borough - 1 Haddon Township - 1 Lindenwold Borough - 1 Merchantville Borough - 1 Pennsauken Township - 1 Runnemede Borough - 1
Note: Rings of the same size indicate the location experienced little or no change from the previous time period.
Data is missing from some locations in Camden County; please see below for the time period missing in the chart. *location added after 2016 ***location missing data from 2020-2022 ****location missing data (multiple periods)
Gloucester County
Counter Locations - 8
Counters by Facility Type Striped Shoulder - 3 Bicycle Lane - Conventional - 2 Mixed Traffic - 2 Multiuse Trail or Sidepath - 1
Counters by Municipality Glassboro Borough - 2 Clayton Borough - 1 East Greenwich Township - 1 Elk Township - 1 Monroe Township - 1 Paulsboro Borough - 1 Woodbury City - 1
Note: Rings of the same size indicate the location experienced little or no change from the previous time period.
Data is missing from some locations in Gloucester County; please see below for the time period missing in the chart. *location added after 2016 ****location missing data (multiple periods)
Pennsylvania Counties
The following maps showcase bicycle cyclical count data for DVRPC's Pennsylvania counties, which include Bucks, Montgomery, Delaware, and Chester. The number of count locations and facility types varies from county to county. To view data for individual count locations, please click on a specific location on the county map.
Bucks County
Counter Locations - 6 Counters by Facility Type Mixed Traffic - 6
Counters by Municipality Bensalem Township - 1 Bristol Township - 1 Doylestown Borough - 1 Morrisville Borough - 1 New Hope Borough - 1 Solebury Township - 1
Note: Rings of the same size indicate the location experienced little or no change from the previous time period.
Data is missing from some locations in Bucks County; please see below for the time period missing in the chart. **location missing data from 2017-2019 ***location missing data from 2020-2022 ****location missing data (multiple periods)
Montgomery County
Counter Locations - 19
Counters by Facility Type Mixed Traffic - 8 Multiuse Trail or Sidepath - 6 Striped Shoulder - 3 Bicycle Lane - Conventional - 1 Sharrow - 1
Counters by Municipality Abington Township - 3 Norristown Borough - 3 Upper Providence Township - 2 Conshohocken Borough - 1 Hatfield Township - 1 Lansdale Borough - 1 Lower Merion Township - 1 Narberth Borough - 1 Pottstown Borough - 1 Upper Dublin Township - 1 Upper Merion Township - 1 West Norriton Township - 1 Whitemarsh Township - 1 Whitpain Township - 1
Note: Rings of the same size indicate the location experienced little or no change from the previous time period.
Data is missing from some locations in Montgomery County; please see below for the time period missing in the chart. *location added after 2016 ***location missing data from 2020-2022 ****location missing data (multiple periods)
Chester County
Counter Locations - 20
Counters by Facility Type Mixed Traffic - 9 Multiuse Trail or Sidepath - 6 Striped Shoulder - 5
Counters by Municipality East Bradford Township - 2 Phoenixville Borough - 2 Tredyffrin Township - 2 Uwchlan Township - 2 West Chester Borough - 2 Coatesville City - 1 East Marlborough Township - 1 East Vincent Township - 1 Honey Brook Borough - 1 Kennett Township - 1 Lower Oxford Township - 1 New Garden Township - 1 Spring City Borough - 1 Wallace Township - 1 West Grove Borough - 1
Note: Rings of the same size indicate the location experienced little or no change from the previous time period.
Data is missing from some locations in Chester County; please see below for the time period missing in the chart. *location added after 2016 ***location missing data from 2020-2022 ****location missing data (multiple periods)
Delaware County
Counter Locations - 12
Counters by Facility Type Mixed Traffic - 7 Striped Shoulder - 3 Multiuse Trail or Sidepath - 2
Counters by Municipality Swarthmore Borough - 2 Upper Darby Township - 2 Yeadon Borough - 2 Edgmont Township - 1 Glenolden Borough - 1 Haverford Township - 1 Marcus Hook Borough - 1 Marple Township - 1 Media Borough - 1
Note: Rings of the same size indicate the location experienced little or no change from the previous time period.
Data is missing from some locations in Delaware County; please see below for the time period missing in the chart. ***location missing data from 2020-2022 ****location missing data (multiple periods)
Philadelphia
The following maps showcase bicycle cyclical count data for Philadelphia, the most populated county in the DVRPC nine-county region. The number of count locations and facility types varies from county to county. To view data for individual count locations, please click on a specific location on the county map.
Philadelphia
Counter Locations - 29
Counters by Facility Type Bicycle Lane - Conventional - 12 Mixed Traffic - 7 Bicycle Lane - Buffered - 5 Bicycle Lane - Protected - 3 Multiuse Trail or Sidepath - 1 Sharrow - 1
Counters by Planning Districts Central - 12 University-Southwest - 9 South - 4 Lower North - 1 Lower Northwest - 1 North Delaware - 1 River Wards - 1
Note: Rings of the same size indicate the location experienced little or no change from the previous time period.
Data is missing from some locations in Philadelphia; please see below for the time period missing in the chart. *location added after 2016 ***location missing data from 2020-2022 ****location missing data (multiple periods)
Analysis and Next Steps
Since the program's inception in 2014, shifting trends and behaviors have positively and negatively impacted bicycle volumes. The program exists to detect these shifts by collecting new data at each location every three years. This data is then compared to previous periods to determine if a volume shift has occurred and, if so, identify if it is a change or part of a long-term pattern. The following section analyzes data collected at 87 locations in the nine-county region with volume data from each period: 2014-2016, 2017-2019, and 2020-2022.
The program is limited as it cannot collect data from every facility in the nine-county region. There may be instances where newly installed bicycle infrastructure on a corridor that is not part of the program impacts bicycle volumes on a nearby street that is. It's important to acknowledge the program's limitations, but as more counts are collected and the database grows, the program will continue to reflect bicycle volumes and trends in the region more accurately.
Growth of Indego
Indego, Philadelphia’s public bike-share program, launched in 2015 with 600 bicycles at 60 stations. The initial service area focused on Center City and nearby neighborhoods but has since expanded throughout the city. In 2016, its first full year, residents and visitors completed 655,058 trips on Indego; six years later, in 2022, the number of completed trips grew to 905,790. Indego now has 237 active stations with more than 2,150 bicycles, consisting of conventional and electric bicycles, which were introduced in 2019. In 2024, Indego plans to expand its fleet to 3,000 bikes and add 1,000 new dock points at 45-50 new stations.
As of April 2023, Indego reported surpassing six million trips in Philadelphia over the last eight years. With about 8,700 active Indego pass holders, the bike-share service has transformed active transportation in Philadelphia and has provided bicycle access to many residents. Indego likely played a key role in the increase in bicycle volumes in Philadelphia between 2017 and 2019 by providing additional bicycle access to residents and visitors. Between 2020 and 2022, as bicycle volumes fell in the city, the expansion of Indego stations and the growth of overall trips likely prevented a further decline in ridership.
Bicycle Infrastructure Expands
Over the last nine years of the program, bicycle infrastructure in the nine-county region has expanded to more streets and trails. Notable improvements include a 3.8-mile Chester Valley Trail extension in Montgomery County, which now connects to the Schuylkill River Trail in Norristown, PA. A conventional bicycle lane was added to Park Drive in Pennsauken, NJ, along the north bank of Cooper River in Camden County. A bollard and parking-protected bicycle lane was installed on Chestnut Street between 63rd Street and 22nd Street in Philadelphia. These upgrades are likely to increase bicycle volumes in the region as the dedicated space reduces interactions with motorists, creating a safer and more comfortable riding experience for cyclists.
Shift to Remote Work
Bicycle volumes in the nine-county region have been impacted by a change in commuting behavior as many office workers shifted to remote and hybrid work schedules during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Pennsylvania counties had the highest percentage of workers who reported working from home at 13.6 percent in 2021, up from 4.9 percent at the start of the Bicycle Cyclical Count Program in 2014.
The decline in bicycle commuters is borne out in the count data as many would-be cyclist commuters now work remotely or with a hybrid work schedule. Nationwide, between 2019 and 2021, there was a significant decline in workers cycling to work, dropping by 24 percent. The lingering impact of the pandemic can be observed in other modes of transportation; in SEPTA's Passenger Revenue & Ridership report from November 2023 , systemwide ridership was 67 percent of its pre-pandemic levels, with its regional rail ridership at 58 percent, and transit ridership at 68 percent.
The impact of remote and hybrid work schedules can also be seen in the number of office workers in the region's employment centers. Per Kastle Systems, a security service firm that tracks entries into office buildings, the Philadelphia metropolitan region occupancy rate in November 2023 was 46.6 percent, behind the national average of 57.2 percent. Center City District, a business improvement district in downtown Philadelphia, reported in their 2023 State of Center City that the volume of individuals in the city's office district was just 47 percent of pre-pandemic levels.
Sources: Center City District - 2023 State of Center City Kastle Systems: Back to Work Barometer - November 2023 SEPTA's Passenger Revenue & Ridership - November 2023 U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Ridership Drops in Employment Centers
Employment centers are concentrated areas of non-residential development. These centers form the backbone of the region’s economy and are prime destinations for journey-to-work trips; they significantly impact the region’s highways and transit systems. They are defined as areas where a number of employers together employ at least 500 employees and have an employment density of at least 2.0 employees per acre (DVRPC Regional Employment Centers - 2014).
In the region, there was a one percent increase in bicycle volumes within employment centers before the COVID-19 pandemic. Between 2020 and 2022, bicycle volumes decreased in employment centers in the region, likely due to their high concentration of jobs as workers shifted to remote and hybrid work schedules. The decline was significant within employment centers in Philadelphia and the NJ counties, while bicycle volumes in the PA counties' employment centers remained relatively consistent.
Sources: Bicycle Count Data Source: DVRPC Regional Employment Centers and Sites Source: DVRPC U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Ridership Declines in Dense Areas
People density is the number of people living and working by Census block. For each count location, a people density rating out of five was assigned, with one being the lowest and five being the highest.
In the program's first six years, urban cores, locations with high people density scores, maintained consistent bicycle volumes or even increased, while areas with lower density experienced a marked decline. This trend was likely due to urban cores, such as Philadelphia, installing bicycle infrastructure and beginning to build out a connected network. Between the second and third count periods, 2017-2019 to 2020-2022, bicycle volumes fell the furthest in the most dense areas, with a people density score of four or five. This trend is concerning due to how much of the region's bicycle volumes are concentrated in these areas, about 80 percent of the count locations at the 87 analyzed. The region's least dense areas, locations with a people density score of one, saw a significant increase of 39 percent in bicycle volumes. This trend may be due to cyclists feeling safer riding in more rural and remote areas, but more research and data are needed.
Sources: Bicycle Count Data Source: DVRPC U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Preference for Dedicated Facilities Before COVID-19
To understand cyclists' preferences and uncover behavior patterns, we examined bicycle volumes by facility type. Of the seven facility types surveyed, only dedicated bicycle facilities saw an increase in the program's first six years. The growth of bicycle volumes in protected and buffered facilities especially demonstrated a clear preference by cyclists. After the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, ridership across nearly every facility type began to decline, especially on dedicated bicycle lanes, leading to an overall decline of 23 percent. This is likely due to the shifting commuting patterns of workers, as dedicated facilities are often located in the dense core of Philadelphia.
Source: Bicycle Count Data Source: DVRPC
Concerning Increase in Cyclist Fatalities
The decrease in cycling may also, in part, be due to a rise in aggressive and distracted driving by motorists. In 2021, eight cyclists died in Philadelphia, with seven killed by motorists, the highest number since data tracking began in 1997. In 2022, the number of cyclist fatalities fell to two in the city, but that number rose sharply, with ten cyclists killed in 2023. Cyclists killed or severely injured in the PA counties have remained relatively low compared to the NJ Counties and Philadelphia. Concerns over personal safety may be a key factor discouraging cyclists from riding in the NJ Counties and Philadelphia.
**NJDOT data is unavailable for the NJ counties after 2020
"There are a number of possible reasons for rising deaths — among them, many more of our cars are big and deadly S.U.V.s, states keep raising speed limits, ride-sharing vehicles have made our roads more chaotic, and people drove much more recklessly during the pandemic."
Sources: Bicycle Count Data Source: DVRPC New York Times: Riding a Bike in America Should Not Be This Dangerous (2022) NJDOT PennDOT U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Rise and Fall of Bicycle Volumes in Philadelphia
Over the program's first six years, bicycle volumes steadily increased by five percent in Philadelphia, likely due to an expansion of dedicated bicycle infrastructure and the creation and subsequent growth of the Indego bike share program. The COVID-19 pandemic reversed that trend, especially in Philadelphia's Central, South, and University-Southwest districts.
The Central, South, and University-Southwest districts have the highest bicycle volumes in Philadelphia, likely due to their high concentration of jobs and people-density levels. Between 2017 and 2019, the South district had the largest percentage increase of cyclists in the city, growing by 41 percent. This growth rate was higher than that in the Central and University-Southwest districts, which increased at nine percent and five percent, respectively. However, between 2020 and 2022, bicycle ridership in the South district dropped by more than 55 percent, while in the Central and University-Southwest districts, volumes fell by 34 percent and 28 percent, respectively. In all three districts, ridership from 2020 to 2022 was below the level measured from 2014 to 2016, the start of this data collection. Outside of the region, this downward trend has been observed in peer cities. In Portland, Oregon, bicycle ridership was down 35 percent between 2019 and 2022 and fell to its lowest level since 2006.
Next Steps
DVRPC will continue to monitor volumes to determine lasting changes driven by the pandemic and spot potential new ones. The Office of Transit, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Planning will continue to work with their colleagues in the Office of Travel Monitoring to update data tracking procedures and processes to ensure more reliable and thorough data collection and results in the future.
Product Number: 23013 | DVRPC Policies