Valley of the Winds

UPC\AC Renewables acknowledges the resilience and knowledge of the Weilan, Gomilaroi and Wiradjuri Nations as the traditional custodians of the area, and of the country where we seek to operate renewable energy projects.  We pay our respects to Elders past and present, the many Aboriginal people that did not make their elder status and to those that continue to care for Country.

As a company directly involved in the management of the land and natural resources of this country, we are guided by the knowledge and respect for land and sea that the traditional custodians hold. This is at the forefront of our minds when making any decisions regarding the treatment of Country.

Introduction

A development application was submitted to the New South Wales Government in March 2022 and includes an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), assessing the potential environmental and social impacts and benefits of the project in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979.

The EIS was publicly exhibited from 23 rd  May 2022 until 20 th  June 2022 and can still be viewed on the NSW Department of Planning and Environment major projects website found  here .

UCP\AC is currently reviewing submissions from the community on the project and preparing a response.


Project overview

The wind farm includes approximately 148 wind turbines and supporting infrastructure, including a high voltage transmission line, running from the Girragulang Road cluster to a connection point with the Central-West Orana Renewable Energy Zone (CWO-REZ) Transmission line proposed by the NSW Government.

Construction of the project is expected to commence in early 2024 and last between 24 and 42 months, requiring up to 400 direct full time equivalent employees during the peak construction phase. About 50 direct full time equivalent employees would be required during the operation and maintenance of the wind farm.

The project would supply over 800 megawatts of electricity into the National Electricity Market and would operate for approximately 30 years.

The operational footprint of the wind farm makes up less than 2% of the overall wind farm site, with the remainder continuing to be used for agricultural purposes.

Mount Hope cluster

Mount Hope cluster is the northern most cluster, closest to Coolah.

The cluster contains approximately 76 turbines, a collector substation, electrical reticulation and access tracks. This cluster contains overhead transmission lines dispatching electricity to the central substation located in the Girragulang cluster.

Access for light vehicles would be via Neilrex Road and Black Stump Way. Over Size and Over Mass (OSOM) vehicles to this cluster would be via a new access constructed on Black Stump Way, south of Coolah.

Girragulang Road cluster

Girragulang Road cluster is located south of Coolah and north of the Golden Highway.

The cluster contains approximately 51 turbines, internal access tracks, the central substation for the project as well as electrical reticulation connecting the turbines to the substation. Overhead transmission from this cluster exports the electricity from the central substation to the CWO-REZ.

Access for light vehicles would be via Black Stump Way and Moorefield Road. Access for OSOM vehicles to the Girragulang Road cluster would be via Short Street, Turee Street and Moorefield Road.

Leadville cluster

The Leadville cluster is  the southernmost cluster, closest to Leadville.

The cluster contains approximately 21 turbines, access tracks and electrical reticulation connecting the turbines to the collector substation within the cluster.

This cluster will be accessed by OSOM vehicles via a new access point on the Golden Highway, with light vehicles accessing the site via Wardens Road.


Project benefits

Our aim is to be a valued and trusted member of the local community throughout the entire life cycle of the project.

Direct benefits

Economic analysis of the project estimates the average annual construction effects of the project on the regional economy are between:

  • $274M and $284M in annual direct and indirect output
  • $109M and $115M in annual direct and indirect value- added
  • $41M and $43M in annual direct and indirect household income
  • 518 and 569 direct and indirect jobs

The project is estimated to provide the following total annual contribution to the regional economy:

  • $8M in annual direct and indirect household income 106 direct and indirect jobs
  • $132M in annual direct and indirect regional value-added

Community benefit

Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) It is acknowledged that as part of the NSW planning process, DPE utilises the Voluntary Planning Agreement (VPA) mechanism to ensure that benefits of industry activity are shared. Through targeted social investment, administered through a VPA, impact management and further community enhancement can be undertaken to facilitate development within communities. 

UPC\AC is currently in discussions with Council to implement a VPA to the value of over $500,000 per year. The fund is intended to support projects within the local region such as infrastructure upgrades, public road maintenance, education assistance and any other agreed local community initiatives.

It is UPC\AC’s intention to structure the VPA to include portions of the overall fund into the following areas and administration groups:

  1. Community Benefit Fund – Community Representative Committee;     
  2. Council Contribution Fund – Section 355 Committee; and
  3. Road Maintenance Fund – Council

While the VPA is mandated – it is our intent that benefit sharing be informed by local needs, priorities, and aspirations. We are consulting with community, stakeholders and government to identify areas for potential investment across the local region.

Neighbouring Property Benefit Scheme (NPBS)

Through consultation with the local community a framework specific to Valley of the Winds has been prepared to ensure the benefits of the project are felt more widely across the local region.

The NPBS framework provides residents living within a 5km radius of the project ongoing involvement opportunities throughout the project’s operational life.

This scheme, amongst others, is expected to have an indirect benefit on the local economy and community more broadly for the life of the project.

Local participation

UPC\AC recognises the opportunities a growing renewables industry brings to local regions and this is reflected in our commitment to support local participation through local procurement of goods and services where possible, as well as local employment and investment in education, training and jobs pathways to facilitate long term employment for locals.

Community grants

During the development phase of the project we have also been assisting with various initiatives and programs within the local community including in education, arts, sporting and culture sectors. This support will continue throughout construction, operation and decommissioning.

To date UPC\AC has partnered with the following local community groups and initiatives.

  • Coolah Men’s Shed
  • Coolaburragundy Riverwalk, Yarning Circle
  • Coolah Junior Sports Club
  • Black Stump Rodeo

We are always looking for further community initiatives that align with our values. Please contact the project team to learn more.

Broader benefits

Beyond the potential regional social and economic benefits, the project also forms an important part of Australia’s transition to renewable energy generation and would positively contribute to meeting Commonwealth and State targets with the avoidance of over two million tonnes of CO2 emissions avoided per year.

The project would also enhance the reliability and security of electricity supply by contributing to the anticipated capacity gaps in the electricity market following the closure of major coal-fired power generators within NSW.

Each reporting year, the electricity sector has been the largest greenhouse gas emitting industry in Australia, contributing 47.9% of Australia’s scope 1 emissions in the 2019-2020 reporting year (approximately 156,633,000 tCO2-e) (Clean Energy Regulator, 2021). Of this 47.9%, approximately 50.6% is from black coal fuel sources, 15.4% is from brown coal, 14.9% is from gas and 19.1% from renewables (Clean Energy Regulator, 2021).

Reported scope 1 emissions by industry  Source: adapted from (Clean Energy regulator, 2021). 

Based on the average lifecycle emissions for wind projects (26 tCO2e/GWh) (World Nuclear Association, 2011) the project would generate approximately 2,262 kilotonnes of greenhouse gases over its lifecycle. This is 37,228,594 kilotonnes less than the average lifecycle emissions from conventional brown coal projects and 101,361,016 kilotonnes less than the average lifecycle emissions from black coal projects. This approximation only however it provides a general comparison of the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions released from conventional brown and black coal facilities to the project.

Lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions intensities for electricity generation methods  Source: (World Nuclear Association, 2011). 

Based on recent studies detailed in section 17.3.3 of the EIS, the Energy Payback Time (the period of time for which a wind turbine needs to be in operation before it has generated as much electricity as it consumes in its lifecycle) for the wind turbines would be at most two to three years for turbines ranging between two and five megawatts but could be as short as thirteen months given the megawatt rating of the proposed turbines. Thus, for the 29 subsequent years, the project would power 697,000 households without consuming electricity generated using conventional energy sources. 

The electricity generated by the project would displace electricity produced using fossil fuel sources (such as coal and gas), thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the stationary electricity sector. Therefore, the project would have a positive impact on greenhouse gas emissions.


Planning pathway

The project is being assessed as a State Significant Development under Part 4 of the NSW Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The planning process for State Significant Developments is shown in the illustration below.

In May 2020 UPC\AC submitted a scoping report to the then NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (now the NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPE)). Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) were issued in June 2020 and the supplementary SEARs were issued in July 2020, to address the requirements of the Australian Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment.

The SEARs and supplementary SEARs provide guidance on what must be considered and assessed in the EIS document and its supporting studies. The EIS was then submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment in March 2022 and was  publicly exhibited  until 20 th  June 2022.

State significant development planning process overview

Submissions were received from public authorities and agencies, the public and organisations. These submissions are now being reviewed by DPE and UPC\AC. A submissions report is now under preparation by UPC\AC to address and respond to issues raised within these submissions.

Strategic policy context

All levels of government recognise that renewable sources such as wind, solar and hydro are essential components of sustainable and climate-friendly energy solutions that avoid compromising on efficiency, cost-effectiveness and economic development.

Several key policies have been released to support the development of renewable energy projects in Australia, NSW and the CWO-REZ. The Integrated System Plan 2020 prioritises Renewable Energy Zone developments in three overlapping phases. Renewable energy development in CWO-REZ, where the project would be located, has been identified in as part of the first-priority phase.

Consultation

UPC\AC has undertaken consultation with the community, neighbours, landholders, other community stakeholders such as special interest groups, Registered Aboriginal Parties, Council, various government departments and the media.

Between March 2019 and March 2022 more than 2,700 consultation interactions were undertaken for the project by UPC\AC. We also estimate that more than 600 stakeholders were consulted during this period through one-on-one meetings, community information sessions, virtual community information sessions, group meetings, and surveys and interviews conducted to inform the social impact assessment.

UPC\AC held 10 community information sessions during the planning approvals development phase. The community information sessions included:

  • Coolah on 27 th  February 2020 and Leadville on 28 th  February 2020
  • Coolah on 24 th  March 2021 and Leadville on 25 th  March 2021
  • From mid-2021, escalating positive case numbers associated with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) resulted in lockdowns across Australia, specifically in NSW and Victoria. As a result, further face-to-face consultation sessions were deferred and in September 2021, virtual project update meetings (Zoom, phone call or via email) were advertised and undertaken with interested community members
  • Coolah on 2 nd  February and Leadville on 3 rd  February 2022
  • Dunedoo Show on 12 th  February 2022
  • Uarbry 16 th  February 2022
  • Gulgong Show on 19 th  February 2022

These community information sessions were advertised in the Coolah District Diary, Dunedoo District Diary, 2MG Radio Mudgee (10 on-air “read outs” in the lead up to the event), via a flyer on the community noticeboard at the Coolah IGA, as well as via updates on the project website and Facebook page (once created).

Emerging themes

Key themes emerging from community consultation include:

  • enhanced wellbeing from job opportunities and local spend
  • local community benefit from direct investment in community initiatives
  • landscape values and changes to how people experience the rural surroundings
  • workforce housing, including accommodation pressures due to construction workforce if required to house in local townships
  • construction noise, dust and traffic impacting on how people live, work and play
  • cumulative impacts as a result of concurrent nearby major projects
  • changes to community composition and cohesion as a result of the transient construction workforce

Project refinement

In response to ongoing consultation with the local community and the findings of ongoing environmental assessments throughout the environmental impact assessment preparation, there have been numerous refinements to the wind farm site, project layout and transmission infrastructure.  

Since scoping phase, the number of turbines has been significantly reduced to avoid environmental and social impacts, as well as cumulative impacts relating to other major projects in the region. In addition to significant layout refinements, UPC\AC has incorporated initiatives and frameworks as a direct result of consultation. Two examples highlighting this are listed below.

  • NPBS – stemming from discussions with the local community regarding project equity  
  • Worker accommodation – community feedback relating to a potential housing shortage and impact to local tourism

Together, these refinements have enhanced the functionality of the project whilst addressing community concern.

Landscape and visual


The assessment of landscape and visual impacts from the construction and operation of wind farm developments in NSW is strictly guided by the NSW EPA NSW Wind Energy: Visual Assessment Bulletin (2016).

A detailed landscape and visual impact assessment has been prepared as part of the EIS for the project and in accordance with this guideline and can be found  here . The assessment included:

  • a baseline study that includes analysis of the landscape character, scenic quality and visibility from viewpoints of different sensitivity levels
  • establishment of visual influence zones from viewpoints using data collected in the baseline study
  • assessment of the proposed layout against visual performance objectives
  • justification for the final proposed layout and identification of mitigation and management measures

Public viewpoints

Public viewpoint locations selected for visual photomontages are based on the baseline study and feedback received from the community. Exact photomontage locations were selected on site to represent a worst case (most visible) scenario for the viewpoint location. Screening of views such as by vegetation were avoided (where possible) to ensure maximum exposure to the Project.

Two public viewpoint photomontages are included here to provide an indication of what the project could be expected to look like from Coolah and Leadville.

Viewpoint VOW11

The image on the right provides an existing and proposed view of the project from the Leadville Stock Rte at Leadville. You can use the slider to see between the two images and gain an understanding of what the project might look like from this viewpoint.

Location of viewpoint VOW11

Viewpoint VOW41

The image on the right provides an existing and proposed view of the project from Coolaburragundy River Walk in Coolah. Once again, you can use the slider to see between the two images.

Location of viewpoint VOW41

 Although photomontages are based on a photograph of the existing landscape, it is important to stress that they are not a substitute to visiting a viewpoint in the field. They are only one tool to aid assessment. They provide a two-dimensional image that can be compared with an actual view of the landscape to provide information, such as the scale and potential appearance of a proposed wind farm. 


Noise and vibration

The assessment of noise from the construction and operation of wind farm developments in NSW is strictly guided by the NSW EPA NSW Wind Energy: Noise Assessment Bulletin (2016) and other NSW guidance documents.

A detailed noise and vibration assessment has been prepared as part of the EIS for the project and in accordance with these guidelines. This assessment can be found  here .

The assessment included:

  • background noise monitoring to confirm the existing noise levels across the wind farm site
  • assessment of potential construction and operational noise impacts
  • assessment of potential cumulative noise impacts when considering operation of the Liverpool Range Wind Farm
  • assessment of road traffic noise
  • recommended management and mitigation measures

Three different types of turbines were modelled to confirm if specific technologies should be included or excluded from further consideration.

The assessment demonstrates that the current wind turbine layout would meet NSW’s strict noise limits of 35 dB(A) at all non-associated dwellings, except for one dwelling when considering one of the modelled turbine types. This exception will be considered further.

The contours shown in the map demonstrate the outputs of the model including for 30 dB(A) (equivalent to background noise level), 35 dB(A) (noise limit prescribed by the NSW noise guidance documents).

When assessing the potential cumulative noise impacts of the project with operation of the Liverpool Range Wind Farm, no change to the compliance outcomes of the assessment are expected.

A noise and vibration management plan will be developed for both the construction and operations phases of the project.

Biodiversity

A detailed biodiversity assessment has been prepared as part of the EIS and to help inform the development of the wind farm layout. The biodiversity assessment can be found  here  and includes the following:

  • desktop review of background information, mapping, and publicly available databases
  • extensive field surveys within the wind farm site
  • quantification of potential impacts to biodiversity values
  • calculation of the biodiversity offsets that may be required, and development of management and mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts

Early site surveys in 2019 helped to identify areas of high biodiversity values which were considered during further refinement of the layout to avoid, minimise and mitigate impacts to biodiversity values.

Biodiversity assessment

An assessment of the potential impacts on biodiversity from the project included an assessment of a 500m buffer around the construction and operation footprint. This buffer allows flexibility during the detailed design phase whilst allowing the assessment of a very worst case scenario.

Nine Plant Community Types (PCTs) of varying conditions were identified during the surveys which also included an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (drone) that was utilised to enhance the accuracy of the PCT mapping. Aerial photographs taken with the drone, allowed for post flight analysis of dominant canopy species, vegetation structure, condition and interpretation of cover of various PCTs.

Assessment and survey of potential threatened species habitats recorded fifteen threatened fauna species and one flora species within or adjacent to the wind farm site.

Harp traps were placed in natural flyways in the landscape, making use of overhanging branches, cliff edges, and forest trails. Harp traps were checked daily at dawn, and approximately 1 hour after dark. All harp traps were left in situ for a period of 4 nights each. Harp trapping was only conducted at Leadville and Mount Hope, as these wind farm clusters contained cliff lines and other suitable habitat for breeding Microchiropteran bats.

Harp trap installation

Songmeter minis were also used to assess bat species by continuously recording ultrasonic data from sunset to sunrise. Songmeters were left in situ for a minimum of 4 nights, and up to 30 nights. Songmeters were used across all three wind farm clusters.

Songmeter mini

Matters of National Environment Significance (MNES)

An assessment of significance was completed for all MNES known or likely to be impacted by the project. Assessments concluded that the only MNES likely to be significantly impacted is White Box-Yellow Box-Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland due to the permanent removal of areas of this Critically Endangered Ecological Community (CEEC) listed on the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). Some Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of South-eastern Australia listed as Endangered Ecological Community (EEC) on the EBPC Act may be impacted however, these impacts are expected to be confined to small remnant patches in an existing degraded landscape.

Three threatened species listed on the EPCB Act were observed during site survey and include:

  • Large-eared Pied Bat (fauna)
  • White-throated Needletail (fauna)
  • Dichanthium setosum/Bluegrass (flora)

The project has been designed to avoid and minimise impacts and is predominately located in areas of low or no biodiversity value. The residual impact of the proposed wind farm requires 8,966 ecosystem credits and 19,688 species credits. The project commits to surveying land that was not accessible at the time of the assessment and provides a conservative assumption and assumed presence of credit species that results in additional credit requirements.

A detailed biodiversity management plan will be developed by UPC\AC prior to commencement of construction.

Traffic and transport

A detailed traffic and transport assessment has been prepared as part of the EIS for the project an can be found  here . The assessment included the following:

  • a review of existing baseline conditions, including traffic survey data
  • estimation of future year traffic generation for the construction, operation, and decommissioning phases
  • analysis of the future year conditions with and without the project

The traffic and transport impact assessment deals primarily with the construction phase of the project as traffic generation is forecast to be greatest during the construction phase, when compared to the operation and decommissioning phases, which would require lower or equivalent labour force and materials.

The potential traffic impacts associated with the construction workforce on the surrounding road network have been assessed under two scenarios:

  • regional distribution of workforce including the townships of Coolah, Dunedoo, Cassilis, Coonabarabran, Gulgong and Mudgee
  • centralised workforce bulk of the construction workforce accommodated at a temporary workers accommodation camp located on site

The project would generate the greatest traffic and transport impact during the construction peak period. The worst-case scenario has been assessed showing traffic increases during the construction period compared with the current form indicate that eight upgrades (widening and strengthening of the pavement) would be required for Short Street, Turee Street, Main Street, Wyaldra Street, Moorefield Road, Wardens Road, The Leadville Stock Route and Mount Hope Road.

Intersection upgrades would be required to cater for OSOM vehicles at the following intersections (also refer to the map on the left):

  • Black Stump Way/Mount Hope Access Road
  • Turee Street/Main Street
  • Wyaldra Street/Moorefield Road
  • Golden Highway/Black Stump Way
  • Golden Highway/Leadville Access Road
  • Golden Highway/Short Street

A construction traffic management plan will be prepared in consultation with Transport for NSW and Warrumbungle Shire Council. The plan will include details such as temporary traffic management plans, driver’s code of conduct, dilapidation survey and controls for transport and use of dangerous goods.

The plan will seek to minimise any traffic delays, disruptions, and safety risks associated with project related construction traffic.

Hazards and risks

Detailed assessments were undertaken for each potential hazard which can be found  here . No unacceptable risks have been identified and management measures have been proposed to manage any residual risks.

Aviation

The project is located close to the certified Coolah Airport (YCAH), which is approximately 3.24 nautical miles (six kilometres) north from the nearest Wind Turbine (MH39). Coolah Airport is a certified Code 2 non-instrument airport, operated by Warrumbungle Shire Council. The wind farm site is beyond 30 nautical miles (55.56 kilometres) of any other certified airports. There are three aircraft landing areas (ALAs) located within three nautical miles of the proposed wind turbines. These are:

  • Coolah ALA, Ozton
  • Tongy ALA
  • Unknown ALA 1

The project is also located within Danger Area D538B and a Restricted Area R559B associated with Military Flying Training operated by No 453 Squadron at RAAF Base Williamtown. Military flying in this area is restricted from the ground surface up to 10,000 feet (3048 metres) above mean sea level.

The impact assessment found that Coolah Airport would not be impacted by the project. It is also unlikely that the project will impact on circuit operations and approach and take-off surfaces at the three nearby ALAs. Mitigation measures are proposed that would limit the impacts of wake turbulence effects on aircraft in the circuit area of Coolah ALA and Ozton Tongy ALA. The risks associated with military flying training within Danger Area D538B can be managed with the measures described and ongoing consultation with Department of Defence.

Telecommunications

The assessment of impacts identifies the existing radio, telecommunications and communications systems already operating within the region. It also provides an assessment of the potential impacts and interference effects that may be caused by the Project.

There is the potential for large structures, including wind turbines, to introduce interference when they occur close to or within the signal path. The assessment found that dwellings in the vicinity of the project may experience interference to digital television broadcast signals from two of the nearby towers, although coverage maps suggest that dwellings within these interference zones may not be receiving signal from these towers in the existing conditions. If interference is experienced at receivers as a result of the project, UPC\AC will work with the resident to achieve an acceptable outcome. This may include replacement of an existing antenna with a higher gain antenna or installation of alternative technology such as satellite television. 

Existing weak mobile phone services may be susceptible to interference, but the overall likelihood of interference is considered low and there are a range of options available to rectify difficulties. If interference to point to point or point to multipoint links is experienced by the operators, options to re-route the links, installation of additional towers, or replacing the affected links with alternative communications infrastructure will be explored. 

Potential impacts to other services considered in the assessment including wireless internet, broadcast radio and trigonometrical stations are expected to be minor.

Post construction assessments will be carried out at each dwelling identified as having some risk of interference. If the project is found to be the cause of any interference it will be remedied at UPC\AC’s cost.

Human health

An electromagnetic field is a physical field produced by a moving electric charge that consists of both and electric field component and a magnetic field component. Electromagnetic field associated with the generation, distribution and use of electricity is classified as extremely low frequency electromagnetic field. Short term exposure to very high levels of EMF can be detrimental to human health. The risks to human health from electromagnetic field associated with the project are considered low. Simulations of the electromagnetic field produced from the proposed medium voltage underground cabling has shown that the electromagnetic field at ground level would be within exposure limits recommended for the protection of the general public. The electromagnetic field levels produced by the project are within the recommended exposure limits at all publicly accessible locations in and around the wind farm site.

Bushfire

The wind farm site is located within the Castlereagh Bushfire Management Committee region. Historically, the Castlereagh Castlereagh Bushfire Management Committee region has experienced an average of 80 bushfires per year with an average of three major fires a year. The most recent and significant fire in the region (Sir Ivan fire) was triggered by a lightning strike on 11 February 2017. This fire burnt approximately 55,0000 hectares of remnant vegetation and agricultural land including land surrounding the Leadville and Girragulang Road clusters.

The key bushfire hazards and the associated risk levels for an unmitigated scenario have been determined for the project finding that risk to life and safety and project infrastructure are at the highest overall. Due to the inherent fire safety construction for industrial use facilities, the design and materials of the project would be somewhat resilient to the impacts of bushfire. Bushfire risk can be managed with the measures inherent to the project and those that are specific to the protection of life and safety from bushfire in accordance with the NSW Rural Fire Service policy Planning for Bushfire Protection 2019 including maintenance of asset protection zones and the provision of a dedicated water supply within each of the clusters and at the potential construction workers accommodation.

Blade throw

Blade throw refers to an incident in which a structural failure in the blade of a wind turbine occurs during operation and results in parts of the blade detaching and being thrown into the surrounding area. The detachment of the entire blade or a portion of the blade has been assessed to simulate a catastrophic failure or worst-case scenario.

For the project, the maximum throw distance for an entire blade at a maximum rotor speed is 250 metres. There are no dwellings or other sensitive locations within 250 metres of the proposed turbine locations. All dwellings are more than 860 metres from the nearest proposed turbine location, which is 610 metres beyond the expected maximum throw distance for an entire blade.

Battery storage

A preliminary hazard analysis was prepared to consider and assess the potential hazards and risks posed by the project and the management measures proposed to address these potential hazards and risks in accordance with the requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 (Resilience and Hazards SEPP).

The preliminary hazard analysis identifies the hazardous materials to be stored on and transported to the study area and consideration of the applicable Resilience and Hazards SEPP threshold. The analysis shows that none of the Resilience and Hazards SEPP threshold levels are predicted to be exceeded during any phase of the project and therefore the battery energy storage system infrastructure would not be a potentially hazardous development. The management measures to be implemented as part of the project would further minimise the potential impacts from these materials.

Aboriginal heritage

A detailed Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report (ACHAR) has been prepared in consultation with Registered Aboriginal Parties (RAPs) for the project. The ACHAR can be found  here  and includes:

  • background research, and a predicative model to assist in the identification of potential constraints
  • identification and recording objects or sites of Aboriginal heritage significance, as well as any landforms likely to contain further archaeological deposits
  • assessment of Aboriginal cultural values that have potential to be impacted by the project assessment of the significance of any recorded Aboriginal sites, objects, or places likely to be impacted by the project
  • assessment of the likely impacts of the proposed work to Aboriginal cultural heritage and development of management recommendations

Five new Aboriginal sites were identified during the field survey. The location of one previously recorded NSW Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System (AHIMS) site (36-3-0111) was ground-truthed during the inspection. One other known AHIMS site (36-3-0113) was unable to be inspected due to access restrictions.

The five new Aboriginal sites included:

  • Orana OS-1 – artefact scatter with potential archaeological deposit (PAD)
  • Old Farm OS-1 – stone quarry and artefact scatter with PAD
  • Kensington OS-1 – artefact scatter
  • Cainbil Creek OS-1 – artefact scatter with PAD
  • The Rock IF-1 - isolated find

Of the six Aboriginal sites, one has been avoided by the project through the exclusion of a turbine. The remaining sites can be avoided through the implementation of the environmental exclusion zones and a formal survey of unassessed areas within the survey boundary by archaeologists and representatives from Aboriginal parties post approval.

Refinement to the road design has allowed Cainbil Creek OS-1 PAD to be avoided completely, however, the site extent cannot be avoided entirely. The project commits to artefact collection and fencing to protect unimpacted portions of the site during construction. 

An Aboriginal cultural heritage management plan will be developed to guide management which is to be agreed to by the RAPs and the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment prior to commencement of construction. 

Non-Aboriginal heritage

A heritage impact statement has been prepared as part of the EIS for the project. The assessment can be found  here  and includes:

  • background research and desktop information review
  • site survey
  • assessment of the historic values of items that have potential to be impacted by the project

View north to Mt Hope-HS01 showing the trigonometrical station and surrounding stone circle

Four historic heritage items were recorded within the survey boundary. No areas that are likely to contain significant archaeological deposits of conservation value were identified within the survey boundary.

The four sites included:

  • Mt Hope-HS01: trigonometrical station
  • The Rock-HS01: trigonometrical station
  • The Rock-HS02: rural structure
  • Collier Creek-HS01: rail bridge

The four identified historic items have been assessed as having no significant historic values under the current Heritage NSW guidelines and the Burra Charter. Regardless, UPC\AC is committed to avoiding disturbance to each of the sites to the extent practical, and no impacts to items of are currently expected.

A historic heritage management plan will be developed prior to commencement of construction to guide the management of non-Aboriginal heritage items.

Social

A social impact assessment (SIA) was completed for the project and can be found  here . The SIA included establishment of a social baseline through the collection of information from desktop analysis of demographic data as well through an impartial and participatory engagement process, undertaken independently of the project EIS engagement activities. 

Perceived positive and negative impacts of the project identified through the social impact assessment consultation cover a range of social impact categories and reflect the fears and aspirations of the stakeholders consulted. In summary, the fears and aspirations identified through the research related to the following categories:

  • visual Landscape
  • social amenity
  • sense of community and culture
  • land use change and conflict
  • access to and use of infrastructure and services
  • economic contributions and sustainability
  • intergenerational equity
  • cumulative impacts
  • health and wellbeing

Feedback received indicated that the project provides an opportunity for Coolah and surrounds to achieve increased community resilience and improved access to services, employment and economic stimulus. For this benefit to be realised, it is important that the economic stimulus is distributed in an equitable way, and directly to the towns and villages that will experience the greatest change as a result of this project, including Coolah, Leadville, Uarbry and Dunedoo.

The results of the SIA have allowed a number of mitigation measures to be either incorporated into the projects design or committed to during the operational phase of the project. The intention of these strategies is to maximise the benefits to the local communities and minimise negative impacts.

Economics

An economic assessment was undertaken to assess the economic impacts and benefits of the project. The assessment can be found  here .

The average annual construction effects of the project on the regional economy are estimated at between:

  • $274M and $284M in annual direct and indirect output
  • $109M and $115M in annual direct and indirect value-added
  • $41M and $43M in annual direct and indirect household income
  • 518 and 569 direct and indirect jobs

The project is estimated to make up to the following total annual contribution to the regional economy:

  • $132M in annual direct and indirect regional value-added
  • $8M in annual direct and indirect household income
  • 106 direct and indirect jobs

Foregone agriculture as a result of the project is expected to be <0.26% of total agricultural economic activity in the region. The regional economic activity impacts of potential foregone agricultural activity are minor and significantly less than those of the construction and operation of the project. Therefore, as well as increased benefit to the private landholders, in terms of economic activity, the regional economy would also be better-off. 

Local participation

Our aim is to be a valued and trusted member of the local community throughout the entire life cycle of the project. This means finding ways to contribute to the social fabric and development of the region by enabling local participation in the project through procurement, employment, skills and training. 

UPC\AC will work in partnership with Warrumbungle Shire Council and the local community to help maximise the projected regional economic benefits. Some schemes to achieve this include:

Procurement of goods and service from local businesses and suppliers

  • Hosting of procurement forums to prepare businesses to participate
  • Tenders are reviewed prior to release to extract smaller packages where there is known local and business capability
  • Tender evaluation criteria and weightings built into evaluation processes to prioritise local procurement

Employment, training and skills development

  • Identification of priority roles and the skills required for local residents
  • Investment in initiatives to facilitate the transition from training to long term employment for local participants
  • Investment in education, training and jobs pathways programs to facilitate long term employment for local participants
  • Recruitment evaluation criteria and weightings built into evaluation processes to prioritise local candidates

Land use

Land surrounding the wind farm site includes rolling pastoral hills, open flat valleys and ridgelines with scattered vegetation.

Livestock in the rolling pastoral hills

The hill slopes are generally gentle in gradient and predominantly cleared of vegetation, except for patches of denser remnant vegetation on steeper terrain, near rocky outcrops and between saddles.

The townships of Coolah and Leadville are the closest population centres to the wind farm site. These townships are located on gently sloping to level land within valleys near creeks. Most built structures are of low to moderate scale. The main street of Coolah is the focus for local retail and community services in the local area.

Local retailer in Coolah

Land uses within the locality include:

  • farming – predominantly grazing cattle and sheep, with small patches of cropping (cereal and fodder)
  • rural living – scattered rural dwellings and sheds present throughout the landscape, with a higher density of dwellings in the townships

The project would result in a change of the land use in the operational footprint from its existing agricultural use to electricity generation. The operational footprint of the wind farm make up less than 2% of the wind farm site. The remainder of the wind farm site will remain available for continued existing land use.

This change would be temporary and the land would be returned to its pre‐existing land use or another land use as agreed by the project owner and the landholder at that time. Travelling Stock Reserves (TSR) and the movement of livestock or farm vehicles would not be impeded by the project.

Near completion of operation of the project, a decommissioning and rehabilitation plan will be prepared that outlines the rehabilitation objectives and strategies to return the operational footprint to its pre-existing condition for agricultural land use (cattle grazing). This would include:

  • rehabilitation objectives and strategies
  • describing the design criteria of the final land use and landform
  • performance indicators to be used to guide the return of the land back to a condition suitable for agricultural production (i.e. cattle grazing)
  • expected timeline for the rehabilitation program


Next steps

Public exhibition of EIS - Complete

The EIS was publicly exhibited between 23 th  May 2022 and 20 th  June 2022 and can still be viewed  here .

Feedback consultation - Complete

During this period, the community was able to review the EIS and detailed assessments and provide a submission to DPE on the project.

DPE review submissions - Complete

DPE has reviewed the submissions received from the community, regulators and other stakeholders.

DPE request for response to submissions - Complete

DPE has requested that UPC\AC provide a response to submissions received.

Prepare and submit response to submissions - Current

UPC\AC is currently preparing a response to submissions document and will submit this to DPE.

DPE prepare assessment report

Following receipt of the response to submissions document, DPE will undertake a detailed assessment of the project, including consideration of submissions and UPC\ACs responses, and prepare an assessment report.

Ongoing consultation

UPC\AC will continue to consult with landholders, the community and other stakeholders throughout the assessment period. 

Minister determination or IPC assessment and determination

The project will then be determined by the Minister for Planning or the Independent Planning Commission.


 Developed by Ramboll for UPC\AC Renewables 

Contact

If you would like further information on the project or to discuss any aspect of the project, please contact the UPC\AC Renewables project team on one of the below:

phone

1800 512 339

Reported scope 1 emissions by industry  Source: adapted from (Clean Energy regulator, 2021). 

Lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions intensities for electricity generation methods  Source: (World Nuclear Association, 2011). 

 Developed by Ramboll for UPC\AC Renewables 

State significant development planning process overview

Harp trap installation

Songmeter mini

Livestock in the rolling pastoral hills

Local retailer in Coolah