Include Me, Don’t Force Me Out
A story proposing different levels for slum dwellers engagement during a slum upgrading process in Lagos, Nigeria.
Introduction
Several attempts are made by different cities to achieve the Target 11.1 of the SDG, which among others, is to upgrade all slums by 2030.
The following story seeks to highlight the approaches employed to manage slums in Lagos and the challenges of incorporating residents participation in a slum upgrading process.
Using the ladder of participation (Armstein, 1969), we propose a framework showing different types of residents' participation required in the stages for upgrading projects in slums.
We hope this framework can be adopted in other cities of the world to support achieving the SDG 2030 targets of cities without slums.
Background on Lagos
Lagos is a megacity in south-western Nigeria. The city developed from a coastal village to be one of the fastest growing cities in the world with an estimated population of 23,305,971 in 2015 and an annual population growth rate of 3.2%.
This is due to Lagos been the major economic and former administrative capital of Nigeria.
Slum growth in Lagos
Factors such as high rate of urbanization with limited or no development, inaccessibility to land and poor policies led to high slum proliferation in Lagos.
Two out of three residents in Lagos live in slum like conditions.
Many life cycles of slum residents revolve within slums in Lagos, that is they live, work, and even relax in their slum.
Approaches to Slum management in Lagos
Many slum management practices in Lagos involve slum clearances which require forceful eviction of slum residents from their homes, without any consultation nor provision of alternatives.
The cleared slum land area is then frequently utilized for building high income residential homes, which many slum dwellers cannot afford.
This has led to an increase in poverty, homeless, death and new slum development within and at the outskirts of the city.
There have also been some attempts to upgrade some slums in Lagos.
The Lagos Metropolitan Development and Governance Project (2006-2013) and the Isale gangan housing development are examples of such upgrading projects.
However, these projects had no significant impact on the slum dwellers nor slum growth.
This was attributed to, among other factors, limited or no involvement of slum residents during project development.
Thus, there is an important call for increasing slum dwellers engagement during slum upgrading projects.
Challenges with Residents' Participation in Slum upgrading projects in Lagos
Based on our experience working in slums in Lagos, we believe that slum dwellers know more about their problems than any other third party. Similarly, they can identify solutions and how to achieve them.
But the challenge here is that there are diverse groups of people living in slums and their needs in many cases are different. Also, based on slum dwellers length of stay in the respective slum, their goals may be either short or long term.
In addition, individual problems may cause discord during meetings which thus affect participatory decision making.
Furthermore, self-interest of corrupt community leaders has prevented sustainable actualization of some slum upgrading projects.
So the status quo remain for many slums in Lagos.
Ladder of Participation
In 1969, Sherry Arnstein wrote an article called "A ladder of citizen participation". In the article she described eight types of participation in decision making.
She developed the ladder based on the controversy (at that time) in the description of citizen participation and at what level we can categorically say citizens have total control over decision making.
Way Forward To achieving SDG 11.1 through Residents’ Participation
There is no denying the fact that residents’ participation in slum upgrading will yield better results.
But to overcome the lapses of residents’ participation, we believe it is vital to identify when and at what level residents should be involved in the planning and implementation of any slum upgrading projects.
It is on this note we proposed a framework that gives different types of partnership that can be employed at each level of a planning process for upgrading projects in slums.
This, we hope, can efficiently manage the challenge of residents’ participation in slum upgrading project and can support achieving the SDG 11.1 goal of cities without slums by 2030.
Conclusion
We conclude and end this story with summarizing why we choose to develop this framework.
Our wish is that at least 70% of slums in Lagos can be upgraded by 2030 and make life better for slum dwellers.
This is because up to now, slums are still a trap for many people and government policies have not yielded sustainable results.
Also, considering the expected future population growth in the global south, achieving the SDG 11.1 target will certainly be a challenging task.
With the increasing call for citizen participation in decision making and slum upgrading gaining more grounds, we believe that the proposed framework can support planning and implementation of projects toward slum upgrading.
Moreover, the insights from the framework developed for Lagos may be adopted in other cities based on their respective needs.
We sincerely thank you for enjoying our story with us.
You can contact us on:
olabisi.badmos@hu-berlin.de; tobia.lakes@hu-berlin.de