Single Centre Analysis - Johns Hopkins Children's Center
Interstate Transport Project
Background
Children needing specialty care often require interfacility medical transport, but
- 42% of children’s hospitals are within 20 miles of another state
- 1/3rd of the US population lives in a statistical region that borders or crosses into another state
- Over 95% of children’s hospitals have routine transport catchment areas that include regions outside of their home state
- Variable state EMS regulations can cause delays in transport as teams in one state work to comply with the laws of of state they are transporting to or from
- Paediatric transport data is not publicly available to inform public policy
Interstate Transport Project: Needs Assessment
Methods
- Johns Hopkins Children’s Center (JHCC) Transports from 7/2022-6/2023
- Inclusion Criteria: all in-bound paediatric transports originating outside of Maryland. Any 3rd party transports whose referring and receiving facilities are in different states.
- Exclusion Criteria: neonatal transports, outbound transports, transports originating and terminating in Maryland
- Data aggregating/masking/geocoding
- Spatial Analysis
- 150-mile buffer to simulate typical transport radius
- Proximity analysis to MD state line and JHCC
- Global Moran’s I (Spatial Autocorrelation)
- Spatial Statistics
Results
- n=118 transports
- Urgent/emergent: 101 (86%)
- Inside transport radius: 117 (99%)
- Non-Marylanders: 88 (75%)
- Ground transports : 100 (85%)
- Spatial Statistics
- Mean distance to Maryland (SD) 20 (20.7) miles
- Mean distance to JHCC (SD) 70 (35) miles
- Global Moran’s I p-values: 0.449 to 0.973
Discussion
- Transports are almost completely within typical transport radius
- ¼ of out-of-state transports are in-state residents returning home for care
- There is no statistically significant clustering or dispersion of interstate transports suggesting that these transports are truly random when considering level of care, diagnosis, mode of transport, and acuity